BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    custom home expert witness Lynn Arkansas custom homes expert witness Lynn Arkansas casino resort expert witness Lynn Arkansas retail construction expert witness Lynn Arkansas industrial building expert witness Lynn Arkansas parking structure expert witness Lynn Arkansas structural steel construction expert witness Lynn Arkansas condominiums expert witness Lynn Arkansas condominium expert witness Lynn Arkansas production housing expert witness Lynn Arkansas concrete tilt-up expert witness Lynn Arkansas housing expert witness Lynn Arkansas tract home expert witness Lynn Arkansas landscaping construction expert witness Lynn Arkansas office building expert witness Lynn Arkansas hospital construction expert witness Lynn Arkansas high-rise construction expert witness Lynn Arkansas townhome construction expert witness Lynn Arkansas multi family housing expert witness Lynn Arkansas Subterranean parking expert witness Lynn Arkansas Medical building expert witness Lynn Arkansas low-income housing expert witness Lynn Arkansas
    Lynn Arkansas expert witness roofingLynn Arkansas construction project management expert witnessLynn Arkansas defective construction expertLynn Arkansas architectural expert witnessLynn Arkansas testifying construction expert witnessLynn Arkansas window expert witnessLynn Arkansas multi family design expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Lynn, Arkansas

    Arkansas Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB975: Requires that residential contractors be given notice and an opportunity to repair. Homeowners must provide 20 days notice in writing to builder prior to legal action to address defect and/or repair


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Lynn Arkansas

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    NE Arkansas Home Builders Association
    Local # 0432
    PO Box 17237
    Jonesboro, AR 72403

    Lynn Arkansas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Northwest Arkansas Home Builders Association
    Local # 0424
    2022 Long Ave Ste C
    Springdale, AR 72764

    Lynn Arkansas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    North Central Arkansas Chapter
    Local # 0438
    PO Box 550
    Harrison, AR 72602

    Lynn Arkansas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Carroll County Home Builders Association
    Local # 0412
    908 W. Trimble
    Berryville, AR 72616
    Lynn Arkansas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Twin Lakes Home Builders Association
    Local # 0448
    1520 Hwy 62 East
    Mountain Home, AR 72653

    Lynn Arkansas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Cleburne County Home Builders Association
    Local # 0405
    PO Box 1325
    Heber Springs, AR 72543
    Lynn Arkansas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Greater Fort Smith Associated Home Builders
    Local # 0436
    5111 Rogers Ave Ste 531
    Fort Smith, AR 72903

    Lynn Arkansas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Lynn Arkansas


    National Infrastructure Leaders Visit Dallas' Able Pump Station to Tout Benefits of Water Infrastructure Investment

    Receiving a $0 Verdict and Still Being Deemed the Prevailing Party for Purposes of Attorney’s Fees

    Erasing Any Doubt: Arizona FED Actions Do Not Accrue Until Formal Demand for Possession is Tendered

    New York Court Rejects Owner’s Bid for Additional Insured Coverage

    First Suit Filed for Losses Caused by COVID-19

    Insurer's Quote on Coverage for Theft by Hacker Creates Issue of Fact

    Insurer Need Not Pay for Rejected Defense When No Reservation of Rights Issued

    What is Toxic Mold Litigation?

    Contractor Prevailing Against Subcontractor On Common Law Indemnity Claim

    Will On-Site Robotics Become Feasible in Construction?

    Overruling Henkel, California Supreme Court Validates Assignment of Policies

    Jersey City, New Jersey, to Get 95-Story Condo Tower

    China Home Glut May Worsen as Developers Avoid Price Drop

    Lumber Drops to Nine-Month Low, Extending Retreat From Record

    General Contractor’s Intentionally False Certifications Bar It From Any Recovery From Owner

    Last, but NOT Least: Why You Should Take a Closer Look at Your Next Indemnification Clause

    Chicago Cubs Agree to Make Wrigley Field ADA Improvements to Settle Feds' Lawsuit

    Energy Efficiency Ratings Aren’t Actually Predicting Energy Efficiency

    “We Are Here for One Reason”: Newark Trial Team Achieves Another Favorable Settlement for Client After Jury Selection

    Homeowner Protection Act of 2007 Not Just for Individual Homeowners Anymore?

