Bridging the Information Gap of Alternative Delivery Methods on Public Projects
January 21, 2026 —
Michael S. Blackwell - The Dispute ResolverIn almost all corners of the country, municipalities, counties, and states alike have historically employed a design-bid-build approach to public projects. While the delivery method lends itself easily to selecting the lowest bidder for both the design and construction phases of projects, it also excludes other, alternative methods that may be better suited for projects that require contractor involvement during the design phase, a phased approach to completion, or partnership between the public entity and private investment. But implementation of new delivery methods has posed a problem in some areas due to a lack of familiarity. This blog post proposes a simple solution.
As early as the mid-late 1990s, changes in federal procurement laws allowed for the adoption of design-build, one option for alternative delivery, for public projects. Since that time, states, municipalities, and other public entities have followed suit. Today, you can find the use of design-build, progressive design-build, A + B, CM/GC, CMAR, and P3 just to name a few of the delivery methods that have been adopted in various states. These alternatives help provide options to public entities to find the right fit for their project.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Michael S. Blackwell, Riess LeMieux, LLCMr. Blackwell may be contacted at
mblackwell@rllaw.com
VF Law Strengthens Litigation Practice with Experienced Litigation Attorney Andre Egle in the Seattle Office
October 27, 2025 —
VF LawSeattle, WA -
VF Law, a full-service law firm, is pleased to announce that seasoned litigator, Andre Egle, has joined the firm. Andre has over 20 years of experience in commercial litigation, representing large and small businesses, as well as individuals, including builders, developers, general contractors, and contractors, in complex litigation matters. Andre has litigated cases that have involved a plethora of different subject matters both in federal and state courts. In his practice, he has been primarily focused on breach of contract claims, insurance coverage and bad faith matters, defective construction and construction management disputes, as well as cases that arose out of disputes with various real estate issues, such as employment discrimination, wage and hour claims, personal injury, covenants not to compete, and trade secrets.
"We're pleased to welcome Andre to the team with his many strengths, including serving as a trusted advisor to clients," said VF Law Managing Partner T. Beau Ellis. "His diverse experience managing high-stakes matters makes him a strong addition to help our clients succeed in litigation."
Before joining VF Law, Andre served as a litigation attorney in Washington state at other boutique law firms and in private practice. Andre has represented various community associations in litigation matters, including, without limitation, insurance loss and uninsured expense allocation issues, contract review, fair housing matters, breach of fiduciary duty, and more. Andre received his law degree from the University of Washington School of Law and his Bachelor of Laws from the University of Latvia. He is fluent in English and Russian.
"It's an honor to be joining such a forward-thinking, agile law firm to collaborate with colleagues daily, and to utilize my extensive experience and strategic insights to obtain results that are sought after by the firm's clients," said Andre. "I am a steadfast, business-savvy advocate who always strives to resolve clients' legal problems in a cost-effective manner while being keenly aware of their business goals."
About VF Law
VF Law understands that legal matters are personal matters. We tirelessly advocate for our clients, utilizing our outstanding knowledge and experience to deliver positive results. Across numerous core practice areas, VF Law attorneys have built a reputation for their depth of expertise, personalized service, and bold strategies. We foster client relationships founded upon confidence and trust. Visit www.vf-law.com.
Ball Janik LLP Elevates Construction Litigation Attorneys Keegan A. Berry and Nicholas B. Vargo to Partner
February 02, 2026 —
Ball Janik LLPOrlando, FL – January 28, 2026 –
Ball Janik LLP is pleased to announce the elevation of
Keegan A. Berry and
Nicholas B. Vargo to Partner, effective 2026. Both attorneys are dedicated to their clients and have provided significant contributions to the firm's Construction Defect and Litigation practice.
"Keegan and Nicholas exemplify the excellence and client-focused approach that define Ball Janik LLP," said James C. Prichard, Managing Partner of Ball Janik LLP. "Their elevation to Partner reflects not only their exceptional legal skills and dedication to our clients but also their commitment to advancing the firm's mission. We are proud to recognize their achievements and look forward to their continued leadership."
