BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    institutional building expert witness Bohannon Virginia retail construction expert witness Bohannon Virginia casino resort expert witness Bohannon Virginia townhome construction expert witness Bohannon Virginia Medical building expert witness Bohannon Virginia production housing expert witness Bohannon Virginia mid-rise construction expert witness Bohannon Virginia Subterranean parking expert witness Bohannon Virginia industrial building expert witness Bohannon Virginia tract home expert witness Bohannon Virginia parking structure expert witness Bohannon Virginia concrete tilt-up expert witness Bohannon Virginia custom home expert witness Bohannon Virginia multi family housing expert witness Bohannon Virginia condominium expert witness Bohannon Virginia landscaping construction expert witness Bohannon Virginia low-income housing expert witness Bohannon Virginia office building expert witness Bohannon Virginia housing expert witness Bohannon Virginia hospital construction expert witness Bohannon Virginia custom homes expert witness Bohannon Virginia structural steel construction expert witness Bohannon Virginia
    Bohannon Virginia forensic architectBohannon Virginia expert witness structural engineerBohannon Virginia structural engineering expert witnessesBohannon Virginia construction cost estimating expert witnessBohannon Virginia building envelope expert witnessBohannon Virginia construction code expert witnessBohannon Virginia building code expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Bohannon, Virginia

    Virginia Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (HB558; H 150; §55-70.1) Warranty extension applicable to single-family but not HOAs: in addition to any other express or implied warranties; It requires registered or certified mail notice to "vendor" stating nature of claim; reasonable time not to exceed six months to "cure the defect".


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Bohannon Virginia

    A contractor's license is required for all trades. Separate boards license plumbing, electrical, HVAC, gas fitting, and asbestos trades.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Central VA
    Local # 4827
    20334 Timberlake Rd Ste 3
    Lynchburg, VA 24502

    Bohannon Virginia Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Roanoke Regional Home Builders Association
    Local # 4881
    1626 Apperson Dr
    Salem, VA 24153

    Bohannon Virginia Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Virginia-State
    Local # 4800
    707 E Franklin St
    Richmond, VA 23219

    Bohannon Virginia Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Richmond
    Local # 4872
    400 North Ridge Road
    Richmond, VA 23229

    Bohannon Virginia Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    New River Valley Home Builders Association
    Local # 4837
    PO Box 2010
    Christiansburg, VA 24068

    Bohannon Virginia Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Southside VA
    Local # 4863
    10300 Corporate Road
    Petersburg, VA 23805

    Bohannon Virginia Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Peninsula Housing & Builders Association
    Local # 4844
    760 McGuire Pl
    Newport News, VA 23601

    Bohannon Virginia Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Bohannon Virginia


    More Hensel Phelps Ripples in the Statute of Limitations Pond?

    Be Proactive Now: Commercial Construction Quickly Joining List of Industries Vulnerable to Cyber Attacks

    Flooded Courtroom May be Due to Construction Defect

    Meet Orange County Bar Associations 2024 Leaders

    Denver Court Rules that Condo Owners Must Follow Arbitration Agreement

    Bally's Secures Funding for $1.7B Chicago Casino and Hotel Project

    U.K. Construction Growth Unexpectedly Accelerated in January

    New Jersey Court Pumps the Brakes on Product Liability Lawsuit

    Only Two Weeks Until BHA’s Texas MCLE Seminar in San Antonio

    Seven Key Issues for Construction Professionals to Consider When Dealing With COVID-19

    California Supreme Court Finds Negligent Supervision Claim Alleges An Occurrence

    Google Advances Green Goal With AES Deal for Carbon-Free Power

    New Safety Requirements added for Keystone Pipeline

    Hawaii Supreme Court Reaffirms an "Accident" Includes Reckless Conduct, Finds Green House Gases are Pollutants

    Statutory Bad Faith and an Insured’s 60 Day Notice to Cure

    Another Municipality Takes Action to Address the Lack of Condominiums Being Built in its Jurisdiction

    First Railroad Bridge Between Russia and China Set to Open

    Take Advantage of AI and Data Intelligence in Construction

    Changes to Pennsylvania Mechanic’s Lien Code

    The Argument for Solar Power

    The Ghosts of Baha Mar: How a $3.5 Billion Paradise Went Bust

    OSHA Set to Tag More Firms as Severe Violators Under New Criteria

    Plaintiffs Not Barred from Proving Causation in Slip and Fall Case, Even With No Witnesses and No Memory of Fall Itself

    Specific Source of Water Not Relevant in Construction Defect Claim

    Insurance Policies Broadly Defining “Suits” May Prompt an Insurer’s Duty to Defend and Indemnify During the Chapter 558 Pre-Suit Notice Process

    Contractor Entitled to Defense for Alleged Faulty Workmanship of Subcontractor

    Trial Court Abuses Discretion in Appointing Unqualified Umpire for Appraisal

    Candis Jones Named “On the Rise” by Daily Report's Georgia Law Awards

    Builder’s Be Wary of Insurance Policies that Provide No Coverage for Building: Mt. Hawley Ins. Co v. Creek Side at Parker HOA

    “You’re Out of Here!” -- CERCLA (Superfund) Federal Preemption of State Environmental Claims in State Courts

    American Roads Are Paved With Inefficiency

    Reinventing the Building Envelope – Interview with Gordon A Geddes

    Commercial Real Estate in 2023: A Snapshot

    New York Preserves Subrogation Rights

    Contract Construction Smarts: Helpful Provisions for Dispute Resolution

    Should Post Contract Award Tariffs be Reimbursable? Why Public Works Contractors Deserve Clarity

    Massachusetts Federal Court Rejects Adria Towers, Finds Construction Defects Not an “Occurrence”

    Product Liability Alert: Evidence of Apportionment of Fault Admissible in Strict Products Liability Action

    2023 West Coast Casualty Construction Defect Seminar

    Minnesota Supreme Court Dismisses Vikings Stadium Funding Lawsuit

    Pay Loss Provision Does Not Preclude Assignment of Post-Loss Claim

    California to Build ‘Total Disaster City’ for Training

    Hirer Liable for Injury to Subcontractor’s Employee Due to Failure to Act, Not Just Affirmative Acts, Holds Court of Appeal

    Bound by Group Builders, Federal District Court Finds No Occurrence

    Arizona Court Cites California Courts to Determine Construction Defect Coverage is Time Barred

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “A Less Than Valiant Effort”

    South Carolina Law Clarifies Statue of Repose

    On to Year Thirteen for Blog

    Navigating Turbulent Waters Ashore: Insurance Lessons from a Navy Project Dispute

    Colorado Hotel Neighbors Sue over Construction Plans
    Corporate Profile

    BOHANNON VIRGINIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Bohannon, Virginia Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Leveraging from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Bohannon's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Bohannon, Virginia

    Not Every Job Is Worth Winning: Contract Risk Questions Contractors Should Ask Before They Bid

    September 29, 2026 —
    Introduction Winning the work is not the same as winning the project, at least financially. Consider a contractor that commits to procure custom or long-lead materials before receiving complete construction documents. Depending on the language of the contract, if the final design is altered after those materials have been ordered, the contractor may be left responsible for replacement costs, procurement delays, or both. Alternatively, a subcontractor that accepts a pay-if-paid provision without investigating the owner’s financing, or prematurely waives lien rights, potentially risks nonpayment for properly performed work. Such concessions can quickly transform an apparently profitable project into a significant financial burden. A successful bid can therefore become an unsuccessful project if the contractor accepts contractual “red flags” without evaluating their consequences and the long-term financial impacts that they may have. The significance of each risk will depend on the project, the parties, the proposed contract, applicable law, and the contractor’s business objectives. Although not comprehensive, this article identifies several key considerations for that process to help mitigate certain risks. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Jack Mayo, Jones Walker LLP
    Mr. Mayo may be contacted at jmayo@joneswalker.com

    Kahana Feld Opens New Office in Sacramento, Adding Key Litigator and Expanding Northern California Footprint

    August 24, 2026 —
    IRVINE, CA – Aug. 11, 2026 – Kahana Feld is pleased to announce the opening of a new office in Sacramento, CA. This will be the firm’s 19th office across the United States. Partner Melvin F. Marcia has joined Kahana Feld and will lead the opening of the Sacramento office. He is joined by attorneys Matthew Brenner and Britney Lucchesi as well as paralegal Michelle Welcker. “We’re excited to welcome Melvin to the Kahana Feld team and expand our footprint in Northern California,” said Amir Kahana, Firmwide Managing Partner of Kahana Feld. “His addition strengthens Kahana Feld’s capabilities and will allow us to work more closely with our general liability, construction defect, and labor and employment clients in the Sacramento area while continuing to provide the level of service and experience they have come to expect from our firm.” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Kahana Feld

    The GKN Aerospace Chemical Release and the Laws Designed to Address It

    July 06, 2026 —
    On May 21, 2026, a 34,000-gallon storage tank at the GKN Aerospace facility in Garden Grove, California began leaking methyl methacrylate (MMA), a volatile and highly flammable industrial chemical used to manufacture high-strength acrylic plastics. GKN Aerospace makes advanced military and commercial transparencies, such as aircraft canopies, windshields, cabin windows, bullet-resistant glass, and spacecraft windows. In polymer chemistry lingo, MMA is known as a monomer. Monomers are like individual links to a chain. Under the right conditions they link up (react) with each other to form long-chained polymers, or plastics. MMA is an unstable monomer that requires controlled storage conditions to avoid setting off a polymerization (chain) reaction. According to early reports, the MMA tank at GKN Aerospace overheated. The cause of the overheating is not yet clear, but the overheating may have created conditions enabling the MMA to initiate polymerization, which in turn generated heat, which in turn generated pressure, activating the tank’s pressure-relief system and releasing MMA vapor into the atmosphere. Concerns about a runaway reaction, massive release, and explosion led the Orange County Fire Authority to order evacuation of approximately 40,000 residents and closure of thirteen schools. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Sean M. Sherlock, Snell & Wilmer
    Mr. Sherlock may be contacted at ssherlock@swlaw.com

    Insured’s Bad Faith Claim Survives Summary Judgment

    July 13, 2026 —
    The insurer’s motion for partial summary judgment to dispose of the insured’s bad faith claim was unsuccessful. Page v. State Farm Lloyds, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102293 (E.D. Texas March 18, 2026). Plaintiff insured alleged that hail and a windstorm caused damage to his property. The damage was reported to the defendant insurer. A claims adjuster inspected the property. Defendant then paid plaintiff $24,493.06, which was the total of the estimated damage minus depreciation and the deductible. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Traub Lieberman Partner Ryan Parker and Associates Robert Biferie and Matthew Groteke Win Final Summary Judgment on Behalf of Homeowner’s Insurance Company

    November 02, 2026 —
    Traub Lieberman Partner Ryan Parker and Associates Robert Biferie and Matthew Groteke won final summary judgment on behalf of their client, a homeowner’s insurance company. The case related to a claim for damage caused by Hurricane Milton, which was reported more than ten months after the date of loss. The homeowner’s insurance company reviewed historical aerial photography of the roof and determined that there was no evidence of damage immediately after the Hurricane, which was inconsistent with the condition of the roof when it was inspected more than ten months later. Additionally, the homeowner’s insurance company was unable to determine when the interior water damage occurred due to the delay in reporting the claim. After a lawsuit was filed, the Traub Lieberman team took depositions of the Plaintiffs and the opposing expert and eventually filed a Motion for Summary Judgment based on the failure to timely report the claim and resulting prejudice to their client. The Court granted the Motion for Summary Judgment finding that notice of the claim was untimely as a matter of law and that the Plaintiffs failed to rebut the legal presumption of prejudice to the insurance company. As a result of the ruling, the insurance company has a valid claim for attorney’s fees. Reprinted courtesy of Ryan S. Parker, Traub Lieberman, Robert Biferie, Traub Lieberman and Matthew Groteke, Traub Lieberman Mr. Parker may be contacted at rparker@tlsslaw.com Mr. Biferie may be contacted at rbiferie@tlsslaw.com Mr. Groteke may be contacted at mgroteke@tlsslaw.com Read the full story...

    Nevada’s Mandatory Nonbinding Arbitration Law for Civil Cases is Going Through Changes

    May 14, 2026 —
    Nevada currently operates an expedited litigation program designed to resolve civil disputes with a value up to $50,000 without incurring the “usual” expense of litigating these disputes. Over time, however, the number of civil cases that have been “exempted” from this program based on the claimed damages exceeding $50,000 has grown dramatically. In response, the Nevada Legislature recently enacted a number of rule changes designed to streamline Nevada’s arbitration process and include more cases. Among these changes are increasing the arbitration “cap” from $50,000 to $100,000. By way of background, the Nevada’s Court Annexed Arbitration program is a mandatory, non-binding program for civil cases in judicial districts that have county populations of 100,000 or more [1]. Nevada’s Court Annexed Arbitration was born out of NRS 38.250, which was enacted in 1991 and went into effect in the summer of 1992. The newly enacted NRS 38.250 was regarded as a way to address the problem of increased court caseloads while promoting judicial economy and efficiency in civil cases having a probable jury award of less than $25,000 [2]. Initially, cases that were automatically exempt from the program included class actions, medical malpractice disputes, divorce proceedings, and other domestic relations matters [3]. Reprinted courtesy of Brandon Wright, Lewis Brisbois and Manuel Gurule, Lewis Brisbois Mr. Wright may be contacted at Brandon.Wright@lewisbrisbois.com Mr. Gurule may be contacted at Manuel.Gurule@lewisbrisbois.com Read the full story...

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (8/19/26) – Single-Family Housing Investors Worry, Confidence in Multifamily REITs and Construction Backlog Falls

    September 08, 2026 —
    In our latest roundup, U.S. Chamber of Commerce creates Housing Advisory Council, a legal battle develops over new federal rules related to mortgage escrow accounts, hospitality dealmakers pursue ‘bigger, higher-conviction’ M&A, and more!
    • In the wake of the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act becoming law, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce has created a Housing Advisory Council with the goal of advancing market-driven policies that help increase housing supply and promote affordability. (Julie Strupp, Multifamily Dive)
    • Investors in the single-family housing market are increasingly concerned about interest rates, rising insurance and home costs, and the ongoing war with Iran. (Diana Olick, CNBC)
    • A legal battle is brewing over new federal rules related to accounts that hold money to pay homeowners’ property taxes and insurance payments. (Sarah Agostino, CNBC)
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Pillsbury's Construction & Real Estate Law Team

    EPA Steps Back, Arizona Moves Forward

    May 12, 2026 —
    In a significant development for Arizona’s business community and environmental policymakers, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has paused its planned reclassification of Maricopa County from “Moderate” to “Serious” ozone nonattainment status pursuant to the Clean Air Act’s National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). This decision marks a shift in federal air policy — one that recognizes the unique challenges faced by regions like metro Phoenix, where environmental conditions beyond local control are often key contributors to air quality readings. The EPA’s move follows a series of meetings between EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin, Arizona elected officials, and business and civic leaders, including a recent roundtable in Phoenix convened by U.S. Senator Mark Kelly. In announcing the pause, Zeldin acknowledged the need for flexibility and fairness in the application of Clean Air Act standards, especially when emissions from other states, nations, and natural events significantly influence local air quality. Reprinted courtesy of Patrick J. Paul, Snell & Wilmer, John Habib, Snell & Wilmer and Sukhmani K. Singh, Snell & Wilmer Mr. Paul may be contacted at ppaul@swlaw.com Mr. Habib may be contacted at jhabib@swlaw.com Ms. Singh may be contacted at ssingh@swlaw.com Read the full story...