BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    condominium expert witness Stephens County Texas high-rise construction expert witness Stephens County Texas townhome construction expert witness Stephens County Texas office building expert witness Stephens County Texas institutional building expert witness Stephens County Texas casino resort expert witness Stephens County Texas mid-rise construction expert witness Stephens County Texas housing expert witness Stephens County Texas Subterranean parking expert witness Stephens County Texas condominiums expert witness Stephens County Texas Medical building expert witness Stephens County Texas hospital construction expert witness Stephens County Texas concrete tilt-up expert witness Stephens County Texas production housing expert witness Stephens County Texas parking structure expert witness Stephens County Texas retail construction expert witness Stephens County Texas custom homes expert witness Stephens County Texas multi family housing expert witness Stephens County Texas landscaping construction expert witness Stephens County Texas tract home expert witness Stephens County Texas custom home expert witness Stephens County Texas structural steel construction expert witness Stephens County Texas
    Stephens County Texas roofing and waterproofing expert witnessStephens County Texas construction project management expert witnessStephens County Texas structural concrete expertStephens County Texas building code compliance expert witnessStephens County Texas construction expert testimonyStephens County Texas structural engineering expert witnessesStephens County Texas multi family design expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Stephens County, Texas

    Texas Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB 730 amended the Texas Property Code by adding Title 16 and amending chapter 27. Overseen by the Texas Residential Construction Commission (TRCC) the code asserts that a contractor is not liable for any percentage of damages caused by failure to take reasonable action to mitigate damages or take reasonable action to maintain the residence. It also limits damages, requires written notification and response for right of repair and defines warranty periods. Additionally, SB 754 states“(5-10 Sec. 27.107) a contractor may assert as an affirmative defense to an allegation of a defect made in a complaint filed under this subchapter that the defect is the result of abuse, neglect, or unauthorized modifications or alterations of the home.”


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Stephens County Texas

    No state license is required, however, general contractors must get permits at the local level. Separate boards license HVAC, and plumbing trades.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Builders Association of Greater Fort Worth
    Local # 4530
    70001 Blvd 26 Ste 323
    Fort Worth, TX 76180

    Stephens County Texas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    East Texas Builders Association
    Local # 4542
    2023 Alpine Rd
    Longview, TX 75601

    Stephens County Texas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Greater Dallas
    Local # 4524
    5816 West Plano Pkwy
    Plano, TX 75093

    Stephens County Texas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Big Country Home Builders Association
    Local # 4506
    4398 Crawford Dr
    Abilene, TX 79602

    Stephens County Texas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Tyler Area Builders Association
    Local # 4569
    1504 West Grande Blvd St A
    Tyler, TX 75703

    Stephens County Texas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Texarkana
    Local # 4566
    PO Box 7048
    Texarkana, TX 75505

    Stephens County Texas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Permian Basin Home Builders Association
    Local # 4540
    4305 N Garfield St Ste 224
    Midland, TX 79705

    Stephens County Texas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Stephens County Texas


    BHA Announces New Orlando Location

    Engineering Report Finds More Investigation Needed of Balconies at New Jersey Condo

    Construction’s AI Moment — Why Contractors Are Increasingly Optimistic

    Project-Specific Policies and Products-Completed Operations Hazard Extensions

    The Best Laid Plans: Contingency in a Construction Contract

    Accessibility Considerations – What Your Company Should Be Aware of in 2021

    Insurance for Large Construction Equipment Such as a Crane

    Doing Construction Lead Programs the Right Way

    New Jersey Supreme Court Hears Arguments on Coverage Gap Dispute

    Green Cement? You Bet!

    What are Section 8(f) Agreements?

    Delaware State Court Holds that Defective Workmanship Claims do not Trigger Coverage by a Builder’s Commercial General Liability Policy

    Subcontractors Have Remedies, Even if “Pay-if-Paid” Provisions are Enforced

    Top 10 Take-Aways from the 2024 Annual Forum Meeting in New Orleans

    Powering Goal Congruence in Construction Through Smart Contracts

    Who, Me?

    AEC Business Among Top Construction Blogs

    Congratulations 2020 DE, MA, NY and PA Super Lawyers and Rising Stars

    Quick Note: Choice of Law Provisions

    An Insurance Policy Isn’t Ambiguous Just Because You Want It to Be

    Sick Leave, Paid Time Off, and the Families First Coronavirus Response Act

    New Jersey Appellate Court Reinstates Asbestos Action

    Texas Legislative Update

    One Colorado Court Allows Negligence Claim by General Contractor Against Subcontractor

    Illinois Supreme Court Finds Construction Defect Claim Triggers Initial Grant of Coverage

    Court Bars Licensed Contractor From Seeking Compensation for Work Performed by Unlicensed Sub

    Preserving Your Construction Claim

    Steven L. Heisdorffer Joins Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell

    Code Changes Pave Way for CLT in Tall Buildings and Spark Flammability Debate

    Even Where Fraud and Contract Mix, Be Careful With Timing

    Scotiabank Is Cautious on Canada Housing as RBC, BMO Seek Action

    What Do I Do With This Stuff? Dealing With Abandoned Property After Foreclosure

    Sean Shecter to Join American University Environmental and Energy Law Alumni Advisory Council

    Insurers Refuse Indemnification of Subcontractors in Construction Defect Suit

    An “Agreement to Agree” Is Not a Binding Contract

    The Construction Lawyer as Problem Solver

    ABC Chapter President Comments on Miami Condo Collapse

    Real Protection for Real Estate Assets: Court Ruling Reinforces Importance of D&O Insurance

    Additional Insured Coverage Confirmed

    Insured's Experts Excluded, But Insurer's Motion for Summary Judgment Denied

    Hawaii Federal Court Grants Insured's Motion for Remand

    Is Your Construction Business Feeling the Effects of the Final DBA Rule?

    Several Wilke Fleury Attorneys Featured in Sacramento Magazine 2022 Top Lawyers!

    Florida Former Public Works Director Fined for Ethics Violation

    Specified Or Designated Operations Endorsement – Limitation of Insurance Coverage

    New FAR Rule Mandates the Use of PLAs on Large Construction Projects

    Contractor Allegedly Stole Construction Materials

    Appetite for Deconstruction

    Arbitration: For Whom the Statute of Limitations Does Not Toll in Pennsylvania

    Collaborating or Competing with Construction Tech Startups
    Corporate Profile

    STEPHENS COUNTY TEXAS CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 7,000 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Stephens County, Texas Construction Expert Witness Group provides a wide range of trial support and consulting services to Stephens County's most acknowledged construction practice groups, CGL carriers, builders, owners, and public agencies. Drawing from a diverse pool of construction and design professionals, BHA is able to simultaneously analyze complex claims from the perspective of design, engineering, cost, or standard of care.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Stephens County, Texas

    DOI Finalizes Long-Awaited Modernization of Type A Natural Resource Damage Assessment Regulations

    August 03, 2026 —
    For nearly three decades, the U.S. Department of the Interior’s (DOI) simplified “Type A” Natural Resource Damage Assessment (NRDA) regulations were available more in theory than in practice, constrained by dated models, narrow geographic applicability and a $100,000 cap that rarely matched the economics of modern environmental claims. DOI has now finalized revisions to the Type A natural resource damages assessment procedures under 43 C.F.R. Part 11 for hazardous substance releases under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) and the Clean Water Act (CWA), with the final rule published in the Federal Register on July 13, 2026 and scheduled to become effective August 12, 2026. As discussed previously, DOI has sought to modernize what it views as an “inefficient and inflexible” process and restore the Type A procedure to its intended role as a more streamlined pathway for smaller, less contentious NRD claims. The final rule adopts a $5 million default damages threshold, allows use above that amount if all parties agree, clarifies that Type A may be used in all environments and for all natural resource types, and removes legacy model appendices that had tethered the process to outdated formulas. Reprinted courtesy of Amanda G. Halter, Pillsbury, Ashleigh K. Myers, Pillsbury and Jillian Marullo, Pillsbury Ms. Halter may be contacted at amanda.halter@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Myers may be contacted at ashleigh.myers@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Marullo may be contacted at jillian.marullo@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    The Best Lawyers in America® - Ball Janik Attorneys Earn Multiple Recognitions

    September 01, 2026 —
    Orlando, FL, August 20, 2026 – Ball Janik LLP is pleased to announce that 24 of its attorneys have been recognized in the 2027 editions of The Best Lawyers in America® and Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch® in America. The 33rd Best Lawyers edition recognitions are based on peer review and highlight attorneys across a range of practice areas. This recognition underscores the broad experience Ball Janik's attorneys bring to the firm's construction defect practice. "We're proud to be recognized by Best Lawyers again this year," said James C. Prichard, Managing Partner of Ball Janik LLP. "These honors reflect the expertise and depth of our team, our continued growth across Florida, and our commitment to providing strong counsel to clients in complex construction, insurance recovery, and litigation matters." Ball Janik attorneys recognized in the 2027 edition of The Best Lawyers in America® include: Keegan A. Berry — Construction Law Brian T. Crevasse — Construction Law; Litigation - Construction Todd Demetriades — Litigation - Construction Joseph R. Fitos — Construction Law; Litigation - Construction Megan A. Picataggio — Construction Law Jon E. Lemole — Construction Law; Litigation - Construction Salvatore G. Scro — Construction Law Nicholas B. Vargo — Construction Law; Litigation - Construction Kelly M. Corcoran — Construction Law Gabriel Z. Coelho — Construction Law Evan J. Small — Construction Law; Litigation - Construction Franchesco Soto — Construction Law; Litigation - Construction Phillip E. Joseph — Litigation - Construction; Real Estate Law James C. Prichard — Construction Law Ball Janik attorneys recognized in the 2027 edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch® in America include: Nicholas Passantino — Litigation - Construction Amanda L. Gonzalez — Construction Law; Litigation - Construction Morgan N. Lester — Litigation - Construction Chris S. Tribbey — Construction Law Kyle Bugden — Construction Law; Litigation - Construction Brian Tannenbaum — Construction Law Kayla Mosquera — Insurance Law Natasha L. Biela — Commercial Litigation Elijah C. Waring, Jr. — Product Liability Litigation - Defendants Greg K. Demers — Construction Law About Ball Janik LLP Ball Janik LLP is a Florida-based law firm offering construction defect, construction law, insurance recovery, and commercial litigation counsel, to its local and national clients. The firm was founded in 1982 and has expanded its capabilities, professionals, and geographic footprint. What started as a small firm focused on real property, land use, and litigation (known then as Ball Janik & Novack) has grown to a team of 70-plus attorneys and paralegals in five offices in Florida, with centuries of combined experience and capabilities. The firm has been recognized by Chambers USA, including for its construction law capabilities in Florida, U.S. News & World Report and Best Lawyers®, The Best Lawyers in America©, Super Lawyers, and Corporate International. Read more at www.balljanik.com.

    Connecticut Expands Construction Wage-Theft Liability and Prevailing Wage Recordkeeping Requirements

    June 29, 2026 —
    This post was co-authored by Labor + Employment group lawyer Christopher Costain, Hayden Eckblom (Summer Intern), and Pasqualina Fox-Mina (Summer Associate). Hayden and Pasqualina are not admitted to practice law. On May 11, 2026, Connecticut Governor Ned Lamont signed into law Public Act 26-12, a wide-ranging bill centered around employee rights. Our colleagues in Robinson+Cole’s Labor, Employment, Benefits + Immigration group recently published a legal update summarizing the key components of Public Act 26-12. Here, we focus on the Wage Theft and Prevailing Wage concepts in the bill that directly relate to the construction industry. Wage Theft With exceptions for public works and small residential projects, general contractors will be jointly and severally liable for any unpaid wages owed to an employee of a subcontractor of any tier on private construction projects, beginning with contracts entered into on or after January 1, 2027. As we know, there is a separate regime for public works projects involving payment bonds. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Anand Gupta, Robinson & Cole LLP
    Mr. Gupta may be contacted at agupta@rc.com

    New Executive Order on AI Innovation and Security: Key Takeaways for the Construction Industry

    June 15, 2026 —
    On June 2, 2026, President Trump signed an Executive Order titled “Promoting Advanced Artificial Intelligence Innovation and Security.” At its core, the Order is a cybersecurity and national-security measure rather than a broad regulation of how private companies develop or use AI. It directs federal agencies to harden government systems against AI-enabled cyber threats, establishes voluntary frameworks for collaboration between the federal government and the AI and critical-infrastructure sectors, and strengthens criminal enforcement against the malicious use of AI. Notably, the Order expressly disclaims any intent to create a “mandatory governmental licensing, preclearance, or permitting” regime for the “development, publication, release, or distribution of new AI models.” Instead, the Executive Order seeks to “promote AI innovation and security” by working with the private sector to modernize government and private-sector information systems and harden them against external threats, protect intellectual property from exploitation or theft, and cultivate American AI capabilities. Reprinted courtesy of Richard R. Volack, Peckar & Abramson, PC and Denis Serkin, Peckar & Abramson, PC Mr. Volack may be contacted at rvolack@pecklaw.com Mr. Serkin may be contacted at dserkin@pecklaw.com Read the full story...

    Motion for Summary Judgment Granted in Significant California Public Utilities Suit

    May 12, 2026 —
    Congratulations to Partner Mike D’Andrea and Associates Ruth Rasiah and Kaylah Abdullah in the Los Angeles office for obtaining a complete dismissal of their clients in a significant claim involving California’s Public Utilities regulations. After lengthy litigation, BWB&O’s Motion for Summary Judgment was granted against Claimant, Spectrum (Charter Communications), which resulted in a complete dismissal of the action against BWB&O’s clients. At issue was whether California’s Public Utilities Code shifted the common law duty to maintain certain utility equipment in residential areas within Southern California. After significant briefing, the Superior Court found that BWB&O correctly argued that the Public Utilities Code required utility companies, like Spectrum, to fully maintain utility equipment, and that private residents are not responsible for utility maintenance (even if the physical equipment is located on private property). Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara LLP

    The Race to Reengineer Cybersecurity

    October 06, 2026 —
    It took six days for Colonial Pipeline Co.'s 5,500-plus miles of connected refined petroleum supply infrastructure from Houston to New York City, to come back on line after a May 7, 2021 ransomware cyberattack forced the company to shut down operations and pay $4.4 million for restoration. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Emell D. Adolphus, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Adolphus may be contacted at adolphuse@enr.com

    My Current Love-Hate Relationship with AI

    June 08, 2026 —
    It’s early in the relationship, I know. But still, there are some things that bug me. Yet, I also know that it’s a relationship in which leaving is not an option, and even if I could, it’s not to the point where it’s so bad that I would do so. So, if you would, let me gripe a bit. While there’s been much discussion about AI and, at least in my neck of the woods, a fair amount of discussion about how lawyers can, should, and must use AI or risk becoming discarded into the dustbin of history, much less has been written about clients’ use of AI. Increasingly, I’ve gotten the sense that my clients are using AI. For example, I had a client ask for confirmation that if he disagreed with an administrative decision that he could file a writ of mandate, and if so, whether that deadline was 30, 60 or 90 days after the administrative decision. The answer to the first question was yes, and as to the second question, the answer was 90 days. This was from a client who, smart as he is, probably didn’t know this off the top of his head. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Garret D. Murai, Nomos LLP
    Mr. Murai may be contacted at gmurai@nomosllp.com

    $356 Million Judgement Against Developer for Defective Construction of DC Condominium

    August 16, 2026 —
    On July 31, 2026, the Superior Court of the District of Columbia entered a $356,085,513.00 judgment against developers JBG Smith for defective construction and renovation of the Wardman Tower Residential Condominium in Washington, D.C. The case is Wardman Tower Residential Condominium Unit Owners Association v. JBG Smith Properties, et al., No. 2020 CA 004807 B (D.C. Super. Ct.). In a 148-page Trial Order, the D.C. Superior Court awarded $118,695,171.00 in damages in favor of the condominium association and against the condominium developers, including JBG Smith. The Court trebled those damages pursuant to the District of Columbia Consumer Protection Procedures Act (“CPPA”) to reach an ultimate judgment of $356,085,513.00. See Cowie Law Group: DC Condominium Construction Defects: Recovering Attorney’s Fees, Litigation Expenses & Treble Damages Under the Consumer Protection Procedures Act. Cowie Law Group, P.C. filed the lawsuit on behalf of the Association in 2020. The firm represented the Association throughout years of pretrial discovery and ultimately served as trial counsel with Williams & Connolly LLP during a lengthy bench trial before the Honorable Yvonne Williams. The Cowie Law Group team included attorneys, George A. Bealefeld, III, Albert G. McCarraher, Stanford L. Kimmel, III and Nicholas D. Cowie. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Nicholas D. Cowie, Cowie Law Group
    Mr. Cowie may be contacted at ndc@cowielawgroup.com