New Jersey Court Upholds Registration Requirement for Joint Ventures Bidding on Public Works Contracts
December 16, 2023 —
Nicholas J. Zaita & Brian Glicos - Peckar & Abramson, P.C.Introduction
In a matter of “first impression,” on November 30, 2023, the Appellate Division affirmed the New Jersey Superior Court decision in
Ernest Bock & Sons-Dobco Pennsauken Joint Venture v. Township of Pennsauken and Terminal Construction Corp., finding that the New Jersey Public Works Contractor Registration Act, N.J.S.A. 34:11-56.48 to -56.57 (“PWCRA” or the “Act”), applies to a joint venture formed for the sole purpose of bidding on a public works contract. Therefore, the Court held that the PWCRA requires any joint venture bidding on public works projects in New Jersey to be registered under the Act at the time of bid submission. Accordingly, the Township of Pennsauken acted within its authority and properly rejected the bid submission of the Ernest Bock & Sons-Dobco Joint Venture which was not registered under the Act in the name of the joint venture at the time of its bid submission, despite the individual members of the joint venture being registered.
Reprinted courtesy of
Nicholas J. Zaita, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and
Brian Glicos, Peckar & Abramson, P.C.
Mr. Zaita may be contacted at nzaita@pecklaw.com
Mr. Glicos may be contacted at bglicos@pecklaw.com
Read the full story...
Are Construction Contract Limitation of Liability Clauses on the Way Out in Virginia?
March 11, 2024 —
Christopher G. Hill - Construction Law MusingsRemember BAE Systems and Fluor? This post is the third here at Construction Law Musings relating to this case which is a seemingly never-ending source for content. In the prior post discussing this case, the Court found that Va. Code 1-4.1:1 which bars waiver of a right to payment before work is performed did not apply because Fluor had provided work before execution of the contract or any change orders.
In the most recent opinion in this long-running litigation, and after a motion to reconsider by Fluor that was granted, the Court re-examined this finding along with the contractual language found in the Limitation of Damages (LOD) clause and came to the opposite conclusion regarding certain change orders that remained unpaid by BAE.
The Court first looked to the language of the contract itself and specifically the language in the LOD provision that states “Except as otherwise provided in this Subcontract.” The Court then looked at the change order provision and its typical equitable adjustment language and the mandatory nature of the equitable adjustment language. The Court found that the LOD provisions did not apply to change orders both because price increases due to change orders are not “damages” and because of the exception language in the LOD provision itself.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
The Law Office of Christopher G. HillMr. Hill may be contacted at
chrisghill@constructionlawva.com
Drawing the Line: In Tennessee, the Economic Loss Doctrine Does Not Apply to Contracts for Services
December 11, 2023 —
Gus Sara - The Subrogation StrategistIn Commercial Painting Co. v. Weitz Co. LLC, No. W2019-02089-SC-R11-CV, 2023 Tenn. LEXIS 39 (Weitz), the Supreme Court of Tennessee (Supreme Court) considered whether the economic loss doctrine barred the plaintiff’s claims for fraud, negligent misrepresentation and punitive damages arising out of a contract with the defendant for construction services. The court held that the economic loss doctrine only applies to product liability cases and does not apply to claims arising from contracts for services. This case establishes that, in Tennessee, the economic loss doctrine does not bar tort claims in disputes arising from service contracts.
In Weitz, defendant, Weitz Co. LLC (Weitz), was the general contractor for a construction project and hired plaintiff Commercial Painting Co. (Commercial) as a drywall subcontractor. Weitz refused to pay Commercial for several of its payment applications, claiming that the applications were submitted untimely and contained improper change order requests. Commercial filed a lawsuit against Weitz seeking over $1.9 million in damages, alleging breach of contract, unjust enrichment, enforcement of a mechanic’s lien, and interest and attorney’s fees under the Prompt Pay Act of 1991. Weitz filed a counterclaim for $500,000 for costs allegedly incurred due to Commercial’s delay and defective workmanship. In response, Commercial amended its complaint to add claims for fraud, intentional and negligent misrepresentation, rescission of the contract and $10 million in punitive damages. Commercial alleged that Weitz received an extension of the construction schedule but fraudulently withheld this information from Commercial and continued to impose unrealistic deadlines.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Gus Sara, White and WilliamsMr. Sara may be contacted at
sarag@whiteandwilliams.com
Congratulations to San Diego Partner Alex Giannetto and Senior Associate Michael Ibach on Settling a Case 3 Weeks Into a 5-Week Trial!
April 15, 2024 —
Dolores Montoya - Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara LLPPartner Alex Giannetto and Senior Associate Michael Ibach of BWB&O’s San Diego office started a trial in San Diego set to last at least five weeks. Plaintiffs alleged causes of action of negligence, trespass and nuisance against BWB&O’s client, arguing the owner/property manager did not properly handle alleged overwatering of the front yard, allegedly resulting in a landslide impacting 8 homes on a City slope in Carlsbad. Cross-Complainant City alleged independent negligence to fix the slope it owned and controlled as well as various indemnity-based causes of action against BWB&O’s client. Plaintiffs claimed over $24 million in damages, while Cross-Complainant placed sole blame for the incident on BWB&O’s client around $6 million.
Heading into trial, it was made clear that neither Plaintiffs nor Cross-Complainant would accept anything less than 7-figures to settle BWB&O’s client out of the case. In the first week of trial, BWB&O was able to leverage motions in limine, opening statements, and cross-examinations to secure a dismissal of three of the four causes of action alleged by Plaintiff that were associated with pain & suffering. In the second week of trial, BWB&O secured a dismissal of Cross-Complainant’s negligence cause of action paving the way for a settlement with Plaintiffs. Leveraging the threat of a non-suit when Plaintiffs rested, BWB&O secured resolution of Plaintiffs’ complaint for a fraction of what had previously been sought. Finally, BWB&O was able to secure a dismissal of the remaining indemnity-based causes of action in the cross-complaint and fully extract the client from the matter.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Dolores Montoya, Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara LLP
Why Employees Are Taking Ownership of Their Architecture Firms
January 22, 2024 —
Kriston Capps - BloombergThe architecture firm BNIM has always been a leader on sustainable design. In the late 1980s, principal emeritus Bob Berkebile was one of the first architects to push the industry to take the idea of green buildings seriously. Then-President Bill Clinton even recruited him to lead a climate-minded restoration of the White House. Berkebile and his Kansas City, Missouri–based firm — he’s the “B” in BNIM, alongside Tom Nelson, David Immenschuh and Steve McDowell — received top honors from the American Institute of Architects in 2011, among many other accolades.
Now the firm behind such projects as the US Embassy expansion in Kampala, Uganda, and a proposed South Loop park to deck over a highway in downtown Kansas City hopes to stand out in another way. In October, BNIM announced its transition to an employee stock ownership plan, or ESOP. The firm is one of a handful in the industry to recently embrace the employee-ownership model, following similar moves in 2021 by SHoP Architects and Zaha Hadid Architects.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Kriston Capps, Bloomberg
Get Creative to Solve Your Construction Company's Staffing Challenges
February 25, 2024 —
Kit Dickinson - Construction ExecutiveConstruction projects are on the rise due to a generational investment in infrastructure spending. The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act passed by Congress in August 2021 includes around $550 billion in new federal investment in America’s roads and bridges, water infrastructure and more to be allocated over the next five years.
Because of the influx of federal funds for infrastructure, construction firms that previously focused on local, private sector clients are incentivized to pursue public projects in other states and regions. There are a couple of bumps in the road, however. Payroll becomes more complex when you’re paying across multiple jurisdictions and at different pay rates, and reporting requirements for government work make managing projects and controlling costs trickier. Add to this the changes in the Davis-Bacon Act prevailing wage rules which went into effect on October 23, 2023. To capture this business and make it worthwhile, construction professionals need technology built specifically for the industry.
Reprinted courtesy of
Kit Dickinson, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved.
HB24-1014: A Warning Bell for Colorado Businesses Amid Potential Consumer Protection Changes
February 26, 2024 —
Jennifer Brockel - Colorado Construction Litigation BlogHB24-1014 stands to eliminate the longstanding public impact requirement found within C.R.S. § 6-1-105(2) of the Colorado Consumer Protection Act (“CCPA”). While this proposed change professes the noblest intentions of “public peace, health or safety,” its effect portends a large detriment to Colorado business and an astronomical payday for Colorado plaintiffs’ attorneys.
Brief History
For over 100 years, Colorado recognized the need to protect its citizens from deceptive trade practices through a mechanism akin to the Federal Trade Commission Act that preceded it. In 1915, Colorado passed legislation prohibiting “untrue, deceptive, or misleading” advertising. C.L. 1921 § 6942 evolved into the broade
Fraud and Construction Contracts- Like Oil and Water?Landlords Challenge U.S. Eviction Ban and Continue to Oust RentersAppraisal Panel Can Determine Causation of Loss under Ohio LawChicago Debt Document Says $8.5B O'Hare Revamp May Be DelayedStaying the Course, Texas Supreme Court Rejects Insurer’s Argument for Exception to Eight-Corners Rule in Determining Duty to DefendEffective Zoning Reform Isn’t as Simple as It SeemsCalifornia Case That Reads Like Russian Novel Results in Less Than Satisfying Result for Both Project Owner and Contractors From the Ground UpIllinois Supreme Court Rules Labor Costs Not Depreciated to Determine Actual Cash ValueCourt Strikes Expert Opinion That Surety Acted as a “De Facto Contractor”Agree to Use your “Professional Best"? You may Lose Insurance Coverage! (Law Note)Colorado House Bill 20-1290 – Restriction on the Use of Failure to Cooperate Defense in First-Party Claims Ruling Finds Builder and Owners at Fault in Construction Defect CaseDesigners George Yabu and Glenn Pushelberg Discuss One57’s Ultra-Luxury Park HyattConstruction Defects Survey Results Show that Warranty Laws Should be Strengthened for Homeowners & Condominium AssociationsMaine Case Demonstrates High Risk for Buying Home “As Is”Filling Out the Contractor’s Final Payment AffidavitInsurer Beware: Failure to Defend Ends with Hefty VerdictAvoiding Project Planning Disasters: How to Spot Problem ProjectsLoo
Candis Jones Named to Atlanta Magazine’s 2024 “Atlanta 500” List
Developer Transition - Maryland Condominiums
Just When You Thought General Contractors Were Necessary Parties. . .
