BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    structural steel construction expert witness Eau Claire County Wisconsin condominium expert witness Eau Claire County Wisconsin industrial building expert witness Eau Claire County Wisconsin office building expert witness Eau Claire County Wisconsin institutional building expert witness Eau Claire County Wisconsin retail construction expert witness Eau Claire County Wisconsin mid-rise construction expert witness Eau Claire County Wisconsin multi family housing expert witness Eau Claire County Wisconsin townhome construction expert witness Eau Claire County Wisconsin hospital construction expert witness Eau Claire County Wisconsin casino resort expert witness Eau Claire County Wisconsin housing expert witness Eau Claire County Wisconsin custom home expert witness Eau Claire County Wisconsin parking structure expert witness Eau Claire County Wisconsin low-income housing expert witness Eau Claire County Wisconsin high-rise construction expert witness Eau Claire County Wisconsin Medical building expert witness Eau Claire County Wisconsin Subterranean parking expert witness Eau Claire County Wisconsin concrete tilt-up expert witness Eau Claire County Wisconsin custom homes expert witness Eau Claire County Wisconsin production housing expert witness Eau Claire County Wisconsin condominiums expert witness Eau Claire County Wisconsin
    Eau Claire County Wisconsin construction cost estimating expert witnessEau Claire County Wisconsin construction expert testimonyEau Claire County Wisconsin engineering expert witnessEau Claire County Wisconsin soil failure expert witnessEau Claire County Wisconsin expert witness windowsEau Claire County Wisconsin construction expert witness public projectsEau Claire County Wisconsin construction expert witnesses
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Eau Claire County, Wisconsin

    Wisconsin Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB448 specifies 90 day notice with details and evidence prior to commencing legal action. It provides for a 15 day written response from contractor or 25 days if cross-claims against subcontractors; The law states “The claimant and contractor or supplier are bound by any contractor or supplier warranty terms pertaining to products or services supplied for the dwelling.”


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Eau Claire County Wisconsin

    Contractors are required to have the correct credentials for their trade. Not all classifications require credentialing. For a list of credentials, see the website.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Wolf River Builders Association
    Local # 5193
    PO Box 595
    Shawano, WI 54166
    Eau Claire County Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Chippewa Valley Home Builders Association
    Local # 5104
    4319 Jeffers Rd Ste 200
    Eau Claire, WI 54703

    Eau Claire County Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Door County Home Builders Association
    Local # 5103
    PO Box 112 4087
    Sturgeon Bay, WI 54235

    Eau Claire County Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    St Croix Valley Home Builders Association
    Local # 5182
    1632 ROLLING HILLS LN
    River Falls, WI 54022

    Eau Claire County Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Wausau Area Builders Association
    Local # 5172
    141 W Thomas St
    Wausau, WI 54401

    Eau Claire County Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Brown County Home Builders Association
    Local # 5124
    PO Box 13194 811 Packerland Drive
    Green Bay, WI 54307

    Eau Claire County Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Golden Sands Home Builders Association
    Local # 5118
    1001 Theater Dr
    Plover, WI 54467

    Eau Claire County Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Eau Claire County Wisconsin


    Ninth Circuit Court Weighs In On Insurance Coverage For COVID-19 Business Interruption Losses

    Pa. Contractor Pleads No Contest to Prevailing-Wage Charges, Pays Workers $20.7M

    Denial of Coverage for Bulge in Wall Upheld

    So a Lawsuit Is on the Horizon…

    Candis Jones Named to Atlanta Magazine’s 2024 “Atlanta 500” List

    Illinois Favors Finding Construction Defects as an Occurrence

    Harmon Hotel Construction Defect Update

    Elizabeth Lofts Condo Owners Settle with Plumbing Supplier

    Insureds Survive Motion to Dismiss Civil Authority Claim

    Washington State Lawmakers Pass Statewide Rent Stabilization Legislation

    Building Materials Price Increase Clause for Contractors and Subcontractors – Three Options

    Injury to Employees Endorsement Eliminates Coverage for Insured Employer

    AB5 Construction Exemption – A Checklist to Avoid Application of AB5’s Three-Part Test

    Your Excess Policy May Not “Follow Form” to Your Primary Policy’s Aggregate Limits: How to Avoid a Multi-Million Dollar Mistake

    Ball Janik LLP Welcomes Construction Defect Associate Miguel Bonnelly as Orlando Office Continues to Grow

    Zillow Topping Realogy Shows Web Surge for Housing Market

    Hybrid Contracts for The Sale of Goods and Services and the Predominant Factor Test

    Brown Paint Doesn’t Cover Up Construction Defects

    Important Insurance Alert for Out-of-State Contractors Assisting in Florida Recovery Efforts!

    Walmart and Alquist 3D Set New Standards with 3D Printed Supercenter Expansion

    Why Metro Atlanta Is the Poster Child for the US Housing Crisis

    16 Wilke Fleury Attorneys Featured in Sacramento Magazine 2021 Top Lawyers!

    Sobering Facts for Construction Safety Day

    Court Calls Lease-Leaseback Project What it is: A Design-Bid-Build Project

    Partner Patrick Au Achieves a Major Arbitration Result on a Redevelopment Project in Downtown Los Angeles!

    Builder Pipeline in U.S. at Eight-Year High: Under the Hood

    Lessons Learned from Implementing Infrastructure BIM in Helsinki

    Colorado Requires Builders to Accommodate High-Efficiency Devices in New Homes

    Best Lawyers® Recognizes 40 White and Williams Lawyers

    Congratulations to Newport Beach Lawyers Rick Peterson and Lindsey Wells on an Outstanding Trial Victory in a Habitability Case!

    General Contractor’s Professional Malpractice/Negligence Claim Against Design Professional

    Louisiana District Court Declines to Apply Total Pollution Exclusion

    Don’t Miss the 2015 West Coast Casualty Construction Defect Seminar

    New-Home Sales in U.S. Unexpectedly Fall to Four-Month Low

    OSHA Fines Alabama Contractor After Site Manager Electrocuted

    Seattle Council May Take a New Look at Micro-Housing

    White and Williams Earns National "Best Law Firm" Rankings from US News

    1 De Haro: A Case Study on Successful Cross-Laminated Timber Design and Construction in San Francisco

    White Collar Overtime Regulations Temporarily Blocked

    Texas Public Procurements: What Changed on September 1, 2017? a/k/a: When is the Use of E-Verify Required?

    Construction Companies Must Prepare for a Surge of Third-Party Contractors

    Robots on Construction Sites Are Raising Legal Questions

    Shimmick Gets Nod for Second Pilot Pile at Settling Millennium Tower

    Understand Agreements in Hold Harmless and Indemnity Provisions

    Court Holds That Public Entity Can Unilaterally Replace Subcontractor Under California’s Subletting and Subcontracting Fair Practices Act

    New Evidence Code Requires Attorney to Obtain Written Acknowledgement that the Confidential Nature of Mediation has been Disclosed to the Client

    Pulling the Plug

    Background Owner of Property Cannot Be Compelled to Arbitrate Construction Defects

    COVID-19 Response: Environmental Compliance Worries in the Time of Coronavirus

    New Jersey Federal Court Examines And Applies The “j.(5)” Ongoing Operations Exclusion
    Corporate Profile

    EAU CLAIRE COUNTY WISCONSIN CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 7,000 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Eau Claire County, Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness Group provides a wide range of trial support and consulting services to Eau Claire County's most acknowledged construction practice groups, CGL carriers, builders, owners, and public agencies. Drawing from a diverse pool of construction and design professionals, BHA is able to simultaneously analyze complex claims from the perspective of design, engineering, cost, or standard of care.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Eau Claire County, Wisconsin

    Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. Expands with New Office in Foxborough, Massachusetts

    June 08, 2026 —
    Foxborough, MA — April 1st, 2026— Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. (SDV), a national law firm focused exclusively on representing policyholders in insurance coverage disputes, is pleased to announce the opening of its new office in Foxborough, Massachusetts. The expansion marks another milestone in the firm’s continued growth and deepens SDV’s ability to serve clients across the region. The new location strengthens SDV’s presence in Massachusetts and expands the firm’s capacity to support both existing and anticipated client needs in an increasingly complex insurance landscape. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C.

    Ninth Circuit Holds That Policies Covering Environmental Claims Do Not Have Aggregate Limits

    May 12, 2026 —
    In the case of County of San Bernardino v. Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania, the Ninth Circuit recently addressed the issue of whether general liability policies issued in the 1960s and 1970s included aggregate limits for claims arising under the premises-operations coverage in CGL policies. The difference between the policyholder’s interpretation of the policies’ limits clauses and the insurer’s interpretation was worth hundreds of millions of dollars in exposure for the insurer. The Court closely examined the policy language and extrinsic evidence from both the insurance industry’s drafting history and the parties before concluding that the policies were ambiguous. The Court construed that ambiguity in favor of the policyholder and ruled that aggregate limits did not apply to the claims at issue. The Court’s decision underscores the importance of carefully examining a policy’s limits, especially for older policies written before 1986 when the insurance industry revised the standard-form CGL policy to state the aggregate limits apply not only to products liability claims but to premises-operations claims as well. Decades of insurance industry drafting history confirms, as the policyholder’s submissions in this case indicate, that the industry well understood that operations claims like the environmental waste-disposal claims at issue here typically were not subject to aggregate limits. Reprinted courtesy of Lorelie S. Masters, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP and Joseph T. Niczky, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP Ms. Masters may be contacted at lmasters@hunton.com Mr. Niczky may be contacted at jniczky@hunton.com Read the full story...

    From CERCLA to Drinking Water: D.C. Circuit’s PFAS Ruling Enters a Second Regulatory Fight

    October 06, 2026 —
    On August 18, 2026, a unanimous panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit upheld EPA’s designation of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) as hazardous substances under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA or Superfund). In Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. EPA, the court rejected challenges to EPA’s interpretation of CERCLA Section 102(a), the adequacy of its notice and comment process, its analysis of costs and benefits, and its decision to proceed despite uncertainty about future response actions and costs. This decision is already being invoked in a separate D.C. Circuit challenge to EPA’s 2024 PFAS drinking water rule promulgated under the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA). Six days after the CERCLA decision, respondent intervenors cited it as supplemental authority in American Water Works Association v. EPA, No. 24-1188, ahead of oral argument scheduled for September 18, 2026. The Chamber of Commerce decision may assist the respondent intervenors on certain notice and comment and economic analysis arguments, but its significance should not be overstated. The principal challenges to the standards for the four PFAS subject to EPA’s Hazard Index-based maximum contaminant level (MCL) turn on requirements specific to the SDWA, and EPA itself now agrees that those provisions were promulgated through an unlawful process. Reprinted courtesy of Ashleigh K. Myers, Pillsbury, Amanda G. Halter, Pillsbury and Jillian Marullo, Pillsbury Ms. Myers may be contacted at ashleigh.myers@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Halter may be contacted at amanda.halter@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Marullo may be contacted at jillian.marullo@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    Meet BWB&O’s Super Lawyers Rising Stars in Colorado!

    April 08, 2026 —
    Bremer Whyte Brown & O’Meara, LLP is thrilled to share that Partner Devin Brunson and Associate Melissa Youngpeter have been named to the Super Lawyers 2026 Colorado Rising Stars list. This recognition reflects their exceptional work in Personal Injury and Civil Litigation.
    SUPER LAWYERS RISING STARS
    Devin Brunson: 2024-2026
    Melissa Youngpeter: 2026
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bremer Whyte Brown & O’Meara, LLP

    Structural Concerns Force Emergency Closure of Maryland Office Building

    August 16, 2026 —
    A 10-story Baltimore-area office building was evacuated after an underground parking structure was compromised during construction work. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Jim Parsons, Engineering News-Record
    ENR may be contacted at enr@enr.com

    The Grenfell & Champlain Towers: Risk Management Considerations in the Wake of Catastrophic Loss — A UK/US Comparison

    June 02, 2026 —
    1. Introduction As part of the multinational collaborative relationship between Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. and Fenchurch Law, we continually find ourselves in conversations about the sometimes subtle but sometimes drastic differences between risk management and coverage considerations from one country to the next. These differences are often highlighted by the fallout from large catastrophic losses that are widely publicized and illuminate sometimes widespread risks and perils that many others may be facing in the coming years. The response of governments and their subdivisions to the needs of victims and/or commercial parties, and insurance markets’ evaluation of and reactions to catastrophic losses vary widely from country to country and jurisdiction. In this article, we discuss these responses and reactions in the cases of the Grenfell Tower Fire in London, England, and the Champlain Tower collapse in Surfside, Florida, within the United States. These two widely publicized losses involved different risk management and insurance considerations based on where they occurred. They also saw substantially different government responses and raised varied questions about what the next steps are for their respective commercial and insurance markets. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Eric M. Clarkson, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C.
    Mr. Clarkson may be contacted at EClarkson@sdvlaw.com

    ACEC Supports BUILD America 250 Act as Important First Step on Surface Reauthorization

    May 26, 2026 —
    WASHINGTON -- The American Council of Engineering Companies (ACEC), the business voice of America’s engineering and design services industry released the following statement on the BUILD America 250 Act: "Chairman Graves and Ranking Member Larsen have taken an important bipartisan step toward reauthorizing the federal surface transportation programs that are critical to economic growth in every state. The BUILD America 250 Act provides five years of stability in funding road and transit projects, raises new revenues to address the solvency of the Highway Trust Fund, and includes meaningful provisions to strengthen project delivery, advance digital infrastructure, and improve the contracting framework that engineering firms rely on every day. ACEC will continue to advocate for investment levels that keep pace with the country's growing infrastructure needs, and we urge the Committee to keep this process moving forward." The American Council of Engineering Companies (ACEC) is the business association of America’s engineering industry, representing more than 5,500 independent engineering firms and more than 650,000 professionals throughout the United States engaged in the development of America’s transportation, water, and energy infrastructure, along with environmental, industrial, and other public and private facilities. Founded in 1906 and headquartered in Washington, D.C., ACEC is a national federation of 51 state and regional organizations.

    Insurer Cannot Raise Issues on Appeal that Were Not Presented to the Trial Court

    June 15, 2026 —
    The Florida Court of Appeals affirmed a judgment on a collapse claim for the insured, rejecting the insurer’s arguments that were not presented to the trial court. Homeowner’s Choice Prop. & Cas. Ins, Co. v. Oakes, 2026 Fl. App. LEXIS 2086 (Fl. Ct. App. March 18, 2026). The insured’s ceiling collapsed in the secondary home on the insured’s property. The claim was reported to the insurer, but coverage was denied after its investigation. The insured sued the insurer for breach of contract. Under the Additional Coverage provisions of the policy, collapse was covered if it was “abrupt.” An abrupt collapse was not covered, however, if exclusions for “Fungi, Wet or Dry Rot” and “faulty, inadequate or defective design, specifications, workmanship, repair, construction, renovation, remodeling, materials or maintenance” applied. The collapse provisions contained no language stating that the coverage granted in the provision was also subject to all the other exclusions in the policy. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com