• Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    high-rise construction expert witness Ashburn Virginia parking structure expert witness Ashburn Virginia low-income housing expert witness Ashburn Virginia concrete tilt-up expert witness Ashburn Virginia custom home expert witness Ashburn Virginia townhome construction expert witness Ashburn Virginia casino resort expert witness Ashburn Virginia mid-rise construction expert witness Ashburn Virginia condominium expert witness Ashburn Virginia retail construction expert witness Ashburn Virginia landscaping construction expert witness Ashburn Virginia production housing expert witness Ashburn Virginia condominiums expert witness Ashburn Virginia custom homes expert witness Ashburn Virginia tract home expert witness Ashburn Virginia Subterranean parking expert witness Ashburn Virginia hospital construction expert witness Ashburn Virginia institutional building expert witness Ashburn Virginia Medical building expert witness Ashburn Virginia industrial building expert witness Ashburn Virginia office building expert witness Ashburn Virginia housing expert witness Ashburn Virginia
    Ashburn Virginia structural engineering expert witnessesAshburn Virginia construction defect expert witnessAshburn Virginia construction expert witness consultantAshburn Virginia construction forensic expert witnessAshburn Virginia construction code expert witnessAshburn Virginia consulting general contractorAshburn Virginia engineering consultant
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Ashburn, Virginia

    Virginia Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (HB558; H 150; §55-70.1) Warranty extension applicable to single-family but not HOAs: in addition to any other express or implied warranties; It requires registered or certified mail notice to "vendor" stating nature of claim; reasonable time not to exceed six months to "cure the defect".

    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Ashburn Virginia

    A contractor's license is required for all trades. Separate boards license plumbing, electrical, HVAC, gas fitting, and asbestos trades.

    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Northern Virginia Building Industry Association
    Local # 4840
    3901 Centerview Dr Suite E
    Chantilly, VA 20151

    Ashburn Virginia Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    The Top of Virginia Builders Association
    Local # 4883
    1182 Martinsburg Pike
    Winchester, VA 22603

    Ashburn Virginia Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Shenandoah Valley Builders Association
    Local # 4848
    PO Box 1286
    Harrisonburg, VA 22803

    Ashburn Virginia Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Piedmont Virginia Building Industry Association
    Local # 4890
    PO Box 897
    Culpeper, VA 22701

    Ashburn Virginia Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Fredericksburg Area Builders Association
    Local # 4830
    3006 Lafayette Blvd
    Fredericksburg, VA 22408

    Ashburn Virginia Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Augusta Home Builders Association Inc
    Local # 4804
    PO Box 36
    Waynesboro, VA 22980

    Ashburn Virginia Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Blue Ridge Home Builders Association
    Local # 4809
    PO Box 7743
    Charlottesville, VA 22906

    Ashburn Virginia Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Ashburn Virginia

    WSHB Ranks No.10 in Law360’s Best of Law Firms for Women

    How Construction Contracts are Made. Hint: It’s a Bit Like Making Sausage

    Insurance Agent Sued for Lapse in Coverage after House Collapses

    Altman Contractors, Inc. v. Crum & Forster Specialty Ins. Co.

    New Becker & Poliakoff Attorney to Expand Morristown Construction Litigation Practice

    Ahead of the Storm: Preparing for Irma

    Man Pleads Guilty in Construction Kickback Scheme

    A Duty to Design and Maintain Reasonably Safe Roadways Extends to All Persons. (WA)

    Rooftop Owners Sue Cubs Consultant for Alleged False Statements

    KB Homes Sues Condo Buyers over Alleged Cybersquatting and Hacking

    Failure to Comply with Contract Leaves No Additional Insured Coverage

    Developer Africa Israel Wins a Round in New York Condominium Battle

    Greystone on Remand Denies Insurer's Motion for Summary Judgment To Bar Coverage For Construction Defects

    Stormy Seas Ahead: 5th Circuit to Review Whether Maritime Law Applies to Offshore Service Contract

    Housing Starts in U.S. Surge to Seven-Year High as Weather Warms

    London’s Best Districts Draw Buyers on Italian Triple Dip

    Peru’s Former President and His Wife to Stay in Jail After Losing Appeal

    Brooklyn’s Hipster Economy Challenges Manhattan Supremacy

    Deck Collapse Raises Questions about Building Defects

    Big League Dreams a Nightmare for Town

    Architectural Firm Disputes Claim of Fault

    Berkeley Researchers Look to Ancient Rome for Greener Concrete

    Landmark Towers Association, Inc. v. UMB Bank, N.A. or: One Bad Apple Spoils the Whole Bunch