Berry is based in Ball Janik LLP's Orlando office and is a Florida Bar Board Certified Specialist in Construction Law. Throughout his career, Berry has focused on complex litigation and resolving matters through arbitration, alternative dispute resolution, and trial, with extensive experience both prosecuting and defending construction claims on behalf of owners, contractors, and manufacturers. His practice also encompasses complex commercial and general litigation, including business torts, professional liability, products liability, and general liability.
"I'm honored to continue serving Florida's business and property owner communities as a partner at Ball Janik, leveraging my experience to deliver efficient, results-driven solutions in even the most complex construction disputes," said Berry.
Vargo is based in Ball Janik LLP's Tampa office and is a Florida Bar Board Certified Specialist in Construction Law. He focuses on Construction Litigation, representing residential and commercial property owners in construction defect litigation. Vargo has spent most of his career in construction defect law with Ball Janik and has been instrumental in growing Ball Janik's presence in Florida's west coast.
"Becoming a partner at Ball Janik is both a privilege and a responsibility, and I look forward to continuing to advocate fiercely for our clients while holding accountable those who attempt to evade their obligations," said Vargo.
About Ball Janik LLP
Ball Janik LLP is a Florida-based law firm offering construction defect, construction law, insurance recovery, and commercial litigation counsel, to its local and national clients. The firm was founded in 1982 and has expanded its capabilities, professionals, and geographic footprint. What started as a small firm focused on real property, land use, and litigation (known then as Ball Janik & Novack) has grown to a team of 50-plus attorneys and paralegals in 5 offices in Florida, with centuries of combined experience and capabilities. The firm has been recognized by Chambers USA, U.S. News & World Report and Best Lawyers®, The Best Lawyers in America©, and Corporate International. Read more here: https://www.balljanik.com/.
Don’t Assert as a Counterclaim to a Lien Foreclosure Lawsuit an Order to Show Cause Claim
October 27, 2025 —
David Adelstein - Florida Construction Legal UpdatesIf there is a construction lien on your property and you don’t like the lien, here are options to deal with the lien:
- You negotiate a resolution a get a satisfaction of lien to record in the public records. Or, you can transfer the lien to the security of a lien transfer bond, but that just means the lienor would need to foreclose against the bond instead of the real property. In other words, the lien is collateralized by the lien transfer bond and not the real property so it does not resolve the lien.
- You record a Notice of Contest of Lien to shorten the lienor’s statute of limitations to foreclose on the construction lien to 60 days. (See here.) If the lienor does not timely foreclose, then the lien is of no effect as a matter of law. However, this does force the issue, meaning the lienor may file a lien foreclosure lawsuit sooner than later. (But, if they file the lawsuit sooner, then the lienor was always going to file the lawsuit later.)
- You can file a lawsuit for an Order to Show Cause under Fla. Stat. s. 713.21(4) and force the lienor to file a lien foreclosure counterclaim within 20 days from service of the show cause summons. (See here.) The only time you’d really do this is if you want to initiate a lawsuit that you’d probably initiate no matter what. Otherwise, the Notice of Contest of Lien is more cost effective and more efficient.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
David Adelstein, Kirwin NorrisMr. Adelstein may be contacted at
dma@kirwinnorris.com
Insured’s Counsel Sanctioned for Filing Pleading with No Legal or Factual Justification
October 27, 2025 —
Tred R. Eyerly - Insurance Law HawaiiThe insured’s attorney was sanctioned for pursuing claims that were factually and legally unfounded. Wright v ASI Lloyds, No. 3?22-cv-357, Order (S.D. Texas Aug. 5, 2025).
ASI moved for sections against the insured’s counsel, Eric B. Dick of the Eric Dick Law Firm, PLLC, requiring payment of fees, costs and expenses reasonably incurred in defending the insured’s action. The evidence revealed that the complaint was founded upon falsities. Dick either knew or should have know when filing the complaint the following:
- The complaint alleged vandalism damaged the insured’s property, but the insured did not believe vandalism caused the damage.
- The complaint alleged the property was the insured’s primary residence, but she had lived elsewhere since 2000 and the property had been vacant for two years at the time she discovered the damage.
