BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    office building expert witness Wautoma Wisconsin mid-rise construction expert witness Wautoma Wisconsin hospital construction expert witness Wautoma Wisconsin multi family housing expert witness Wautoma Wisconsin custom home expert witness Wautoma Wisconsin landscaping construction expert witness Wautoma Wisconsin housing expert witness Wautoma Wisconsin parking structure expert witness Wautoma Wisconsin condominiums expert witness Wautoma Wisconsin industrial building expert witness Wautoma Wisconsin Subterranean parking expert witness Wautoma Wisconsin concrete tilt-up expert witness Wautoma Wisconsin institutional building expert witness Wautoma Wisconsin low-income housing expert witness Wautoma Wisconsin custom homes expert witness Wautoma Wisconsin condominium expert witness Wautoma Wisconsin townhome construction expert witness Wautoma Wisconsin production housing expert witness Wautoma Wisconsin high-rise construction expert witness Wautoma Wisconsin Medical building expert witness Wautoma Wisconsin retail construction expert witness Wautoma Wisconsin tract home expert witness Wautoma Wisconsin
    Wautoma Wisconsin construction expert witnessWautoma Wisconsin expert witness structural engineerWautoma Wisconsin architectural expert witnessWautoma Wisconsin construction safety expertWautoma Wisconsin construction project management expert witnessWautoma Wisconsin OSHA expert witness constructionWautoma Wisconsin building code compliance expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Wautoma, Wisconsin

    Wisconsin Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB448 specifies 90 day notice with details and evidence prior to commencing legal action. It provides for a 15 day written response from contractor or 25 days if cross-claims against subcontractors; The law states “The claimant and contractor or supplier are bound by any contractor or supplier warranty terms pertaining to products or services supplied for the dwelling.”


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Wautoma Wisconsin

    Contractors are required to have the correct credentials for their trade. Not all classifications require credentialing. For a list of credentials, see the website.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Winnebago Home Builders Association
    Local # 5190
    4041 State Road 91 Suite A
    Oshkosh, WI 54904

    Wautoma Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Manitowoc County Home Builders Association
    Local # 5143
    1011 South 10th St Ste 103
    Manitowoc, WI 54220

    Wautoma Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Mid-Shore Home Builders Association Affil w/National Associated Home Builders
    Local # 5150
    PO Box 125 2104 Mary Ave
    New Holstein, WI 53061

    Wautoma Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    La Crosse Area Builders Association
    Local # 5126
    816 2nd Ave S
    Onalaska, WI 54650

    Wautoma Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Valley Home Builders Association
    Local # 5168
    920 W Association Dr
    Appleton, WI 54914

    Wautoma Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Central Wisc Home Builders Association
    Local # 5180
    2135 8th Street S
    Wisconsin Rapids, WI 54494

    Wautoma Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Fond Du Lac & Dodge Cos
    Local # 5116
    490 W Rolling Meadows Dr
    Fond Du Lac, WI 54937

    Wautoma Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Wautoma Wisconsin


    GRSM Secures Illinois Appellate Victory for Architectural Firm in Implied Warranty Dispute

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (11/5/25) – Apartment Conversion Projects Surge, Targeted AI in Real Estate Increases and Hotel Lobby Urge End of Government Shutdown

    California Supreme Court Adopts Vertical Exhaustion for Long-Tail Claims

    Napa Quake, Flooding Cost $4 Billion in U.S. in August

    An Occurrence Under Builder’s Risk Insurance Policy Is Based on the Language in the Policy

    Best Practices: Commercial Lockouts in Arizona

    SIGAR Report Finds +$15 Billion in “Waste, Fraud and Abuse” in Afghanistan

    KF-103 v. American Family Mutual Insurance: Tenth Circuit Upholds the “Complaint Rule”

    Make Sure You Comply with Florida’s Pre-Suit Notice Requirements for Construction Defects

    AB 1701 Has Passed – Developers and General Contractors Are Now Required to Double Pay for Labor Due to Their Subcontractors’ Failure to Pay

    CA Court of Appeal Reinstates Class Action Construction Defect Claims Against Homebuilder

    California Supreme Court Protects California Policyholders for Intentional Acts of Employees

    Construction Law Client Alert: Hirer Beware - When Exercising Control Over a Job Site’s Safety Conditions, You May be Held Directly Liable for an Independent Contractor’s Injury

    Want a Fair Chance at a Government Contract? Think Again

    Framework, Tallest Mass Timber Project in the U.S., Is On Hold

    New EPA Regulation for Phase I Environmental Site Assessments

    Defense Victory in Breach of Fiduciary Action

    Labor Under the Miller Act And Estoppel of Statute of Limitations

    Housing Starts Fall as U.S. Single-Family Projects Decline

    New American Home Construction Nears Completion Despite Obstacles

    Traub Lieberman Partner Eric D. Suben Obtains Federal Second Circuit Affirmance of Summary Judgment in Insurer’s Favor

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (1/30/24) – Life Science Construction to Increase, Overall Homeownership Is Majority Female, and Senators Urge Fed Chair to Lower Interest Rates

    Insurers Subrogating in Arkansas Must Expend Energy to Prove That Their Insureds Have Been Made Whole

    Palo Alto Considers Fines for Stalled Construction Projects

    President Obama Vetoes Keystone Pipeline Bill

    RDU Terminal 1: Going Green

    Industry Groups Decry Jan. 6 Riot; DOT Chief Chao Steps Down in Protest

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (12/4/24) – Highest Rate of Office Conversions, Lending Caps for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and Affordability Challenges for Homebuyers

    Is It Time to Revisit Construction Defects in Kentucky?

