BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    retail construction expert witness Forest County Wisconsin low-income housing expert witness Forest County Wisconsin multi family housing expert witness Forest County Wisconsin landscaping construction expert witness Forest County Wisconsin institutional building expert witness Forest County Wisconsin structural steel construction expert witness Forest County Wisconsin parking structure expert witness Forest County Wisconsin office building expert witness Forest County Wisconsin concrete tilt-up expert witness Forest County Wisconsin Medical building expert witness Forest County Wisconsin condominium expert witness Forest County Wisconsin casino resort expert witness Forest County Wisconsin custom homes expert witness Forest County Wisconsin hospital construction expert witness Forest County Wisconsin housing expert witness Forest County Wisconsin high-rise construction expert witness Forest County Wisconsin townhome construction expert witness Forest County Wisconsin condominiums expert witness Forest County Wisconsin Subterranean parking expert witness Forest County Wisconsin tract home expert witness Forest County Wisconsin mid-rise construction expert witness Forest County Wisconsin production housing expert witness Forest County Wisconsin
    Forest County Wisconsin consulting architect expert witnessForest County Wisconsin construction defect expert witnessForest County Wisconsin engineering consultantForest County Wisconsin OSHA expert witness constructionForest County Wisconsin defective construction expertForest County Wisconsin building envelope expert witnessForest County Wisconsin reconstruction expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Forest County, Wisconsin

    Wisconsin Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB448 specifies 90 day notice with details and evidence prior to commencing legal action. It provides for a 15 day written response from contractor or 25 days if cross-claims against subcontractors; The law states “The claimant and contractor or supplier are bound by any contractor or supplier warranty terms pertaining to products or services supplied for the dwelling.”


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Forest County Wisconsin

    Contractors are required to have the correct credentials for their trade. Not all classifications require credentialing. For a list of credentials, see the website.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Heart of the North Builders Association
    Local # 5137
    PO Box 6
    Rice Lake, WI 54868

    Forest County Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Headwaters Builders Association
    Local # 5196
    PO Box 1074
    Minocqua, WI 54548

    Forest County Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Northland Area Builders Association
    Local # 5135
    29148 Mail Rd
    Danbury, WI 54830

    Forest County Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Wausau Area Builders Association
    Local # 5172
    141 W Thomas St
    Wausau, WI 54401

    Forest County Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    St Croix Valley Home Builders Association
    Local # 5182
    1632 ROLLING HILLS LN
    River Falls, WI 54022

    Forest County Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Door County Home Builders Association
    Local # 5103
    PO Box 112 4087
    Sturgeon Bay, WI 54235

    Forest County Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Chippewa Valley Home Builders Association
    Local # 5104
    4319 Jeffers Rd Ste 200
    Eau Claire, WI 54703

    Forest County Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Forest County Wisconsin


    U.S. Government Bans Use of Mandatory Arbitration Agreements between Nursing Homes and Residents, Effective November 28, 2016

    FTC Issues Warning Letters to Property Management Software Providers on Price Transparency

    Alabama Court Determines No Coverage For Insured's Faulty Workmanship

    Four Steps to Effectively Manage Rising Risk of Construction Liability Claims

    Defending Against the Res Ipsa Loquitur Doctrine – Liability Considerations

    Nevada Governor Signs Construction Defect Reform Bill

    Energy Efficiency Ratings Aren’t Actually Predicting Energy Efficiency

    2016 California Construction Law Upate

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (4/24/24) – Omni Hotels Hit with Cyberattack, Wisconsin’s Low-Interest Loans for Home Construction, and Luxury Real Estate Sales Increase

    US Court Questions 102-Mile Transmission Project Over River Crossing

    Seeking the Urban Lifestyle in the Suburbs

    Just Because I May Be An “Expert” Does Not Mean I Am Giving Expert Testimony

    Flood Sublimits Do Not Apply to Loss Caused by Named Windstorm

    A New Statute of Limitations on Construction Claims by VA State Agencies?

    Retired Judge Claims Asbestos in Courthouse gave him Cancer

    Safe and Safer

    GRSM Attorneys Selected to 2025 Super Lawyers and Rising Stars Lists

    Janeen Thomas Installed as State Director of WWBA, Receives First Ever President’s Award

    Investigators Explain Focus on Pre-Collapse Cracking in Florida Bridge

    Hovnanian Increases Construction Defect Reserves for 2012

    Court Grants Motion to Dismiss Negligence Claim Against Flood Insurer

    Wisconsin Supreme Court Holds that Subrogation Waiver Does Not Violate Statute Prohibiting Limitation on Tort Liability in Construction Contracts

    Portion of Washington State’s Prevailing Wage Statute Struck Down … Again

    Colorado Temporarily Requires Employers to Provide Sick Leave While Awaiting COVID-19 Testing

    Arizona Court Cites California Courts to Determine Construction Defect Coverage is Time Barred

    What California’s COVID-19 Reopening Means for the Construction Industry

    New York’s Highest Court Reverses Lower Court Ruling That Imposed Erroneous Timeliness Requirement For Disclaimers of Coverage

    Wall Enclosing Georgia Neighborhood Built for Walking Dead TV Show

    Can’t Get a Written Change Order? Document, Document, Document

    New Nafta Could Settle Canada-U.S. Lumber War, Resolute CEO Says

    S&P 500 Little Changed on Home Sales Amid Quarterly Rally

    Traub Lieberman Attorneys Recognized as 2026 Illinois Super Lawyers® and Rising Stars

    Building and Landscape Standards Enacted in Response to the Governor's Mandatory Water Restrictions Dealing with the Drought and Possible Effects of El Niño

    New York Amends Prompt Payment Act: Retainage Above 5% in Private Construction Contracts Now Void

    Singer Akon’s Multibillion-Dollar Futuristic City in Africa Gets Final Notice

    Pulte Home Corp. v. CBR Electric, Inc.

    Builders Beware: A New Class Of Defendants In Asbestos Lawsuits

    West Coast Casualty’s Construction Defect Seminar Returns to Anaheim May 15th & 16th

    Termination for Convenience Clauses: Maybe More Than Just Convenience

    Designed to Expose: Beware Lender Certificates

    Notice Provisions in Contracts Matter

    Nevada Bill Would Bring Changes to Construction Defects

    Liquidating Agreements—Bridging the Privity Gap for Subcontractors

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (5/1/24) – IMF’s Data on Housing, REITs Versus Private Real Estate, and Suburban Versus Urban Office Property Market

    Delaware Supreme Court Choice of Law Ruling Vacates a $13.7 Million Verdict Against Travelers

    Coverage Found for Faulty Workmanship Damaging Other Property

    ACI 318-25 Structural Concrete Code Update Adds Sustainability Guide, Performance-based Wind Design

    Nomos LLP Partner Garret Murai Recognized by Super Lawyers

    California’s One-Action Rule May Apply to Federal Lenders

    Leftover Equipment and Materials When a Contractor Is Abruptly Terminated
    Corporate Profile

    FOREST COUNTY WISCONSIN CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Forest County, Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Drawing from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Forest County's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Forest County, Wisconsin

    PJM’s Reliability Backstop Procurement Proposal—Fast-Track Capacity to Meet Rising Large-Load Demand

    May 12, 2026 —
    In January, we discussed the Statement of Principles jointly signed by the National Energy Dominance Council and governors across the mid-Atlantic region—framing accelerating demand (especially from large-scale data centers) as an emergency reliability issue for PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. (PJM), the nation’s largest power grid operator. That policy signal is now becoming a near-term, accelerated procurement and contracting exercise. On April 8, 2026, PJM notified stakeholders of a critical issue fast path reliability backstop procurement process. PJM subsequently released a request for information (RFI) with respect to a proposed Reliability Backstop Procurement (RBP)—a one-time mechanism intended to attract significant new capacity to address projected reliability shortfalls driven by large-load growth. RBP compresses what is often a multiyear market and regulatory conversation into a fast-moving set of commercial choices. Developers, large loads, utilities and capital providers should be preparing now for (i) an accelerated bilateral contracting window and (ii) a standardized PJM-led backstop procurement if bilateral deals do not clear enough capacity. Reprinted courtesy of Stephen J. Humes, Pillsbury, Alicia M. McKnight, Pillsbury, Jason Drogin Atwood, Pillsbury and Andrew H. Jacobs, Pillsbury Mr. Humes may be contacted at stephen.humes@pillsburylaw.com Ms. McKnight may be contacted at alicia.mcknight@pillsburylaw.com Mr. Atwood may be contacted at jason.atwood@pillsburylaw.com Mr. Jacobs may be contacted at andrew.jacobs@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    Special Counsel Lorelie (Lorie) Masters Appointed Chair of the ABA’s Commission on Women in the Profession

    October 06, 2026 —
    Special counsel Lorelie (Lorie) Masters was recently appointed as the chair of the American Bar Association’s Commission on Women in the Profession. Established in 1987, the Commission was created to assess the status of women in the legal sector and remove barriers to their professional advancement. As chair, Lorie will lead a 12-member roster of commissioners, and a panel of special advisers, dedicated to ensuring equal participation and systemic equity for women lawyers across the justice system and pursuing various studies to identify issues uniquely facing women in the profession, including disparate treatment, training and recruitment, parenting, and other issues. Most recently, the Commission in late July 2026 issued a groundbreaking study about issues affecting the mental health and well-being of women lawyers. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP

    Insurer Granted Summary Judgment on Claim for Roof Damage Caused by Windstorm

    May 26, 2026 —
    The insurer successfully moved for summary judgment, eliminating the insured’s claim for roof damage due to windstorm. Mulas v. Westchester Surplus Lines Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20537 (Jan. 30, 2026). The insureds’ commercial property sustained windstorm damage during Hurricane Ian. Westchester denied the claim. The insureds believed Westchester wrongfully denied coverage for roof damage and various interior damage to property. The insureds also argued that Westchester’s actual cash value (ACV) payment did not reflect the fully insured loss. The insureds sued and Westchester moved for summary judgment. Westchester argued the roof damage was not covered because Hurricane Ian did not cause the damage. Westchester hired an engineer who determined the roof damage was not caused by wind from Hurricane Ian. Westchester pointed out that the insureds’ expert also found no wind damage on the roof. The insureds offered no other evidence suggesting the hurricane caused roof damage. Therefore, the insureds could not show that Westchester breached the policy by denying coverage. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Underlying Complaint Alleges Possibility of Coverage, Triggering Duty to Defend

    September 15, 2026 —
    In a dispute among insurers for various defendants in the underlying case regarding the providing of a defense, the Second Circuit vacated, in part, the district court’s judgment and remanded the case. New Your Marine and Gen. Ins. Co. v. Fed. Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 18087 (2nd Cir. June 23, 2026). Mary Guzman, who worked for a cleaning company, PBM, LLC, alleged that she was injured when a glass panel in a revolving door fell onto her as she cleaned the door. She filed suit in state court against the owners of the building as well as the lessee of the fifteenth floor where the accident occurred, Bank of New York Mellon (Bank). She alleged the owners and the Bank were negligent in creating the dangerous condition that caused her injury. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Idaho Contractor Registration: Lessons from the Ward v. Bishop Decision

    April 20, 2026 —
    The Idaho Supreme Court’s recent decision in Ward v. Bishop Constr., Ltd. Liab. Co., No. 51118, 2025 Ida. LEXIS 143 (Dec. 31, 2025) offers valuable guidance for contractors and construction attorneys navigating the Idaho Contractor Registration Act (ICRA). The December 2025 ruling clarifies critical questions about when and how defendants may raise contractor registration defenses, the weight of pretrial stipulations, and the consequences of procedural missteps in construction litigation. This article examines the key takeaways from the decision and offers practical actions for consideration by those working in Idaho’s construction industry. The Facts Behind the Dispute The case arose from a long-standing working relationship between cousins Joel Ward and Ren Bishop dating to the 1990s. Ward performed general construction work for Bishop Construction, LLC, including building, plumbing, electrical, framing, roofing, and siding work on projects in Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming. Bishop agreed to pay Ward $10 per hour, later increased to $12 per hour, plus one-way travel expenses. Between 2017 and 2019, Ward worked over 1,100 hours but was never paid, totaling $12,443.54 in claimed damages. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tara Martens Miller, Snell & Wilmer
    Ms. Miller may be contacted at tmmiller@swlaw.com