- The complaint alleged the property was well-maintained prior to the loss, but the city cited the property as a nuisance, unsanitary, and unfit for human habitation a year before the alleged date of loss.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak HastertMr. Eyerly may be contacted at
te@hawaiilawyer.com
Structuring Water Resilience for Data Center Development: Water Rights, Reuse Incentives, and Emerging Disclosure Risk
March 10, 2026 —
Ashleigh Myers, Jillian Marullo & Jason Drogin Atwood - Gravel2Gavel Construction & Real Estate Law BlogAs AI-driven data center development accelerates, developers, communities and regulators are increasingly focused on water demand—both the volume required and the sources from which that water will be drawn. While industry attention has largely centered on electricity procurement and grid impacts, the availability and legal entitlement to a firm water supply has become equally material to siting, permitting and community acceptance. Particularly as surface and groundwater supplies become increasingly constrained and new projects are sited in regions experiencing tighter hydrologic conditions or growth-related supply constraints, project teams are increasingly integrating water supply analysis into early-stage development to address issues that can materially affect schedule, financing and long-term operations.
Reprinted courtesy of
Ashleigh Myers, Pillsbury,
Jillian Marullo, Pillsbury and
Jason Drogin Atwood, Pillsbury
Ms. Myers may be contacted at ashleigh.myers@pillsburylaw.com
Ms. Marullo may be contacted at jillian.marullo@pillsburylaw.com
Mr. Atwood may be contacted at jason.atwood@pillsburylaw.com
Read the full story...
Homeowners Associations Must Prepare for Cold Season Maintenance and Repairs in Western Washington
November 21, 2025 —
Andre Egle - VF LawWashington experiences major winter storms in the Greater Puget Sound area approximately two or three times per winter. While this depends on whether the winter weather pattern is affected by either El Niño or the La Niña Pacific Ocean current, associations must prepare for storm impacts rather than scramble after a storm has hit. La Niña conditions are ongoing and are likely to persist into the winter of 2025-2026, though forecasts indicate it will remain weak. Here are some steps Homeowners Associations (HOA) can take to protect themselves.
What Proactive Steps Can a Washington HOA Take to Identify and Minimize Potential Construction or Maintenance Risks Before a Major Storm?
Knowing that the chances for heavier-than-usual rains are in the forecast, a local HOA should inspect roofs, gutters, building envelopes, and drainage systems to identify vulnerabilities to water intrusion inside the buildings or ice buildup on the outside. Trees, landscaping features, walkways, and retaining walls need to be checked for dangers like dead limbs, tripping hazards, or any signs of shifting structure. Mechanical and utility systems such as plumbing, HVAC, and exterior lighting must be inspected to ensure they have sufficient insulation, protection, and proper operation. Contractors must ensure that all active construction sites are properly secured. They should also have a plan in place to protect materials from storm damage and address any other hazardous conditions.
What Key Questions Should HOA Boards and HOA Property Managers Ask Potential Contractors to Ensure Good Workmanship and Accountability?
The following five core questions capture the essentials of a contractor’s quality, reliability, and accountability: (1) Are you licensed, bonded, insured (inquire into the policy types and the applicable limits), and able to provide references for similar HOA projects? (2) Who will manage the project on-site work (request that person’s CV or work history), and how will you communicate work progress, potential issues, and timelines to the HOA? (3) What materials, methods, and quality-control procedures will you use, and how will you protect the property while performing the work, particularly during the rainy and stormy season? (4) Can you provide a detailed, written scope of work and price estimate, and explain, in writing, your company procedures for handling change orders or unexpected conditions? (5) What warranties do you provide for labor and materials that you will be using, and how do you handle a warranty or “punch-list” issues after the job is complete?
What are Some Insurance Pitfalls HOAs Often Overlook - and How to Avoid Them?
