BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    casino resort expert witness Coatesville Pennsylvania Medical building expert witness Coatesville Pennsylvania institutional building expert witness Coatesville Pennsylvania housing expert witness Coatesville Pennsylvania concrete tilt-up expert witness Coatesville Pennsylvania office building expert witness Coatesville Pennsylvania low-income housing expert witness Coatesville Pennsylvania townhome construction expert witness Coatesville Pennsylvania industrial building expert witness Coatesville Pennsylvania production housing expert witness Coatesville Pennsylvania multi family housing expert witness Coatesville Pennsylvania parking structure expert witness Coatesville Pennsylvania hospital construction expert witness Coatesville Pennsylvania condominium expert witness Coatesville Pennsylvania landscaping construction expert witness Coatesville Pennsylvania structural steel construction expert witness Coatesville Pennsylvania Subterranean parking expert witness Coatesville Pennsylvania custom home expert witness Coatesville Pennsylvania custom homes expert witness Coatesville Pennsylvania mid-rise construction expert witness Coatesville Pennsylvania tract home expert witness Coatesville Pennsylvania condominiums expert witness Coatesville Pennsylvania
    Coatesville Pennsylvania window expert witnessCoatesville Pennsylvania eifs expert witnessCoatesville Pennsylvania building envelope expert witnessCoatesville Pennsylvania building consultant expertCoatesville Pennsylvania building code compliance expert witnessCoatesville Pennsylvania construction defect expert witnessCoatesville Pennsylvania structural engineering expert witnesses
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Coatesville, Pennsylvania

    Pennsylvania Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB 1875 stipulates that “no later than 90 days before filing an action, serve written notice of claim on the contractor. Upon receipt of notice, builder has 15 days to forward the claim to any subcontractor/supplier and 30 days after service of notice to offer to compromise and settle the claim by monetary payment without inspection, propose to inspect the dwelling that is the subject of the claim; or reject the claim. Contractor has 14 days after inspection to provide written notice of intention.”


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Coatesville Pennsylvania

    No state license required. For public works projects, see General Services website.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Building Industry Association of Philadelphia
    Local # 3946
    1735 Market St Ste A432
    Philadelphia, PA 19103

    Coatesville Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Chester & Delaware Co
    Local # 3941
    1502 McDaniel Dr
    West Chester, PA 19380

    Coatesville Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    York County Builders Assn
    Local # 3972
    540 Greebriar Road
    York, PA 17404

    Coatesville Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Franklin County Builders Association
    Local # 3912
    1102 Sheller Ave Ste C
    Chambersburg, PA 17201

    Coatesville Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Somerset Co Builders Association
    Local # 3958
    PO Box 221
    Berlin, PA 15530

    Coatesville Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Builders Association of Fayette County
    Local # 3961
    PO Box 1323
    Uniontown, PA 15401
    Coatesville Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Building Industry Association of Lancaster
    Local # 3936
    204 Butler Ave Ste 200
    Lancaster, PA 17601

    Coatesville Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Coatesville Pennsylvania


    Top 10 Hurricane Preparedness Practices for Construction Sites

    Real Estate & Construction News Round-Up (08/24/22) – Local Law 97, Clean Energy, and IRA Tax Credits

    Beyond the Flow-Down Clause: Subcontract Provisions That Can Expose General Contractors to Increased Liability and Inconsistent Outcomes

    Search in Florida Collapse to Take Weeks; Deaths Reach 90

    Tall and Sustainable Is Not an Easy Fix

    Policy's One Year Suit Limitation Does Not Apply to Challenging the Insurer's Claims Handling

    Eighth Circuit Remands to Determine Applicability of Collapse Exclusion

    Contractor Pleads Guilty to Disadvantaged-Business Fraud

    New WA Law Caps Retainage on Private Projects at 5%

    Congratulations to Haight Attorneys Selected to the 2021 Southern California Super Lawyers List

    The Importance of the Recent Amendment to Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence

    Failure to Consider Safety Element in Design Does Not Preclude Public Entity’s Discretionary Authority Under Design Immunity Defense

    Lewis Brisbois Successfully Concludes Privacy Dispute for Comedian Kathy Griffin Following Calif. Supreme Court Denial of Review

    Recovering Attorney’s Fees and Treble Damages in Washington DC Condominium Construction Defect Cases

    Delay In Noticing Insurer of Loss is Not Prejudicial

    Falling Crime Rates Make Dangerous Neighborhoods Safe for Bidding Wars

    Navigating the DOT’s Interim Final Rule on DBE Certification Standards - and Preparing for the (Bumpy) Road Ahead

    Not All Design-Build Projects are Created Equal

    Haight Expands California Reach – Opens Office in Sacramento

    Supreme Court of Idaho Rules That Substantial Compliance With the Notice and Opportunity to Repair Act Suffices to Bring Suit

    Hawaii Federal District Rejects Another Construction Defect Claim

    Latosha Ellis Selected for 2019 Leadership Council on Legal Diversity Pathfinder Program

    The Moment of Truth

    Newmeyer & Dillion Named as One of the 2018 Best Places to Work in Orange County for Seventh Consecutive Year

    Brad Pitt’s Foundation Sues New Orleans Architect for Construction Defects

    Elon Musk’s Proposed Vegas Strip Transit System Advanced by City Council Vote

    Changing Your Mind, for Whatever Reason – Terminating a Construction Contract for Convenience in Florida

    Super Lawyers Selects Haight’s Melvin Marcia for Its 2023 Northern California Rising Stars List

    CCPA Class Action Lawsuits Are Coming. Are You Ready?

