BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    landscaping construction expert witness Ashburn Virginia production housing expert witness Ashburn Virginia multi family housing expert witness Ashburn Virginia Medical building expert witness Ashburn Virginia concrete tilt-up expert witness Ashburn Virginia condominiums expert witness Ashburn Virginia institutional building expert witness Ashburn Virginia Subterranean parking expert witness Ashburn Virginia tract home expert witness Ashburn Virginia low-income housing expert witness Ashburn Virginia casino resort expert witness Ashburn Virginia mid-rise construction expert witness Ashburn Virginia townhome construction expert witness Ashburn Virginia hospital construction expert witness Ashburn Virginia industrial building expert witness Ashburn Virginia parking structure expert witness Ashburn Virginia custom home expert witness Ashburn Virginia housing expert witness Ashburn Virginia condominium expert witness Ashburn Virginia retail construction expert witness Ashburn Virginia office building expert witness Ashburn Virginia high-rise construction expert witness Ashburn Virginia
    Ashburn Virginia consulting architect expert witnessAshburn Virginia reconstruction expert witnessAshburn Virginia building code expert witnessAshburn Virginia contractor expert witnessAshburn Virginia eifs expert witnessAshburn Virginia building expertAshburn Virginia expert witness roofing
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Ashburn, Virginia

    Virginia Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (HB558; H 150; §55-70.1) Warranty extension applicable to single-family but not HOAs: in addition to any other express or implied warranties; It requires registered or certified mail notice to "vendor" stating nature of claim; reasonable time not to exceed six months to "cure the defect".


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Ashburn Virginia

    A contractor's license is required for all trades. Separate boards license plumbing, electrical, HVAC, gas fitting, and asbestos trades.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Northern Virginia Building Industry Association
    Local # 4840
    3901 Centerview Dr Suite E
    Chantilly, VA 20151

    Ashburn Virginia Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    The Top of Virginia Builders Association
    Local # 4883
    1182 Martinsburg Pike
    Winchester, VA 22603

    Ashburn Virginia Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Shenandoah Valley Builders Association
    Local # 4848
    PO Box 1286
    Harrisonburg, VA 22803

    Ashburn Virginia Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Piedmont Virginia Building Industry Association
    Local # 4890
    PO Box 897
    Culpeper, VA 22701

    Ashburn Virginia Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Fredericksburg Area Builders Association
    Local # 4830
    3006 Lafayette Blvd
    Fredericksburg, VA 22408

    Ashburn Virginia Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Augusta Home Builders Association Inc
    Local # 4804
    PO Box 36
    Waynesboro, VA 22980

    Ashburn Virginia Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Blue Ridge Home Builders Association
    Local # 4809
    PO Box 7743
    Charlottesville, VA 22906

    Ashburn Virginia Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Ashburn Virginia


    The NAR asks FAA to Amend their Drone Rules for Real Estate Use

    Steel-Fiber Concrete Link Beams Perform Well in Tests

    Faulty Workmanship an Occurrence in Iowa – as Long as Other Property Damage is Involved

    Collapse of Improperly Built Deck Not An Occurrence

    The New “White Collar” Exemption Regulations

    Fire Tests Inspire More Robust Timber Product Standard

    Highest Building Levels in Six Years in Southeast Michigan

    California Pipeline Disaster Brings More Scandal for PG&E

    One World Trade Center Tallest Building in US

    Colorado Chamber of Commerce CEO Calls for Change to Condo Defect Law

    Affordable Global Housing Will Cost $11 Trillion

    NY Attorney General to Propose Bill Requiring Climate Adaptation for Utilities

    Exponential Acceleration—Interview with Anders Hvid

    Whitney Stefko Named to ENR’s Top Young Professionals, formerly ENR’s Top 20 Under 40, in California

    OSHA Issues New Rules on Injury Record Keeping

    Ten Firm Members Recognized as Super Lawyers or Rising Stars

    Builders Seek to Modify Scaffold Law

    Domtar Update

    The ‘Sole Option’ Arbitration Provision in Construction Contracts

    Leaning San Francisco Tower Seen Sinking From Space

    Anti-Concurrent, Anti-Sequential Causation Clause Precludes Coverage

    California Contractor License Bonds to Increase in 2016

    The General Assembly Seems Ready to Provide Some Consistency in Mechanic’s Lien Waiver

    Contract Change #8: Direct Communications between Owners and Contractors (law note)

    U.S. Firm Helps Thais to Pump Water From Cave to Save Boys

    Contract Terms Can Impact the Accrual Date For Florida’s Statute of Repose

    July Sees Big Drop in Home Sales

    Primer Debuts on Life-Cycle Assessments of Embodied Carbon in Buildings

    Changes to Pennsylvania Mechanic’s Lien Code

    Toll Brothers Climbs After Builder Reports Higher Sales

    FAA Seeks Largest Fine Yet on Drones in Near-Miss Crackdown

    Business Interruption Claim Upheld

    County Officials Refute Resident’s Statement that Defect Repairs Improper

    California Supreme Court Clarifies Deadline to File Anti-SLAPP Motions in Light of Amended Pleadings

    Ambiguity in Insurance Policy will be Interpreted in Favor of Insurance Coverage

    Construction Delayed by Discovery of Bones

    Subsurface Water Exclusion Found Unambiguous

    Jean Nouvel’s NYC ‘Vision Machine’ Sued Over Construction Defects

    Federal Court Predicts Coverage In Nevada for Damage Caused by Faulty Workmanship

    Stucco Contractor Trying to Limit Communication in Construction Defect Case

    Drones Used Despite Uncertain Legal Consequences

    Home Sales Going to Investors in Daytona Beach Area

    Condo Owners Allege Construction Defects

    Women Make Slow Entry into Building Trades

    Faulty Workmanship Causing Damage to Other Property Covered as Construction Defect

    How the Election Could Affect the Housing Industry: Steven Cvitanovic Authors Construction Today Article

    Can General Contractors Make Subcontractors Pay for OSHA Violations?

    Construction Litigation—Battles on Many Fronts

    New Jersey Supreme Court Hears Arguments on Coverage Gap Dispute

    Contractor's Agreement to Perform Does Not Preclude Coverage Under Contractual Liability Exclusion
    Corporate Profile

    ASHBURN VIRGINIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 5500 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Ashburn, Virginia Construction Expert Witness Group provides a wide range of trial support and consulting services to Ashburn's most acknowledged construction practice groups, CGL carriers, builders, owners, and public agencies. Drawing from a diverse pool of construction and design professionals, BHA is able to simultaneously analyze complex claims from the perspective of design, engineering, cost, or standard of care.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Ashburn, Virginia

    EPC Contractors Procuring from Foreign Companies need to Reconsider their Contracts

    July 18, 2018 —
    A recent California case may force engineering, procurement and construction companies doing business with foreign suppliers to reconsider—and maybe rewrite—their contracts. In Rockefeller Technology Investments (Asia) VII v. Changzhou SinoType Technology Co., Ltd., the California Court of Appeal held that parties may not contract around the formal service requirements of the Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents, commonly referred to as the Hague Service Convention. The decision could have profound implications for international business. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Hwan Kim, Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
    Mr. Kim may be contacted at hkim@sheppardmullin.com

    The Top 10 Changes to the AIA A201: What You Need to Know

    May 24, 2018 —
    For this week’s Guest Post Friday here at Musings, we welcome back Melissa Dewey Brumback. Melissa is a construction law attorney with Ragsdale Liggett in Raleigh, North Carolina. Aside from the fact that she is a UNC grad and fan, she’s okay! In 2017, as it does every ten years, the American Institute of Architects (AIA) updated most of its standard form contract documents, including the A201 General Conditions. This cycle, the contract changes are evolutionary in nature, not revolutionary. Even so, it is crucial to know the changes to avoid making a fatal mistake that could cost you money on a construction project. In reverse order, the top 10 changes you need to know include: # 10: Differing Site Conditions Prior editions of the A201 provided that upon encountering differing site conditions, the Contractor was to promptly provide notice to the Owner and Architect, before the conditions are disturbed, and in no event later than 21 days after the conditions were first observed. A201–2017 shortens the time for notice from 21 to 14 days. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Christopher G. Hill, The Law Office of Christopher G. Hill
    Mr. Hill may be contacted at chrisghill@constructionlawva.com

    California Supreme Court Clarifies Deadline to File Anti-SLAPP Motions in Light of Amended Pleadings

