BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    multi family housing expert witness Orange Grove Texas landscaping construction expert witness Orange Grove Texas Medical building expert witness Orange Grove Texas tract home expert witness Orange Grove Texas concrete tilt-up expert witness Orange Grove Texas production housing expert witness Orange Grove Texas hospital construction expert witness Orange Grove Texas industrial building expert witness Orange Grove Texas institutional building expert witness Orange Grove Texas parking structure expert witness Orange Grove Texas Subterranean parking expert witness Orange Grove Texas housing expert witness Orange Grove Texas mid-rise construction expert witness Orange Grove Texas high-rise construction expert witness Orange Grove Texas structural steel construction expert witness Orange Grove Texas low-income housing expert witness Orange Grove Texas condominium expert witness Orange Grove Texas office building expert witness Orange Grove Texas retail construction expert witness Orange Grove Texas custom home expert witness Orange Grove Texas condominiums expert witness Orange Grove Texas custom homes expert witness Orange Grove Texas
    Orange Grove Texas consulting general contractorOrange Grove Texas construction cost estimating expert witnessOrange Grove Texas construction claims expert witnessOrange Grove Texas OSHA expert witness constructionOrange Grove Texas expert witness roofingOrange Grove Texas civil engineer expert witnessOrange Grove Texas stucco expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Orange Grove, Texas

    Texas Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB 730 amended the Texas Property Code by adding Title 16 and amending chapter 27. Overseen by the Texas Residential Construction Commission (TRCC) the code asserts that a contractor is not liable for any percentage of damages caused by failure to take reasonable action to mitigate damages or take reasonable action to maintain the residence. It also limits damages, requires written notification and response for right of repair and defines warranty periods. Additionally, SB 754 states“(5-10 Sec. 27.107) a contractor may assert as an affirmative defense to an allegation of a defect made in a complaint filed under this subchapter that the defect is the result of abuse, neglect, or unauthorized modifications or alterations of the home.”


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Orange Grove Texas

    No state license is required, however, general contractors must get permits at the local level. Separate boards license HVAC, and plumbing trades.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Laredo Builders Association
    Local # 4593
    201 W Hillside Suite 3
    Laredo, TX 78041

    Orange Grove Texas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Builders Association of Corpus Christi
    Local # 4521
    5325 Yorktown Blvd
    Corpus Christi, TX 78413

    Orange Grove Texas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Builders Association of Victoria
    Local # 4572
    5105 E Airline Rd
    Victoria, TX 77904

    Orange Grove Texas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Galveston Area Builders & Remodelers Association
    Local # 4533
    P O Box 1037
    Santa Fe, TX 77517

    Orange Grove Texas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Builders Association of Greater San Antonio
    Local # 4560
    3625 Paesanos Parkwary
    San Antonio, TX 78231

    Orange Grove Texas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Rio Grande Valley Home Builders Association
    Local # 4534
    419 Nolana Ste C
    McAllen, TX 78504
    Orange Grove Texas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Greater New Braunfels Home Builders Association
    Local # 4503
    625 W San Antonio St
    New Braunfels, TX 78130

    Orange Grove Texas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Orange Grove Texas


    If Passed, New Bill AB 2320 Will Mandate Cyber Insurance For State Government Contractors

    Arizona Contractor Designs Water-Repellant Cabinets

    Do You Have the Receipt? Pennsylvania Court Finds Insufficient Evidence That Defendant Sold the Product

    Construction Defects and Warranties in Maryland

    General Contractor Intervening to Compel Arbitration Per the Subcontract

    Four Steps to Effectively Manage Rising Risk of Construction Liability Claims

    Four Things Construction Professionals Need to Know About Asbestos

    How Many Homes have Energy-Efficient Appliances?

    If You Get ‘Reported to the Board’ for Your Professional License (Law Note)

    $57M Settlement Keeps Red River Diversion Project Claims Out of Court

    Leveraging the 50-State Initiative, Connecticut and Maine Team Secure Full Dismissal of Coverage Claim for Catastrophic Property Loss

    French Laundry Spices Up COVID-19 Business Interruption Debate

    When Cyber Crooks Steal Payments, Think Insurance Makes Up The Loss? Think Again.

    Hunton Insurance Team Wins Summary Judgment on Firm’s Own Hurricane Harvey Business Income Loss

    Augmented and Mixed Reality in Construction

    In Appellate Division First, New York Appellate Team Successfully Invokes “Party Finality” Doctrine to Obtain Dismissal of Appeal for Commercial Guarantors

    Smoke and Soot Constitute Direct Physical Loss

    Storm Eunice Damage in U.K. Could Top £300 Million

    Another Guilty Plea In Nevada Construction Defect Fraud Case

    Will On-Site Robotics Become Feasible in Construction?

    New Jersey’s Governor Puts Construction Firms on Formal Notice of His Focus on Misclassification of Workers as Independent Contractors

    Carbon Sequestration Can Combat Global Warming, Sometimes in Unexpected Ways

    CGL Insurer’s Duty To Defend Broader Than Duty To Indemnify And Based On Allegations In Underlying Complaint

    Novation Agreements Under Federal Contracts

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (1/28/25) – FTC Suing Greystar, DOJ Investigating Top Residential Landlords and Trump Facing Housing Conundrum

    Utility Contractor Held Responsible for Damaged Underground Electrical Line

    Equitable Subrogation Part Deux: Mechanic’s Lien vs. Later Bank Deed of Trust

    Condominium Association Responsibility to Resolve Construction Defect Claims

    Hilary Soaks California With Flooding Rain and Snarls Flights

    Las Vegas Stadium for Athletics, Now $1.75B Project, Gains Key OK

    Super Lawyers Names Five White and Williams LLP Attorneys to its Metro New York Lists

    First Circuit Limits Insurers’ Right to Recoup Defense Costs or Settlement Payments

    U.S. Army Corps Announces Regulatory Program “Modernization” Plan

    Unqualified Threat to Picket a Neutral is Unfair Labor Practice

    Court Addresses Insurers' Dispute Over Which is Primary, Which is Excess

    COVID-19 Business Interruption Claims Four Years Later: What Have We Learned?

    Legal Disputes Soar as Poor Information Management Impacts the AEC Industry

    New York Team Secures Dismissal of Premises Liability Action Against Client

    Bank of America’s Countrywide Ordered to Pay $1.3 Billion

    Oregon Supreme Court Finds Recovery for an "Accident" Depends On Whether There is Tort Liability

    Insurance Measures Passed by 2015 Hawaii Legislature

    Las Vegas Sphere Lawsuits Roll On in Nevada Courtrooms

    How the Pandemic Pushed the Construction Industry Five Years Into the Future

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (10/1/24) – Hybrid Work Technologies, AI in Construction and the Market for Office Buildings

    Texas Court Requires Insurer to Defend GC Despite Breach of Contract Exclusion

    Florida Governor Bans Foreign Citizens From Buying Land in Florida

    Hawaii Appellate Court Finds Appraisers Limited to Determining Amount of Loss

    Additional Insured Not Entitled to Indemnity Coverage For Damage Caused by Named Insured

    City of Sacramento Approves Kings NBA Financing Plan

    Making the Construction Industry a Safer place for Women
    Corporate Profile

    ORANGE GROVE TEXAS CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Orange Grove, Texas Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Leveraging from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Orange Grove's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Orange Grove, Texas

    Powering Data Centers in a Moving Regulatory Landscape: Positioning Deals Before FERC’s Next Move

    April 27, 2026 —
    The explosive growth of data‑center load—driven by artificial intelligence, cloud computing and the expansion of digital infrastructure across industries—has forced U.S. energy regulators into unfamiliar territory. Nowhere is this more evident than at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), which is actively considering how large, concentrated loads can be powered without compromising grid reliability or shifting costs to other customers. FERC has not yet issued a standalone rulemaking on data centers. But make no mistake, the regulatory framework is quietly and deliberately being built. For developers, hyperscalers, utilities and investors, the period before FERC finalizes its next round of decisions represents the critical window to crystallize advocacy and structure transactions in ways that anticipate regulatory change. Reprinted courtesy of Stephen J. Humes, Pillsbury, Alicia M. McKnight, Pillsbury and Andrew H. Jacobs, Pillsbury Mr. Humes may be contacted at stephen.humes@pillsburylaw.com Ms. McKnight may be contacted at alicia.mcknight@pillsburylaw.com Mr. Jacobs may be contacted at andrew.jacobs@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    LA Scores Major Victory in a High-Exposure Premises Liability Action

    July 06, 2026 —
    Our firm is proud to announce a decisive defense victory obtained by Partner Daniel Crespo and Associate Lauren Landau for our client in a high-exposure premises liability action arising from a 2022 incident at an active school construction site in Perris, California. On March 10, 2026, the Riverside County Superior Court granted Summary Judgment in full for our client, dismissing all claims brought by Plaintiff, who alleged she tripped and fell over a curb while picking up her daughter from school and sustained ankle and wrist injuries as a result. Through meticulous preparation and the strategic use of construction plans, contractual documents, and onsite surveillance video evidence, our team demonstrated that our client had no ownership, possession, or control over the portion of the existing sidewalk where the incident occurred, with construction plans unambiguously designating the area as pre-existing concrete outside our client’s scope of work, and the Construction Services Agreement expressly reserving control over all existing site improvements to the school district. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara LLP

    Bridging the Gap at Alaska’s Juneau Creek

    September 21, 2026 —
    The largest single-span steel plate girder bridge launch in the nation wasn’t about setting records. Alaska’s Juneau Creek Bridge design was a matter of necessity. The fully erected steel plate girder bridge, featuring a 440-ft main span hovering 285 ft above the Juneau Creek, was part of the larger Sterling Highway project. It offered a logistical challenge but was chosen among over a dozen bridge types due to the unique constraints brought by the mountainous site. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tim Newcomb, Engineering News-Record
    ENR may be contacted at enr@enr.com

    Seattle’s Residential Zoning Transformation: What Property Owners, Buyers, and Investors Should Understand

    May 14, 2026 —
    Seattle is in the midst of a significant transformation in residential land use policy. Longstanding neighborhood zoning patterns that historically favored detached single-family development are being reexamined in response to housing supply pressures, affordability concerns, and evolving state mandates. For homeowners, purchasers, investors, and builders, these changes may create substantial new opportunities. They also create a heightened need for careful legal and practical due diligence. While zoning reform can expand potential uses of property, it does not eliminate the many other constraints that may still govern what can actually be built. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lawrence S. Glosser, Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLC
    Mr. Glosser may be contacted at larry.glosser@acslawyers.com

    From CERCLA to Drinking Water: D.C. Circuit’s PFAS Ruling Enters a Second Regulatory Fight

    October 06, 2026 —
    On August 18, 2026, a unanimous panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit upheld EPA’s designation of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) as hazardous substances under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA or Superfund). In Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. EPA, the court rejected challenges to EPA’s interpretation of CERCLA Section 102(a), the adequacy of its notice and comment process, its analysis of costs and benefits, and its decision to proceed despite uncertainty about future response actions and costs. This decision is already being invoked in a separate D.C. Circuit challenge to EPA’s 2024 PFAS drinking water rule promulgated under the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA). Six days after the CERCLA decision, respondent intervenors cited it as supplemental authority in American Water Works Association v. EPA, No. 24-1188, ahead of oral argument scheduled for September 18, 2026. The Chamber of Commerce decision may assist the respondent intervenors on certain notice and comment and economic analysis arguments, but its significance should not be overstated. The principal challenges to the standards for the four PFAS subject to EPA’s Hazard Index-based maximum contaminant level (MCL) turn on requirements specific to the SDWA, and EPA itself now agrees that those provisions were promulgated through an unlawful process. Reprinted courtesy of Ashleigh K. Myers, Pillsbury, Amanda G. Halter, Pillsbury and Jillian Marullo, Pillsbury Ms. Myers may be contacted at ashleigh.myers@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Halter may be contacted at amanda.halter@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Marullo may be contacted at jillian.marullo@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    Miller Act Payment Bond Claim “No Nos!”

    October 06, 2026 —
    A recent federal district court opinion, Sauer Construction, LLC v. United Structures of Georgia, LLC, 2026 WL 2522849 (M.D.Fla. 2026), addressed two worthy considerations when it comes to a Miller Act payment bond claim. And, when I am talking about considerations, I am really talking about “no-nos.” These are things you don’t do. First, don’t file an untimely Miller Act payment bond lawsuit. Make sure, as a claimant, you file that lawsuit within one year from your final furnishing. In this case, the subcontractor claimant did not and tried to argue around the statute of limitations with an equitable tolling argument, i.e., that the statute of limitations should be equitably tolled to accommodate the late filing of the lawsuit. Guess what? The subcontractor was not successful. You are fighting an uphill (losing) battle when arguing equitable tolling because “traditional equitable tolling principles require that the claimant demonstrate extraordinary circumstances, such as fraud, misinformation, or deliberate concealment.” Sauer Construction, supra. This means you need ultra-persuasive evidence to support such equitable tolling principles. Actually, having this evidence is doubtful. Thus, timely file the Miller Act payment bond lawsuit. There is no legitimate reason not to. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Endra Rethinks MEP Design with AI

    July 06, 2026 —
    Niklas Lindgren, co-founder and CEO of Endra, joins the AEC Business Podcast to discuss why his Stockholm-based startup is rebuilding MEP design from the ground up with AI. Endra recently raised $50 million in Series A funding and counts some of the world’s largest engineering consultancies as customers. Niklas explains why Revit’s underlying data model is too coarse to support deep automation, and why Endra built its own granular 3D data model instead of working as a plugin. He describes Endra’s “spatial AI” approach to routing conduit and ductwork without clashes, and how the platform models entire electrical systems, from receptacle to transformer, inside a single source of truth. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    Texas Adopts New Procedural Rules for Summary Judgment Motions: What You Need To Know

    July 13, 2026 —
    On March 1, 2026, sweeping amendments to Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 166a took effect, fundamentally changing how Texas courts handle summary judgment motions — from filing and briefing through disposition. Whether representing a plaintiff or defendant, Texas litigants and attorneys must understand these new rules and their impact on case strategy and timelines. These procedural changes carry particular significance for construction litigants. Background: The Prior Rule Texas summary judgment practice has long diverged from the federal model. The Texas Rules of Civil Procedure recognize two types of summary judgment motions: (1) the traditional motion for summary judgment, and (2) the “no-evidence” motion for summary judgment. The no-evidence motion — unique to Texas — may be filed only after adequate time for discovery has passed. No bright-line rule governs that determination; it depends on the unique circumstances of each case. Reprinted courtesy of Conor G. Bateman, Snell & Wilmer and Marsha Cotton, Snell & Wilmer Mr. Bateman may be contacted at cbateman@swlaw.com Ms. Cotton may be contacted at mcotton@swlaw.com Read the full story...