    Presumption of Prejudice Applies to All Affirmative Defenses Regarding Insured’s Failure to Comply with Post-Loss Policy Conditions

    June 23, 2026 —
    n a recent property insurance coverage dispute, an issue on appeal pertained to the “prejudice” jury instruction associated with the insured’s failure to comply with post-loss policy conditions. The trial court found that the prejudice only pertained to prompt notice and not other post-loss policy conditions. This was reversed on appeal as prejudice applied to ALL the post loss policy conditions that the insured failed to comply with, not just the prompt notice requirement. The prejudice presumption applies to all affirmative defenses regarding an insured’s failure to comply with post-loss policy conditions. Consider this discussion when dealing with an insurer raising prejudice as an affirmative defense to do an insured’s failure to comply with post-loss policy conditions, and the associated burdens of proof: On appeal, [the insurer] contends the trial court erred by instructing the jury that the presumption of prejudice was inapplicable to all of its post-loss obligation defenses except prompt notice. We agree. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Did You Know: Unique Legal Considerations for Animal Care Facilities

    August 24, 2026 —
    Animal care facilities are highly specialized environments that require expertise far beyond traditional commercial or even standard medical construction. Whether designing and building animal shelters, doggy daycares, veterinary clinics or full-service animal hospitals, these facilities operate under conditions that introduce unique challenges related to sanitation, durability, animal behavior and operational workflows. Because of these complexities, projects that fail to account for animal care requirements adequately often encounter costly issues—many of which result in litigation. Below are real-world examples drawn from expert witness work, followed by proactive best practices construction professionals should apply to future animal care projects. Reprinted courtesy of Hannah Skidmore, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Trial-Tested Property Litigator Kimberlee Martin Joins Ball Janik LLP's Orlando Construction Defect Team

    October 06, 2026 —
    ORLANDO, FL, September 30, 2026 — Ball Janik LLP has added Kimberlee A. Martin to its Construction Defect Practice Group as an associate in the firm's Orlando office. For more than a decade, she has litigated matters in the fields of criminal defense, first-party property, and insurance disputes, taking cases and claims from inception through jury trial. It's the same path many of Ball Janik's clients face when construction goes wrong, and her arrival deepens the firm's trial bench in Central Florida. "Florida property owners are dealing with complex building problems and less time to act on them. That puts a premium on attorneys who can take a case the distance," said James C. Prichard, Managing Partner of Ball Janik LLP. "Kimberlee has carried property and insurance claims from pre-suit all the way through trial, working hand in hand with experts along the way. Community associations and commercial property owners need exactly that combination, and she brings it to our team on day one." Most recently, Kimberlee served as Litigation Director, where she oversaw homeowners' property claims in pre-suit and litigation, managed a substantial caseload, and guided associate attorneys on litigation strategy. Her civil work includes jury trials, summary judgment and dismissal motions, expert and witness depositions, mediations, and site inspections, along with close coordination with contractors, consultants, and other experts. That skill set maps directly onto construction defect and insurance recovery litigation, where cases often turn on site evidence, expert testimony, and a credible readiness to go to trial. "I've seen firsthand how much is at stake when a building has problems: owners' investments, residents' homes, and everyone's peace of mind," said Kimberlee. "Ball Janik is focused on exactly those clients, which made this a natural next step for my practice. I'm excited to join this team and help property owners hold the responsible parties accountable and get their buildings repaired." Kimberlee earned her J.D., cum laude, from Florida International University College of Law and her B.A. in political science, with a minor in legal studies, from the University of Central Florida. About Ball Janik LLP Ball Janik LLP is a Florida-based law firm offering construction defect, construction law, insurance recovery, and commercial litigation counsel, to its local and national clients. The firm was founded in 1982 and has expanded its capabilities, professionals, and geographic footprint. What started as a small firm focused on real property, land use, and litigation (known then as Ball Janik & Novack) has grown to a team of 70-plus attorneys and paralegals in five offices in Florida, with centuries of combined experience and capabilities. The firm has been recognized by Chambers USA, including for its construction law capabilities in Florida, U.S. News & World Report and Best Lawyers®, The Best Lawyers in America©, Super Lawyers, and Corporate International. Read more at www.balljanik.com.