The Need to Be Specific and Precise in Drafting Settling Agreements
San Francisco Law Firm Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman Hired New Partner
Construction in the Time of Coronavirus
Manhattan Bargain: Condos for Less Than $3 Million
Under Colorado House Bill 17-1279, HOA Boards Now Must Get Members’ Informed Consent Before Bringing A Construction Defect Action
County Officials Refute Resident’s Statement that Defect Repairs Improper
Difference Between a Novation And A Modification to a Contract
Welcome to SubTropolis: The Massive Business Complex Buried Under Kansas City
Client Alert: Court of Appeal Applies Common Interest Privilege Doctrine to HOA Litigation Meetings
7 Sustainability Ideas for Modular Classrooms in the Education Industry (guest post)
Case-Shiller Redo Shows Less Severe U.S. Home-Price Slump
The CA Supreme Court Grants Petition for Review of McMillin Albany LLC v. Super Ct. 2015 F069370 (Cal.App.5 Dist.) As to Whether the Right to Repair Act (SB800) is the Exclusive Remedy for All Defect Claims Arising Out of New Residential Construction
Hurricane Claim Cannot Survive Anti-Concurrent Causation Clause
Bailout for an Improperly Drafted Indemnification Provision
To Sea or Not to Sea: Fifth Circuit Applies Maritime Law to Offshore Service Contract, Spares Indemnity Provision from Louisiana Oilfield Indemnity Act
Two More Lawsuits Filed Over COVID-19 Business Interruption Losses
Quick Note: Notice of Contest of Claim Against Payment Bond
Do Not Lose Your Mechanics Lien Right Through a Subordination Agreement
Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (04/18/23) – Clean Energy, Critical Infrastructure and Commercial Concerns
Quick Note: Be Careful with Pay if Paid Clauses (Both Subcontractors and General Contractors)
Tests Find Pollution From N.C. Coal Ash Site Hit by Florence Within Acceptable Levels
Here's Proof Homebuilders are Betting on a Pickup in the Housing Market
Embracing Generative Risk Mitigation in Construction
With VA Mechanic’s Liens Sometimes “Substantial Compliance” is Enough (but don’t count on it) [UPDATE]
A Few Green Building Notes
Connecticut Grapples With Failing Concrete Foundations
The “Right to Repair” Construction Defects in the Rocky Mountain and Plains Region
Bad Welds Doom Art Installation at Central Park
Georgia Amends Anti-Indemnity Statute
Union THUGS Plead Guilty
Coverage Article - To Settle or Not To Settle?
Second Circuit Certifies Question Impacting "Bellefonte Rule"
Subsequent Owners of Homes Again Have Right to Sue Builders for Construction Defects
Make Sure to Properly Perfect and Preserve Construction Lien Rights
An Increase of US Metro Areas’ with Normal Housing & Economic Health
Attorney Risks Disqualification If After Receiving Presumptively Privileged Communication Fails to Notify Privilege Holder and Uses Document Pending Privilege Determination by Court
Florida Courts Inundated by Wave of New Lawsuits as Sweeping Tort Reform Appears Imminent
COVID-19 Is Not Direct Physical Loss Or Damage
The Problem With Building a New City From Scratch
Building Permits Up in USA Is a Good Sign
A DC Office Building Offers a Lesson in Glass and Sculpture
“Slow and Steady Doesn’t Always Win the Race” – Applicability of a Statute of Repose on Indemnity/Contribution Claims in New Hampshire
Traub Lieberman Recognized in 2022 U.S. News – Best Lawyers “Best Law Firms”
No Coverage for Additional Insured
Insurer Not Bound by Decision in Underlying Case Where No Collateral Estoppel
Homeowner’s Claims Defeated Because “Gravamen” of Complaint was Fraud, not Breach of Contract
Real-Estate Pros Fight NYC Tax on Wealthy Absentee Owners