    Condominiums and Homeowners Associations Remain Popular Housing Choices for U-S Homeowners

    The Complex Insurance Coverage Reporter – A Year in Review

    PSA: Latest Updates from AGC-VA on COVID Rules (UPDATED)

    Will COVID-19 Permanently Shift the Balance between Work from Home and the Workplace?

    Ex-Detroit Demolition Official Sentenced for Taking Bribes

    Get Creative to Solve Your Construction Company's Staffing Challenges

    New York’s Lawsky Proposes Changes to Reduce Home Foreclosures

    Court Rejects Efforts to Limit Scope of Judgment Creditor’s Direct Action Under Insurance Code Section 11580

    The Five-Step Protocol to Reopening a Business

    Vacation during a Project? Time for your Construction Documents to Shine!

    Kahana Feld LLP Senior Attorney Rachael Marvin and Partner Dominic Donato Obtain Complete Dismissal of Plaintiff’s Labor Law Claims on Summary Judgment

    First Circuit Finds No Coverage For Subcontracted Faulty Work

    Traub Lieberman Attorneys Recognized as 2025 Illinois Super Lawyers® and Rising Stars

    CGL Policy Covering Attorney’s Fees in Property Damage Claims

    Attorney-Client Privilege in the Age of Cyber Breaches

    Delay Leads to Problems with Construction Defects

    Court Makes an Unsettling Inference to Find that the Statute of Limitations Bars Claims Arising from a 1997 Northridge Earthquake Settlement

    NEHRP Recommendations Likely To Improve Seismic Design

    Limiting Plaintiffs’ Claims to a Cause of Action for Violation of SB-800

    Brian Newberry Accepted into ABOTA

    KF-103 v. American Family Mutual Insurance: Tenth Circuit Upholds the “Complaint Rule”

    Preserving your Rights to Secure Payment on Construction Projects (with Examples)

    Los Angeles Team Secures Summary Judgment for Hotel Owner & Manager in Tenant’s Lawsuit

    The Greenest U.S. Cities & States

    U.S. District Court of Colorado Interprets Insurance Policy’s Faulty Workmanship Exclusion and Exception for Ensuing Damage

    Pennsylvania Homeowner Blames Cracks on Chipolte Construction

    Contract Disruptions: Navigating Supply Constraints and Labor Shortages

    2018 Construction Outlook: Mature Expansion, Deceleration in Some Sectors, Continued Growth in Others

    Builder’s Be Wary of Insurance Policies that Provide No Coverage for Building: Mt. Hawley Ins. Co v. Creek Side at Parker HOA

    Property Insurance Exclusion: Leakage of Water Over 14 Days or More
    Corporate Profile

    LYNN ARKANSAS CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Lynn, Arkansas Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Leveraging from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Lynn's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Lynn, Arkansas

    Appeals Court Upholds Skanska, Granite Win in ‘I-4 Ultimate’ JV Dispute

    June 15, 2026 —
    A federal appeals court has upheld a lower court’s decision requiring The Lane Construction Corp. to pay roughly $79 million in damages, plus interest, to joint venture partners Skanska USA Civil Southeast and Granite Construction for work on Florida’s I-4 Ultimate highway megaproject in Orlando, which was completed in 2022. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Gottlieb may be contacted at gottliebb@enr.com

    Insurer Dispenses with Bad Faith Claim on Summary Judgment

    June 22, 2026 —
    The court granted the insurer’s motion for partial summary judgment because the insured failed to present evidence that the insurer failed to conduct a reasonable investigation. PSY Burger, LLC v. State Farm General Insurance Company, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66991(C.D. Cal. March 20, 2026). The insured’s commercial property suffered heavy damage from tropical storm Hilary. State Farm denied coverage to repair the damage. The insured sued State Farm alleging breach of contract and bad faith due to an inadequate investigation. Apparently, the insured did not retain an expert to opine on claims handling. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Cuomo Bridge Lawsuit Adversaries Weigh Mediated Settlement

    July 06, 2026 —
    Rival legal teams have reached a critical juncture as they consider a mediated settlement in one of two major payment lawsuits pending between a design-build contracting team and the New York State Thruway Authority over construction of the more than $3-billion Mario M. Cuomo Bridge north of New York City. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Richard Korman, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Korman may be contacted at kormanr@enr.com

    Insurance Coverage and Bad Faith Practice Earns Prestigious Band One Ranking in the Chambers USA 2026 Guide