    July 02, 2018 —
    California’s “anti-SLAPP” (“SLAPP” is an acronym for strategic lawsuit against public participation) statute—codified at California Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16 et seq.—is the primary vehicle for defending against any action involving petitioning or free speech. The statute was designed to provide an early and fast summary judgment-like procedure to allow defendants and cross-defendants to file a motion to dismiss either an entire complaint, specific causes of action, or even just portions of a cause of action, and to require the plaintiff to respond before conducting discovery. By facilitating an early challenge to a plaintiff or cross-complainant’s claims, the anti-SLAPP statute allows the responding party to avoid the costs and delay that chill the exercise of constitutionally protected rights. Under California Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16(f), an anti-SLAPP motion must be filed “within 60 days of the service of the complaint . . . .” But what if the plaintiff files an ameded complaint? In Newport Harbor Ventures, LLC v. Morris Cerullo World Evangelism (2018) 4 Cal.5th 637, the California Supreme Court held that the 60-day timeline runs from the date a complaint is filed with the cause(s) of action challenged in the anti-SLAPP motion. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tony Carucci, Snell & Wilmer
    Mr. Carucci may be contacted at acarucci@swlaw.com

    As Evidence Grows, Regions Prepare for Sea Level Rise

    July 02, 2018 —
    Cities, states and regions are taking steps to prepare their buildings, infrastructure and homes for the impacts of climate change as bad news continues to mount about rising sea levels. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Pam Radtke Russell, ENR
    Ms. Russell may be contacted at Russellp@bnpmedia.com

    Ohio Supreme Court Case to Decide Whether or Not to Expand Insurance Coverage Under GC’s CGL Insurance Policies

    August 14, 2018 —
    According to W. Matthew Bryant of Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr LLP, the Ohio Supreme Court will be deciding whether or not a general contractor's commercial general liability ("CGL") insurance policy may provide coverage for damage caused by a subcontractor's defective construction work. Bryant explained the status quo in Ohio: “Since 2012, Ohio has followed the rule that a CGL policy would not cover damage caused by a contractor to the contractor's own work.” That could change depending on how the Ohio Supreme Court rules in an upcoming case: “The Ohio Supreme Court will decide whether to affirm or overturn Ohio Northern University v. Charles Construction Services, Inc., 77 N.E.3d 538 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017) ("ONU"), an Ohio Court of Appeals decision holding that CGL coverage may exist for property damage caused by faulty work performed by the subcontractor of an insured general contractor.” Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    Investigators Eye Fiber Optic Work in Deadly Wisconsin Explosion

    July 18, 2018 —
    A hole punched into a 4-in.-dia gas pipeline during fiber-optic line laying is blamed for an explosion that killed a 34-year-old fire captain and injured nine other people, including four firefighters, in downtown Sun Prairie, Wis., on July 10. The injured were treated at nearby hospitals and have since been released. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Jeff Yoders, ENR
    Mr. Yoders may be contacted at yodersj@enr.com

    U.S. Homeowners Are Lingering Longer, and the Wait Is Paying Off

    July 28, 2018 —
    Homeowners in the U.S. are holding on to their houses longer than they have in at least 18 years, and when they do sell, they’re reaping gains that haven’t been seen since before the housing crisis. Those who sold in the second quarter did so after owning their homes for an average of 8.09 years, the longest stretch since Attom Data Solutions started tracking the statistic in 2000. The wait appears to be paying off: Second-quarter sellers recorded gains averaging $58,000 -- the most since the third quarter of 2007. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Jeremy Hill, Bloomberg

    What Types of “Damages Claims” Survive a Trustee’s Sale?

    February 28, 2018 —
    Introduction Arizona’s trustee’s sale statutory scheme provides for the waiver of all defenses and objections to a trustee’s sale that: (i) are not raised prior to the sale, and (ii) do not result in an injunction against the sale going forward. See A.R.S. § 33-811(C). In other words, if you have an objection to a trustee’s sale, you must seek and obtain an injunction prior to the sale or your objection will be waived. Arizona’s Court of Appeals previously held that notwithstanding this statutory waiver, “common law” defenses to repayment of the debt survive a non-judicial foreclosure even in the absence of an injunction prior to the sale. See Morgan AZ Financial, L.L.C. v. Gotses, 235 Ariz. 21, 326 P.3d 288 (Ct. App. 2014). Our analysis of the Morgan decision can be found here. In Zubia v. Shapiro, 243 Ariz. 412, 408 P.3d 1248 (2018), the Arizona Supreme Court revisited the issue of what claims survive a trustee’s sale, and clarified that if a person fails to enjoin a trustee’s sale prior to its occurrence, then that person waives any and all damages claims dependent upon a trustee’s sale. That person does not, however, waive damages claims that are independent of the sale. Thus, determining what types of claims are “dependent” versus “independent” of a trustee’s sale is of critical importance to lenders and borrowers alike. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Ben Reeves, Snell & Wilmer
    Mr. Reeves may be contacted at breeves@swlaw.com