BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    casino resort expert witness Cora Wyoming structural steel construction expert witness Cora Wyoming Medical building expert witness Cora Wyoming high-rise construction expert witness Cora Wyoming production housing expert witness Cora Wyoming mid-rise construction expert witness Cora Wyoming Subterranean parking expert witness Cora Wyoming landscaping construction expert witness Cora Wyoming industrial building expert witness Cora Wyoming hospital construction expert witness Cora Wyoming custom homes expert witness Cora Wyoming condominiums expert witness Cora Wyoming condominium expert witness Cora Wyoming retail construction expert witness Cora Wyoming institutional building expert witness Cora Wyoming housing expert witness Cora Wyoming parking structure expert witness Cora Wyoming custom home expert witness Cora Wyoming concrete tilt-up expert witness Cora Wyoming multi family housing expert witness Cora Wyoming office building expert witness Cora Wyoming tract home expert witness Cora Wyoming
    Cora Wyoming construction project management expert witnessCora Wyoming construction forensic expert witnessCora Wyoming forensic architectCora Wyoming defective construction expertCora Wyoming construction cost estimating expert witnessCora Wyoming civil engineering expert witnessCora Wyoming construction defect expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Cora, Wyoming

    Wyoming Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Case law precedent


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Cora Wyoming

    State license is required for electrical trades only. All other licensing is done at the local level.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Converse Co Chapter
    Local # 5230
    PO Box 714 739 East Antelope Road
    Douglas, WY 82633
    Cora Wyoming Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Wyoming Home Builders Association
    Local # 5200
    PO Box 646
    Sheridan, WY 82801
    Cora Wyoming Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Big Horn Home Builders Association
    Local # 5250
    23 North Scott Ste 14
    Sheridan, WY 82801

    Cora Wyoming Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Southeast Wyoming Builders Association
    Local # 5210
    1819 Warren Avenue
    Cheyenne, WY 82001

    Cora Wyoming Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Cora Wyoming


    Fixing the Problem – Not the Blame

    Under Privette Doctrine, A Landowner Delegates All Responsibility For Workplace Safety to its Independent Contractor, and therefore Owes No Duty to Remedy or Adopt Measures to Protect Against Known Hazards

    Testimony from Insureds' Expert Limited By Motion In Limine

    The Complex Insurance Coverage Reporter – A Year in Review

    Unjust Enrichment and Express Contract Don’t Mix

    Contract Construction Smarts: Helpful Provisions for Dispute Resolution

    #11 CDJ Topic: Cortez Blu Community Association, Inc. v. K. Hovnanian at Cortez Hill, LLC, et al.

    GRSM Partner Debra Ellwood Meppen Recognized as 2026 Legal Visionary by Los Angeles Times

    Viva La France! 2024 Summer Olympics Construction Features Sustainable Design, Including, Simply Not Building at All

    School Board Settles Construction Defect Suit

    Insurer Rejects Claim on Dolphin Towers

    Parol Evidence can be Used to Defeat Fraudulent Lien

    Motions to Dismiss, Limitations of Liability, and More

    Sacramento’s Commercial Construction Market Heats Up

    How to Remove a Mechanics Lien from Your Property

    General Liability Alert: ADA Requirements Pertaining to Wall Space Adjacent to Interior Doors Clarified

    No Damages for Delay May Not Be Enforceable in Virginia

    D.C. Decision Finding No “Direct Physical Loss” for COVID-19 Closures Is Not Without Severe Limitations

    Va. Contractor Fined for Alleged DC Wage and Classification Violations

    Breach of an Oral Contract and Unjust Enrichment and Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing

    Prevailing Parties Entitled to Contractual Attorneys’ Fees Under California CCP §1717 Notwithstanding Declaration That Contract is Void Under California Government Code §1090

    Major Change to Residential Landlord Tenant Law

    Cross-Motions for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings for COVID-19 Claim Denied

    Despite Construction Gains, Cement Maker Sees Loss

    Report: Construction Firms Could Better Protect Workers From Noise Hazards

    Arbitration in Construction Disputes: Process and Best Practices

    Where-Forum Art Thou? Is the Chosen Forum Akin to No Forum at All?

