BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    condominiums expert witness Oconomowoc Wisconsin Subterranean parking expert witness Oconomowoc Wisconsin concrete tilt-up expert witness Oconomowoc Wisconsin casino resort expert witness Oconomowoc Wisconsin institutional building expert witness Oconomowoc Wisconsin production housing expert witness Oconomowoc Wisconsin parking structure expert witness Oconomowoc Wisconsin townhome construction expert witness Oconomowoc Wisconsin multi family housing expert witness Oconomowoc Wisconsin landscaping construction expert witness Oconomowoc Wisconsin housing expert witness Oconomowoc Wisconsin hospital construction expert witness Oconomowoc Wisconsin structural steel construction expert witness Oconomowoc Wisconsin mid-rise construction expert witness Oconomowoc Wisconsin industrial building expert witness Oconomowoc Wisconsin office building expert witness Oconomowoc Wisconsin high-rise construction expert witness Oconomowoc Wisconsin low-income housing expert witness Oconomowoc Wisconsin custom home expert witness Oconomowoc Wisconsin retail construction expert witness Oconomowoc Wisconsin custom homes expert witness Oconomowoc Wisconsin Medical building expert witness Oconomowoc Wisconsin
    Oconomowoc Wisconsin construction claims expert witnessOconomowoc Wisconsin testifying construction expert witnessOconomowoc Wisconsin construction claims expert witnessOconomowoc Wisconsin construction expert witness public projectsOconomowoc Wisconsin consulting general contractorOconomowoc Wisconsin expert witness windowsOconomowoc Wisconsin architectural engineering expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Oconomowoc, Wisconsin

    Wisconsin Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB448 specifies 90 day notice with details and evidence prior to commencing legal action. It provides for a 15 day written response from contractor or 25 days if cross-claims against subcontractors; The law states “The claimant and contractor or supplier are bound by any contractor or supplier warranty terms pertaining to products or services supplied for the dwelling.”


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Oconomowoc Wisconsin

    Contractors are required to have the correct credentials for their trade. Not all classifications require credentialing. For a list of credentials, see the website.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Wisconsin Builders Association (State)
    Local # 5100
    4868 High Crossing Blvd
    Madison, WI 53704

    Oconomowoc Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Metro Builders Association of Gr Milwaukee
    Local # 5148
    N16 W23321 Stoneridge Dr
    Waukesha, WI 53188

    Oconomowoc Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Madison Area Builders Association
    Local # 5132
    5936 Seminole Centre Ct
    Madison, WI 53711

    Oconomowoc Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Lakeland Builders Association
    Local # 5128
    1560 N Country Club Pkwy
    Elkhorn, WI 53121

    Oconomowoc Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Racine-Kenosha Builders Association
    Local # 5156
    PO Box 706
    Sturtevant, WI 53177

    Oconomowoc Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Mid Wisconsin Home Builders Association
    Local # 5181
    PO Box 865
    Portage, WI 53901

    Oconomowoc Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    South Central Wisconsin Builders Association
    Local # 5140
    PO Box 563
    Janesville, WI 53547

    Oconomowoc Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Oconomowoc Wisconsin


    Washington Court of Appeals Upholds Standard of Repose in Fruit Warehouse Case

    GA Federal Court Holds That Jury, Not Judge, Generally Must Decide Whether Notice Was Given “As Soon as Practicable” Under First-Party Property Damage Policies

    Updated 3/13/20: Coronavirus is Here: What Does That Mean for Your Project and Your Business?

    Seventh Circuit Remands “Waters of the United States” Case to Corps of Engineers to Determine Whether there is a “Significant Nexus”

    End of an (Endangerment) Era

    Insureds' Not Entitled to Recovery for Partial Collapse

    Contractors Board May Discipline Over Workers’ Comp Reporting

    NAHB Examines Single-Family Detached Concentration Statistics

    Construction Suit Ends with Just an Apology

    Mortgage Company Fails to Prove Loss or Entitlement to Damages, Eliminating Recovery

    Pre-Judgment Interest Not Awarded Under Flood Policy

    Construction Lien Does Not Include Late Fees Separate From Interest

    FEMA, Congress Eye Pre-Disaster Funding, Projects

    Burden Supporting Termination for Default

    White and Williams Announces Partner and Counsel Promotions

    Colorado Federal Court Confirms Consequetial Property Damage, But Finds No Coverage for Subcontractor

    Texas Construction Firm Officials Sentenced in Contract-Fraud Case

    The Drought Is Sinking California

    House Panel Subpoenas VA Documents on Colorado Project

    Denver Airport Terminates P3 Contract For Main Terminal Renovation

    Contract Should Have Clear and Definite Terms to Avoid a Patent Ambiguity

    Subcontractor Entitled to Defense for Defective Work Causing Property Damage Beyond Its Scope of Work

    While Starts Fall, Builder Confidence and Permits are on the Rise

    Housing Inflation Begins to Rise

    Party Cannot Skirt Out of the Very Fraud It Perpetrates

    Loss Caused by Theft, Continuous Water Discharge Not Covered

    Thomson Reuters Construction Law (Virginia Practice Series)

    Critical Materials for the Energy Transition: Of “Rare Earths” and Even Rarer Minerals

    Miorelli Doctrine’s Sovereign Immunity in Public Construction Contracts — Not the Be-All and End-All

    Musings: Moving or Going into a New Service Area, There is More to It Than Just…

    Client Alert: Expert Testimony in Indemnity Action Not Limited to Opinions Presented in Underlying Matter

    The Latest News on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac

    Landlords Beware: Subordination Agreements

    Vermont Supreme Court Finds COVID-19 May Damage Property

    Insurer's Motion to Dismiss Allegations of Collapse Rejected

    Vallagio v. Metropolitan Homes: Colorado Supreme Court Upholds Declarant Consent Provision to Amend Arbitration Out of Declarations

    Construction Expert and Judge Living in the Same Hood Is Not Grounds For Recusal

    New-Home Sales in U.S. Unexpectedly Fall to Four-Month Low

    Disappointment on an Olympian Scale After Rio 2016 Summer Games

    The 2023 Term of the Supreme Court: Administrative and Regulatory Law Rulings

    How SmartThings Wants to Automate Your Home

    New OSHA Regulations on Confined Spaces in Construction

    Insurer's Summary Judgment Motion to Reject Claim for Construction Defects Upheld

    Top 10 Hurricane Preparedness Practices for Construction Sites

    East Coast Evaluates Damage After Fast-Moving 'Bomb Cyclone'

    UK SFO Makes Arrests in European Data Center Bribery Probe

    Coverage Established for Property Damage Caused by Added Product

    Perovskite: The Super Solar Cells

    Insurance Client Alert: Mere Mailing of Policy and Renewals Into California is Not Sufficient Basis for Jurisdiction Over Bad Faith Lawsuit

    Preparing For and Avoiding Residential Construction Disputes: For Homeowners and Contractors
    Corporate Profile

    OCONOMOWOC WISCONSIN CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Oconomowoc, Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Drawing from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Oconomowoc's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Oconomowoc, Wisconsin

    The Most Expensive Signature to Not Get: Why Change Orders Matter

    August 16, 2026 —
    George Bernard Shaw has a quote we use a lot in my family: “The single biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place.” This is pertinent to contractors and homeowners alike because the cost of failing to get proper signatures on documents like construction contracts, and particularly, change orders, is heavy. Both contractors and homeowners are in the same boat as far as wanting to complete a job as swiftly as possible: contractors go on to their next job and homeowners can return to peace in their home. This is prime territory for either party to suggest the work be completed today and the contract or change order executed tomorrow, or even later. However, without a contract, there is no memorialization of the communication between the parties, which can lead to confusion and missed expectations on both sides. Construction plans are rarely as neat and tidy as they originally seem to be. A contractor may uncover unforeseen conditions, an owner may request additional work or changes that require additional work, or weather interferes with project schedules or the work itself. Unfortunately, the signature that never gets collected can become one of the most expensive omissions on a project – for both sides. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Kathryne E. Baldwin, Wilke Fleury
    Ms. Baldwin may be contacted at kbaldwin@wilkefleury.com

    Texas Voids Out-of-State Forum and Choice of Law Clauses in Construction Contracts

