BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    custom home expert witness Mikana Wisconsin condominium expert witness Mikana Wisconsin office building expert witness Mikana Wisconsin concrete tilt-up expert witness Mikana Wisconsin casino resort expert witness Mikana Wisconsin institutional building expert witness Mikana Wisconsin low-income housing expert witness Mikana Wisconsin retail construction expert witness Mikana Wisconsin industrial building expert witness Mikana Wisconsin parking structure expert witness Mikana Wisconsin custom homes expert witness Mikana Wisconsin townhome construction expert witness Mikana Wisconsin tract home expert witness Mikana Wisconsin condominiums expert witness Mikana Wisconsin mid-rise construction expert witness Mikana Wisconsin hospital construction expert witness Mikana Wisconsin housing expert witness Mikana Wisconsin Subterranean parking expert witness Mikana Wisconsin production housing expert witness Mikana Wisconsin landscaping construction expert witness Mikana Wisconsin Medical building expert witness Mikana Wisconsin structural steel construction expert witness Mikana Wisconsin
    Mikana Wisconsin construction forensic expert witnessMikana Wisconsin architectural expert witnessMikana Wisconsin soil failure expert witnessMikana Wisconsin expert witness concrete failureMikana Wisconsin construction defect expert witnessMikana Wisconsin consulting architect expert witnessMikana Wisconsin construction claims expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Mikana, Wisconsin

    Wisconsin Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB448 specifies 90 day notice with details and evidence prior to commencing legal action. It provides for a 15 day written response from contractor or 25 days if cross-claims against subcontractors; The law states “The claimant and contractor or supplier are bound by any contractor or supplier warranty terms pertaining to products or services supplied for the dwelling.”


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Mikana Wisconsin

    Contractors are required to have the correct credentials for their trade. Not all classifications require credentialing. For a list of credentials, see the website.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Heart of the North Builders Association
    Local # 5137
    PO Box 6
    Rice Lake, WI 54868

    Mikana Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Headwaters Builders Association
    Local # 5196
    PO Box 1074
    Minocqua, WI 54548

    Mikana Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Northland Area Builders Association
    Local # 5135
    29148 Mail Rd
    Danbury, WI 54830

    Mikana Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Wausau Area Builders Association
    Local # 5172
    141 W Thomas St
    Wausau, WI 54401

    Mikana Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    St Croix Valley Home Builders Association
    Local # 5182
    1632 ROLLING HILLS LN
    River Falls, WI 54022

    Mikana Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Door County Home Builders Association
    Local # 5103
    PO Box 112 4087
    Sturgeon Bay, WI 54235

    Mikana Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Chippewa Valley Home Builders Association
    Local # 5104
    4319 Jeffers Rd Ste 200
    Eau Claire, WI 54703

    Mikana Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Mikana Wisconsin


    Understanding Entitlement to Delays and Proper Support

    The “Pay When Paid” Clause in California Construction—Strategies as the Battle Continues

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “The Jury Is Still Out”

    Insured's Failure to Prove Entire Collapse of Building Leads to Dismissal

    Limiting Services Can Lead to Increased Liability

    Congratulations to BWB&O’s Orange County Team for Securing a Strong MSJ Result in a Residential Gas Explosion Matter!

    Netflix Plans $900M Facility At Former New Jersey Army Base

    Denial of Coverage for Bulge in Wall Upheld

    Jury Awards 20 Million Verdict Against Bishop Abbey Homes

    "Ordinance or Law" Provision Mandates Coverage for Roof Repair

    Thanks to All for My 9th Straight Super Lawyers Election

    More Thoughts on “Green” (the Practice, not the Color) Building

    CSLB Joint Venture Licenses – Providing Contractors With The Means To Expand Their Businesses

    New Jersey Construction Company Owner and Employees Arrested for Fraud

    Hurricane Warning: Florida and Southeastern US Companies – It is Time to Activate Your Hurricane Preparedness Plan and Review Key Insurance Deadlines

    Virginia Families Hope to Sue over Chinese Drywall

    #3 CDJ Topic: Underwriters of Interest Subscribing to Policy No. A15274001 v. ProBuilders Specialty Ins. Co., Case No. D066615

    Stucco Contractor Trying to Limit Communication in Construction Defect Case

    Wisconsin Supreme Court Holds Fire Damage Resulted from Single Occurrence

    Bert L. Howe & Associates to Join All-Star Panel at West Coast Casualty Seminar

    Arbitration is Waivable (Even If You Don’t Mean To)

    S&P Near $1 Billion Mortgage Ratings Settlement With U.S.

    Trend Continues Where Unlicensed Contractors Have No Recourse

    Luxury Villa Fraudsters Jailed for Madeira Potato Field Scam

    So a Lawsuit Is on the Horizon…

    Brief Overview of Rights of Unlicensed Contractors in California

    Illinois Supreme Court Limits Reach of Implied Warranty Claims Against Contractors

    The Almost-Collapse of a Sarasota, Florida Condo Building

    Contractor Removed from Site for Lack of Insurance

    2017 California Construction Law Update

    Construction Companies Can Be Liable for “Secondary Exposure” of Asbestos to Household Members

    Fixed Price, Fluid Quantities: The Hidden Risks in Lump Sum Agreements with Variable Units

    Expanded Virginia Court of Appeals Leads to Policyholder Relief

    Vertical vs. Horizontal Exhaustion – California Supreme Court Issues Ruling Favorable to Policyholders

    #4 CDJ Topic: Vita Planning and Landscape Architecture, Inc. v. HKS Architects, Inc.

    Representation and Warranties Claims Reach Record Payouts in 2024

    Mitigating FCRA Risk Through Insurance

    New York Team’s Win Limits Scope of Property Owners’ Duties to Workers for Hazards Inherent in Their Work

    AIA Releases State-Specific Waiver and Release Forms

    Mediation in the Zero Sum World of Construction

    Ivanhoe Cambridge Plans Toronto Office Towers, Terminal

    Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Strikes a Deathblow to Substantial Factor Causation in Most Cases; Is Asbestos Litigation Next?

    Create a Culture of Safety to Improve Labor Recruitment Efforts

    Top 10 Lessons Learned from a Construction Attorney

    Burlingame Construction Defect Case Heading to Trial

    City of Pawtucket Considering Forensic Investigation of Tower

    The Death of Retail and Legal Issues

    What You Need to Know About Additional Insured Endorsements

    As of July 1, 2024, California Will Require Most Employers to Have a Written Workplace Violence Prevention Program (WVPP) and Training. Is Your Company Compliant?

    #5 CDJ Topic: David Belasco v. Gary Loren Wells et al. (2015) B254525
    Corporate Profile

    MIKANA WISCONSIN CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Mikana, Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Leveraging from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Mikana's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Mikana, Wisconsin

    Perennial Question, Perennial Answer? EPA and Army Corps Propose Year-Round Standard for WOTUS that Could Reshape Clean Water Act Jurisdiction

    October 12, 2026 —
    Federal Clean Water Act jurisdiction may be about to get considerably narrower. On September 4, 2026, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) announced a supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking that would limit federal authority over streams and wetlands to those containing water year-round—a “perennial” standard that would go beyond even what the Supreme Court required in Sackett v. EPA, 598 U.S. 651 (2023). The supplemental notice offers two options for revising the definition of “waters of the United States” (WOTUS) under the Clean Water Act (CWA): One would define “relatively permanent” waters as perennial, and the other would require perennial surface water to establish a wetland’s continuous surface connection to a jurisdictional water. If adopted, either option would substantially reduce the number of streams, wetlands and other water features subject to federal permitting, with the sharpest effects in arid and semi-arid regions where rainfall patterns leave many waterways dry for portions of the year. Reprinted courtesy of Ashleigh K. Myers, Pillsbury and Jillian Marullo, Pillsbury Ms. Myers may be contacted at ashleigh.myers@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Marullo may be contacted at jillian.marullo@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    A Win for Clarity: What a Recent Federal Court Decision Means for Davis-Bacon Compliance

    July 13, 2026 —
    Following the Department of Labor’s 2023 Davis-Bacon rule changes, federal construction contractors faced a pressing question: not whether paying prevailing wages is required, but how far those obligations could extend. Could they reach off-site material suppliers? Delivery drivers? Contracts that omitted Davis-Bacon clauses entirely? A recent federal court decision in AGC of America v. US Department of Labor answers these questions in important ways, vacating several disputed provisions and giving contractors greater certainty when pricing, bidding, and administering federal construction projects. The ruling addresses three aspects of the 2023 regulations that sought to extend Davis-Bacon obligations beyond their traditional scope. By vacating those provisions, the decision creates a more predictable compliance environment and reinforces an important principle: Davis-Bacon enforcement works best when contractors, workers, and regulators operate under clear, objective rules. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Stephen E. Irving, Peckar & Abramson, P.C.
    Mr. Irving may be contacted at sirving@pecklaw.com

    Arizona Court Enters $323 Million Judgment Against ZOM Living Following Unanimous Jury Verdict