    June 22, 2026 —
    White and Williams LLP's Insurance Coverage and Bad Faith Practice Group is pleased to share that it has received a Band One ranking in the Chambers USA 2026 Guide for Insurance, Pennsylvania. Additionally, Patricia B. Santelle, Chair Emeritus, Randy Maniloff, Partner, and Robert Walsh, Partner have all been individually ranked on the Chambers USA 2026 Guide in Insurance in Pennsylvania. The Insurance Coverage and Bad Faith Practice's consistent focus on their clients and handling of complex claims were just two of the attributes contributing to their elite Band One ranking, after 11 years on the Chambers USA list. When asked about their experience working with White and Williams’ Pennsylvania Insurance Practice, one client stated, “What distinguishes White and Williams is the high level of service and accountability. The team is responsive, organized and reliable, which allows our internal teams to move quickly and make informed decisions with confidence.” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of White and Williams LLP

    USDOT’s DBE Interim Final Rule: How It Affects Current and Out-to-Bid DOT and Airport Projects

    June 15, 2026 —
    In our April 16, 2026 post, we discussed the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Interim Final Rule (IFR) concerning Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) and Airport Concession Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (ACDBE) certification, specifically as it concerns transportation and airport projects in California. This post addresses a broader question: What does the IFR mean for current and out-to-bid DOT projects operating under pre-existing DBE goals? The answer is that the IFR did more than change who qualifies as a DBE. It also changed how federally funded transportation and airport projects must be handled during the re-evaluation period. This affects active contracts, pending procurements, airport projects, design-build teams, and anyone relying on old assumptions about DBE goals and counting of DBE and ACDBE credit. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Zachary F. Jacobson, Seyfarth Shaw LLP
    Mr. Jacobson may be contacted at zjacobson@seyfarth.com

    ACEC Supports BUILD America 250 Act as Important First Step on Surface Reauthorization

    May 26, 2026 —
    WASHINGTON -- The American Council of Engineering Companies (ACEC), the business voice of America’s engineering and design services industry released the following statement on the BUILD America 250 Act: "Chairman Graves and Ranking Member Larsen have taken an important bipartisan step toward reauthorizing the federal surface transportation programs that are critical to economic growth in every state. The BUILD America 250 Act provides five years of stability in funding road and transit projects, raises new revenues to address the solvency of the Highway Trust Fund, and includes meaningful provisions to strengthen project delivery, advance digital infrastructure, and improve the contracting framework that engineering firms rely on every day. ACEC will continue to advocate for investment levels that keep pace with the country's growing infrastructure needs, and we urge the Committee to keep this process moving forward." The American Council of Engineering Companies (ACEC) is the business association of America’s engineering industry, representing more than 5,500 independent engineering firms and more than 650,000 professionals throughout the United States engaged in the development of America’s transportation, water, and energy infrastructure, along with environmental, industrial, and other public and private facilities. Founded in 1906 and headquartered in Washington, D.C., ACEC is a national federation of 51 state and regional organizations.

    Two Important Points Regarding the Miller Act

    September 15, 2026 —
    A recent Miller Act case, U.S. f/u/b/o Boundless Management Outsourcing Group, LLC v. Endurance Assurance Corp, 2026 WL 2241491 (D. Puerto Rico 2026), confirms two important points when it comes to the Miller Act. In this case, a subcontractor pursued a Miller Act payment bond lawsuit more than one year after its work was finished. The subcontractor also asserted a claim against the federal government. The lawsuit was dismissed. Below are two takeaway points to consider if you are dealing with a Miller Act payment bond lawsuit. First, as it relates the claim against the federal government, the federal district court followed authority that held that the Miller Act does NOT include a waiver of sovereign immunity against the federal government. “[T]he Court does not identify any clear language in the Miller Act expressly waiving the United States or its agencies’ sovereign immunity.” Endurance Assurance Corp., supra at *3. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Structural Engineer Claims Reinforcement Was Never Installed on Troubled NYC Tower

    September 01, 2026 —
    New York City has expanded its investigation into the structural failure at the former Pfizer headquarters tower in Midtown Manhattan as the Dept. of Investigation confirmed a parallel inquiry and the Dept. of Buildings directed the property owner to retain third-party engineering oversight. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Gottlieb may be contacted at gottliebb@enr.com