    March 17, 2026 —
    The Texas Legislature amended statutes impacting construction contracts for projects located in Texas to declare any forum selection clause or choice of law provision “void as against public policy,” and mandate venue for any litigation or arbitration shall be in the Texas county in which the work is performed. The parties may stipulate to a different venue only after the dispute arises. Forum selection clauses and choice of law provisions are common in construction contracts. Frequently, general contractors based in other jurisdictions require subcontractors to sign contracts designating the contractor’s preferred venue for any dispute. These contracts may also select the law of another state to govern the contract. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Conor G. Bateman, Snell & Wilmer
    Mr. Bateman may be contacted at cbateman@swlaw.com

    New York Team Secures Dismissal of Premises Liability Action Against Client

    May 26, 2026 —
    New York Associate Nicole Koch and Partner Jennine Gerrard recently secured a complete dismissal of a plaintiff’s claims for injuries following a fall in front of a client’s business at an outdoor mall. The plaintiff alleged that she was walking on the sidewalk outside of the client's hair care supply store in the Bronx in May 2024 when she tripped and fell on a broken/defective portion of the sidewalk. As a result of the accident, the plaintiff suffered injuries to her spine, hip, wrist, and both knees. She proceeded to file suit in New York County Supreme Court against Lewis Brisbois’ client and the landlord for the property. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Managing Rising Costs and Shifting Legal Risk for Florida High-Rise and Condominium Projects

    May 05, 2026 —
    Florida's construction defect landscape is experiencing a major shift. The convergence of material and labor cost volatility, regulatory tightening, and increasingly complex litigation strategies is forcing associations, developers, and their counsel to rethink how they approach risk management and dispute resolution. For those managing large-scale condo and high-rise projects, the stakes have never been higher. The Cost Volatility Trap Construction material prices rose at a "staggering" 12.6% annualized rate during the first two months of 2026, according to recent industry analysis. Tariff impacts are projected to lead to more increases of 5.4% to 6.8%, depending on property type. For associations facing construction defect claims, this volatility creates a cascading problem: repair scopes defined two years ago are now dramatically underpriced, and damage calculations that appeared reasonable at discovery are obsolete by the time of settlement. Courts and mediators are increasingly scrutinizing how cost estimates were developed and whether they account for existing market circumstances. Associations must now commission updated repair assessments more frequently, a practice that increases investigation costs but strengthens the credibility of damage claims. Conversely, defendants are weaponizing cost inflation as a defense, arguing that claimed damages are speculative or inflated. The practical result: repair sequencing and phasing strategies have become critical litigation tools. Associations that can demonstrate a rational, cost-effective repair plan tied to current market data are more favorably placed in settlement negotiations. Regulatory Pressure and Deliberate Timing Florida's 2026 condo compliance regime has significantly changed the defect claims landscape. Elevated transparency requirements, stricter reserve funding mandates, and tightened building safety inspection protocols mean that associations now face dual pressures: Comply with new regulations while simultaneously handling construction defect exposure. This regulatory environment is changing investigation and documentation strategy. Associations that delay defect investigation to avoid triggering reserve funding obligations or disclosure requirements are taking on considerable legal risk. Recent case law such as the Third District Court of Appeal's reaffirmation of Chapter 558's pre-suit mediation requirements, underscores Florida's intent to resolve disputes early. Associations that move deliberately and record carefully during the pre-suit phase gain leverage in mediation and reduce the risk of expensive litigation. Timing also intersects with repair sequencing. Associations must now balance the urgency of compliance inspections against the strategic advantage of phased repairs. Some associations are using compliance deadlines as a forcing mechanism to accelerate settlement discussions, while others are sequencing repairs to demonstrate good-faith remediation efforts before litigation commences. The Emerging Risk Transfer Challenge As construction defect claims grow more complex and costly, the traditional risk transfer systems, such as design-build warranties, contractor bonds, and insurance, are proving inadequate. Developers and general contractors are increasingly shifting risk to subcontractors and material suppliers, fragmenting liability and complicating recovery efforts for associations. Permitting and approval friction is also creating new litigation pressure points. Delays in municipal approvals, changes to building code interpretations, and disputes over remedial work compliance continue to spawn collateral claims that go beyond the original defect. Associations must now anticipate not only defect liability but also regulatory compliance disputes with municipalities, creating a dual-front legal challenge. For large communities, this means reconsidering the entire risk architecture. Insurance carriers are tightening coverage, and traditional indemnification chains are breaking down. Forward-thinking associations are engaging counsel earlier in the development process to negotiate clearer risk allocation provisions and more robust insurance requirements. Taking a Data-Driven Approach Managing rising costs and shifting legal risk in Florida's high-rise and condo market requires a more sophisticated, data-driven approach. Associations must commission frequent cost updates, move deliberately through pre-suit investigation and mediation, and challenge traditional assumptions about risk transfer. Developers and their counsel should view regulatory compliance not as a burden but as an opportunity to demonstrate good-faith risk management and strengthen settlement positioning. The firms and associations that succeed in 2026 will be those that treat cost volatility, regulatory change, and litigation strategy not as separate challenges but as linked elements of a coherent risk management framework. Stephen Hauptman is special counsel in Ball Janik LLP’s Fort Lauderdale office. He may be reached at shauptman@balljanik.com.

