BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    industrial building expert witness Sauk County Wisconsin multi family housing expert witness Sauk County Wisconsin concrete tilt-up expert witness Sauk County Wisconsin landscaping construction expert witness Sauk County Wisconsin casino resort expert witness Sauk County Wisconsin low-income housing expert witness Sauk County Wisconsin production housing expert witness Sauk County Wisconsin condominiums expert witness Sauk County Wisconsin parking structure expert witness Sauk County Wisconsin custom homes expert witness Sauk County Wisconsin institutional building expert witness Sauk County Wisconsin hospital construction expert witness Sauk County Wisconsin Subterranean parking expert witness Sauk County Wisconsin custom home expert witness Sauk County Wisconsin housing expert witness Sauk County Wisconsin retail construction expert witness Sauk County Wisconsin condominium expert witness Sauk County Wisconsin mid-rise construction expert witness Sauk County Wisconsin office building expert witness Sauk County Wisconsin tract home expert witness Sauk County Wisconsin high-rise construction expert witness Sauk County Wisconsin Medical building expert witness Sauk County Wisconsin
    Sauk County Wisconsin structural engineering expert witnessesSauk County Wisconsin ada design expert witnessSauk County Wisconsin construction defect expert witnessSauk County Wisconsin construction forensic expert witnessSauk County Wisconsin construction expert witnessSauk County Wisconsin expert witness concrete failureSauk County Wisconsin architect expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Sauk County, Wisconsin

    Wisconsin Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB448 specifies 90 day notice with details and evidence prior to commencing legal action. It provides for a 15 day written response from contractor or 25 days if cross-claims against subcontractors; The law states “The claimant and contractor or supplier are bound by any contractor or supplier warranty terms pertaining to products or services supplied for the dwelling.”


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Sauk County Wisconsin

    Contractors are required to have the correct credentials for their trade. Not all classifications require credentialing. For a list of credentials, see the website.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Mid Wisconsin Home Builders Association
    Local # 5181
    PO Box 865
    Portage, WI 53901

    Sauk County Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Wisconsin Builders Association (State)
    Local # 5100
    4868 High Crossing Blvd
    Madison, WI 53704

    Sauk County Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Sheboygan Cty Home Builders Association
    Local # 5159
    435 E Mill Street
    Plymouth, WI 53073

    Sauk County Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Fond Du Lac & Dodge Cos
    Local # 5116
    490 W Rolling Meadows Dr
    Fond Du Lac, WI 54937

    Sauk County Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Metro Builders Association of Gr Milwaukee
    Local # 5148
    N16 W23321 Stoneridge Dr
    Waukesha, WI 53188

    Sauk County Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Madison Area Builders Association
    Local # 5132
    5936 Seminole Centre Ct
    Madison, WI 53711

    Sauk County Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    La Crosse Area Builders Association
    Local # 5126
    816 2nd Ave S
    Onalaska, WI 54650

    Sauk County Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Sauk County Wisconsin


    Another Guilty Plea in Las Vegas HOA Scandal

    Avoiding Wage Claims in California Construction

    Did You Get a Notice of Mechanic’s Lien after Project Completion? Don’t Panic!

    Water Drainage Case Lacks Standing

    A Win for Clarity: What a Recent Federal Court Decision Means for Davis-Bacon Compliance

    Illinois Appellate Court Finds That Damages in Excess of Policy Limits Do Not Trigger Right to Independent Counsel

    Steps to Curb Construction Defect Actions for Homebuilders

    PSA: Pay If Paid Ban Goes into Effect on January 1, 2023

    Register and Watch Partner John Toohey Present on the CLM Webinar Series!

    Illinois Court of Appeals Addresses What It Means to “Reside” in Property for Purposes of Coverage

    2019 Legislative Session

    Be Sure to Dot All of the “I’s” and Cross the “T’s” in Virginia

    New York Court Holds That the “Lesser of Two” Doctrine Limits Recoverable Damages in Subrogation Actions

    California Supreme Court Adopts Vertical Exhaustion for Long-Tail Claims

    Middle District of Florida Disregards Other Insurance Clause Where Subcontractor Contractually Promised to Indemnify General Contractor

    New York's New Gateway: The Overhaul of John F. Kennedy International Airport

    Connecticut Appellate Court Breaks New Ground on Policy Exhaustion

    Insured's Claim for Cyber Coverage Rejected

    Miami Building Boom Spreads Into Downtown’s Tent City

    Eleventh Circuit Finds Professional Services Exclusion Applies to Construction Management Activities

    U.K. Developer Pledges Building Safety in Wake of Grenfell

    The “Unavailability Exception” is Unavailable to Policyholders, According to New York Court of Appeals

    Colorado Supreme Court Weighs in on Timeliness of Claims Against Subcontractors in Construction Defect Actions

    GRSM Team Wins Summary Judgment in Million-Dollar HOA Dispute

    Texas Construction Firm Officials Sentenced in Contract-Fraud Case

    Unit Owners Have No Standing to Sue under Condominium Association’s Policy

    Construction Defect Suit Can Continue Against Plumber

    Five Frequently Overlooked Points of Construction Contracts

    Evacuations in Santa Barbara County as more Mudslides are Predicted

    BHA’s Next MCLE Seminar in San Diego on July 25th

    Parking Reform Takes Off on the West Coast

    Court Resolves Carriers' Dispute Over Which Must Defend

    California Complex Civil Litigation Superior Court Panels

    Florida Courts Inundated by Wave of New Lawsuits as Sweeping Tort Reform Appears Imminent

    U.S. District Court of Colorado Interprets Insurance Policy’s Faulty Workmanship Exclusion and Exception for Ensuing Damage

    Construction Contract Clauses That May or May Not Have Your Vote – Part 3

    Residential Building Sector: Peaking or Soaring?

    Reversing Itself, West Virginia Supreme Court Holds Construction Defects Are Covered

    Preventing Costly Litigation Through Your Construction Contract

    GRSM Multi-Office Team Secures Dismissal of Claims for Global Paint and Coatings Manufacturer Under the Federal Hazardous Substances Act

    Jersey City, New Jersey, to Get 95-Story Condo Tower

    Empire State Building Owners Sue Photographer for Topless Photo Shoot

    Incorporate Sustainability in Building Design to Meet Green Construction Goals

    Sewage Treatment Agency Sues Insurer and Contractor after Wall Failure and Sewage Leak

    New Defendant Added to Morrison Bridge Decking Lawsuit

    The Deadline to File Suit on a Public Works Payment Payment Bond is Triggered by a Claimant’s Work on a Project Not by a Claimant’s Work Under a Contract

    Old Case Teaches New Tricks

    Quick Note: Be Careful with Pay if Paid Clauses (Both Subcontractors and General Contractors)

    Newmeyer Dillion Named One of "The Best Places To Work In Orange County" by Orange County Business Journal

    Court Holds That Self-Insured Retentions Exhaust Vertically And Awards Insured Mandatory Prejudgment Interest in Stringfellow Site Coverage Dispute
    Corporate Profile

    SAUK COUNTY WISCONSIN CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 7,000 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Sauk County, Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness Group provides a wide range of trial support and consulting services to Sauk County's most acknowledged construction practice groups, CGL carriers, builders, owners, and public agencies. Drawing from a diverse pool of construction and design professionals, BHA is able to simultaneously analyze complex claims from the perspective of design, engineering, cost, or standard of care.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Sauk County, Wisconsin

    Navigating Timelines and Technology: Patent Strategies for Space and Earth

    June 01, 2026 —
    More than half a century after the Apollo 11 landing fulfilled President John F. Kennedy’s bold vision, the global race back to the Moon is no longer theoretical. With renewed attention on NASA’s Artemis program and a surge of commercial investment in space infrastructure, lunar exploration is again shaping technology priorities here on Earth. Reprinted courtesy of Kate Nuehring Su, Engineering News-Record and Vanessa Wang, Engineering News-Record Read the full story...
    ENR may be contacted at enr@enr.com

    EPA, Maryland Sue DC Water Over Massive Potomac River Sewage Spill

    May 14, 2026 —
    The state of Maryland and the federal government have filed separate lawsuits against the District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority (DC Water), both alleging that the agency’s failure to address longstanding deterioration in the Potomac Interceptor contributed to a weeklong release of more than 240 million gallons of raw sewage into the Potomac River this past January. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Jim Parsons, Engineering News-Record
    ENR may be contacted at enr@enr.com

    A Customized Approach to Data Center Construction

    June 29, 2026 —
    Data center construction projects are, to put it mildly, distinct. They differ from traditional construction in a host of manners, and are particularly distinctive because the value of the facility depends on unique measures of performance. A center that cannot meet uptime, cooling, redundancy or connectivity standards will not achieve its mission, whether or not the structure itself meets standard industry contract-form “substantial completion” or “mechanical completion” definitions. Owners, developers, lenders, operators and hyperscalers—especially hyperscalers!—want it all. They seek favorable and stable pricing, accelerated delivery and sophisticated components, all of which are evolving in “real project time.” Standard construction contract forms deserve extensive modifications to align clauses with expectations, with a heightened focus on systems integration, commissioning, and allocation of special risks. This article details customized considerations for drafting, negotiating and administering data center design and construction agreements. Reprinted courtesy of James P. Bobotek, Pillsbury, Arielle L. Murphy, Pillsbury and Robert A. James, Pillsbury Mr. Bobotek may be contacted at james.bobotek@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Murphy may be contacted at arielle.murphy@pillsburylaw.com Mr. James may be contacted at rob.james@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    California Enacts Change Order Fair Payment Act

    March 24, 2026 —
    For private works construction contracts entered on or after January 1, 2026, recent legislation establishes a claims and dispute resolution process for change orders. The law is codified at Civil Code § 8850. A synopsis of the pertinent provisions includes the following:
    1. Submitting a Claim. Contractors or subcontractors must submit a detailed, documented claim when requesting additional time or payment.
    2. Owner’s Response Time. The owner must meet and confer within thirty (30) days after receiving the claim. Within ten (10) days of meeting, the owner must provide a written statement identifying which portions of the claim are undisputed and which are disputed. An owner’s failure to respond is treated as disputing the entire claim.
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Michael J. Baker, Snell & Wilmer
    Mr. Baker may be contacted at mjbaker@swlaw.com

    Inaccurate Representations Can Lead to Differing Site Conditions Claim

    May 26, 2026 —
    In the prior posting, I discussed a case dealing with a differing site condition. In that case, the owner did not have an affirmative duty to make a representation and there was no inaccurate representation made by the owner that misled the contractor. Well, what about when there is an inaccurate misrepresentation regarding the site? This was the circumstance in an older Florida case where a dredging contractor had a successful differing site conditions claim. See Jacksonville Port Authority v. Parkhill-Goodloe, Co., Inc., 362 So.2d 1009 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). The government provided inaccurate information as to the lack of rock that would be encountered during the dredging that was relied on by the dredging contractor. But the government had “superior knowledge” that there was rock in an adjacent location based on a prior claim from a contractor, yet the government did not disclose the possibility that rock could be encountered. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Shane Singh Named One of Los Angeles Business Journal's 'Top 100 Lawyers of Los Angeles' for 2026

    April 27, 2026 —
    Sacramento Partner Shane Singh has been named one of the Los Angeles Business Journal's "Top 100 Lawyers of Los Angeles" for 2026. The LABJ’s annual list honors Los Angeles' top lawyers for their achievements within the city's business community. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Daily Journal Publishes Article by Brenda Radmacher on Proposed Overhaul of California Construction Defect Law

    June 29, 2026 —
    Daily Journal (California) featured an article by Construction Law partner Brenda Radmacher, “A new path for construction defects in California.” The piece, published on June 15, 2026, examines Assembly Bill 1903 and its potential to significantly reshape California’s construction defect framework, particularly for common interest properties. The article highlights how AB 1903 would overhaul the state’s current right-to-repair system by mandating completion of prelitigation procedures, raising requirements for defect claims, strengthening developers’/builders’ rights to repair, and introducing a voluntary “certified building” program. The legislation aims to rebalance competing interests by reducing litigation-driven costs while preserving protections for homeowners. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Brenda Radmacher, Seyfarth Shaw LLP
    Ms. Radmacher may be contacted at bradmacher@seyfarth.com

    Federal Bid Protest Standard of Review and Disparate Treatment with Ratings

    August 16, 2026 —
    A recent decision out of the Federal Claims Court explains the post-award bid protest standard of review. In Massman Construction Co. v. U.S., 2026 WL 1971985 (Fed.Cl. 2026), a protestor brought a post-award bid protest after the Army Corps of Engineers awarded the contract to another contractor. The protestor argued that the Army Corps (government) acted irrational in its evaluation through disparate treatment. The Court of Federal Claims agreed and remanded for the Army Corps to “either justify this disparity or explain why [awardee’s] lower-priced, but technically inferior proposal provides the best value to the government.” Massman Construction, supra at *1. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com