    Newmeyer & Dillion Announces Three New Partners

    HOA Has No Claim to Extend Statute of Limitations in Construction Defect Case

    Texas “your work” exclusion

    Alabama Supreme Court Finds No Coverage for Construction Defect to Contractor's own Product

    Reinsurer Must Reimburse Health Care Organization for Settlement Costs

    We Knew Concrete Could Absorb Carbon—New Study Tells How Much

    Umbrella Policy Must Drop Down to Assist with Defense

    Housing to Top Capital Spending in Next U.S. Growth Leg: Economy

    How to Survive the Insurance Claim Process Before It Starts –Five Tips to Keep Your Insurance Healthy

    Construction Companies Can Be Liable for “Secondary Exposure” of Asbestos to Household Members

    President Trump’s “Buy American, Hire American” Executive Order and the Construction Industry

    Association Insurance Company v. Carbondale Glen Lot E-8, LLC: Federal Court Reaffirms That There Is No Duty to Defend or Indemnify A Builder For Defective Construction Work

    More Charges Anticipated in Las Vegas HOA Scam

    Florida Self-Insured Retention Satisfaction and Made Whole Doctrine

    Fire Damages Unfinished Hospital Tower at NYU Langone Medical Center

    Architect Plans to 3D-Print a Two-Story House

    Work without Permits may lead to Problems Later

    Client Alert: Release of Liability Agreement Extinguishes Duty of Ordinary Care

    Home Prices in 20 U.S. Cities Rose at Faster Pace in January

    New Case Alert: California Federal Court Allows Policy Stacking to Cover Continuous Injury

    New York Developer’s Alleged Court Judgment Woes

    Connecticut Supreme Court Finds Faulty Work By Subcontractor Constitutes "Occurrence"

    California Supreme Court Confirms the Right to Repair Act as the Exclusive Remedy for Seeking Relief for Defects in New Residential Construction

    Harvey's Aftermath Will Rattle Construction Supply Chain, Economists Say

    HP Unveils Cheaper, 3-D Printing System to Spur Sales

    Condo Owners Suing Bank for Failing to Disclose Defects

    Pine River’s Two Harbors Now Targets Non-Prime Mortgages
    Corporate Profile


    The Ashburn, Virginia Construction Expert Witness Group is comprised from a number of credentialed construction professionals possessing extensive trial support experience relevant to construction defect and claims matters. Leveraging from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to the nation's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, Fortune 500 builders, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, and a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Ashburn, Virginia

    Insurance Policies Broadly Defining “Suits” May Prompt an Insurer’s Duty to Defend and Indemnify During the Chapter 558 Pre-Suit Notice Process

    May 30, 2018 —
    In Altman Contractors, Inc. v. Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Company, No. SC16-1420, 2017 WL 6379535 (Fla. Dec. 14, 2017), the Florida Supreme Court addressed whether the notice and repair process set forth in chapter 558, Florida Statutes, constitutes a “suit” within the meaning of a commercial liability policy issued by Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Company (“C&F”) to Altman Contractors, Inc. (“Altman”). The Court found that because the chapter 558 pre-suit process is an “alternative dispute resolution proceeding” as included in the definition of “suit” in the policy by C&F to Altman, C&F had a duty to defend Altman during the chapter 558 process, prior to the filing of a formal lawsuit. Chapter 558, titled “Construction Defects,” sets forth procedural requirements before a claimant may file a construction defect action. It requires a claimant to serve a written notice of claim on the applicable contractor, subcontractor, supplier, and/or design professional prior to filing a construction defect lawsuit. The legislature intended for Chapter 558 to be an alternative dispute resolution mechanism in certain construction defect matters allowing an opportunity to resolve the claim without further legal process. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Daniel Garcia, Gordon & Rees Scully Mansukhani
    Mr. Garcia may be contacted at

    Part I: Key Provisions of School Facility Construction & Design Contracts

    May 16, 2018 —
    We all expect our school construction projects will go smoothly, on time and under budget. But despite our best efforts, some projects will encounter speed bumps, detours or outright roadblocks. While there are many precautions a school facility manager may take, one of the best precautions is to have solid construction and design contracts. A good contract will account for the known risks and specify an outcome in favor of the school authority. School construction risks can be categorized into a few categories: performance risk, time risk, cost risk and political risk. Some risks are typical to all construction projects, while others are peculiar to the unique needs of school authorities. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David R. Cook Jr., Autry, Hall & Cook, LLP
    Mr. Cook may be contacted at