    Inaccurate Representations Can Lead to Differing Site Conditions Claim

    May 26, 2026 —
    In the prior posting, I discussed a case dealing with a differing site condition. In that case, the owner did not have an affirmative duty to make a representation and there was no inaccurate representation made by the owner that misled the contractor. Well, what about when there is an inaccurate misrepresentation regarding the site? This was the circumstance in an older Florida case where a dredging contractor had a successful differing site conditions claim. See Jacksonville Port Authority v. Parkhill-Goodloe, Co., Inc., 362 So.2d 1009 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). The government provided inaccurate information as to the lack of rock that would be encountered during the dredging that was relied on by the dredging contractor. But the government had “superior knowledge” that there was rock in an adjacent location based on a prior claim from a contractor, yet the government did not disclose the possibility that rock could be encountered. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Kahana Feld Obtains Favorable Result in High-Exposure NY Premises Liability Case

    June 15, 2026 —
    Kahana Feld partner Leigh Katz obtained a significant victory in a recent matter involving a videotaped alleged trip and fall on the sidewalk in front of the client’s commercial residence. The plaintiff claimed he suffered a knee injury that necessitated surgery, along with other assorted injuries that prevented him from continuing high-level athletic activities. Leigh was able to demonstrate that the fall was staged and received a voluntary discontinuance with prejudice. At mediation, Leigh emphasized that KF’s expert witness challenged the plaintiff’s claim that the fall was caused by a sidewalk height differential after reviewing the videotape footage and determining the plaintiff’s fall began before his feet made contact with the alleged defect. Based on this analysis, the expert concluded the reported height differential did not initiate the fall, which supported KF’s position that the incident depicted in the video was unrealistic and appeared staged. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Leigh Katz, Kahana Feld
    Ms. Katz may be contacted at lkatz@kahanafeld.com

    Kamran Salour Named to Los Angeles Times' 2026 Legal Visionaries List

    June 02, 2026 —
    Orange County Partner and Data Privacy & Cybersecurity Practice Co-Chair Kamran Salour was named to the Los Angeles Times' 2026 Legal Visionaries list, which honors the most innovative attorneys in Southern California. In announcing this year's Legal Visionaries, the Times said that Mr. Salour and his co-honorees "distinguish themselves not only through skilleand results but through an unwavering commitment to their clients, their craft and the communities they serve." "Their paths – shaped by rigorous education, defining cases and purposeful leadership – offer a deeper perspective on what sets true standouts apart," the Times' announcement stated. "Together, these visionaries exemplify a forward-thinking approach to the law, elevating both their profession and the people who depend on it." Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Construction Robotics Works Where Variation Ends

    August 11, 2026 —
    BuiltWorlds published its 2026 Robotics Top 50 this summer, and the list is genuinely wide. Fifty solutions across nine categories, from 3D printing and prefabricated component manufacturing to earthmoving, demolition, material transport, layout, installation, inspection, and drilling. The honorees come from sixteen countries. It looks like robotics has finally spread across the whole project lifecycle. However, having vendors in nine categories does not mean that contractors are robotizing their work en masse. Zacua Ventures, in its 2026 construction robotics report, estimates that on-site robotics accounted for less than 0.03% of global construction spending in 2025. Zacua says: “That is not a failed market. It is a market at the beginning of an adoption S-curve”, while warning that its estimates rest on private vendor data and may be high if vendors overstate how widely their machines are deployed. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi