BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    multi family housing expert witness Ogema Wisconsin housing expert witness Ogema Wisconsin tract home expert witness Ogema Wisconsin casino resort expert witness Ogema Wisconsin institutional building expert witness Ogema Wisconsin mid-rise construction expert witness Ogema Wisconsin hospital construction expert witness Ogema Wisconsin structural steel construction expert witness Ogema Wisconsin townhome construction expert witness Ogema Wisconsin custom home expert witness Ogema Wisconsin production housing expert witness Ogema Wisconsin parking structure expert witness Ogema Wisconsin Subterranean parking expert witness Ogema Wisconsin condominiums expert witness Ogema Wisconsin landscaping construction expert witness Ogema Wisconsin condominium expert witness Ogema Wisconsin high-rise construction expert witness Ogema Wisconsin custom homes expert witness Ogema Wisconsin industrial building expert witness Ogema Wisconsin Medical building expert witness Ogema Wisconsin low-income housing expert witness Ogema Wisconsin retail construction expert witness Ogema Wisconsin
    Ogema Wisconsin construction expert witness public projectsOgema Wisconsin building envelope expert witnessOgema Wisconsin roofing and waterproofing expert witnessOgema Wisconsin architecture expert witnessOgema Wisconsin defective construction expertOgema Wisconsin architect expert witnessOgema Wisconsin construction project management expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Ogema, Wisconsin

    Wisconsin Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB448 specifies 90 day notice with details and evidence prior to commencing legal action. It provides for a 15 day written response from contractor or 25 days if cross-claims against subcontractors; The law states “The claimant and contractor or supplier are bound by any contractor or supplier warranty terms pertaining to products or services supplied for the dwelling.”


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Ogema Wisconsin

    Contractors are required to have the correct credentials for their trade. Not all classifications require credentialing. For a list of credentials, see the website.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Heart of the North Builders Association
    Local # 5137
    PO Box 6
    Rice Lake, WI 54868

    Ogema Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Headwaters Builders Association
    Local # 5196
    PO Box 1074
    Minocqua, WI 54548

    Ogema Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Wausau Area Builders Association
    Local # 5172
    141 W Thomas St
    Wausau, WI 54401

    Ogema Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Northland Area Builders Association
    Local # 5135
    29148 Mail Rd
    Danbury, WI 54830

    Ogema Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    St Croix Valley Home Builders Association
    Local # 5182
    1632 ROLLING HILLS LN
    River Falls, WI 54022

    Ogema Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Door County Home Builders Association
    Local # 5103
    PO Box 112 4087
    Sturgeon Bay, WI 54235

    Ogema Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Chippewa Valley Home Builders Association
    Local # 5104
    4319 Jeffers Rd Ste 200
    Eau Claire, WI 54703

    Ogema Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Ogema Wisconsin


    (Don’t) Go Fish

    Evergrande’s Condemned Towers on China’s Hawaii Show Threat

    Red Tape Is Holding Up a Greener Future

    Agent Not Liable for Loss Given Insured’s Vague Instructions for Coverage

    What Happens When Dave Chappelle Buys Up Your Town

    Seventh Circuit Finds “Additional Insured” Requirements Met Where Non-Party Subcontractor Was Proximate Cause of Underlying Injuries

    As Trump Visits Border, Texas Landowners Prepare to Fight the Wall

    Condominium's Agent Owes No Duty to Injured Apartment Owner

    Court Holds That One-Year SOL Applies to Disgorgement Claims Under B&P Section 7031

    Cybersecurity In Construction: How To Effectively Mitigate Cyber Risk

    New York Construction Practice Team Obtains Summary Judgment and Dismissal of Labor Law Claims

    Hawaii Federal District Rejects Another Construction Defect Claim

    From Both Sides Now: Looking at Contracts Through a Post-Pandemic Lens

    Subcontractor Exception to Your Work Exclusion Paves the Way for Coverage

    Duty to Defend For Accident Exists, But Not Duty to Indeminfy

    Safety Officials Investigating Death From Fall

    Lack of Credibility Can Destroy a Claim

    Lead Paint: The EPA’s Renovation, Repair and Painting Rule

    Insurer Must Defend Claims of Alleged Willful Coal Removal

    A Changing Climate for State Policy-Making Regarding Climate Change

    Rejection’s a Bear- Particularly in Construction

    South Dakota Supreme Court Holds That Faulty Workmanship Constitutes an “Occurrence”

    Excessive Corrosion Cause of Ohio State Fair Ride Accident

    Don’t Just Document- Document Right!