    Quick Note: Do Your Homework When it Comes to Selecting Your Arbitrator

    Fannie-Freddie Propose Liquidity Rules for Mortgage Insurers

    Be Careful When Walking Off of a Construction Project

    XL Group Pairs with America Contractor’s Insurance Group to Improve Quality of Construction

    NY Project Produces America's First Utility Scale Wind Power

    Turner, Subcontractor Reach $23.5M Settlement in Worker Death on Chicago Project

    Construction of New U.S. Homes Declines on Plunge in South

    The Power of Planning: Four Key Themes for Mitigating Risk in Construction

    Chambers USA 2020 Ranks White and Williams as a Leading Law Firm

    Buffalo, NY Stadium Work Resumes After Suspects ID'ed in $150K Graffiti Vandalism

    Public Contract Code Section 1104 Does Not Apply to Claims of Implied Breach of Warranty of Correctness of Plans and Specifications

    Claims for Bad Faith and Punitive Damages Survive Insurer's Motion for Summary Judgment

    MDL Panel Grants Consolidation for One Group of COVID-19 Claims

    Florida Adopts Daubert Standard for Expert Testimony

    Force Majeure Under the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic

    Feds, County Seek Delay in Houston $7B Road Widening Over Community Impact

    Wharf Holdings to Sell Entire Sino-Ocean Stake for $284 Million

    Final Thoughts on New Pay If Paid Legislation in VA

    Engineer Proposes Slashing Scope of Millennium Tower Pile Upgrade

    On to Year Thirteen for Blog

    Best Practices for Installing Networks in New Buildings

    Toll Brothers Snags Home Builder of the Year Honors at HLS

    Brooklyn’s Hipster Economy Challenges Manhattan Supremacy
    Corporate Profile

    CORA WYOMING CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 7,000 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Cora, Wyoming Construction Expert Witness Group provides a wide range of trial support and consulting services to Cora's most acknowledged construction practice groups, CGL carriers, builders, owners, and public agencies. Drawing from a diverse pool of construction and design professionals, BHA is able to simultaneously analyze complex claims from the perspective of design, engineering, cost, or standard of care.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Cora, Wyoming

    Why Travelers Fought a Fire Claim for Invisible Smoke Damage

    February 23, 2026 —
    Just 40 minutes after midnight on Sept. 27, 2018, the sky lit up over Birmingham, Ala. A fire engulfed an apartment building under construction—the last-to-be completed section of a wood-framed complex called the Metropolitan. It fueled one of the largest recorded blazes in the city’s history. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Elaine Silver, Engineering News-Record
    ENR may be contacted at enr@enr.com

    2026 Southern California Super Lawyers Recognizes 14 Snell & Wilmer Attorneys

    March 03, 2026 —
    LOS ANGELES AND ORANGE COUNTY – Snell & Wilmer is pleased to announce that 14 attorneys in its Los Angeles and Orange County offices have been selected for inclusion in the 2026 Southern California Super Lawyers publication. Of those 15, six were recognized as Rising Stars. Super Lawyers is a listing of lawyers from more than 70 practice areas who have attained a high degree of peer recognition and professional achievement. The selection process is multi-phased and includes independent research, peer nominations, and peer evaluations. The final published list represents no more than 5 percent of the lawyers in the state. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Snell & Wilmer

    A Win for Clarity: What a Recent Federal Court Decision Means for Davis-Bacon Compliance

    July 13, 2026 —
    Following the Department of Labor’s 2023 Davis-Bacon rule changes, federal construction contractors faced a pressing question: not whether paying prevailing wages is required, but how far those obligations could extend. Could they reach off-site material suppliers? Delivery drivers? Contracts that omitted Davis-Bacon clauses entirely? A recent federal court decision in AGC of America v. US Department of Labor answers these questions in important ways, vacating several disputed provisions and giving contractors greater certainty when pricing, bidding, and administering federal construction projects. The ruling addresses three aspects of the 2023 regulations that sought to extend Davis-Bacon obligations beyond their traditional scope. By vacating those provisions, the decision creates a more predictable compliance environment and reinforces an important principle: Davis-Bacon enforcement works best when contractors, workers, and regulators operate under clear, objective rules. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Stephen E. Irving, Peckar & Abramson, P.C.
    Mr. Irving may be contacted at sirving@pecklaw.com

    That’s a Wrap! Pennsylvania Court Holds Arbitration Clause in Online Agreement Unenforceable

    May 14, 2026 —
    In Duffy v. Tatum, 2026 Pa. Super. LEXIS 112, 2026 PA Super 41, the Superior Court of Pennsylvania (Superior Court) considered whether an arbitration provision contained in the online Terms of Service on the defendant’s website were enforceable. The plaintiff, Daniel Duffy (Duffy), visited the website of defendant, Dolly, Inc. (Dolly), to purchase moving services. Duffy selected the number of movers, items to be moved and the type of vehicle needed. To complete the booking, the website required Duffy to checkmark a box labeled “By checking this box I accept the Dolly Terms of Service.” Duffy did not have to open the link or scroll to the bottom of the agreement before being able to click on the checkmark box. The Terms of Service included an arbitration provision requiring that any dispute related to the moving services to be resolved by arbitration in accordance with the American Arbitration Association. The Terms of Service did not include any statement that the user was waiving the right to a jury trial. The Superior Court found the internet Terms of Service unenforceable. During the moving process, an accident occurred and injured Duffy. In May 2024, Duffy and his wife sued Dolly and other related entities alleging negligence and loss of consortium. Dolly filed preliminary objections alleging that the parties agreed to alternative dispute resolution. The lower court overruled the preliminary objections, finding that Dolly’s website did not provide reasonably obvious notice of its Terms of Service to Duffy and, as such, Duffy never agreed to waive his constructional right to a jury trial. Dolly filed an appeal to the Superior Court. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gus Sara, White and Williams LLP
    Mr. Sara may be contacted at sarag@whiteandwilliams.com