    A Good Examination of Fraud, Contract and Negligence Per Se

    February 28, 2018 —
    I have spoken on several occasions here at Construction Law Musings about the interplay (or lack thereof) between fraud and contract as it relates to construction in Virginia. The general rule is that fraud and contract claims don’t mix and a fraud claim in the face of a contractual one is likely to be dismissed. However, there are exceptions to this rule as there are to just about every legal rule (we construction lawyers would be out of a job without them). A good examination of the interplay between fraud and contract was set out by the Eastern District of Virginia federal court in Zuberi et al v. Hirezi et al. In that case the Zuberis purchased a home from the Hirezis and later filed suit alleging that the Hirezis concealed serious structural defects that made the house uninhabitable and unsellable. Among the many claims by the Zuberis were those fro fraud, fraudulent inducement, constructive fraud, negligence per se, violation of the Virginia Consumer Protection Act, and civil conspiracy. In short, they were out for blood. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Christopher G. Hill, The Law Office of Christopher G. Hill
    Mr. Hill may be contacted at

    “Good Faith” May Not Be Good Enough: California Supreme Court to Decide When General Contractors Can Withhold Retention

    March 22, 2018 —
    It is industry standard in California for owners of a construction project to make monthly payments to a contractor for work it has completed, less a certain percentage that is withheld as a guarantee of future satisfactory performance. This withholding is called a retention. Contractors generally pass these withholdings on to their subcontractors via a retention clause in the subcontract. Under such clause, if a subcontractor fails to complete its work or correct deficiencies in its work, the owner and the general contractor may use the retention to bring the subcontractor’s work into conformance with the requirements of the contract. When and how retention payments must be released are governed by, among other statutes, Civil Code section 8800 et seq. Specifically, Civil Code section 8814, subdivision (a), states that a direct contractor must pay each subcontractor its share of a retention payment within ten days after the general contractor receives all or part of a retention payment. Failure to make payments in accordance with Section 8814 can subject an owner or a contractor to a (1) two percent penalty per a month on the amount wrongfully withheld, and (2) claim for attorney’s fees for any litigation required to collect the wrongfully withheld retention payments. (Civ. Code, § 8818.) Reprinted courtesy of Erinn Contreras, Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP and Joy Siu, Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP Ms. Contreras may be contacted at Ms. Siu may be contacted at Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    Beware of Personal-Liability Clauses – Even When Signing in Your Representative Capacity

    January 31, 2018 —
    When a contract is drafted by a party, the other party expects some level of one-sidedness in favor of the drafter. But there are times when a contract goes too far. There are certain provisions that most persons in the construction industry would find unacceptable, unfair, and beyond the pale – even for a one-sided contract. Such a provision was arguably found in an electrical subcontract at issue in a 2014 opinion by a three-judge panel of the Georgia Court of Appeals. Unfortunately, due to long-standing Georgia law, the panel was forced to apply the provision as written. In the case, a contractor hired a subcontractor to perform the electrical scope of work. When the subcontractor failed to pay a sub-subcontractor, the sub-subcontractor filed suit against the subcontractor, contractor, and the payment-bond surety. The contractor asserted a claim of indemnity against the subcontractor based on the sub-subcontractor’s claim. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David R. Cook Jr., Autry, Hall & Cook, LLP
    Mr. Cook may be contacted at

    What is Toxic Mold Litigation?

    April 11, 2018 —
    To understand what Toxic Mold Litigation is, it is important to first identify and understand what toxic mold is. Mold is a fungus which is essentially everywhere, and certain types of mold, known as toxic mold, may cause severe personal injuries and/or property damage. Toxic mold refers to those molds capable of producing mycotoxins which are organic compounds capable of initiating a toxic response in vertebrates. Toxic mold generally occurs because of water intrusion, from sources such as plumbing problems, floods, or roof leaks. It is this ageless life form that has spawned a new species of toxic tort claims and has had legal and medical experts debating the complex health implications that follow. Here is some information as to what toxic mold litigation is and when you should hire a lawyer for toxic mold. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Vik Nagpal
    Mr. Nagpal may be contacted at

    New Spending Measure Has Big Potential Infrastructure Boost

    February 14, 2018 —
    Construction and engineering companies find lots of good news in a newly enacted budget and appropriations package that keeps federal agencies open until late March, provides $89 billion for post-disaster relief and rebuilding and also holds out the prospect of an additional $20 billion in infrastructure funding over the next two years. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tom Ichniowski, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Ichniowski may be contacted at

    2018 Spending Plan Boosts Funding for Affordable Housing

    April 11, 2018 —
    On March 23, President Trump signed into law the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2018, a $1.3 trillion spending package that includes a 12.5% increase in low-income housing tax credit allocations over the next four years, along with funding increases for several affordable housing programs. This is welcome news to affordable housing developers who have been facing funding gaps as a result of reductions in the corporate tax rate under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act enacted in late 2017, which led to reduced pricing from equity investors. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Emily Bias, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
    Ms. Bias may be contacted at