BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    Medical building expert witness Fountain Green Utah Subterranean parking expert witness Fountain Green Utah condominiums expert witness Fountain Green Utah casino resort expert witness Fountain Green Utah parking structure expert witness Fountain Green Utah landscaping construction expert witness Fountain Green Utah tract home expert witness Fountain Green Utah production housing expert witness Fountain Green Utah mid-rise construction expert witness Fountain Green Utah housing expert witness Fountain Green Utah custom homes expert witness Fountain Green Utah low-income housing expert witness Fountain Green Utah industrial building expert witness Fountain Green Utah custom home expert witness Fountain Green Utah concrete tilt-up expert witness Fountain Green Utah hospital construction expert witness Fountain Green Utah retail construction expert witness Fountain Green Utah condominium expert witness Fountain Green Utah high-rise construction expert witness Fountain Green Utah multi family housing expert witness Fountain Green Utah office building expert witness Fountain Green Utah institutional building expert witness Fountain Green Utah
    Fountain Green Utah soil failure expert witnessFountain Green Utah reconstruction expert witnessFountain Green Utah building code expert witnessFountain Green Utah construction code expert witnessFountain Green Utah construction claims expert witnessFountain Green Utah consulting architect expert witnessFountain Green Utah expert witness roofing
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Fountain Green, Utah

    Utah Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Case law precedent


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Fountain Green Utah

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Central Utah Home Builders Association
    Local # 4674
    PO Box 27
    Ephraim, UT 84627

    Fountain Green Utah Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Utah Valley Home Builders Association
    Local # 4670
    1443 W 800 N Ste 103
    Orem, UT 84057

    Fountain Green Utah Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Utah (state)
    Local # 4600
    9069 South 1300 West
    West Jordan, UT 84088

    Fountain Green Utah Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Salt Lake Home Builders Association
    Local # 4655
    9069 S 1300 W
    West Jordan, UT 84088

    Fountain Green Utah Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Park City Area Home Builders Association
    Local # 4690
    PO Box 980850
    Park City, UT 84098

    Fountain Green Utah Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Northern Wasatch Home Builders Association
    Local # 4640
    5728 S 1475 E Suite 100
    South Ogden, UT 84403

    Fountain Green Utah Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Iron County Home Builders Association
    Local # 4695
    PO Box 368
    Cedar City, UT 84721

    Fountain Green Utah Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Fountain Green Utah


    How BIM Helps Make Buildings Safer

    Dear Engineer: Has your insurer issued a “Reservation of Rights” letter? (law note)

    Outcry Over Peru’s Vast Graft Probe Prompts Top Lawyer to Quit

    The Real Estate Crisis in North Dakota's Man Camps

    Window Manufacturer Weathers Recession by Diversifying

    Insurance Policy Language Really Does Matter

    "Your Work" Exclusion Bars Coverage

    Construction Costs Must Be Reasonable

    How to Determine the Deadline for Recording a California Mechanics Lien

    Shoring of Ceiling Does Not Constitute Collapse Under Policy's Definition

    The Fifth Circuit, Applying Texas Law, Strikes Down Auto Exclusion

    Stuck in Seattle: The Aggravating Adventures of a Gigantic Tunnel Drill

    Famed NYC Bridge’s Armor Is Focus of Suit Against French Company

    Big Waves and High Tides Can Be Just as Insidious as Hurricanes

    The Great Escape: Non-Invalidation Clauses and Property Damage Claims

    Drones Used Despite Uncertain Legal Consequences

    Warning! Danger Ahead for Public Entities

    Colorado Court of Appeals Finds Damages to Non-Defective Property Arising From Defective Construction Covered Under Commercial General Liability Policy

    Asbestos Client Alert: Court’s Exclusive Gatekeeper Role May not be Ignored or Shifted to a Jury

    Construction Case Alert: Appellate Court Confirms Engineer’s Duty to Defend Developer Arises Upon Tender of Indemnity Claim

    Insurer Not Entitled to Summary Judgment on Construction Defect, Bad Faith Claims

    American Arbitration Association Revises Construction Industry Rules and Mediation Procedures

    Motion to Strike Insureds' Experts Denied, Claims under Fair Claims Settlement Act Survives Summary Judgment

    Beyond the Executive Orders: Legislative Proposals to Strengthen the U.S. Critical Minerals Supply Chain

    Virginia Chinese Drywall and pollution exclusion

    BWB&O’s Colorado Lawyers Successfully Defend Damages of more than $150 Million in Historic Construction Lawsuit!

    Solving the Construction Workforce Puzzle

    Still Going, After All This Time: the Sacketts, EPA and the Clean Water Act

    Homebuilder Confidence Takes a Beating

    Executive Order Addresses Wildfire Rebuilding Delays Through Federal Preemption of State and Local Permitting

    Jury Trials and Mediation in Philadelphia County: Virtually in Person

    NY Appellate Court Holds Common Interest Privilege Applies to Parties to a Merger

    Construction Firms Complain of Missed Payments on Redevelopment Project

    A Relatively Small Exception to Fraud and Contract Don’t Mix

    Before Collapse, Communications Failed to Save Bridge Project

    Chambers USA Names Peckar & Abramson to Band 1 Level in Construction Law; 29 P&A Lawyers Recognized as Leading Attorneys; Six Regions and Government Contracts Practice Recognized

    Summarizing Changes to NEPA in the Fiscal Responsibility Act (P.L. 118-5)

    Four Payne & Fears Attorneys Named 2026 Southern California Super Lawyers Rising Stars

    Red Tape Is Holding Up a Greener Future

    President Trump Announces New Steel Tariffs

    Snell & Wilmer Recognized Among the Top 10 Largest Law Firms in Orange County by the Orange County Business Journal for the Ninth Consecutive Year

    Contractor Sues Supplier over Defective Products

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (9/4/24) – DOJ Sues RealPage, Housing Sales Increase and U.S. Can’t Build Homes Fast Enough

    Three Kahana Feld Attorneys Selected to 2024 NY Metro Super Lawyers Lists

    Want to Stay Up on Your Mechanic’s Lien Deadlines? Write a Letter or Two

    Zoning Hearing Notice Addressed by Georgia Appeals Court

    New York Team Secures Dismissal of Premises Liability Action Against Client

    The ‘Sole Option’ Arbitration Provision in Construction Contracts

    Top Developments 2025 - Issue 4

    Allegations That COVID-19 Was Physically Present and Altered Property are Sufficient to Sustain COVID-19 Business Interruption Suit
    Corporate Profile

    FOUNTAIN GREEN UTAH CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 7,000 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Fountain Green, Utah Construction Expert Witness Group provides a wide range of trial support and consulting services to Fountain Green's most acknowledged construction practice groups, CGL carriers, builders, owners, and public agencies. Drawing from a diverse pool of construction and design professionals, BHA is able to simultaneously analyze complex claims from the perspective of design, engineering, cost, or standard of care.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Fountain Green, Utah

    Every High-Tech Building Has Many Lifespans

    August 16, 2026 —
    When I worked as an architect, our team designed a laboratory for fuel research. The facility included a large research hall where various boilers and other devices were tested and analyzed. The setup required extensive floor channeling under the thick concrete floor. We suggested building a modular system that would allow flexibility in the future, when requirements would certainly change. They did not want that because of budget constraints. The high-tech construction trend is spreading. Data centers, semiconductor fabs, battery plants, and life science facilities share one property that sets them apart from ordinary buildings. The technology inside turns over faster than the structure around it. Server generations change every three to five years. Rack densities have risen from 10 or 20 kW to 130 kW and beyond in just a few years. A high-tech facility is really several buildings with different lifespans inside one envelope, and we keep designing them as if they were one. The failure is not that things become obsolete. It is that we never say when each layer is expected to. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    Denis Serkin and Michael S. Zicherman Co-Edit/Author Lexology Panoramic: Construction 2027

    August 03, 2026 —
    P&A partners Denis Serkin and Michael S. Zicherman served as co-editors and authors of Lexology’s Panoramic: Construction 2027 – US and Global guide. Formerly Getting the Deal Through, Lexology Panoramic provides members of the construction industry and construction-related legal and business providers with side-by-side comparison of key industry issues in 19 jurisdictions worldwide. Reprinted courtesy of Denis Serkin, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and Michael S. Zicherman, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. Mr. Serkin may be contacted at dserkin@pecklaw.com Mr. Zicherman may be contacted at mzicherman@pecklaw.com Read the full story...

    GRSM Trial Team Holds Alameda County Asbestos Verdict to $900,000 Against $50 Million Demand

    July 27, 2026 —
    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani Partners John Katerndahl and Vincent Gunter recently obtained an outstanding trial result for a manufacturer of asbestos-containing electrical cable, holding a jury verdict to $900,000 against a $50 million demand following an eight-week trial in Alameda County Superior Court, which is among the most challenging asbestos venues in the country. The GRSM team also included Associate Brandon Sanchez, on-site trial Paralegal Laura Vitanova, and Paralegal Kerrie Lease. The plaintiffs, the surviving spouse and four children of a former painter who died of mesothelioma, alleged that the decedent was exposed to asbestos from the company’s electrical cable during construction of a California nuclear power facility. GRSM’s client was the sole remaining defendant at trial. The plaintiffs asked the jury for $50 million and called 15 witnesses across their case-in-chief and rebuttal. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    OC Streetcar Project Mediation Sets $50M Payment to Walsh

    July 20, 2026 —
    Walsh Construction told a California state court judge last month that lawsuit mediation of its claims on an Orange County light-rail project—known as OC Streetcar—had produced a settlement of some claims under which the county agreed to pay the contractor almost an additional $50 million. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Richard Korman, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Korman may be contacted at kormanr@enr.com

    What Construction Attorneys Do and When Contractors Need Them

    August 11, 2026 —
    Direct Answer A construction attorney advises contractors on contracts, payment rights, mechanic's liens, payment bond claims, change orders, delay claims, OSHA matters, defect claims, terminations and dispute resolution. The work covers far more than lawsuits—much of its value comes before a dispute ever becomes formal. Construction attorneys help contractors protect payment rights, manage project risk, resolve disputes and avoid contract terms that can turn a profitable job into a financial loss. Their work covers more than lawsuits. A construction attorney may review a contract before bid day, help preserve lien rights, respond to a defective work claim, prepare for mediation or defend a contractor after a safety citation. For contractors, legal counsel is often most valuable before a dispute becomes formal. A missed notice deadline, vague scope clause, unsigned change order or broad indemnity provision can create problems long before a claim is filed. Construction attorneys help identify those risks while there is still time to negotiate, document the issue or preserve leverage. Reprinted courtesy of Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Defend Now, Allocate Later? An Unresolved Tension in Colorado Construction Law

    August 16, 2026 —
    For decades, Colorado law has recognized an important distinction between the duty to defend and the duty to indemnify. The former ordinarily arises at the beginning of litigation; the latter generally cannot be determined until the underlying liability is known. That distinction makes intuitive sense. A defense that becomes due only after litigation concludes is not much of a defense. But Colorado’s construction anti-indemnity statute, C.R.S. § 13-21-111.5(6), raises an interesting question about how that familiar rule operates in construction disputes. The statute expressly regulates contractual obligations not only to indemnify, but also to insure and defend, and it reflects a legislative policy that construction businesses should bear financial responsibility for their own negligence. Those principles have developed along separate tracks. At some point, a Colorado appellate court may have to decide precisely how they fit together. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David McLain, Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC
    Mr. McLain may be contacted at mclain@hhmrlaw.com

    What Massachusetts Contractors and Developers Can Learn from Cannistraro v. Columbia Construction

    July 13, 2026 —
    Introduction On June 26, 2026 the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court issued its decision in J.C. Cannistraro, LLC v. Columbia Construction Co.—a holding that sits at the intersection of Prompt Pay Act compliance and the Massachusetts Arbitration Act.[1] Most already know that the Massachusetts Prompt Pay Act (PPA) imposes strict timing and certification requirements for rejecting payment applications and proposed change orders on projects valued at $3 million or more. Most notably, the PPA requires the paying party to give the payee written notice of its approval or rejection of progress applications and proposed changes within 15 days of receipt, which notice must include a “factual and contractual basis for the rejection” and must be “certified as made in good faith.”[2] In the absence of a timely certified notice, payment is “deemed to be approved” unless the payor properly rejects payment before it comes due.[3] Reprinted courtesy of Anthony LaPlaca, Seyfarth Shaw LLP and Luke Marston, Seyfarth Shaw LLP Mr. LaPlaca may be contacted at alaplaca@seyfarth.com Mr. Marston may be contacted at lmarston@seyfarth.com Read the full story...

    Cuomo Bridge Lawsuit Adversaries Weigh Mediated Settlement

    July 06, 2026 —
    Rival legal teams have reached a critical juncture as they consider a mediated settlement in one of two major payment lawsuits pending between a design-build contracting team and the New York State Thruway Authority over construction of the more than $3-billion Mario M. Cuomo Bridge north of New York City. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Richard Korman, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Korman may be contacted at kormanr@enr.com