BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    office building expert witness Lipscomb Texas custom homes expert witness Lipscomb Texas low-income housing expert witness Lipscomb Texas structural steel construction expert witness Lipscomb Texas townhome construction expert witness Lipscomb Texas condominiums expert witness Lipscomb Texas custom home expert witness Lipscomb Texas parking structure expert witness Lipscomb Texas industrial building expert witness Lipscomb Texas Subterranean parking expert witness Lipscomb Texas Medical building expert witness Lipscomb Texas institutional building expert witness Lipscomb Texas mid-rise construction expert witness Lipscomb Texas hospital construction expert witness Lipscomb Texas tract home expert witness Lipscomb Texas production housing expert witness Lipscomb Texas casino resort expert witness Lipscomb Texas landscaping construction expert witness Lipscomb Texas concrete tilt-up expert witness Lipscomb Texas housing expert witness Lipscomb Texas condominium expert witness Lipscomb Texas retail construction expert witness Lipscomb Texas
    Lipscomb Texas construction defect expert witnessLipscomb Texas construction scheduling and change order evaluation expert witnessLipscomb Texas civil engineer expert witnessLipscomb Texas construction expert testimonyLipscomb Texas engineering consultantLipscomb Texas forensic architectLipscomb Texas building envelope expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Lipscomb, Texas

    Texas Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB 730 amended the Texas Property Code by adding Title 16 and amending chapter 27. Overseen by the Texas Residential Construction Commission (TRCC) the code asserts that a contractor is not liable for any percentage of damages caused by failure to take reasonable action to mitigate damages or take reasonable action to maintain the residence. It also limits damages, requires written notification and response for right of repair and defines warranty periods. Additionally, SB 754 states“(5-10 Sec. 27.107) a contractor may assert as an affirmative defense to an allegation of a defect made in a complaint filed under this subchapter that the defect is the result of abuse, neglect, or unauthorized modifications or alterations of the home.”


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Lipscomb Texas

    No state license is required, however, general contractors must get permits at the local level. Separate boards license HVAC, and plumbing trades.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Texas Panhandle Builders Association
    Local # 4509
    5601 Enterprise Cir
    Amarillo, TX 79106

    Lipscomb Texas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    North Texas Home Builders Association
    Local # 4578
    4410 Fairway Blvd
    Wichita Falls, TX 76308

    Lipscomb Texas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Grayson - Fannin and Cooke Counties
    Local # 4563
    PO Box 1421
    Sherman, TX 75091

    Lipscomb Texas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of West Texas
    Local # 4545
    4223 85th St
    Lubbock, TX 79423

    Lipscomb Texas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Texarkana
    Local # 4566
    PO Box 7048
    Texarkana, TX 75505

    Lipscomb Texas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Greater Dallas
    Local # 4524
    5816 West Plano Pkwy
    Plano, TX 75093

    Lipscomb Texas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Builders Association of Greater Fort Worth
    Local # 4530
    70001 Blvd 26 Ste 323
    Fort Worth, TX 76180

    Lipscomb Texas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Lipscomb Texas


    Only A Contractor Can Appeal a Contracting Officer’s Final Decision

    Contract Change #9: Owner’s Right to Carry Out the Work (law note)

    Chambers USA 2021 Ranks White and Williams as a Leading Law Firm

    Coverage Exists for Landlord as Additional Insured

    New WOTUS Rule

    Texas Couple Claim Many Construction Defects in Home

    Death, Taxes and Attorneys’ Fees in Construction Disputes

    Texas Legislative Update

    MDL for Claims Against Manufacturers and Distributors of PFAS-Containing AFFFs Focuses Attention on Key Issues

    Function Over Form: Eighth Circuit Narrows Application of Cosmetic Damage Exclusion

    Nevada Senate Minority Leader Gets Construction Defect Bill to Committee

    Kentucky Supreme Court Creates New “Goldilocks Zone” to Limit Opinions of Biomechanical Experts

    Nine ACS Lawyers Recognized by Best Lawyers®

    NYC Building Explosion Kills Two After Neighbor Reports Gas Leak

    An Interesting Look at Mechanic’s Lien Priority and Necessary Parties

    Congratulations to Jonathan Kaplan on his Promotion to Partner!

    AI as Co-Counsel: How Litigators Can Leverage AI for Depositions, Experts, and Trial Preparation

    Building Resiliency: Withstanding Wildfires and Other Natural Disasters

    Reminder About the Upcoming Mechanic’s Lien Form Change

    Mechanic’s Liens- Big Exception

    Shoring of Problem Girders at Salesforce Transit Center Taking Longer than Expected

    Foundation Differences Across the U.S.