    Determining Duty to Defend in Wisconsin Does Not Include Extrinsic Evidence

    Explore Legal Immigration Options for Construction Companies

    No Collapse Coverage Where Policy's Collapse Provisions Deleted

    New Law Prompts ABC Minnesota/North Dakota to Design New Telecommunications Safety Training Program

    U.S. Home Lending Set to Bounce Back in 2015 After Slump

    The Starter Apartment Is Nearly Extinct in San Francisco and New York

    French Government Fines National Architects' Group $1.6M Over Fee-Fixing

    Couple Sues for Construction Defects in Manufactured Home

    Insurers' Communications Through Brokers Not Privileged

    Contract Construction Smarts: Helpful Provisions for Dispute Resolution

    Wharf Holdings to Sell Entire Sino-Ocean Stake for $284 Million

    PJM’s Reliability Backstop Procurement Proposal—Fast-Track Capacity to Meet Rising Large-Load Demand

    Hurricane Ian: Discussing Wind-Water Disputes

    On to Year Thirteen for Blog

    Colorado Construction-Defects Reform Law Attempt Expected in 2015

    Vermont Supreme Court Reverses, Finding No Coverage for Collapse

    Trial-Tested Property Litigator Kimberlee Martin Joins Ball Janik LLP's Orlando Construction Defect Team

    Homeowners Associations Must Prepare for Cold Season Maintenance and Repairs in Western Washington

    Property Damage Caused By Construction Next Door Covered as Ensuing Loss

    Arbitration Provision Must Be Incorporated into a Bond for Surety to Elect Arbitration

    Insurer's Denial of Coverage to Additional Insured Constitutes Bad Faith
    Corporate Profile

    COATESVILLE PENNSYLVANIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Coatesville, Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Leveraging from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Coatesville's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Coatesville, Pennsylvania

    ACEC Research Institute Report: Real Risk of AI Isn’t Technology. It’s the Org Chart.

    September 01, 2026 —
    WASHINGTON (August 19, 2026) – The ACEC Research Institute today released Leading Through AI Risk: The Enterprise Framework for Engineering Firm Leaders, a new study finding that the most significant risks artificial intelligence poses to engineering firms are organizational rather than technological, and that firms treating AI as an IT initiative are managing the wrong issue. The report, part of the Institute’s yearslong Firm of the Future initiative, combines an extensive literature review with in-depth interviews of 21 leaders drawn from engineering firms, public infrastructure owners, technology vendors, insurance and legal professionals, licensing and regulatory agencies, and AI consultants. The report groups AI risk into eight interconnected domains:
    • technical reliability and model risk
    • professional liability and standard of care risk
    • data governance, privacy, and intellectual property risk
    • organizational and workforce risk
    • ethical, regulatory, and reputational risk
    • operational and cybersecurity risk
    • financial and business model risk
    • strategic leadership and enterprise governance risk
    The last serves as the integrating domain through which firms coordinate responsible AI adoption enterprise wide. The report stresses that firms do not experience these risks one at a time. Weak oversight may create legal liability. Workforce gaps may affect quality assurance. “Understanding these interactions,” the study notes, “is often more important than understanding individual risks independently.” About the ACEC Research Institute The ACEC Research Institute is the independent research arm of the American Council of Engineering Companies (ACEC). Its mission is to fund and deliver research to equip the engineering industry with actionable intelligence on the issues critical to its success. Learn more at www.acecresearchinstitute.org.

    Labor Shortages in Construction: Managing Legal and Operational Risks

    April 14, 2026 —
    Labor shortages in the construction industry have become more than a scheduling headache—they are a legal and financial risk multiplier. As contractors scramble to meet deadlines with limited manpower, shortcuts in compliance, safety and subcontractor oversight become more likely. These gaps can expose companies to regulatory penalties, contractual disputes and reputational damage. Understanding how workforce constraints intersect with labor laws and contractual obligations is critical to mitigating the risks and navigating these challenges without compromising compliance or project integrity. The construction industry has faced persistent workforce challenges for years, but recent trends have intensified the problem. Factors such as an aging workforce, reduced immigration and post-pandemic recovery pressures have left contractors struggling to find skilled labor. According to Associated Builders and Contractors, the construction workforce shortage surpassed half a million workers in 2024; in the same year, Associated General Contractors reported 88% of construction companies had difficulty finding qualified workers. Reprinted courtesy of Meghan Douris, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Seattle Team Obtains Summary Judgment in Real Estate Broker Professional Liability Action

    July 20, 2026 —
    Seattle Partner Kathleen A. Nelson and Associate Synova M. L. Edwards prevailed on a hotly contested motion for summary judgment in Whatcom County, Washington court in a real estate broker professional liability action. The plaintiff filed an action against Lewis Brisbois' clients, a real estate agent and brokerage firm, among several others, including the title company, purchasers and others related to the sale of real property following his complicated and long running divorce action. These claims primarily arose out of the clients’ reliance on an order signed by the court in the underlying divorce action. The order allowed the clients to execute the purchase and sale agreement, as the plaintiff was non-cooperative. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    For Urban Walkers, a Patchy Dilemma: Who Owns the Sidewalk?

    July 06, 2026 —
    In 2007, New York City’s sanitation department threatened Natalie Shea with a $300 fine for defacing public property with graffiti. Her crime: drawing a blue flower in front of her family’s Park Slope home with sidewalk chalk. She was six years old. The incident, which made local and national news at the time, captures the fraught role that sidewalks often play in US cities. These patches of pavement do more than carry pedestrians to their destinations: They’re also places for commerce, social interaction and childhood play, from chalking to learning how to ride a bike. Urbanist Jane Jacobs once likened the range of activities that city sidewalks attract to an “intricate ballet.” In the new book Sidewalk Nation: The Life and Law of America’s Most Overlooked Resource (Harvard University Press), author Michael Pollack explores the “tangled web of state and local regulation” that governs sidewalks, with cities often passing along responsibilities for tasks like clearing snow and keeping walkways safe. He paints a portrait of the American sidewalk a disorderly and often neglected network, filled with literal and metaphorical cracks that give rise to all sorts of conflict, from mundane clashes over maintenance to more consequential fights over accessibility and inequality. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Linda Poon, Bloomberg

    How Engineers Will Determine Why NYC's Pfizer HQ Conversion Buckled

    July 13, 2026 —
    Construction crews have stabilized the former Pfizer headquarters redevelopment in Midtown Manhattan after two load-bearing structural columns buckled on the 21st floor July 7. The focus has now shifted from emergency response to determining what caused the office-to-residential conversion to suffer a major structural failure. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Gottlieb may be contacted at gottliebb@enr.com

    Best Lawyers Honors Hundreds of Lewis Brisbois Attorneys, Names Five Partners 'Lawyers of the Year'

    September 08, 2026 —
    Best Lawyers has selected 207 Lewis Brisbois attorneys across 45 offices for its 33rd edition of The Best Lawyers in America. It has also recognized five Lewis Brisbois partners on its "Lawyers of the Year" list: Akron Partner John R. Conley (Product Liability Litigation - Defendants); Akron Managing Partner David Kern (Corporate Law; Mergers and Acquisitions Law; Private Funds / Hedge Funds Law; Tax Law; Trusts and Estates); Weirton Managing Partner Michelle L. Gorman (Mass Tort Litigation / Class Actions - Defendants); Portland Partner Megan Cook (Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants); and San Diego Partner Craig T. Mann (Medical Malpractice Law - Defendants). Please join us in congratulating the following attorneys on their Best Lawyers recognition! You can also see the full list of attorneys named to Best Lawyers' Ones to Watch in America here. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Project Labor Agreements: A New Bid Protest Forum Split

    May 14, 2026 —
    Advertisements often include a disclaimer: “individual results may vary.” Similarly, lawyers are notorious for saying “it depends.” The mandatory Project Labor Agreement (“PLA”) regulations have recently placed into context this adage as it applies to federal contract bid protests, with very different results depending on which forum – the Court of Federal Claims (“COFC”) versus the Government Accountability Office (“GAO”) – different contractors have selected to bring PLA bid protests. Over the last two years, over 30 protesters have successfully achieved removal of mandatory PLAs from large-scale federal construction contracts based on two landmark bid protest decisions issued by the COFC. Similar challenges to PLAs at the GAO, however, have not been successful in removing PLAs, highlighting an emerging trend that the COFC is often a more effective relief forum than GAO for government construction contractors. Reprinted courtesy of Dirk D. Haire, Burr & Forman LLP, David P.J. Timm, Burr & Forman LLP and Michael J. Brewer, Burr & Forman LLP Mr. Haire may be contacted at dhaire@burr.com Mr. Timm may be contacted at dtimm@burr.com Mr. Brewer may be contacted at mbrewer@burr.com Read the full story...

    “The Superintendent Told Us to Do It:” Why Verbal Approval May Not Be Enough

    June 02, 2026 —
    In construction defect litigation, one scenario appears repeatedly: a subcontractor installs work in a manner that differs from the plans, specifications, manufacturer instructions, or industry standards after being verbally directed to do so by the general contractor, superintendent, architect, or owner’s representative. At the time, the decision may seem minor. The project is moving quickly, the field team wants to maintain progress, and nobody wants to stop working over what appears to be a small issue. The subcontractor may trust the superintendent or project manager and assume the conversation will be remembered later if questions arise. Years later, however, when the project experiences problems, the people involved may deny the conversation occurred, remember it differently, or simply no longer remember the project. Without written documentation, the subcontractor can find itself defending claims for defective work, even though it performed the installation exactly as directed. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Andrew Lintner, Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC
    Mr. Lintner may be contacted at alintner@hhmrlaw.com