Here are the most common insurance pitfalls that HOAs may overlook, along with proposed solutions for addressing them. Pitfall No.1: Outdated or generic replacement-cost estimates that do not reflect actual construction costs in Washington. Solution: Obtain a professional replacement-cost appraisal every 3–5 years and ensure that the policy includes full replacement cost, not actual cash value. Pitfall No.2: Misunderstanding of the division of responsibility for covered losses between the HOA and individual owners. Solution: Educate the owners that under most an HOA’s contemporary governing documents such as the Declarations Of Conditions, Covenants, and Restrictions (DCCRs) and the Bylaw, the association’s insurance primarily covers repairs not only to the association’s common areas and limited common areas, but also the repairs of structural and other building elements inside each individual units, and then collects from the unit owner a proportional share of the HOA’s insurance premium. That way, the repairs covered by the HOA’s property insurance are uniform, and the HOA - not the unit owner - will deal with the repair contractor and its insurer if the repairs are subpar. Pitfall No. 3: Gaps in Water Damage Coverage. Property and liability insurance policies often exclude slow leaks, sewer backups, and water intrusion - three types of claims that typically are most expensive for an HOA. Solution: To request that the HOA insurance broker add to the policy coverage of (a) a backup of sewer/drain coverage, (b) wind-driven rain, and (c) water intrusion, and (d) sudden pipe failures. Afterward, the HOA should ensure that owners consistently keep the plumbing in their units in good working order. Pitfall No. 4: Failing to Adjust Coverage After Renovations. Specifically, HOAs frequently forget to update insurance after roof replacements, building upgrades, or additions of new amenities. Solution: Notify the HOA’s insurance broker after any major capital project and update insurable values to reflect the improvements. Pitfall No. 5: Not reviewing vendor insurance requirements because contractors may frequently have inadequate coverage or let policies lapse in the middle of a construction or renovation project. Solution: At the time of contracting for the construction or renovation work at the HOA property, (i) request that contractors provide their current Certificates of Insurance (“COI”), additional insured endorsements, and insurance policies Declaration pages that show the limits or coverage, and (ii) re-verify the same insurance facts before the work begins.
What is the Best Practice for Communicating with Residents of a Community Owned by an HOA to Maintain Trust and Transparency During and After a Winter Storm?
First, before a storm, send a simple, fact-based, expectation-setting message outlining what the HOA will do (snow removal plans, inspections, vendor readiness) and what residents should be prepared to do. Utilize multiple channels, including email, text alerts, HOA portal, lobby postings, and social media (if applicable). Second, set realistic expectations about response times because trust is built when residents understand what the HOA can and cannot do. Share with residents: (a) snow/ice vendor schedules; (b) priority areas, e.g., roads, walkways, private drives; (c) any delays due to the severity of the weather, and (d) clear expectations meant to reduce the residents’ frustration. Third, provide regular updates, even if the update is “no change.” Residents want visibility and care, not perfection. Report: (i) storm status; (ii) timing of plow/ice treatment timing, (iii) any emerging hazards (e.g., downed branches, icy walkways), and (vi) instructions for safety or temporary restrictions on moving about the community. Fourth, keep a record of and clarify every step taken to address the storm’s impact, since being transparent helps build trust when residents see that the HOA operates in an organized and responsible manner. After each key action, such as plowing, salting, emergency repairs, and the like, share with residents a brief update stating (a) what was done, (b) when it was complete, (c) the name of the vendor that performed the work, and (d) the dangers that are yet to be addressed. Fifth, within 48 to 72 hours after the storm, call a meeting to conduct a post-event summary to discuss what worked well, what challenges the HOA had to deal with, what repairs or follow-up work will happen, and what improvements will be made to meet the next storm with a higher degree of preparedness. Such a meeting would be one of the strongest ways to build long-term trust in the residents of the community owned by the HOA.
Andre Egle is an attorney at
VF Law. He may be reached at andre.egle@vf-law.com.
Builders Oppose Senate Housing Bill Over Investor Ban Provision
March 24, 2026 —
Katy O'Donnell - BloombergA powerful group representing the nation’s home builders is coming out against the most significant housing legislation in more than a decade over a provision negotiated by the White House that would restrict institutional investors from purchasing single-family homes.
The builders’ objection could imperil the bill’s chances of becoming law, even as leaders of both parties are desperate to show they are doing something to alleviate voters’
cost-of-living concerns. The Senate voted 90-8 to clear a procedural hurdle for the bill on Wednesday, with a vote on final passage expected early next week.
The inclusion of the investor ban in a broader housing bill was key to getting the White House on board,
Senate Banking Committee Chairman Tim Scott, a Republican from South Carolina, told reporters Tuesday.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Katy O'Donnell, Bloomberg