    OSHA Launches Program to Combat Trenching Accidents

    Hurricane Harvey: Understanding the Insurance Aspects, Immediate Actions for Risk Managers

    New England Construction Defect Law Groups to Combine

    Personal Guarantor Cannot Escape a Personal Guarantee By…

    Tampa Office Secures Summary Judgment for Property Owner Client in Trip-and-Fall Lawsuit

    Construction Mediation Tips for Practitioners and 'Eyes Only' Tips for Construction Mediators

    "Occurrence" May Include Intentional Acts In Montana

    Beyond the Disneyland Resort: Museums

    Flood Coverage Denied Based on Failure to Submit Proof of Loss

    Court Orders House to be Demolished or Relocated

    CGL Policy May Not Cover Cybersecurity and Data-Related Losses

    Sometimes a Reminder is in Order. . .

    Scotiabank Is Cautious on Canada Housing as RBC, BMO Seek Action

    PA Supreme Court to Rule on Scope of Judges' Credibility Determinations

    The Law of Patent v Latent Defects

    The Law Clinic Paves Way to the Digitalization of Built Environment Processes

    Judgment for Insurer Reversed Due to Failure to Establish Depreciation

    Angelo Mozilo Speaks: No Regrets at Countrywide

    California Appellate Court Holds “Minimal Causal Connection” Satisfies Causation Requirement in All Risk Policies

    Energy Efficiency Ratings Aren’t Actually Predicting Energy Efficiency

    Travelers v. Larimer County and the Concept of Covered Cause of Loss

    West Virginia Couple Claim Defects in Manufactured Home

    Nationwide Immigrant Strike May Trigger Excusable Delay and Other Contract Provisions

    Patti Santelle Honored by Rutgers School of Law with Arthur E. Armitage Sr. Distinguished Alumni Award

    These Pioneers Are Already Living the Green Recovery

    ASCE Statement On White House "Accelerating Infrastructure Summit"

    Ahlers, Cressman & Sleight PLLC Ranked Top Washington Law Firm By Construction Executive

    The Requirement to Post Collateral Under General Agreement of Indemnity Is Real
    Corporate Profile

    LIPSCOMB TEXAS CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Lipscomb, Texas Construction Expert Witness Group is comprised from a number of credentialed construction professionals possessing extensive trial support experience relevant to construction defect and claims matters. Leveraging from more than 25 years experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to the nation's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, Fortune 500 builders, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, and a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Lipscomb, Texas

    Actual Controversy Without Actual Exhaustion: California Supreme Court Allows Declaratory Relief and Bad Faith Claims Against Excess Insurers

    August 24, 2026 —
    California courts were previously split on the issue of whether an insured may bring declaratory relief claims against excess insurers prior to the exhaustion of underlying insurance. Some California courts held that the actual exhaustion of underlying insurance was necessary, whereas other courts allowed for these types of claims to proceed.[1] Recently, the California Supreme Court addressed this split of authority and, in doing so, handed down a significant win for policyholders. In Fox Paine & Company, LLC, et al. v. Twin City Fire Insurance Company et al., the Court held that insureds may proceed with bringing forth viable declaratory relief and bad faith claims against excess insurers prior to the exhaustion of underlying insurance.[2] A summary of the Court’s opinion is provided below. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Kyle A. Rudolph, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C.
    Mr. Rudolph may be contacted at KRudolph@sdvlaw.com

    RONI: What You Lose by Not Investing in AI – With Sam Zolfagharian

    September 21, 2026 —
    Sam Zolfagharian returns to the AEC Business Podcast for her second appearance. She is an AI strategist, keynote speaker, and the author of two books, Disrupt It and Future by Design. She spoke at the AI in AEC conference in Helsinki in March, and we picked up the conversation where that keynote left off. The starting point was a question her clients keep raising. Executives are being asked by their boards about the return on their AI investments, and many of them do not have an answer they trust. This episode is about what to measure instead, and when the dollar figure finally becomes the right number to look at. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    GRSM Defeats Class Certification in Precedent-Setting HOA Management Case

    September 15, 2026 —
    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani Partners Fletcher Alford and Kevin Liu and Associate Jigar Desai secured a favorable outcome on behalf of an HOA management company in a precedent-setting class action before the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California, obtaining denial of the plaintiff’s motion for class certification and dismissal without prejudice of the three claims at issue. The plaintiff alleged that the defendant received earnings credit payments from a bank in exchange for maintaining HOA deposit accounts and failed to disclose the arrangement to its HOA clients. The plaintiff sought more than $40 million in damages, asserting five claims: (1) breach of contract for failing to act in class members’ best interests by not disclosing the alleged earnings credit arrangement; (2) violation of California’s Unfair Competition Law (UCL) based on alleged violations of California Civil Code §§ 5375, 5375.5, and 5380; (3) breach of fiduciary duty based on the alleged undisclosed arrangement; (4) violation of the UCL for unfair business practices arising from the alleged nondisclosure; and (5) unjust enrichment. The plaintiff sought class certification under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(2) and 23(b)(3) only as to its second, third, and fourth causes of action. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    New York Climate Superfund Rulings Put Vermont Law in Focus

    October 20, 2026 —
    A second federal judge has struck down New York’s Climate Change Superfund Act and barred its enforcement. On September 23, 2026, Judge P. Kevin Castel of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York issued a decision granting summary judgment to the United States and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), declaring the Act unconstitutional, and permanently enjoining New York officials from enforcing it in United States v. New York, No. 1:25-cv-03656 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 23, 2026). Judge Castel’s decision closely tracks the Northern District of New York’s August 31 decision in West Virginia v. James, Case No. 1:25-cv-00168 (N.D.N.Y. Aug. 31, 2026). Both courts held that the Clean Air Act (CAA) preempts New York’s effort to impose strict liability through a climate attribution and cost recovery framework based on interstate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Both also held that the foreign affairs doctrine preempts the Act as applied to fossil fuel activity outside the United States. On September 24, the Northern District entered Rule 54(b) judgment implementing its August 31 decision, enjoining Attorney General Letitia James and DEC Commissioner Amanda Lefton from implementing or enforcing the Act and permitting an immediate appeal of the preemption claims. Reprinted courtesy of Amanda G. Halter, Pillsbury, Ashleigh K. Myers, Pillsbury, Jillian Marullo, Pillsbury and Marcus Manca, Pillsbury Ms. Halter may be contacted at amanda.halter@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Myers may be contacted at ashleigh.myers@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Marullo may be contacted at jillian.marullo@pillsburylaw.com Mr. Manca may be contacted at marcus.manca@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    Lewis Brisbois Welcomes Clients and Community Leaders to New Garden City Office Opening

    July 27, 2026 —
    On July 15, Lewis Brisbois hosted a ribbon-cutting event for its new Garden City office, which opened in April to serve the Long Island community and beyond. The event was attended by more than 100 people, including Lewis Brisbois attorneys and staff as well as clients, local business and government leaders, Nassau County Supreme Court judges, and members of the press. Nassau County Executive Bruce Blakeman delivered remarks and cut the ribbon for the office. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Communication Gaps Can Cost Construction Firms in the Data Center Boom

    June 02, 2026 —
    The data center construction boom is transforming the construction industry at a historic pace. Fueled by cloud computing, artificial intelligence and relentless demand for digital infrastructure, data centers have become one of the fastest-growing project types in the built environment. Billions of dollars are flowing into new facilities and expansions, creating unprecedented opportunities for construction firms positioned to deliver reliably. But opportunity alone does not guarantee success. As competition intensifies, communication failures and poor information management are emerging as some of the most common (and costly) reasons firms lose margins, miss deadlines or fail to secure repeat work. In data center construction, where schedules are compressed and tolerance for error is minimal, even small breakdowns in communication can have outsized consequences. Reprinted courtesy of Mike Lewis, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Amanda Mathieu Named to Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly 2026 “Top Women of Law” List

    September 21, 2026 —
    Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly recently named Boston Deputy Managing Partner Amanda Mathieu to its 2026 “Top Women of Law” list, which honors leaders who have shown excellence, innovation, and meaningful contributions to the industry and their communities. According to the publication, “Top Women of Law honorees represent the very best of Massachusetts’ legal community—from accomplished advocates and firm leaders to pioneers, educators, trailblazers, and role models driving positive change throughout the profession. Their influence extends beyond the courtroom and boardroom, creating a lasting impact on their clients, colleagues, organizations, and communities.” “We are lucky to have Amanda as a leader in our Boston office, and a mentor to so many Lewis Brisbois Associates who are getting their careers started in the legal profession” said Managing Partner Ken Walton on this recognition. “This is a well-deserved honor for her, and I look forward to continuing to continuing to work with her as we deliver excellent results for our clients across the country." Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Insured is Third Party Beneficiary of Forced-Place Policy

    October 26, 2026 —
    The court denied the insurer’s motion to dismiss the insured’s fire damage claims under a forced-place policy because the insured was a third-party beneficiary of the policy. Fredericks v. Assurant Specialty, et al., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 179779 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 12, 2026). The insureds’ home burned down on the same day their homeowner’s policy expired. The expiration automatically triggered a forced-placed policy issued by American Security Insurance Company (ASIC) to the insureds’ mortgage company, Rocket Mortgage Company, LLC. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com