    Lewis Brisbois Listed as Top 10 Firm of 2022 on Leopard Solutions Law Firm Index

    North Dakota Supreme Court Clarifies Breadth of Contractual Liability Coverage

    New Executive Order on AI Innovation and Security: Key Takeaways for the Construction Industry

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “It’s One, Two… Eight Strikes: You’re Out!”

    Lenders Facing Soaring Costs Shutting Out U.S. Homebuyers

    Coloradoans Deserve More Than Hyperbole and Rhetoric from Plaintiffs’ Attorneys; We Deserve Attainable Housing

    Preservationists Want to Save Penn Station. Yes, That Penn Station.

    Spotting Problem Projects

    Where Do We Go From Here?

    FEMA Offers to Review Hurricane Sandy Claims

    Meet the Forum's In-House Counsel: SONYA SEEDER

    ASCE Statement on EPA Lead Pipe and Paint Action Plan

    Montana Court Finds Duty to Defend over Construction Defect Allegation

    FERC’s New Order on Data Center Co-Location: What Utilities Need to Know

    Landmark San Diego Hotel Settles Defects Suit for $6.4 Million

    Lump Sum Subcontract? Perhaps Not.

    Colorado Statutes of Limitations and Repose, A First Step in Construction Defect Litigation

    Federal Contractors Should Request Debriefings As A Matter Of Course

    You Don’t Have To Be a Consumer to Assert a FDUTPA Claim

    Policy Reformed to Add New Building Owner as Additional Insured

    Minneapolis Condo Shortage Blamed on Construction Defect Law

    Chinese Hunt for Trophy Properties Boosts NYC, London Prices

    Ohio Court of Appeals: Absolution Pollution Exclusion Bars Coverage for Workplace Coal-Tar Pitch Exposure Claims

    Watch Your Step – Playing Golf on an Outdoor Course Necessarily Encompasses Risk of Encountering Irregularities in the Ground Surface

    New Zealand Using Plywood Banned Elsewhere

    Federal Contract Termination For Convenience
    Corporate Profile

    OGEMA WISCONSIN CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Ogema, Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Drawing from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Ogema's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Ogema, Wisconsin

    Insured General Contractor Prevails on Motion for Summary Judgment to Establish Builder’s Risk Coverage

    July 06, 2026 —
    The general contractor’s motion for partial summary judgment successfully established that damage to footings in place before the policy period was covered after the collapse of a building. Big D Builders, Inc. v. Am Zurich Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72012 (D. Idaho March 31, 2026). Big D was the general contractor for building a new airplane hangar by erecting a 38,000 square foot structure. Before Big D began construction, the site of the hangar did not contain any pre-existing structures or buildings. Before completion of the hangar, it collapsed and caused extensive property damage. The builder’s risk policy issued by Zurich covered certain aspects of the construction project for the policy period December 28, 2023, to December 28, 2024. Zurich accepted coverage for most of the damage but not for damage to footings and columns installed prior to the start date of the policy. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Civil Megaprojects: The Evolving Use of Dispute Prevention and Collaborative Delivery Methods in Public Contracting

    January 13, 2026 —
    Civil megaprojects are large, complex ventures in civil engineering and construction that typically cost over $1 billion to construct. These projects generally have significant and long-lasting impacts on the economy, environment and society, and involve multiple public and private stakeholders. Typical civil megaprojects include infrastructure projects, such as highways, bridges, tunnels, airports, dams, power plants and public buildings, which require extensive planning, design, coordination and construction over an extended period of time. In the United States, there is over $500 billion worth of civil megaprojects in the pipeline, with an average of four megaprojects per month in 2024 and a total monthly value of $9.2 billion.[i] Here are some recent examples of civil megaprojects: The Hudson Tunnel Project (a portion of the Gateway Program), under construction in the states of New York and New Jersey, involves the construction of two new tunnels and the renovation of aging rail tunnels used by Amtrak and New Jersey Transit that were damaged by Superstorm Sandy along the Northeast Corridor. This has been deemed one of the most important infrastructure projects in the country. It is projected to be completed in 2027 at a cost of over $16 billion.[ii] Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lisa D. Love, JAMS

    Potential Gap in Workers Compensation Immunity Statutory Framework

    June 02, 2026 —
    Workers compensation insurance is important. As an owner, you want to ensure the contractors you hire have workers compensation insurance. Assuming you hire a contractor that is statutorily exempt from workers compensation, you want to make sure, no exception, that any subcontractor that is hired has workers compensation insurance. (Regardless, you always want subcontractors to have workers compensation insurance.). In construction, the prime contractor serves as the “statutory employer” for purposes of workers compensation insurance. With workers compensation comes workers compensation immunity. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    In the Eye of the Beholder: Court of Appeal Finds Duty of Care Owed by Owner and Contractors for Death of Minors Caused by Independent Truck Driver

    May 05, 2026 —
    I was a T.A. for my high school history teacher, a really smart and nice guy, Mr. Reynolds. In the room at the back of the classroom which served as his office he had the picture above. It’s called “My Wife and My Mother-in-Law” and is taken from a German postcard from 1888. Depending on how you look it, you might see fashionable young lady, or an old lady. Cases can sometimes be like that: You see what you want to see. The next case is also like that. In Lorenzo v. Calex Engineering, Inc., 110 Cal.App.5th 49 (2025), the 2nd District Court of Appeals reversed a motion for summary judgment granted in favor of an owner and its contractors in a case involving the death of two minors struck by a dump truck enroute to a non-permitted off-site staging area. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Garret D. Murai, Nomos LLP
    Mr. Murai may be contacted at gmurai@nomosllp.com

    Soot Constitutes Property Damage

    March 17, 2026 —
    Applying Missouri law, the Eighth Circuit affirmed the jury verdict awarding damages for the presence of soot after a fire. Maxus Metropolitan, LLC v. Travelers Property Cas. Co. of Am., 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 29921 (8th Cir. Nov, 17, 2025). A fire destroyed Phase 6 of a multi-building apartment complex known as the Metropolitan. At the time of the fire, all six phases of the Metropolitan were at various stages of completion, including some of which were occupied by tenants. Phase 6 was still under construction. The fire caused severe damage to Phase 5. The interiors of Phases 1-4 were unaffected by the fire. Maxus Metropolitan, the owner of the complex, had a policy with Travelers which covered up to $35 million in “direct physical loss, . . or damage.” The policy also provided coverage for up to $5 million in lost business income. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    At the Intersection of Indemnity and Prevailing Wages

    March 17, 2026 —
    In a case that I’m frankly surprised I don’t see more of, the 2nd District Court of Appeal of California examined an indemnity claim by a subcontractor against a general contractor and public entity who mistakenly believed that a construction project did not require the payment of prevailing wages. The Nabors Case In Nabors Corporate Services, Inc. v. City of Long Beach, 108 Cal.App 540 (2025), subcontractor Nabors Corporate Services, Inc. sued general contractor Tidelands Oil Production Company and the City of Long Beach after it was found liable in a class action lawsuit for failing to pay prevailing wages to its employees. Nabors’ contract with Tidelands did not require the payment of prevailing wages and neither Tidelands nor the City believed that the project, which involved “oil well plug and abandonment” work, required the payment of prevailing wages. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Garret Murai, Nomos LLP
    Mr. Murai may be contacted at gmurai@nomosllp.com

    New California Law Requires Real Estate Agents and Brokers to Disclose AI Alterations in Listings

    January 21, 2026 —
    San Diego, Calif. (December 19, 2025) - Artificial intelligence and digital marketing have become ubiquitous in real estate advertising. The widespread use of AI creates risk for consumers who don’t know whether images shown online or on the multiple listing services are real. A new California law that goes into effect in January 2026 tries to draw a clear line: innovation is welcome but deception is not. The state’s new law requires licensed real estate brokers and salespersons to disclose when images used in advertisement and promotional materials have been digitally altered and to provide access to the original, unaltered images. The law is intended to enhance transparency in real estate advertising and to reduce the risk of consumer deception arising from image editing, virtual staging, or other digital modifications. Who Is Covered The law applies to real estate agents, brokers, developers, and marketing staff involved in property advertising. It encompasses advertisements including those in print and online. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Brian Slome, Lewis Brisbois
    Mr. Slome may be contacted at Brian.Slome@lewisbrisbois.com

    Lost in Translation: AEC Tech’s Missing Role

    May 12, 2026 —
    I once visited a construction site where the contractor’s headquarters had commissioned a tech company to build an on-site quality-inspection application. The developer had admitted to the site engineer that they had never set foot on a construction site before. The engineer showed me what he was actually using: his own phone camera and an Excel sheet. The new app did not map to how work actually happened on site. This is not an isolated story. The vendor builds something technically coherent but operationally disconnected. The client, somewhere up the chain, had fallen in love with the idea of the solution before anyone had built an honest business case for it. The result is a tool that gets demonstrated at a board meeting but isn’t used in the field. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi