BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    landscaping construction expert witness Greenford Ohio condominiums expert witness Greenford Ohio parking structure expert witness Greenford Ohio production housing expert witness Greenford Ohio hospital construction expert witness Greenford Ohio mid-rise construction expert witness Greenford Ohio concrete tilt-up expert witness Greenford Ohio industrial building expert witness Greenford Ohio casino resort expert witness Greenford Ohio custom home expert witness Greenford Ohio low-income housing expert witness Greenford Ohio condominium expert witness Greenford Ohio multi family housing expert witness Greenford Ohio high-rise construction expert witness Greenford Ohio office building expert witness Greenford Ohio tract home expert witness Greenford Ohio housing expert witness Greenford Ohio townhome construction expert witness Greenford Ohio Medical building expert witness Greenford Ohio retail construction expert witness Greenford Ohio Subterranean parking expert witness Greenford Ohio institutional building expert witness Greenford Ohio
    Greenford Ohio consulting engineersGreenford Ohio roofing construction expertGreenford Ohio eifs expert witnessGreenford Ohio construction scheduling and change order evaluation expert witnessGreenford Ohio construction expert witnessGreenford Ohio expert witness roofingGreenford Ohio architectural expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Greenford, Ohio

    Ohio Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: According to HB 175, Chptr 1312, for a homebuilder to qualify for right to repair protection, the contractor must notify consumers (in writing) of NOR laws at the time of sale; The law stipulates written notice of defects required itemizing and describing and including documentation prepared by inspector. A contractor has 21 days to respond in writing.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Greenford Ohio

    Licensing is done at the local level. Licenses required for plumbing, electrical, HVAC, heating, and hydronics trades.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Building Industry Association of Stark County
    Local # 3615
    4344 Metro Cir NW
    North Canton, OH 44720

    Greenford Ohio Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Hancock County
    Local # 3639
    9811 Smokies Way
    Findlay, OH 45840

    Greenford Ohio Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Portage & Summit Counties
    Local # 3603
    799 White Pond Drive
    Akron, OH 44320

    Greenford Ohio Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Wayne and Holmes Cos
    Local # 3690
    4973 Cleveland Rd Suite A
    Wooster, OH 44691

    Greenford Ohio Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Mahoning Valley
    Local # 3689
    5121 Mahoning Ave
    Youngstown, OH 44515

    Greenford Ohio Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Seneca County Home Builders Association
    Local # 3671
    PO Box 712
    Tiffin, OH 44883
    Greenford Ohio Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Medina County Home Builders Association
    Local # 3655
    4081 N Jefferson St
    Medina, OH 44256

    Greenford Ohio Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Greenford Ohio


    Quanta Asks Judge to Block Award of $400M Long Island, NY Grid Contract to PSEG

    Is The Enforceability Of A No-Damage-For-Delay Provision Inappropriate For Summary Judgment

    Home-Building Climate Warms in U.S. as Weather Funk Lifts

    New York City Council’s Carbon Emissions Regulation Opposed by Real Estate Board

    Killer Subcontract Provisions

    Court Finds That $400 Million Paid Into Abatement Fund Qualifies as “Damages” Under the Insured’s Policies

    Maryland Contractor Documents its Illegal Deal and Pays $2.15 Million to Settle Fraud Claims

    Turning Expert Services into Products

    Pennsylvania: Searching Questions Ahead of Oral Argument in Domtar

    Janeen Thomas Installed as State Director of WWBA, Receives First Ever President’s Award

    Poor Record Keeping = Going to the Poor House (or, why project documentation matters)

    Corporate Formalities: A Necessary Part of Business

    Colorado Court of Appeals’ Ruling Highlights Dangers of Excessive Public Works Claims

    Improper Classification Under Davis Bacon Can Be Costly

    OSHA Issues Fines for Fatal Building Collapse in Philadelphia

    Louisiana State Legislature 2025 Regular Session: Tort Reform - Acts & Vetoed Insurance Bill

    Judge Halts Sale of Brazilian Plywood

    Look Out! Texas Building Shedding Marble Panels

    Faulty Workmanship may be an Occurrence in Indiana CGL Policies

    Celebrating 29 Years – Thank You for Your Continued Trust!

    Fifth Circuit Reverses Insurers’ Summary Judgment Award Based on "Your Work" Exclusion

    New California "Construction" Legislation

    GRSM Defeats Class Certification in Precedent-Setting HOA Management Case

    Navigating Casualty Challenges and Opportunities

    Showdown Over Landmark Housing Law Looms at U.S. Supreme Court

    Real Estate & Construction News Round-Up (12/07/22) – Home Sales, EV Charging Infrastructure, and Office Occupancy

    Gibbs Giden is Pleased to Announce Four New Partners and Two New Associates

    U.S. Judge Says Wal-Mart Must Face Mexican-Bribe Claims

    Wildfire Insurance Coverage Series, Part 6: Ensuring Availability of Insurance and State Regulations

    99-Year-Old Transmission Tower Seen as Possible Cause of Devastating Calif. Wildfire

    Unpredictable Opinion Regarding Construction Lien (Reinstatement??)