    May 26, 2026 —
    PHOENIX, May 19, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- A Maricopa County court has entered a $323 million compensatory damages judgment in favor of Gray Development Group against ZOM Holding Inc., doing business as ZOM Living, following a 12-day trial, a unanimous jury verdict and post-trial proceedings related to a proposed business transaction. The jury found ZOM liable on claims of breach of contract and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing stemming from a proposed joint venture tied to a planned pipeline of luxury multifamily and commercial projects in Phoenix and Scottsdale. The lawsuit centered on a 13-project, $1.4 billion development pipeline originated and planned by Gray Development Group over more than a decade. In 2019, Gray invited Florida-based ZOM to participate in a joint venture involving the completion of five projects, which would have marked ZOM's entry into the Arizona market. According to court findings presented at trial, the companies entered into a mutual confidentiality and non-circumvention agreement before Gray shared extensive sensitive and proprietary information related to the projects, including planning, market analysis, costs, financial data, local business relationships and operational strategies developed by Gray over decades in Arizona. Evidence presented during trial showed that over a 10-month period while under contract, ZOM made hundreds of requests for confidential project and market information before circumventing Gray and pursuing the projects independently, ultimately displacing Gray from projects it spent years planning and developing. ZOM Living, headquartered in Orlando, develops multifamily and senior housing communities across the United States and operates regional offices in Boston, Dallas, Fort Lauderdale, Nashville, Phoenix, and Raleigh. ZOM is owned by Timeless Investments, the Amsterdam-based family office of Dutch businessman Hans van Veggel, which acquired the company in 1997. About Gray Development Group Gray Development Group was founded by architect Bruce Gray in 1991. The Phoenix-based company was the top-ranked multifamily developer in Arizona for more than a decade. The company designed and developed more than 15,000 apartment and condominium units throughout metropolitan Phoenix. Two Gray-designed developments — a Tempe midrise and a San Diego high-rise — received National Apartment Community of the Year awards.

    One Industry, One Goal: Construction Safety Week 2026

    May 05, 2026 —
    Construction safety has long been a top priority across the industry. Yet fatality rates have remained stubbornly flat for more than a decade. Steven Carter, global health and safety director at Gilbane chair company for Construction Safety Week 2026—believes the industry has reached a pivotal moment. This year’s theme—”All In Together: Recognize. Respond. Respect.”—is a unified call to action for owners, designers, contractors and craft professionals around a shared, risk-based approach to preventing serious injuries and fatalities. In a recent interview with Construction Executive, Carter discusses why the industry must move beyond incremental improvements, how technology and AI can support better planning and what it will take to create a true culture of psychological safety on jobsites. Reprinted courtesy of Maggie Murphy, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Celebrating Freedom: The Overlooked Freedom to Contract in Commercial Insurance

    July 20, 2026 —
    Happy 4th and 250 years of freedom . . . to contract! Many policyholders assume insurance policies are “standard” and must be accepted as-is. That assumption is often wrong—and dangerously limiting. Unlike many consumer insurance markets, the commercial insurance realm preserves a robust “freedom to contract,” allowing sophisticated policyholders to negotiate terms, exclusions, definitions, and limits before a policy is even issued. Particularly in recent years, high-profile disputes over cyber coverage, business interruption, and war/cyber exclusions have shown not just what happens when coverage is denied, but what could have been done up front to avoid those fights. This post highlights the power policyholders still hold in the negotiation process and illustrates, with concrete examples from recent media-covered disputes, how that freedom can be strategically used. Reprinted courtesy of Michael S. Levine, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP and Andrea DeField, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP Mr. Levine may be contacted at mlevine@hunton.com Ms. DeField may be contacted at adefield@hunton.com Read the full story...

    World's Longest Immersed Tunnel Passes Milestone, But Faces Delays

    August 03, 2026 —
    Work on the $8-billion Fehmarnbelt Tunnel, which is planned to link Germany and Denmark as the world’s longest immersed tunnel, is progressing as crews achieved a milestone last month with the successful immersion of its first precast concrete element. But Danish state-owned project owner Femern A/S says the plan is now running at least two years behind schedule and the tunnel’s road and rail portions will open in two separate stages. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of James Leggate, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Leggate may be contacted at leggatej@enr.com

    HDR Agreed to $12M Settlement With Miami Bridge Design-Build Team

    May 12, 2026 —
    HDR last year agreed to pay $12 million to the design-build construction contractor Archer Western-de Moya Group to settle its claims that the engineer had incompletely designed and under-designed Miami's new Signature Bridge when the joint venture committed to a fixed price prior to construction in 2018. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Richard Korman, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Korman may be contacted at kormanr@enr.com

    Insufficient Notice of Commencement and Construction Lien Rights

    August 03, 2026 —
    When a party is preserving their construction lien rights, the party will look to the recorded Notice of Commencement. This is the recorded document that provides the lienor with the information for purposes of preserving construction lien rights. A Notice to Owner company will typically rely on the Notice of Commencement to serve Notices to Owners from lower tiers not in contract with the owner. However, when it comes to preparing the lien, a lienor should look beyond just the Notice of Commencement and also look to the property appraiser’s website as a backstop. In a recent case, a window company had the homeowner sign the Notice of Commencement and then filled in the information. The company naturally did this for the convenience of the homeowner that probably was unfamiliar with the Notice of Commencement process. Regardless, information in the Notice of Commencement was inaccurate. It failed to include all the real property owners. Thus, when a payment dispute arose and a construction lien was prepared, it did not identify all of the real property owners. All of the real property owners were added later during the pendency of a lien foreclosure lawsuit. The trial court denied the lien because of the defective / insufficient Notice of Commencement — the lienor assumed the risk of error by filling out the information in the Notice of Commencement. The trial court further denied the lien holding that because the work did not commence within 90 days of the Notice of Commencement, the Notice of Commencement is void. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com