BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    low-income housing expert witness Scott County Virginia parking structure expert witness Scott County Virginia office building expert witness Scott County Virginia custom home expert witness Scott County Virginia institutional building expert witness Scott County Virginia retail construction expert witness Scott County Virginia tract home expert witness Scott County Virginia high-rise construction expert witness Scott County Virginia landscaping construction expert witness Scott County Virginia condominium expert witness Scott County Virginia housing expert witness Scott County Virginia hospital construction expert witness Scott County Virginia structural steel construction expert witness Scott County Virginia industrial building expert witness Scott County Virginia multi family housing expert witness Scott County Virginia townhome construction expert witness Scott County Virginia mid-rise construction expert witness Scott County Virginia custom homes expert witness Scott County Virginia Medical building expert witness Scott County Virginia condominiums expert witness Scott County Virginia Subterranean parking expert witness Scott County Virginia production housing expert witness Scott County Virginia
    Scott County Virginia eifs expert witnessScott County Virginia engineering expert witnessScott County Virginia engineering consultantScott County Virginia structural engineering expert witnessesScott County Virginia multi family design expert witnessScott County Virginia construction expert witness consultantScott County Virginia soil failure expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Scott County, Virginia

    Virginia Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (HB558; H 150; §55-70.1) Warranty extension applicable to single-family but not HOAs: in addition to any other express or implied warranties; It requires registered or certified mail notice to "vendor" stating nature of claim; reasonable time not to exceed six months to "cure the defect".


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Scott County Virginia

    A contractor's license is required for all trades. Separate boards license plumbing, electrical, HVAC, gas fitting, and asbestos trades.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Tidewater Builders Association
    Local # 4854
    2117 Smith Ave
    Chesapeake, VA 23320

    Scott County Virginia Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Builders & Associates of Southern VA
    Local # 4829
    PO Box 10178 Ste 28
    Danville, VA 24543
    Scott County Virginia Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Peninsula Housing & Builders Association
    Local # 4844
    760 McGuire Pl
    Newport News, VA 23601

    Scott County Virginia Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Southside VA
    Local # 4863
    10300 Corporate Road
    Petersburg, VA 23805

    Scott County Virginia Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    New River Valley Home Builders Association
    Local # 4837
    PO Box 2010
    Christiansburg, VA 24068

    Scott County Virginia Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Roanoke Regional Home Builders Association
    Local # 4881
    1626 Apperson Dr
    Salem, VA 24153

    Scott County Virginia Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Central VA
    Local # 4827
    20334 Timberlake Rd Ste 3
    Lynchburg, VA 24502

    Scott County Virginia Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Scott County Virginia


    Dallas Home Being Built of Shipping Containers

    The Great Skyscraper Comeback Skips North America

    Manhattan Developer Breaks Ground on $520 Million Project

    Reducing Rework on Construction Projects Benefits Budget, Schedule and Financial Loss

    Skyline Cockpit’s Game-Changing Tower Crane Teleoperation

    ETF Bulls Bet Spring Will Thaw the U.S. Housing Market

    Harrisburg Sought Support Before Ruinous Incinerator Retrofit

    When Coronavirus Cases Spike at Construction Jobsites

    How To Fix Oroville Dam

    How VR and AR Will Help in Remote Expert Assistance

    Traub Lieberman Recognized in the 2026 Edition of Chambers USA

    Anatomy of a Construction Dispute- A Wrap Up

    GRSM Offices Earn Top Recognitions in 2025 Lists by The Business Journals Regional Publications

    The Sky is Falling! – Or is it? Impacting Lives through Addressing the Fear of Environmental Liabilities

    Glendale City Council Approves Tohono O’odham Nation Casino

    New York Court Rejects Owner’s Bid for Additional Insured Coverage

    Ex-Turner Exec Gets 46 Months for Bloomberg Construction Bribes

    Trump Administration Issues Proposed 'Waters of the U.S.' Rule

    Comparing Contracts: A Review of the AIA 201 and ConsensusDocs - Part I

    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani Recognized as Largest Litigation Presence in Sacramento

    AIA Releases Decennial 2017 Updates to its Contracts Suites

    Steps to Defending against Construction Defect Lawsuits

    Best Practices: Commercial Lockouts in Arizona

    Southern California Super Lawyers Recognizes Four Snell & Wilmer Attorneys As Rising Stars

    Quick Note: Attorney’s Fees and the Significant Issues Test

    Connecticut Grapples With Failing Concrete Foundations

    Understanding Liability Insurer’s Two Duties: To Defend and to Indemnify

    Privity Problems Continue for Additional Insureds in the Second Circuit

    Arizona Supreme Court Confirms a Prevailing Homeowner Can Recover Fees on Implied Warranty Claims

    Insurer’s Federal Suit Dismissed in Favor of Insured’s State Suit

    Party Cannot Skirt Out of the Very Fraud It Perpetrates

    Woodbridge II and the Nuanced Meaning of “Adverse Use” in Hostile Property Rights Cases in Colorado

    Minnesota Addresses How Its Construction Statute of Repose Applies to Condominiums

    Roadway Contractor Owed Duty of Care to Driver Injured Outside of Construction Zone

    Construction Defects Lead to “A Pretty Shocking Sight”

    Do Hurricane-Prone Coastal States Need to Update their Building Codes?

    Undocumented Debris at Mississippi Port Sparks Legal Battle

    Maryland Court Affirms Condo Association’s Right to Sue for Construction Defects

    South Carolina “occurrence” and allocation

    Los Angeles Warehousing Mecca Halts Expansion Just as Needs Soar

    BWB&O’s Colorado Lawyers Successfully Defend Damages of more than $150 Million in Historic Construction Lawsuit!

    Big News for “Smaller” Construction Cases

    The New “White Collar” Exemption Regulations

    Additional Insured Obligations and the Underlying Lawsuit

    HOA Group Speaking Out Against Draft of Colorado’s Construction Defects Bill

    Texas Law Bars Coverage under Homeowner’s Policy for Mold Damage

    Contracts and Fraud Don’t Mix (Even for Lawyers!)

    NJ Supreme Court Declines to Review Decision that Exxon Has No Duty to Indemnify Insurers for Environmental Liability Under Prior Settlement Agreement

    Seattle’s Tallest Tower Said Readying to Go On the Market

    'You're Talking About Lives': The New Nissan Stadium
    Corporate Profile

    SCOTT COUNTY VIRGINIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 7,000 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Scott County, Virginia Construction Expert Witness Group provides a wide range of trial support and consulting services to Scott County's most acknowledged construction practice groups, CGL carriers, builders, owners, and public agencies. Drawing from a diverse pool of construction and design professionals, BHA is able to simultaneously analyze complex claims from the perspective of design, engineering, cost, or standard of care.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Scott County, Virginia

    GRSM Team Obtains Defense Verdict for Homeowners’ Association in Orange County Superior Court

    July 20, 2026 —
    A Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani multi-state team, including Partners Christine Barker, Sean Ferron, and Keith Cramer, obtained a defense verdict on behalf of a homeowners’ association (HOA) in an Orange County Superior Court bench trial spanning two months. The case began in 2022 when a homeowner sued after the Architectural Review Committee and HOA Board of Directors declined his teardown-and-rebuild plans due to view and aesthetic concerns. After a motion for summary judgment ruling in which the court found that the existing covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&Rs) did not protect views, the HOA held a special election to add explicit view protections to the CC&Rs. At the February 2025 trial call, the plaintiff sought leave to file a third amended complaint challenging the validity of that vote, drastically reframing the case from CC&R enforcement to one of election validity. A second plaintiff then filed a parallel action toward the end of the limitations period, and the two cases were consolidated. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    New Survey Reveals Overwhelmingly Optimistic Results on the Use of AI in Construction

    May 14, 2026 —
    On December 5, 2025, CMiC and Dodge released a survey asking over 6,000 companies across various sectors of the construction industry their stance on artificial intelligence—whether they use it or not; whether they like it or not; whether they have or are planning to implement it or not; and so on. Considering its reputation for skepticism and reluctance when it comes to adopting new forms of technology, the construction industry pleasantly surprised CMiC and Dodge with its answers to these questions, with 87% of contractors believing AI will have a meaningful impact on construction. “The research indicates the construction industry is nearing a tipping point for AI adoption,” says Steve Jones, senior director of industry insights at Dodge Construction Network, who sat down with Construction Executive to delve further into the survey questions and answers and what the industry’s current position on them means for AI’s future role in construction. Reprinted courtesy of Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Only A Contractor Can Appeal a Contracting Officer’s Final Decision

    April 20, 2026 —
    A recent decision from the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals confirms that “only a ‘contractor’ may file an appeal of a contracting officer’s final decision.” Wattiker v. General Services Administration, 2026 WL 846001 (CBCA 2026) (citation omitted). The term “contractor is not an ambiguous term. A ‘contractor’ refers to a party to a federal government contract. Wattiker (citing the Contract Disputes Act). This is why the Contract Disputes Act does not apply to parties that are NOT in contract with the federal government. Id. In Wattiker, an appellant (appealing party) challenged the dismissal of a co-appellant. The co-appellant was dismissed because he was not a contractor, i.e., a party in contract with the federal government. In other words, the co-appellant had no privity of contract with the federal government. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Chambers Global 2026 Recognizes Sheppard Practices and Attorneys

    March 03, 2026 —
    Sheppard has been recognized by Chambers Global 2026 in the following practice areas:
    • Privacy & Data Security in the United States
    • Projects: Power & Renewables: Transactional in the United States
    • Projects: Renewables & Alternative Energy in the United States
    Additionally, the following Sheppard partners have been recognized by Chambers Global 2026:
    • Justin Boose (Projects: Renewables & Alternative Energy – USA)
    • Will Chen (Intellectual Property: International Firms – South Korea)
    • David Chun (Intellectual Property – South Korea)
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Sheppard

    Supreme Court Strikes Down IEEPA Tariffs: The Refund Process Will Be Messy

    March 10, 2026 —
    On February 20, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court held in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump, and the consolidated case Trump v. V.O.S. Selections, Inc., that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not authorize the President to impose tariffs unilaterally.1 The decision invalidates both the “reciprocal” tariffs and the drug-trafficking tariffs imposed under IEEPA. For importers, the immediate question is whether, how, and when refunds can actually be obtained. On that issue, the U.S. Supreme Court provided no roadmap. To the contrary, the dissent warned that the United States “may be required to refund billions of dollars,” that the process is likely to be a “mess,” and that the majority opinion “says nothing today about whether, and if so how, the Government should go about returning the billions of dollars that it has collected from importers.” Reprinted courtesy of Brett W. Johnson, Snell & Wilmer, Derek Flint, Snell & Wilmer, T. Troy Galan, Snell & Wilmer and Thomas Williams, Snell & Wilmer Mr. Johnson may be contacted at bwjohnson@swlaw.com Mr. Flint may be contacted at dflint@swlaw.com Mr. Galan may be contacted at tgalan@swlaw.com Mr. Williams may be contacted at twilliams@swlaw.com> Read the full story...

    Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. Expands with New Office in Foxborough, Massachusetts

    June 08, 2026 —
    Foxborough, MA — April 1st, 2026— Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. (SDV), a national law firm focused exclusively on representing policyholders in insurance coverage disputes, is pleased to announce the opening of its new office in Foxborough, Massachusetts. The expansion marks another milestone in the firm’s continued growth and deepens SDV’s ability to serve clients across the region. The new location strengthens SDV’s presence in Massachusetts and expands the firm’s capacity to support both existing and anticipated client needs in an increasingly complex insurance landscape. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C.

    Ahlers Cressman & Sleight named one of the Top 50 Construction Law Firms

    August 11, 2026 —
    Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLC is pleased to announce its fifth consecutive year of recognition by Construction Executive as one of The Top 50 Construction Law Firms. Since its first publication in 2003, Construction Executive magazine has served as the leading source for news, market developments, and business issues impacting the construction industry. Construction Executive established the rankings by asking over 600 U.S. construction law firms to complete a survey. Constructive Executive’s data collection includes: 2025 revenues from the firm’s construction practice; the number of attorneys in the firm’s construction practice; the percentage of the firm’s total revenues derived from its construction practice; the number of states in which the firm is licensed to practice; the year in which the construction practice was established; and the number of construction industry clients served during the fiscal year 2025. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLC

    Suit Limitation Provision Eliminates Wind Loss Claim

    July 27, 2026 —
    The insurer’s motion for judgment on the pleadings was granted after the insured failed to file suit against the insurer within the policy’s two-year suit limitation provision. Interstate Investments, LLC v. Mt. Hawley Ins Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98108 (S.D. N. Y. May 4, 2026). On or before June 27, 2023, a wind, hail and rainstorm damaged Interstate’s property in Oklahoma. Interstate filed a claim under its policy with Mt. Hawley. The policy provided that New York law applied and contained a two- year suit limitation provision. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com