    Breach of a Construction Contract & An Equitable Remedy?

    Conflicts of Laws, Deficiency Actions, and Statutes of Limitations – Oh My!

    Construction Activity on the Upswing

    Texas Public Procurements: What Changed on September 1, 2017? a/k/a: When is the Use of E-Verify Required?

    Construction Lien Waiver Provisions Contractors Should Be Using

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “Sudden Death”

    Nancy Conrad to Serve as President of the Pennsylvania Bar Association

    Governmental Immunity Waived for Independent Contractor - Lopez v. City of Grand Junction

    Document Everything! Always! No Exceptions! (AKA, Help Your Lawyer Help You!)

    White and Williams Celebrates 125th Anniversary

    Arizona Rooftop Safety: Is it Adequate or Substandard?

    Newark Trial Team Defends “No Cause” With Appellate Affirmance Of 2023 Jury Verdict

    Association Bound by Arbitration Provision in Purchase-And-Sale Contracts and Deeds

    Three Reasons Late Payments Persist in the Construction Industry

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (7/23/25) – Builders Look for Startups, AI Transforms Real Estate and Interest Rates Stall Construction Momentum

    Major Change to Residential Landlord Tenant Law

    Coverage for Faulty Workmanship Denied

    Who Is To Blame For Defective — And Still LEED Certified — Courthouse Square?

    Is an Initial Decision Maker, Project Neutral, or Dispute Resolution Board Right for You?
    Corporate Profile

    GREENFORD OHIO CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 7,000 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Greenford, Ohio Construction Expert Witness Group provides a wide range of trial support and consulting services to Greenford's most acknowledged construction practice groups, CGL carriers, builders, owners, and public agencies. Drawing from a diverse pool of construction and design professionals, BHA is able to simultaneously analyze complex claims from the perspective of design, engineering, cost, or standard of care.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Greenford, Ohio

    Miller Act Payment Bond Claim “No Nos!”

    October 06, 2026 —
    A recent federal district court opinion, Sauer Construction, LLC v. United Structures of Georgia, LLC, 2026 WL 2522849 (M.D.Fla. 2026), addressed two worthy considerations when it comes to a Miller Act payment bond claim. And, when I am talking about considerations, I am really talking about “no-nos.” These are things you don’t do. First, don’t file an untimely Miller Act payment bond lawsuit. Make sure, as a claimant, you file that lawsuit within one year from your final furnishing. In this case, the subcontractor claimant did not and tried to argue around the statute of limitations with an equitable tolling argument, i.e., that the statute of limitations should be equitably tolled to accommodate the late filing of the lawsuit. Guess what? The subcontractor was not successful. You are fighting an uphill (losing) battle when arguing equitable tolling because “traditional equitable tolling principles require that the claimant demonstrate extraordinary circumstances, such as fraud, misinformation, or deliberate concealment.” Sauer Construction, supra. This means you need ultra-persuasive evidence to support such equitable tolling principles. Actually, having this evidence is doubtful. Thus, timely file the Miller Act payment bond lawsuit. There is no legitimate reason not to. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    In-House Insight at CSC

    October 26, 2026 —
    Elaine Y. Lee, Partner in P&A’s Los Angeles office, sat down with Third Thursday to discuss effective collaboration with in-house counsel, strategies for resolving construction disputes, and the factors that can help determine the best path forward. This discussion previews her upcoming Construction Super Conference panel, “Same But Different: How In-House Legal Teams Vary in Approach, Role, and Decision-Making,” on December 2nd. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Elaine Y. Lee, Peckar & Abramson, P.C.
    Ms. Lee may be contacted at elee@pecklaw.com

    Understanding the EPA’s Latest Proposed Drinking Water Contaminant Monitoring Rule, Published in Law360

    September 01, 2026 —
    The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) proposed Sixth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule (UCMR 6) represents another step in the federal government’s ongoing effort to identify and evaluate emerging contaminants in drinking water. The proposal would require certain public water systems to monitor and report on 30 unregulated drinking water contaminants from 2028 through 2030, while generating occurrence data that could inform future regulation and affect environmental, commercial, litigation and risk assessments. In an article published by Law360, Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani Senior Counsel, Ayodeji Ayolola, analyzes the scope and practical implications of UCMR 6, including the contaminants selected, the proposed monitoring requirements for public water systems, and the EPA’s continued focus on PFAS and related organofluorine compounds. The article also touches upon the potential significance of publicly available monitoring data for businesses and property stakeholders. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    Federal Court Strikes Down New York’s Climate Superfund Act: What It Means for the “Polluter Pays” Movement