    Land Use Team Wins Appeal for Affordable Senior Housing Development in San Francisco

    February 23, 2026 —
    Sheppard successfully defended client Mitchelville Real Estate Group and its non-profit development partner Bernal Heights Housing Corporation in an appeal of a 70-unit, 100% affordable senior housing development at 3333 Mission Street in San Francisco’s Bernal Heights neighborhood. The team secured approval of the project, representing the developer on complex land use issues including split zoning, SB 35, the State Density Bonus Law, the Housing Crisis Act, tribal cultural resources and the Subdivision Map Act. Although the ministerially approved parcel map for the project utilized SB 35, it was appealed to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors and unanimously rejected. Sheppard’s real estate transactional team also assisted with the acquisition of the property. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Sheppard

    Louisiana Legislature Enacts Act 932 – Significant Changes to Insurer Bad-Faith Exposure for Failure to Settle

    July 13, 2026 —
    The Louisiana Legislature has enacted Act 932 (formerly House Bill 1162), which became law this week without the Governor's signature pursuant to the Louisiana Constitution, after expiration of the applicable constitutional review period. Act 932 makes several important amendments to Louisiana's insurer bad-faith statute and appears intended, at least in part, to address issues arising from the Louisiana Supreme Court's decision in Kelly v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., 169 So.3d 328 (La. 2015). The Act also makes changes regarding claim payments involving licensed contractors. The Act takes effect on August 1, 2026. Key Takeaways Act 932:
    • Limits certain bad-faith causes of action (bad faith failure to settle) involving personal injury and bodily injury claims where good-faith disputes exist or where an insurer has not been afforded sufficient opportunity to respond to a settlement demand.
    • Requires insurers and adjusters to verify a contractor's Louisiana license status before issuing claim payments when a contractor is named as a payee on a check for repair or restoration of immovable property.
    • Creates a statutory safe harbor protecting insurers from bad-faith penalties and attorney fees when payment delays result from an inability to verify a contractor's license, provided specified documentation and notice requirements are met.
    Reprinted courtesy of Tabitha R. Durbin, Lewis Brisbois and Jennifer E. Michel, Lewis Brisbois Ms. Durbin may be contacted at Tabitha.Durbin@lewisbrisbois.com Ms. Michel may be contacted at Jenny.Michel@lewisbrisbois.com Read the full story...

    Ownership and Licensing in Design Agreements

    April 14, 2026 —
    The ownership and licensing of design documents in professional services agreements play a significant role in protecting the interests of the design professional and the project owner during and after project completion. The ownership or licensing of the drawings provision typically outlines who owns the drawings and specifications, who can use the documents, and how the documents can be used during and after the project. Project owners and developers should understand that payment for design services does not automatically transfer ownership or an exclusive right to use the professional design. Under U.S. copyright law, the default rule is that the design professional retains ownership of the instruments of service absent a contractual provision transferring ownership or a license. See 17 U.S.C. § 101, et seq. The Architectural Works Copyright Protection Act provides that copyright protection applies to “pictorial, graphic and sculptural works” and includes “architectural works.” 17 U.S.C. § 102. A design professional may only transfer copyright ownership in writing. 17 U.S.C. § 204(a). Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Abby Dvorkin, Snell & Wilmer
    Ms. Dvorkin may be contacted at advorkin@swlaw.com

    Seattle Team Obtains Summary Judgment in Real Estate Broker Professional Liability Action

    July 20, 2026 —
    Seattle Partner Kathleen A. Nelson and Associate Synova M. L. Edwards prevailed on a hotly contested motion for summary judgment in Whatcom County, Washington court in a real estate broker professional liability action. The plaintiff filed an action against Lewis Brisbois' clients, a real estate agent and brokerage firm, among several others, including the title company, purchasers and others related to the sale of real property following his complicated and long running divorce action. These claims primarily arose out of the clients’ reliance on an order signed by the court in the underlying divorce action. The order allowed the clients to execute the purchase and sale agreement, as the plaintiff was non-cooperative. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois