BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    concrete tilt-up expert witness Shubert Nebraska low-income housing expert witness Shubert Nebraska Subterranean parking expert witness Shubert Nebraska office building expert witness Shubert Nebraska custom homes expert witness Shubert Nebraska production housing expert witness Shubert Nebraska housing expert witness Shubert Nebraska townhome construction expert witness Shubert Nebraska institutional building expert witness Shubert Nebraska hospital construction expert witness Shubert Nebraska high-rise construction expert witness Shubert Nebraska parking structure expert witness Shubert Nebraska casino resort expert witness Shubert Nebraska Medical building expert witness Shubert Nebraska mid-rise construction expert witness Shubert Nebraska industrial building expert witness Shubert Nebraska condominium expert witness Shubert Nebraska tract home expert witness Shubert Nebraska multi family housing expert witness Shubert Nebraska condominiums expert witness Shubert Nebraska landscaping construction expert witness Shubert Nebraska structural steel construction expert witness Shubert Nebraska
    Shubert Nebraska concrete expert witnessShubert Nebraska roofing construction expertShubert Nebraska window expert witnessShubert Nebraska construction claims expert witnessShubert Nebraska delay claim expert witnessShubert Nebraska construction defect expert witnessShubert Nebraska structural engineering expert witnesses
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Shubert, Nebraska

    Nebraska Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Actions alleging a breach of warranty and construction defect are governed by a four-year statute of limitations (which may be extended by two years if the cause of action is not or could not reasonably have been discovered within the four-year period) and a ten-year statute of repose for latent defects.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Shubert Nebraska

    Businesses must register with the Secretary of State. No state license is required for general contracting, however, local licensure is needed in counties with populations over 100,000. Licensure is required for the electrical trade.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Lincoln
    Local # 2836
    6100 S 58th St Ste C
    Lincoln, NE 68516

    Shubert Nebraska Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    West Central Nebraska Home Builders Association
    Local # 2897
    5817 Ave O Place
    Kearney, NE 68847
    Shubert Nebraska Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Nebraska State Home Builders Association
    Local # 2800
    PO Box 22375
    Lincoln, NE 68542

    Shubert Nebraska Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Central Nebraska Home Builders Association
    Local # 2818
    131 North Grace
    Grand Island, NE 68803
    Shubert Nebraska Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    North Platte Chapter
    Local # 2854
    PO Box 146
    North Platte, NE 69103
    Shubert Nebraska Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Metro Omaha Builders Assn
    Local # 2872
    4141 N 156th Street Ste 100
    Omaha, NE 68116

    Shubert Nebraska Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Columbus Home Builders Association
    Local # 2805
    3121 39th St
    Columbus, NE 68601
    Shubert Nebraska Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Shubert Nebraska


    2021 Real Estate Trends: New Year, New Reality—A Day of Reckoning for Borrowers and Tenants

    Freddie Mac Eases Mortgage Rules to Limit Putbacks

    Contractor Sues Construction Defect Claimants for Defamation

    Housing Isn’t Expensive for Everyone

    Read Her Lips: “No New Buildings”

    Alabama Supreme Court Finds No Coverage for Construction Defect to Contractor's own Product

    Non-compliance With Endorsement Means No Indemnity Coverage

    Jury Instruction That Fails to Utilize Concurrent Cause for Property Loss is Erroneous

    Courts Favor Arbitration in Two Recent Construction Dispute Cases

    Connecticut Civil Engineers Give the State's Infrastructure a "C" Grade

    Navigating Turbulent Waters Ashore: Insurance Lessons from a Navy Project Dispute

    Techniques for Resolving Construction Disputes

    Green Buildings Could Lead to Liabilities

    Manhattan Bargain: Condos for Less Than $3 Million

    Owners Bound by Arbitration Clause on Roofing Shingles Packaging

    Colorado Finally Corrects Thirty-Year Old Flaw in Construction Defect Statute of Repose

    Legal Matters Escalate in Aspen Condo Case

    Fourth Circuit Rejects Application of Wrap-Up Exclusion to Additional Insured

    CC&Rs Not the Place for Arbitration Agreement, Court Rules

    Checking the Status of your Contractor License During Contract Work is a Necessity: The Expanded “Substantial Compliance” under B&P 7031 is Here

    Hawaii Supreme Court Paves the Way for Maui Fire Settlement to Proceed

    US Court Questions 102-Mile Transmission Project Over River Crossing

    California Contractor License Bonds to Increase in 2016

    Does Stricter Decertification Mean More “Leedigation?”

    Sick Leave, Paid Time Off, and the Families First Coronavirus Response Act

    Design Immunity Does Not Shield Public Entity From Claim That it Failed to Warn of a Dangerous Condition

    Truck Hits Warning Beam That Falls, Kills Motorist at Las Vegas Bridge Project

    Understanding the Miller Act

    Arizona Court of Appeals Awards Attorneys’ Fees in Quiet-Title Action

    Quick Note: Submitting Civil Remedy Notice

    New York Developers Facing Construction Defect Lawsuit

    Never, Ever, Ever Assume! (Or, How a Stuck Shoe is Like a Construction Project Assumption)

    UPDATE: ACS Obtains Additional $13.6 Million for General Contractor Client After $19.2 Million Jury Trial Victory

    Hospital Settles Lawsuit over Construction Problems

    The Construction Lawyer as Problem Solver

    Contract Void Ab Initio: Key Insights into the KBR vs. Corps of Engineers Affirmative Defense

    Zetlin & De Chiara Ranked in the Top Tier for Construction Law by Legal 500 USA

    Sold Signs Fill Builder Lots as U.S. Confidence Rises: Economy

    House Bill Clarifies Start Point for Florida’s Statute of Repose

    Georgia Court of Appeals Upholds Denial of Coverage Because Insurance Broker Lacked Agency to Accept Premium Payment

    New York Revises Retainage Requirements for Private Construction Contracts: Overview of the “5% Retainage Law”

    Florida Federal Court Reinforces Principle That Precise Policy Language Is Required Before An Insurer Can Deny Coverage Based On An Exclusion

    Hiring Subcontractors with Workers Compensation Insurance

    Court of Appeals Finds Arbitration Provision Incorporated by Reference Unenforceable

    Blindly Relying on Public Adjuster or Loss Consultant’s False Estimate Can Play Out Badly

    New Jersey/New York “Occurrence”

    California’s High Speed Rail Project. Are We Done With the Drama?

    Mortgagors Seek Coverage Under Mortgagee's Policy

    Vallagio v. Metropolitan Homes: Colorado Supreme Court Upholds Declarant Consent Provision to Amend Arbitration Out of Declarations

    Florida Courts Say that Developers Are Responsible for Flooding
    Corporate Profile

    SHUBERT NEBRASKA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Shubert, Nebraska Construction Expert Witness Group is comprised from a number of credentialed construction professionals possessing extensive trial support experience relevant to construction defect and claims matters. Leveraging from more than 25 years experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to the nation's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, Fortune 500 builders, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, and a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Shubert, Nebraska

    Kahana Feld Announces Key Partner Additions Coast to Coast

    June 22, 2026 —
    IRVINE, CA – June 10, 2026 – Kahana Feld is pleased to announce Yvette Davis, Evan Kalooky, Beth Obra-White, Sean Paden, Michael Parme, Jeffrey Schmid, and Julieanne Yanez have joined the firm as partners. Four of these partners are joining the San Diego office, which further strengthens the firm’s General Liability and Construction Litigation practices and enhances Kahana Feld’s ability to serve clients across a broad range of complex matters in the region. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Kahana Feld

    Inaccurate Representations Can Lead to Differing Site Conditions Claim

    May 26, 2026 —
    In the prior posting, I discussed a case dealing with a differing site condition. In that case, the owner did not have an affirmative duty to make a representation and there was no inaccurate representation made by the owner that misled the contractor. Well, what about when there is an inaccurate misrepresentation regarding the site? This was the circumstance in an older Florida case where a dredging contractor had a successful differing site conditions claim. See Jacksonville Port Authority v. Parkhill-Goodloe, Co., Inc., 362 So.2d 1009 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). The government provided inaccurate information as to the lack of rock that would be encountered during the dredging that was relied on by the dredging contractor. But the government had “superior knowledge” that there was rock in an adjacent location based on a prior claim from a contractor, yet the government did not disclose the possibility that rock could be encountered. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    The Firm Turns 16!

    July 20, 2026 —
    I have always found it appropriate that my jump to solo practice and Independence Day are so close in time. Today marks the 16th anniversary of my first day as a solo practitioner of construction law at The Law Office of Christopher G. Hill, PC. Time sure has flown by thanks to the great clients and friends who followed me to solo practice and whom I have met since the firm’s founding on July 1, 2010. I also could not have made the transition and had the fun and success I have enjoyed over the past 16 years without the support of the best wife and family that any construction lawyer could want. Since the firm’s last anniversary, my youngest child (who was 7 when this journey began!) has graduated from N. C. State University with a fisheries and wildlife biology degree and is currently in Casper, Wyoming working for Wyoming Game & Fish, my second oldest is an assistant director of admissions at Appalachian State University in Boone, NC, and has celebrated his second wedding anniversary, and my oldest has celebrated her fifth marriage anniversary. Our home in Captiva, Florida continues its recovery from from Hurricane Ian and subsequent hurricanes. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of The Law Office of Christopher G. Hill

    Samuel Alhadeff Represents LGI Homes in Acquisition and Re-Entitlement of Maravilla Estates

    July 06, 2026 —
    Temecula Partner Samuel Alhadeff recently represented LGI Homes in its acquisition and re-entitlement of Maravilla Estates, a 169-lot active adult community located in San Jacinto, California. The acquisition and re-entitlement of the project provide LGI Homes with the opportunity to deliver much-needed age-qualified housing in one of Riverside County's growing residential markets. The community includes a recorded final map and finished lots, as well as future development inventory and planned amenities, positioning the project for continued development and completion. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (8/12/26) – Data Center Momentum Increases, Multifamily Construction Projects Decline, CRE Returns as Top Investor Preference

    September 01, 2026 —
    In our latest roundup, office vacancies fall, fair housing advocacy groups sue HUD, foreign buyers reduce purchases of U.S. residential real estate, and more!
    • After a brief slowdown to begin the summer, data center construction planning momentum picked up in July, again shining as the brightest sector in building. (Zachary Phillips, Construction Dive)
    • The number of finished multifamily construction projects declined last year — welcome news for multifamily operators eager to work through the recent supply wave — and a record share of new apartments were high-density. (Julie Strupp, Multifamily Dive)
    • Fair housing advocacy groups sued the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, claiming the agency’s funding restructuring drastically reduces their ability to receive funds from the Fair Housing Initiatives Program. (Ryan Kushner, Multifamily Dive)
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Pillsbury's Construction & Real Estate Law Team

    Every High-Tech Building Has Many Lifespans

    August 16, 2026 —
    When I worked as an architect, our team designed a laboratory for fuel research. The facility included a large research hall where various boilers and other devices were tested and analyzed. The setup required extensive floor channeling under the thick concrete floor. We suggested building a modular system that would allow flexibility in the future, when requirements would certainly change. They did not want that because of budget constraints. The high-tech construction trend is spreading. Data centers, semiconductor fabs, battery plants, and life science facilities share one property that sets them apart from ordinary buildings. The technology inside turns over faster than the structure around it. Server generations change every three to five years. Rack densities have risen from 10 or 20 kW to 130 kW and beyond in just a few years. A high-tech facility is really several buildings with different lifespans inside one envelope, and we keep designing them as if they were one. The failure is not that things become obsolete. It is that we never say when each layer is expected to. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    The AI Knows Too Much: When Employees Feed Trade Secrets into Generative AI Tools

    April 14, 2026 —
    Every time an employee pastes proprietary source code, a customer list, or a confidential business strategy into ChatGPT, Claude, or Google Gemini, they may be quietly dismantling the legal protections that make those secrets worth protecting. Courts and regulators are only beginning to grapple with this problem, and right now, the burden of preventing it falls squarely on employers. The Legal Stakes Under the federal Defend Trade Secrets Act (“DTSA”) and the Uniform Trade Secrets Act (“UTSA”) as adopted across most states, a trade secret plaintiff must show that the information at issue was subject to reasonable measures to maintain its secrecy. Courts have historically credited measures like confidentiality agreements, physical access controls, and employee training—but those safeguards were designed for a world of thumb drives and disgruntled employees. They were not built for a world where a well-meaning engineer can, in seconds, transmit an entire corpus of proprietary data to a third-party AI platform operating under terms of service that may permit the provider to use inputs for model training. Reprinted courtesy of Kazim A. Naqvi, Sheppard and John V. Mysliwiec, Sheppard Mr. Naqvi may be contacted at knaqvi@sheppard.com Mr. Mysliwiec may be contacted at jmysliwiec@sheppard.com Read the full story...

    Project Labor Agreements: A New Bid Protest Forum Split

    May 14, 2026 —
    Advertisements often include a disclaimer: “individual results may vary.” Similarly, lawyers are notorious for saying “it depends.” The mandatory Project Labor Agreement (“PLA”) regulations have recently placed into context this adage as it applies to federal contract bid protests, with very different results depending on which forum – the Court of Federal Claims (“COFC”) versus the Government Accountability Office (“GAO”) – different contractors have selected to bring PLA bid protests. Over the last two years, over 30 protesters have successfully achieved removal of mandatory PLAs from large-scale federal construction contracts based on two landmark bid protest decisions issued by the COFC. Similar challenges to PLAs at the GAO, however, have not been successful in removing PLAs, highlighting an emerging trend that the COFC is often a more effective relief forum than GAO for government construction contractors. Reprinted courtesy of Dirk D. Haire, Burr & Forman LLP, David P.J. Timm, Burr & Forman LLP and Michael J. Brewer, Burr & Forman LLP Mr. Haire may be contacted at dhaire@burr.com Mr. Timm may be contacted at dtimm@burr.com Mr. Brewer may be contacted at mbrewer@burr.com Read the full story...