BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    Medical building expert witness Baxter West Virginia hospital construction expert witness Baxter West Virginia multi family housing expert witness Baxter West Virginia office building expert witness Baxter West Virginia retail construction expert witness Baxter West Virginia townhome construction expert witness Baxter West Virginia tract home expert witness Baxter West Virginia high-rise construction expert witness Baxter West Virginia mid-rise construction expert witness Baxter West Virginia concrete tilt-up expert witness Baxter West Virginia condominium expert witness Baxter West Virginia low-income housing expert witness Baxter West Virginia parking structure expert witness Baxter West Virginia custom home expert witness Baxter West Virginia Subterranean parking expert witness Baxter West Virginia custom homes expert witness Baxter West Virginia institutional building expert witness Baxter West Virginia landscaping construction expert witness Baxter West Virginia structural steel construction expert witness Baxter West Virginia industrial building expert witness Baxter West Virginia condominiums expert witness Baxter West Virginia casino resort expert witness Baxter West Virginia
    Baxter West Virginia expert witness structural engineerBaxter West Virginia construction defect expert witnessBaxter West Virginia OSHA expert witness constructionBaxter West Virginia consulting general contractorBaxter West Virginia construction expert witness consultantBaxter West Virginia construction expert testimonyBaxter West Virginia reconstruction expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Baxter, West Virginia

    West Virginia Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB440: Requires builders notify homeowners with Notice to consumer required; response to claim within 30 days and negotiations to conclude within 90 days.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Baxter West Virginia

    In 1991, the West Virginia Legislature adopted into law Chapter 21, Article 11 of the State Code. This law was established to set specific professional guidelines for contractors as well as to protect state businesses and consumers who utilize their services. The new law paved the way for creation of the Contractor Licensing Board which is made up of state businessmen, contractors and construction specialists.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Eastern Panhandle Home Builders Association
    Local # 5023
    430 Randoph St Ste C
    Martinsburg, WV 25401

    Baxter West Virginia Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of No Central WV
    Local # 5054
    4 Riddle Court
    Morgantown, WV 26505

    Baxter West Virginia Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Mid Ohio Valley
    Local # 5072
    PO Box 556
    Parkersburg, WV 26102

    Baxter West Virginia Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Northern Panhandle Chapter
    Local # 5046
    112 19th St
    Wheeling, WV 26003
    Baxter West Virginia Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Highlands Chapter
    Local # 5021
    PO Box 1847
    Elkins, WV 26241
    Baxter West Virginia Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Potomac Highlands Chapter of National Associated Home Builders
    Local # 5030
    PO Box 452
    Mathias, WV 26812
    Baxter West Virginia Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Midwestern Chapter Of National Associated Home Builders
    Local # 5040
    110 Pleasant Colony Dr
    Evans, WV 25241
    Baxter West Virginia Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Baxter West Virginia


    All Risk Policy Only Covers Repair to Portion of Dock That Sustains Damage

    The Potential (Second) Death of Project Labor Agreements

    Court of Appeals Issues Decision Regarding Second-Tier Subcontractors and Pre-Lien Notice

    2024 Construction Law Update

    Biden's Next 100 Days: Major Impacts Expected for the Construction Industry

    Overtime! – When the Statute of Limitations Isn’t Game Over For Your Claim

    A DC Office Building Offers a Lesson in Glass and Sculpture

    Connecticut Court Clarifies a Limit on Payment Bond Claims for Public Projects

    Payment Bond Claim Notice Requires More than Mailing

    Endra Rethinks MEP Design with AI

    Cincinnati Goes Green

    Henkels & McCoy Pays $1M in Federal Overtime-Pay Case

    CEB’s Mechanics Liens and Related Remedies – 2014 Update

    Connecticut Supreme Court Further Refines Meaning of "Collapse"

    When Is Mandatory Arbitration Not Mandatory?

    NY Appeals Court Ruled Builders not Responsible in Terrorism Cases

    The Legal Landscape

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (2/5/25) – The Effect of Trump’s Policies on the Housing Market, Property Value Loss in the Face of Climate Change, and a Transitional Year for the Apartment Market

    Project-Specific Commercial General Liability Insurance

    Co-Housing Startups Fly in the Face of Old-School NYC Housing Law

    SB 721 – California Multi-Family Buildings New Require Inspections of “EEEs”

    How to Prevent Forest Fires by Building Cities With More Wood

    Charles Carter v. Pulte Home Corporation

    Bar to Raise on Green Standard

    Subcontractors Must be Careful Providing Bonds when General Contractor Does Not

    Public-Employee Union Fees, Water Wars Are Key in High Court Rulings

    Flood Insurance Claim Filed in State Court Properly Dismissed

    Call Me Maybe? . . . Don’t Waive Your Rights Under the Right to Repair Act’s Prelitigation Procedures

    No Global MDL for COVID Business Interruption Claims, but Panel Will Consider Separate Consolidated Proceedings for Lloyds, Cincinnati, Hartford, Society

    Rancosky Adopts Terletsky: Pennsylvania Supreme Court Sets Standard for Statutory Bad Faith Claims

    Denver Parking Garage Roof Collapses Crushing Vehicles

    Minneapolis Condo Shortage Blamed on Construction Defect Law

    Mexico City Metro Collapse Kills 24 After Neighbors’ Warnings

    Ahlers, Cressman & Sleight PLLC Ranked Top Washington Law Firm By Construction Executive

    Georgia Court Clarifies Landlord Liability for Construction Defects

    Suit Limitation Provisions in New York

    Around the State

    Ten Firm Members Recognized as Super Lawyers or Rising Stars

    Balancing Risk and Reward: The Complexities of Stadium Construction Projects

    Background Owner of Property Cannot Be Compelled to Arbitrate Construction Defects

    Report: Construction Firms Could Better Protect Workers From Noise Hazards

    An Expert’s Qualifications are Important

    Benchmark Litigation Recognizes Multiple Snell & Wilmer Offices and Attorneys in 2026 Rankings

    Yet ANOTHER Reminder to Always Respond

    Kahana Feld LLP Senior Attorney Rachael Marvin and Partner Dominic Donato Obtain Complete Dismissal of Plaintiff’s Labor Law Claims on Summary Judgment

    Recovering For Inflation On Federal Contracts: Recent DOD Guidance On Economic Price Adjustment Clauses

    Construction Activity on the Upswing

    Insurer's Motion to Dismiss Business Interruption, COVID-19 Claims Under Pollution Policy Fails

    Focusing on Design Elements of the 2014 World Cup Stadiums

    What’s in a Name? Trademarks and Construction
    Reform Bill

    Specification Challenge; Excusable Delay; Type I Differing Site Condition; Superior Knowledge

    The Five-Step Protocol to Reopening a Business

    Preparing For the Worst with Smart Books & Records

    Would You Trade a Parking Spot for an Extra Bedroom?

    St Louis County Approves Settlement in Wrongful Death Suit

    Convictions Obtained in Las Vegas HOA Fraud Case

    No Coverage for Faulty Workmanship Causing Property Damage to Insured's Product Only

    “Wait! Do You Have All Your Ducks in a Row?” Filing of a Certificate of Merit in Conjunction With a Complaint

    San Francisco Law Firm Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman Hired New Partner

    The Colorado Supreme Court affirms Woodbridge II’s “Adverse Use” Distinction

    Federal Lawsuit Accuses MOX Contractors of Fraud

    Project-Specific Commercial General Liability Insurance

    When Subcontractors Sue Only the Surety on Payment Bond and Tips for General Contractors

    Colorado statutory “property damage” caused by an “occurrence”

    Florida’s Supreme Court Resolves Conflicting Appellate Court Decisions on Concurrent Causation

    From Both Sides Now: Looking at Contracts Through a Post-Pandemic Lens
    Corporate Profile

    BAXTER WEST VIRGINIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Baxter, West Virginia Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Leveraging from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Baxter's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Baxter, West Virginia

    Cuomo Bridge Lawsuit Adversaries Weigh Mediated Settlement

    July 06, 2026 —
    Rival legal teams have reached a critical juncture as they consider a mediated settlement in one of two major payment lawsuits pending between a design-build contracting team and the New York State Thruway Authority over construction of the more than $3-billion Mario M. Cuomo Bridge north of New York City. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Richard Korman, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Korman may be contacted at kormanr@enr.com

    No Bad Faith Despite Insurer’s Appraisal Award Exceeding Initial Payment

    August 03, 2026 —
    The federal district court granted the insurer’s motion for summary judgment, finding no bad faith despite the appraisal award exceeding the amount the insurer initially paid. Jazi Kat 4659 Rockridge LLC, et al. v. Travelers Cas. Ins. Co. of Am., et al., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 105634 (D. Ariz. May 13, 2026). Plaintiffs sued Travelers for breach of contract and bad faith, alleging that Travelers failed to pay money plaintiffs were owed under the policy. Plaintiffs held a commercial property policy for two properties. A fire destroyed one of the properties. Travelers adjusted the claim and issued two payments. Plaintiffs disagreed with the amount of the payments and demanded an appraisal. Travelers agreed to the appraisal. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    A Win for Clarity: What a Recent Federal Court Decision Means for Davis-Bacon Compliance

    July 13, 2026 —
    Following the Department of Labor’s 2023 Davis-Bacon rule changes, federal construction contractors faced a pressing question: not whether paying prevailing wages is required, but how far those obligations could extend. Could they reach off-site material suppliers? Delivery drivers? Contracts that omitted Davis-Bacon clauses entirely? A recent federal court decision in AGC of America v. US Department of Labor answers these questions in important ways, vacating several disputed provisions and giving contractors greater certainty when pricing, bidding, and administering federal construction projects. The ruling addresses three aspects of the 2023 regulations that sought to extend Davis-Bacon obligations beyond their traditional scope. By vacating those provisions, the decision creates a more predictable compliance environment and reinforces an important principle: Davis-Bacon enforcement works best when contractors, workers, and regulators operate under clear, objective rules. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Stephen E. Irving, Peckar & Abramson, P.C.
    Mr. Irving may be contacted at sirving@pecklaw.com

    Arizona Court Enters $323 Million Judgment Against ZOM Living Following Unanimous Jury Verdict

    May 26, 2026 —
    PHOENIX, May 19, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- A Maricopa County court has entered a $323 million compensatory damages judgment in favor of Gray Development Group against ZOM Holding Inc., doing business as ZOM Living, following a 12-day trial, a unanimous jury verdict and post-trial proceedings related to a proposed business transaction. The jury found ZOM liable on claims of breach of contract and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing stemming from a proposed joint venture tied to a planned pipeline of luxury multifamily and commercial projects in Phoenix and Scottsdale. The lawsuit centered on a 13-project, $1.4 billion development pipeline originated and planned by Gray Development Group over more than a decade. In 2019, Gray invited Florida-based ZOM to participate in a joint venture involving the completion of five projects, which would have marked ZOM's entry into the Arizona market. According to court findings presented at trial, the companies entered into a mutual confidentiality and non-circumvention agreement before Gray shared extensive sensitive and proprietary information related to the projects, including planning, market analysis, costs, financial data, local business relationships and operational strategies developed by Gray over decades in Arizona. Evidence presented during trial showed that over a 10-month period while under contract, ZOM made hundreds of requests for confidential project and market information before circumventing Gray and pursuing the projects independently, ultimately displacing Gray from projects it spent years planning and developing. ZOM Living, headquartered in Orlando, develops multifamily and senior housing communities across the United States and operates regional offices in Boston, Dallas, Fort Lauderdale, Nashville, Phoenix, and Raleigh. ZOM is owned by Timeless Investments, the Amsterdam-based family office of Dutch businessman Hans van Veggel, which acquired the company in 1997. About Gray Development Group Gray Development Group was founded by architect Bruce Gray in 1991. The Phoenix-based company was the top-ranked multifamily developer in Arizona for more than a decade. The company designed and developed more than 15,000 apartment and condominium units throughout metropolitan Phoenix. Two Gray-designed developments — a Tempe midrise and a San Diego high-rise — received National Apartment Community of the Year awards.

    Lawmakers Vote to Reauthorize Programs to Support Water Quality, Coastal Protection

    April 20, 2026 —
    The U.S. House of Representatives has passed a package of 14 bills that includes measures to reauthorize several U.S. Environmental Protection Agency programs to protect and restore critical water ecosystems, expand access to broadband, reduce regulatory requirements on airport projects and programs and lower costs of federal buildings. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Pam McFarland, Engineering News-Record
    Ms. McFarland may be contacted at mcfarlandp@enr.com

    New York Team Secures Dismissal of Premises Liability Action Against Client

    May 26, 2026 —
    New York Associate Nicole Koch and Partner Jennine Gerrard recently secured a complete dismissal of a plaintiff’s claims for injuries following a fall in front of a client’s business at an outdoor mall. The plaintiff alleged that she was walking on the sidewalk outside of the client's hair care supply store in the Bronx in May 2024 when she tripped and fell on a broken/defective portion of the sidewalk. As a result of the accident, the plaintiff suffered injuries to her spine, hip, wrist, and both knees. She proceeded to file suit in New York County Supreme Court against Lewis Brisbois’ client and the landlord for the property. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    SDNY Ruling Highlights Privilege Risks in Client Use of Generative AI

    March 03, 2026 —
    Artificial intelligence is quickly becoming a go‑to tool for aggregating and summarizing large volumes of data, formulating and testing arguments, and even sketching litigation strategies. But a recent ruling from the Southern District of New York serves as a stark warning: when clients turn to generative AI for legal strategy, they may be unknowingly turning privileged information over to a third party and then creating documents that may later be discoverable in litigation. In a closely watched bench decision, Judge Rakoff ruled that AI‑generated documents created by the target of a criminal investigation using Anthropic’s Claude were not privileged despite being generated with information learned from his attorneys to support his potential legal defense and then shared with his counsel. The decision highlights the unresolved and increasingly consequential intersection of AI, privilege, and discovery. Facts Bradley Heppner received a grand jury subpoena and hired attorneys at Quinn Emanuel to represent him. After learning he was a target of the investigation, but before he was arrested, he created 31 documents with Claude using information from his attorneys to outline a potential defense strategy. He was later arrested on charges of securities and wire fraud, and federal agents seized his electronic devices, which contained the 31 documents that had been provided to his attorneys. Mr. Heppner argued that the documents were created to prepare his potential defense strategy in anticipation of an indictment, but he conceded that he made the decision to prepare the reports on his own, i.e., not at the direction of counsel. He nevertheless claimed the documents were protected from disclosure by the attorney-client privilege and work product doctrine; the government moved to overrule the objections. Reprinted courtesy of Christopher J. Olsen, Peckar & Abramson, P.C., Freddy X. Muñoz, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and Gary M. Stein, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. Mr. Olsen may be contacted at colsen@pecklaw.com Mr. Muñoz may be contacted at fmunoz@pecklaw.com Mr. Stein may be contacted at gstein@pecklaw.com Read the full story...

    Recognize: A Construction Safety Week Technical Bulletin

    February 23, 2026 —
    Construction Safety Week has long been a powerful show of force, a catalyst for bringing the industry together and putting a spotlight on the critical importance of safety. It represents a shared commitment across an expansive and impactful Industry. The construction industry is a major employer and significant contributor to the U.S. economy, creating nearly $2.1 trillion worth of structures each year—and with that scale comes immense responsibility— and opportunity. Over the last decade, we’ve made meaningful strides: advancing best practices, transitioning from hard hats to helmets, shedding light on vital issues that affect safety, like mental health, fostering a culture of care and accountability, and creating partnerships and initiatives for improving jobsite safety. Reprinted courtesy of Construction Safety Week, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...