    September 28, 2026 —
    A federal judge in the Northern District of New York has struck down New York’s Climate Change Superfund Act, ruling that the “polluter pays” climate law is preempted by federal law and “simply beyond the limits of state law.” The court concluded that the Clean Air Act (CAA) does not authorize New York’s compensation scheme, which calculates liability based on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions attributable to worldwide fossil fuel extraction and refining. It separately held that any cost-recovery demand against a foreign producer would be preempted under the constitutional foreign affairs doctrine, which limits state intrusion into matters committed predominantly to the federal government. The court directed the parties to file a status report by September 14, leaving the form of further relief unresolved. In practical terms, the court has decided that the Act is preempted and cannot be enforced but has not yet determined the precise terms of its final order, including whether to formally enjoin its enforcement. The decision in West Virginia v. James, Case No. 1:25-cv-00168 (N.D.N.Y. Aug. 31, 2026), issued by Chief U.S. District Judge Brenda K. Sannes, who was appointed by President Obama, marks the first judicial invalidation of a state climate superfund statute and carries significant implications for the climate superfund landscape and the three remaining lawsuits challenging these laws. Reprinted courtesy of Amanda G. Halter, Pillsbury, Ashleigh K. Myers, Pillsbury and Jillian Marullo, Pillsbury Ms. Halter may be contacted at amanda.halter@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Myers may be contacted at ashleigh.myers@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Marullo may be contacted at jillian.marullo@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    Special Counsel Lorelie (Lorie) Masters Appointed Chair of the ABA’s Commission on Women in the Profession

    October 06, 2026 —
    Special counsel Lorelie (Lorie) Masters was recently appointed as the chair of the American Bar Association’s Commission on Women in the Profession. Established in 1987, the Commission was created to assess the status of women in the legal sector and remove barriers to their professional advancement. As chair, Lorie will lead a 12-member roster of commissioners, and a panel of special advisers, dedicated to ensuring equal participation and systemic equity for women lawyers across the justice system and pursuing various studies to identify issues uniquely facing women in the profession, including disparate treatment, training and recruitment, parenting, and other issues. Most recently, the Commission in late July 2026 issued a groundbreaking study about issues affecting the mental health and well-being of women lawyers. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP

    New York Orders Moratorium on Large Data Center Permits

    July 27, 2026 —
    Levi W. Barrett, Co-Managing Partner of Peckar & Abramson’s New Jersey office, Co-Chair of the firm’s Construction Contracts & Risk Management team, and Executive Committee Member, was recently quoted in “New York Orders Moratorium on Large Data Center Permits,” an article written by Engineering News-Record (ENR). The article examines New York Governor Kathy Hochul’s executive order temporarily halting state environmental permit reviews for certain large-scale data center projects while regulators develop a comprehensive framework to address the sector’s energy demands, water consumption, environmental impacts, and effects on local communities. It also explores the broader implications of the moratorium for developers, contractors, investors, and other stakeholders, as well as the ongoing debate between economic development, AI-driven infrastructure growth, and environmental and utility ratepayer concerns. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Levi W. Barrett, Peckar & Abramson, P.C.
    Mr. Barrett may be contacted at lbarrett@pecklaw.com

    Generic Complaint Alleging Bad Faith is Insufficient

    August 24, 2026 —
    The federal district court granted the insurer’s motion for judgment on the pleadings after determining that the insured’s claims for bad faith and unfair claims settlement practices were insufficiently pled. Navia v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 111261 (W.D. N. C. May 20, 2026). The insured submitted a claim for damages to real property owned by the insured allegedly caused by Hurricane Helene. State Farm advised the insured that only some of the claimed damages were covered by the policy and payment for such damages were denied because the estimate for the covered damages did not exceed the policy’s deductible. The insured sued asserting claims for breach of contract, bad faith, and unfair claim settlement practices. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    A Nuclear Power Hangover: Controversies Plague New York's Indian Point Plant Cleanup

    November 02, 2026 —
    Michael Tromblee was in for a late night. Of the many after-business-hour duties he performs as superintendent of the Hendrik Hudson school district about 25 miles north of New York City, attending meetings of a board overseeing cleanup of the Indian Point nuclear power plant, located in Buchanan, N.Y., was an infrequent but necessary chore. Since the plant shut down in 2021 and gradually stopped paying taxes to support the school district's students, between one-fourth and one-third of its annual budget funding vanished, and state transitional funds provided to bridge that gap will expire after the 2027-28 school year. Last year, Tromblee described the lost power plant tax revenue, about $25 million annually, as “a financial hit that no school district is built to withstand.” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Richard Korman, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Korman may be contacted at kormanr@enr.com