    Seller's Silence on Unfinished Repairs Sinks Summary Judgment in Real Estate Dispute

    U.S. Army Corps Announces Regulatory Program “Modernization” Plan

    CGL, Builders Risk Coverage and Exclusions When Construction Defects Cause Property Damage

    Agency Principles Matter (Including When It Comes to Arbitration Provisions)

    Brenner Base Tunnelers Conquer Peaks and Valleys in the Alps

    EPA Announces Decision to Retain Current Position on RCRA Regulation of Oil and Gas Production Wastes

    Spearin Doctrine as an Affirmative Defense

    Meet Daniel Hall, Assistant Professor at TU Delft

    Giant Floating Solar Flowers Offer Hope for Coal-Addicted Korea

    Wave Breaker: How a Living Shoreline Will Protect a Florida Highway and Oyster Bed

    Ninth Circuit Clarifies Viability of Takings Claims Under Arizona’s Unclaimed Property Act

    High Court Case Review Frees Jailed Buffalo Billions Contractor CEO

    Pennsylvania Supreme Court Rules in Builder’s Implied Warranty of Habitability Case

    Administration Launches 'Buy Clean' Construction Materials Push

    Texas School District Accepts Settlement Agreement in Construction Defect Case

    Hunton Insurance Partner, Larry Bracken, Elected to the American College of Coverage Counsel

    Representation and Warranties Claims Reach Record Payouts in 2024

    Hawaii Supreme Court Bars Insurers from Billing Policyholders for Uncovered Defense Costs

    US Secretary of Labor Withdraws Guidance Regarding Independent Contractors

    The Job is Substantially Complete, the Subcontract was Never Signed, the Subcontractor Wants to be Paid—Now What?

    New Orleans Reviews System After Storm Swamps Pumps
    Corporate Profile

    WAUTOMA WISCONSIN CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Wautoma, Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness Group is comprised from a number of credentialed construction professionals possessing extensive trial support experience relevant to construction defect and claims matters. Leveraging from more than 25 years experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to the nation's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, Fortune 500 builders, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, and a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Wautoma, Wisconsin

    Navigating Timelines and Technology: Patent Strategies for Space and Earth

    June 01, 2026 —
    More than half a century after the Apollo 11 landing fulfilled President John F. Kennedy’s bold vision, the global race back to the Moon is no longer theoretical. With renewed attention on NASA’s Artemis program and a surge of commercial investment in space infrastructure, lunar exploration is again shaping technology priorities here on Earth. Reprinted courtesy of Kate Nuehring Su, Engineering News-Record and Vanessa Wang, Engineering News-Record Read the full story...
    ENR may be contacted at enr@enr.com

    Endra Rethinks MEP Design with AI

    July 06, 2026 —
    Niklas Lindgren, co-founder and CEO of Endra, joins the AEC Business Podcast to discuss why his Stockholm-based startup is rebuilding MEP design from the ground up with AI. Endra recently raised $50 million in Series A funding and counts some of the world’s largest engineering consultancies as customers. Niklas explains why Revit’s underlying data model is too coarse to support deep automation, and why Endra built its own granular 3D data model instead of working as a plugin. He describes Endra’s “spatial AI” approach to routing conduit and ductwork without clashes, and how the platform models entire electrical systems, from receptacle to transformer, inside a single source of truth. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    Limitations of Liability Provisions in Construction Contracts: A Means to Manage Risk and Limit Financial Exposure

    June 23, 2026 —
    Taking a cue from architects and engineers, construction contractors have started inserting limitation of liability clauses in their construction contracts to manage risk and limit financial exposure. This article will address the specific risks that can be limited through an LOL, tips for negotiating the LOL terms with reluctant owners to cover those specific risks, how to limit unintended consequences of an LOL (such as relieving an insurer of its obligations to cover certain losses), and approaches to setting the amount of the liability cap in the LOL. Addressing Particular Risks An LOL can address a wide range of risks, including:
    • Damages for delay
    • Liability for non-conforming or defective work
    • Liability for third-party bodily injury or property damage
    • Liability excluded by a general liability policy (e.g., pollution and cyber liability)
    • Liability related to intellectual property
    Reprinted courtesy of Ellen Chapelle, Richard Reizen, Hannah Batsche, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Labor Shortages in Construction: Managing Legal and Operational Risks

    April 14, 2026 —
    Labor shortages in the construction industry have become more than a scheduling headache—they are a legal and financial risk multiplier. As contractors scramble to meet deadlines with limited manpower, shortcuts in compliance, safety and subcontractor oversight become more likely. These gaps can expose companies to regulatory penalties, contractual disputes and reputational damage. Understanding how workforce constraints intersect with labor laws and contractual obligations is critical to mitigating the risks and navigating these challenges without compromising compliance or project integrity. The construction industry has faced persistent workforce challenges for years, but recent trends have intensified the problem. Factors such as an aging workforce, reduced immigration and post-pandemic recovery pressures have left contractors struggling to find skilled labor. According to Associated Builders and Contractors, the construction workforce shortage surpassed half a million workers in 2024; in the same year, Associated General Contractors reported 88% of construction companies had difficulty finding qualified workers. Reprinted courtesy of Meghan Douris, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Ball Janik LLP Welcomes Construction Defect Attorney and U.S. Air Force Veteran Jake Scott to its Fort Lauderdale Office

    June 02, 2026 —
    Ball Janik LLP, a leading construction defect and insurance recovery law firm, has welcomed Jake Scott as an associate in its Fort Lauderdale office. Scott joins the Construction Defect Practice Group, bringing experience across construction litigation that includes construction defect, contract dispute, and negligence matters, along with a track record of representing construction professionals through depositions, court appearances, and trial preparation to support the firm's steady growth and client service statewide. "We're excited to welcome Jake Scott to our Fort Lauderdale office and Construction Defect Practice Group," said James C. Prichard, Managing Partner at Ball Janik LLP. "We look forward to the fresh perspectives and legal solutions he will provide for community associations across South Florida." Scott is a results-driven attorney dedicated to providing strategic counsel for complex legal challenges. He has experience managing all phases of a case, from early investigation and discovery through trial preparation and settlement negotiations. Prior to joining Ball Janik, Scott served as an associate attorney in Fort Lauderdale, where he represented clients in construction litigation matters, handled depositions and court appearances, conducted legal research, and drafted pleadings, motions, and briefs. He also worked as an attorney in Tampa, where he represented contractors, subcontractors, and construction firms in defending claims involving construction defects, contractual disputes, and negligence, and worked closely with expert witnesses, engineers, and consultants to develop and present technical evidence. Scott's experience representing the development and building sides of construction disputes provides a valuable, contrast-driven perspective that supports the strategic evaluation of claims and practical approaches to resolution for Ball Janik's clients. A proud veteran, Scott served in the United States Air Force for eight years, including roles as an Airspace Control Officer and in Space Systems Operations, supporting safe space flight operations and satellite communications. Carrying the discipline of airborne operations, Scott worked in the aerospace sector as a Satellite Engineer and Orbital Analyst. He also held a role in the housing sector, supporting marketing and business development initiatives. Scott received his law degree from Stetson University College of Law. He attended American Military University, where he earned degrees in marketing, business management, and related support services. About Ball Janik LLP Ball Janik LLP is a Florida-based law firm offering construction defect, construction law, insurance recovery, and commercial litigation counsel to its local and national clients. The firm was founded in 1982 and has expanded its capabilities, professionals, and geographic footprint. What started as a small firm focused on real property, land use, and litigation (known then as Ball Janik & Novack) has grown to a team of 50-plus attorneys and paralegals in 5 offices in Florida, with centuries of combined experience and capabilities. The firm has been recognized by Chambers USA, U.S. News & World Report and Best Lawyers®, The Best Lawyers in America©, and Corporate International. Read more here: https://www.balljanik.com.

    Contractor Dispute Resolution Framework and Prevention

    July 06, 2026 —
    WHAT DEFINES A CONTRACTOR DISPUTE RESOLUTION FRAMEWORK A contractor dispute resolution framework is a structured system of contractual terms, governance processes and escalation pathways designed to prevent, manage and resolve conflicts between contracting parties with minimal disruption to cost, schedule and performance. The framework operates as both a preventive control and a corrective mechanism. Preventive elements establish clarity in scope, expectations and accountability before work begins. Corrective elements define how disagreements are identified, documented, escalated and resolved once they arise. Reprinted courtesy of Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Oracle's $16B Michigan Data Center Secures Financing as Power Contracts Face Appeals

    June 08, 2026 —
    A $16 billion hyperscale data center under construction outside Ann Arbor, Mich., has secured financing backed by Blackstone and other institutional investors, even as the project's power supply agreements now face a legal challenge before the Michigan Court of Appeals. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Gottlieb may be contacted at gottliebb@enr.com

    Prefatory Contract Language Cannot Be Used to Create an Ambiguity with Operative Provisions

    May 12, 2026 —
    Contract drafting and interpretation matters. A case dealt with the potential conflict with prefatory language in an agreement compared with operative provisions in the agreement. The trial court held that the operative provisions control. I discussed this case here where the appellate court reversed based on the prefatory language. But, through a motion for rehearing, the appellate court reconsidered its position and affirmed the trial court based on the operative provisions, mainly that the prefatory language cannot be used to create an ambiguity with operative provisions. Consider this explanation in affirming the trial court:
    Because the trial court correctly found that the initial language in the contract was prefatory and could not be used to create an ambiguity in the remainder of the contract, we affirm the final judgment.
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com