BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    institutional building expert witness Mumford Texas casino resort expert witness Mumford Texas tract home expert witness Mumford Texas housing expert witness Mumford Texas hospital construction expert witness Mumford Texas industrial building expert witness Mumford Texas low-income housing expert witness Mumford Texas multi family housing expert witness Mumford Texas townhome construction expert witness Mumford Texas condominium expert witness Mumford Texas high-rise construction expert witness Mumford Texas parking structure expert witness Mumford Texas Medical building expert witness Mumford Texas condominiums expert witness Mumford Texas retail construction expert witness Mumford Texas structural steel construction expert witness Mumford Texas concrete tilt-up expert witness Mumford Texas custom home expert witness Mumford Texas office building expert witness Mumford Texas landscaping construction expert witness Mumford Texas custom homes expert witness Mumford Texas production housing expert witness Mumford Texas
    Mumford Texas structural engineering expert witnessesMumford Texas construction project management expert witnessesMumford Texas testifying construction expert witnessMumford Texas multi family design expert witnessMumford Texas expert witnesses fenestrationMumford Texas civil engineer expert witnessMumford Texas contractor expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Mumford, Texas

    Texas Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB 730 amended the Texas Property Code by adding Title 16 and amending chapter 27. Overseen by the Texas Residential Construction Commission (TRCC) the code asserts that a contractor is not liable for any percentage of damages caused by failure to take reasonable action to mitigate damages or take reasonable action to maintain the residence. It also limits damages, requires written notification and response for right of repair and defines warranty periods. Additionally, SB 754 states“(5-10 Sec. 27.107) a contractor may assert as an affirmative defense to an allegation of a defect made in a complaint filed under this subchapter that the defect is the result of abuse, neglect, or unauthorized modifications or alterations of the home.”


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Mumford Texas

    No state license is required, however, general contractors must get permits at the local level. Separate boards license HVAC, and plumbing trades.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Bryan College Station
    Local # 4518
    230 Southwest Pkwy
    College Station, TX 77840

    Mumford Texas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Building Industry Association of the Highland Lakes
    Local # 4558
    1401 Broadway St Ste B1
    Marble Falls, TX 78654

    Mumford Texas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Central Texas Home Builders Association
    Local # 4539
    PO Box 2229
    Harker Heights, TX 76548

    Mumford Texas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Temple Area Home Builders Association
    Local # 4501
    PO Box 2002
    Temple, TX 76503

    Mumford Texas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Greater Austin
    Local # 4512
    8140 Exchange Dr
    Austin, TX 78754

    Mumford Texas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Texas Association of Builders
    Local # 4500
    313 E 12th St Ste 210
    Austin, TX 78701

    Mumford Texas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Deep East Texas Association of Builders
    Local # 4548
    PO Box 153337
    Lufkin, TX 75915

    Mumford Texas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Mumford Texas


    Treasure Island Sues Beach Trail Designer over Concrete Defects

    Georgia Court of Appeals Holds That Policyholder Can “Stack” the Limits of Each Primary Policy After Asbestos Claim

    Be Careful When Requiring Fitness for Duty Examinations

    Georgia Court of Appeals Holds Lay Witness Can Provide Opinion Testimony on the Value of a Property If the Witness Had an Opportunity to Form a Reasoned Opinion

    Cardinal Change Examines the Entire, Factual Undertaking

    Little Known Florida Venue Statue Benefitting Resident Contractors

    Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment Denied in Collapse Claim

    Rise in Single-Family Construction Anticipated in Michigan

    Eleven Payne & Fears Attorneys Honored by Best Lawyers

    Utah Digs Deep and Finds “Design Defect” Includes Pre-Construction Geotechnical Reports

    “Bound by the Bond”

    Toolbox Talk Series: International Arbitration for the "Domestic" Construction Lawyer

    Connecticut Court Clarifies Construction Coverage

    Pennsylvania Federal Court Finds No Coverage For Hacking Claim Under E&O Policy

    City Sues over Leaking Sewer System

    Number of Occurrences Depends on Who is Sued

    Curtain Wall Suppliers Claim Rival Duplicated Unique System

    Nation’s Top Court Limits EPA's Authority in Clean Air Case

    Testimony from Insureds' Expert Limited By Motion In Limine

    Collapse of Breezeway Attached to Building Covered

    The Brexit Effect on the Construction Industry

    Newport Beach Attorneys John Toohey and Nick Rodriguez Receive Full Defense Verdict

    Hawaii Federal District Court Grants Preliminary Approval of Settlement on Volcano Damage

    Potential Pitfalls Under the Contract Disputes Act for Federal Government Contractors

    The Looming Housing Crisis and Limited Government Relief—An Examination of the CDC Eviction Moratorium Two Months In

    Are Modern Buildings Silently Killing Us?

    The Great Fallacy: If Builders Would Just Build It Right There Would Be No Construction Defect Litigation

    ACEC Statement on Negotiated Bipartisan Debt Limit Compromise

    A Year Later, Homeowners Still Repairing Damage from Sandy

    Construction Termination Issues for the Architect and Engineer: Part 1– Introduction to the Series

    How to Build a Water-Smart City

    Document Everything! Always! No Exceptions! (AKA, Help Your Lawyer Help You!)

    Be Careful When Walking Off of a Construction Project

    Damage Control: Major Rebuilds After Major Weather Events

    In Midst of Construction Defect Lawsuit, City Center Seeks Refinancing

    Owner Can’t Pursue Statutory Show Cause Complaint to Cancel Lien… Fair Outcome?

    A Race to the Finish on Oroville Dam Spillway Fix

    Faulty Workmanship an Occurrence in Iowa – as Long as Other Property Damage is Involved

    Design Immunity of Public Entities: Sometimes Designs, Like Recipes, are Best Left Alone

    Safer Schools Rendered Unsafe Due to Construction Defects

    Courts Will Not Rewrite Your Post-Loss Property Insurance Obligations

    A Behind-the-Scenes Look at Substitution Hearings Under California’s Listing Law

    Forecast Sunny for Solar Contractors in California

    Job Growth Seen as Good News for North Carolina Housing Market

    Consider Short-Term Lease Workouts For Commercial Tenants

    Orange County Home Builder Dead at 93

    Additional Insurance Coverage Determined for General Contractor

    Hybrid Contracts for The Sale of Goods and Services and the Predominant Factor Test

    Three Reasons Lean Construction Principles Are Still Valid

    Apartment Boom in Denver a Shortcut Around Condo Construction Defect Suits?
    Corporate Profile

    MUMFORD TEXAS CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Mumford, Texas Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Leveraging from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Mumford's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Mumford, Texas

    Four Payne & Fears Attorneys Named 2026 Southern California Super Lawyers Rising Stars

    March 17, 2026 —
    We congratulate our four Payne & Fears attorneys who have been named 2026 Southern California Super Lawyers Rising Stars. This recognition highlights the next generation of legal talent, honoring attorneys who have made a strong impact in their practice areas early in their careers. Employment & Labor Taylor Brown Bree Oswald Employment Litigation: Defense Tyler Runge Business Litigation Brian Shaw Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Payne & Fears

    Insureds’ Altering Dates for Hailstorm Damage Justifies Denial of Claim

    June 02, 2026 —
    The Firth Circuit affirmed the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the insurer due to the insureds’ failure to establish the date of loss after a hailstorm. Cutchall v. Chubb Lloyds Ins. Co. of Texas, 2026 WL 625633 (5th Cir. March 5, 2026). In September 2021, the Cutchalls made a claim on their policy for interior water damage due to a hailstorm that breached their roof. Chubb retained two engineers to inspect the home, but neither found evidence that a hailstorm caused the damage. Instead, the engineers concluded a variety of other causes, such as poor ventilation and as-built defects, caused the damage. Because Chubb concluded that some of these other causes were covered by the policy, it paid only for the covered portions. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    IEEPA Tariff Refunds: CBP Launches CAPE Process

    April 27, 2026 —
    On April 20, 2026, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) launched the first phase of the Consolidated Administration and Processing of Entries (CAPE) tool in the Automated Commercial Environment (ACE) portal to administer refunds of duties imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) through a streamlined electronic filing process. Background In February 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court held that certain tariffs imposed under IEEPA were unlawful. Subsequent proceedings before the U.S. Court of International Trade required CBP to develop a scalable refund process applicable not only to litigants but also to non-plaintiffs. According to CBP and court filings, approximately 330,000 importers paid or deposited an estimated $166 billion in IEEPA duties across more than 53 million entries. In response, CBP developed CAPE as an electronic, consolidated refund mechanism within ACE. Reprinted courtesy of David J. Creagan, White and Williams LLP, Guido Antolini, White and Williams LLP, Bruce W. MacLennan, White and Williams LLP and Gary P. Biehn, White and Williams LLP Mr. Creagan may be contacted at creagand@whiteandwilliams.com Mr. Antolini may be contacted at antolinig@whiteandwilliams.com Mr. MacLennan may be contacted at maclennanb@whiteandwilliams.com Mr. Biehn may be contacted at biehng@whiteandwilliams.com Read the full story...

    The Firm Turns 16!

    July 20, 2026 —
    I have always found it appropriate that my jump to solo practice and Independence Day are so close in time. Today marks the 16th anniversary of my first day as a solo practitioner of construction law at The Law Office of Christopher G. Hill, PC. Time sure has flown by thanks to the great clients and friends who followed me to solo practice and whom I have met since the firm’s founding on July 1, 2010. I also could not have made the transition and had the fun and success I have enjoyed over the past 16 years without the support of the best wife and family that any construction lawyer could want. Since the firm’s last anniversary, my youngest child (who was 7 when this journey began!) has graduated from N. C. State University with a fisheries and wildlife biology degree and is currently in Casper, Wyoming working for Wyoming Game & Fish, my second oldest is an assistant director of admissions at Appalachian State University in Boone, NC, and has celebrated his second wedding anniversary, and my oldest has celebrated her fifth marriage anniversary. Our home in Captiva, Florida continues its recovery from from Hurricane Ian and subsequent hurricanes. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of The Law Office of Christopher G. Hill

    Texas Adopts New Procedural Rules for Summary Judgment Motions: What You Need To Know

    July 13, 2026 —
    On March 1, 2026, sweeping amendments to Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 166a took effect, fundamentally changing how Texas courts handle summary judgment motions — from filing and briefing through disposition. Whether representing a plaintiff or defendant, Texas litigants and attorneys must understand these new rules and their impact on case strategy and timelines. These procedural changes carry particular significance for construction litigants. Background: The Prior Rule Texas summary judgment practice has long diverged from the federal model. The Texas Rules of Civil Procedure recognize two types of summary judgment motions: (1) the traditional motion for summary judgment, and (2) the “no-evidence” motion for summary judgment. The no-evidence motion — unique to Texas — may be filed only after adequate time for discovery has passed. No bright-line rule governs that determination; it depends on the unique circumstances of each case. Reprinted courtesy of Conor G. Bateman, Snell & Wilmer and Marsha Cotton, Snell & Wilmer Mr. Bateman may be contacted at cbateman@swlaw.com Ms. Cotton may be contacted at mcotton@swlaw.com Read the full story...

    Presumption of Prejudice Applies to All Affirmative Defenses Regarding Insured’s Failure to Comply with Post-Loss Policy Conditions

    June 23, 2026 —
    n a recent property insurance coverage dispute, an issue on appeal pertained to the “prejudice” jury instruction associated with the insured’s failure to comply with post-loss policy conditions. The trial court found that the prejudice only pertained to prompt notice and not other post-loss policy conditions. This was reversed on appeal as prejudice applied to ALL the post loss policy conditions that the insured failed to comply with, not just the prompt notice requirement. The prejudice presumption applies to all affirmative defenses regarding an insured’s failure to comply with post-loss policy conditions. Consider this discussion when dealing with an insurer raising prejudice as an affirmative defense to do an insured’s failure to comply with post-loss policy conditions, and the associated burdens of proof: On appeal, [the insurer] contends the trial court erred by instructing the jury that the presumption of prejudice was inapplicable to all of its post-loss obligation defenses except prompt notice. We agree. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Oracle's $16B Michigan Data Center Secures Financing as Power Contracts Face Appeals

    June 08, 2026 —
    A $16 billion hyperscale data center under construction outside Ann Arbor, Mich., has secured financing backed by Blackstone and other institutional investors, even as the project's power supply agreements now face a legal challenge before the Michigan Court of Appeals. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Gottlieb may be contacted at gottliebb@enr.com

    Building the Research and Healthcare Facilities of Tomorrow Without Impacting the Progress of Today

    August 16, 2026 —
    Research labs run experiments that can’t be paused. Hospitals treat patients around the clock. Yet these same facilities constantly need upgrades—new infrastructure, modernized systems, renovated spaces—to meet the demands of twenty-first century science and medicine. The challenge for construction teams isn’t just building. It’s building without ever turning the lights off. This unique dynamic creates an environment where construction activities are happening adjacent to sensitive testing and treatment, a complex setting where disruptions can have serious consequences. Skanska continues to successfully navigate these challenges across multiple sectors, including from occupied lab space at the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality’s (NCDEQ) Reedy Creek Laboratory in Raleigh to hospital corridors alongside staff and patients in various hospital locations across the country. Reprinted courtesy of Jason Tobias, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...