BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    townhome construction expert witness Cedar Park Texas condominium expert witness Cedar Park Texas industrial building expert witness Cedar Park Texas mid-rise construction expert witness Cedar Park Texas landscaping construction expert witness Cedar Park Texas retail construction expert witness Cedar Park Texas Medical building expert witness Cedar Park Texas custom homes expert witness Cedar Park Texas office building expert witness Cedar Park Texas tract home expert witness Cedar Park Texas condominiums expert witness Cedar Park Texas casino resort expert witness Cedar Park Texas custom home expert witness Cedar Park Texas parking structure expert witness Cedar Park Texas institutional building expert witness Cedar Park Texas low-income housing expert witness Cedar Park Texas high-rise construction expert witness Cedar Park Texas hospital construction expert witness Cedar Park Texas concrete tilt-up expert witness Cedar Park Texas multi family housing expert witness Cedar Park Texas Subterranean parking expert witness Cedar Park Texas structural steel construction expert witness Cedar Park Texas
    Cedar Park Texas expert witness commercial buildingsCedar Park Texas civil engineer expert witnessCedar Park Texas roofing and waterproofing expert witnessCedar Park Texas fenestration expert witnessCedar Park Texas expert witness concrete failureCedar Park Texas construction project management expert witnessesCedar Park Texas delay claim expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Cedar Park, Texas

    Texas Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB 730 amended the Texas Property Code by adding Title 16 and amending chapter 27. Overseen by the Texas Residential Construction Commission (TRCC) the code asserts that a contractor is not liable for any percentage of damages caused by failure to take reasonable action to mitigate damages or take reasonable action to maintain the residence. It also limits damages, requires written notification and response for right of repair and defines warranty periods. Additionally, SB 754 states“(5-10 Sec. 27.107) a contractor may assert as an affirmative defense to an allegation of a defect made in a complaint filed under this subchapter that the defect is the result of abuse, neglect, or unauthorized modifications or alterations of the home.”


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Cedar Park Texas

    No state license is required, however, general contractors must get permits at the local level. Separate boards license HVAC, and plumbing trades.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Building Industry Association of the Highland Lakes
    Local # 4558
    1401 Broadway St Ste B1
    Marble Falls, TX 78654

    Cedar Park Texas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Bryan College Station
    Local # 4518
    230 Southwest Pkwy
    College Station, TX 77840

    Cedar Park Texas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Greater Austin
    Local # 4512
    8140 Exchange Dr
    Austin, TX 78754

    Cedar Park Texas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Texas Association of Builders
    Local # 4500
    313 E 12th St Ste 210
    Austin, TX 78701

    Cedar Park Texas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of SE Texas
    Local # 4515
    5655 Eastex Freeway Ste M6A
    Beaumont, TX 77706

    Cedar Park Texas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Texas Hill Country Home Builders Association
    Local # 4580
    1444 Sidney Baker St
    Kerrville, TX 78028

    Cedar Park Texas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Central Texas Home Builders Association
    Local # 4539
    PO Box 2229
    Harker Heights, TX 76548

    Cedar Park Texas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Cedar Park Texas


    DOI Finalizes Long-Awaited Modernization of Type A Natural Resource Damage Assessment Regulations

    Noncompete Agreements: How to Navigate the Changing Landscape

    When Coronavirus Cases Spike at Construction Jobsites

    Recent Environmental Cases: Something in the Water, in the Air and in the Woods

    Caveat Emptor (“Buyer Beware!”) Exceptions

    Florida Adopts Less Stringent Summary Judgment Standard

    Sureties and Bond Producers May Be Liable For a Contractor’s False Claims Act Violations

    Standard Lifetime Shingle Warranties Aren’t Forever

    Virginia Allows Condominium Association’s Insurer to Subrogate Against a Condominium Tenant

    Former Hoboken, New Jersey Mayor Disbarred for Taking Bribes

    Alleged Negligent Misrepresentation on Condition of Home is Not an Occurrence Causing Property Damage

    Overtime! – When the Statute of Limitations Isn’t Game Over For Your Claim

    Digitalizing the Construction Site – Interview with Tenderfield’s Jason Kamha

    Georgia Court of Appeals Holds That Policyholder Can “Stack” the Limits of Each Primary Policy After Asbestos Claim

    What the FIU Bridge Collapse Says About Peer Review

    Construction Firm Settles Suit Over 2012 Calif. Wildfire

    Additional Insured Not Entitled to Reimbursement of Defense Costs Paid by Other Insurers

    Three Kahana Feld Attorneys Recognized in The Best Lawyers in America® 2025

    Crypto and NFTs Could Help People Become Real Estate Tycoons

    New Jersey Court Upholds Registration Requirement for Joint Ventures Bidding on Public Works Contracts

    California Appellate Court Holds “Minimal Causal Connection” Satisfies Causation Requirement in All Risk Policies

    Wildfire Risk Harms California Home Values, San Francisco Fed Study Finds

    Settlement Reached in California Animal Shelter Construction Defect Case

    Montana Significantly Revises Its Product Liability Laws

    California Appellate Court Confirms: Additional Insureds Are First-Class Citizens

    Bar Against Forum Selection Clauses in Construction Contracts Extended to Design Professionals

    Design-Build Contracting for County Road Projects

    Managing Tariff Volatility in Cross‑Border U.S. Construction Projects: Practical Contract‑Drafting and Procurement Strategies

    A “Flood” of Uncertainty; Massachusetts SJC Finds Policy Term Ambiguous

    Rancosky Adopts Terletsky: Pennsylvania Supreme Court Sets Standard for Statutory Bad Faith Claims

    Insolvency of Primary Carrier Does Not Invoke Excess Coverage

    The Godfather of Solar Predicts Its Future

    Limitation on Coverage for Payment of Damages Creates Ambiguity

    Illinois Supreme Court Holds That the Implied Warranty of Habitability Does Not Extend to Subcontractors

    Know When Your Claim “Accrues” or Risk Losing It

    Am I Still Covered Under the Title Insurance Policy?

    Claim Against Broker for Failure to Procure Adequate Coverage Survives Summary Judgment

    The Rise Of The Improper P2P Tactic

    Insurer Disposes of Bad Faith Claim on Summary Judgment

    Seller's Silence on Unfinished Repairs Sinks Summary Judgment in Real Estate Dispute

    How to Defend Stucco Allegations

    HEI Civil's Colorado Division is Awarded the 2024 NUCA William H. Feather Safety Award For 1,000,000+ Manhours

    Work to Solve the Mental Health Crisis in Construction

    Nevada’s Mandatory Nonbinding Arbitration Law for Civil Cases is Going Through Changes

    Insurer Must Indemnify Additional Insured After Settlement

    When OSHA Cites You

    Difficulty in Defending Rental Supplier’s Claim Under Credit Application

    FHFA’s Watt Says Debt Cuts Possible for Underwater Homeowners

    What Buyers Want in a Green Home—and What They Don’t

    Four Ways to Master the Twists and Turns of Construction Project Change Orders
    Corporate Profile

    CEDAR PARK TEXAS CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 7,000 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Cedar Park, Texas Construction Expert Witness Group provides a wide range of trial support and consulting services to Cedar Park's most acknowledged construction practice groups, CGL carriers, builders, owners, and public agencies. Drawing from a diverse pool of construction and design professionals, BHA is able to simultaneously analyze complex claims from the perspective of design, engineering, cost, or standard of care.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Cedar Park, Texas

    Miller Act Payment Bond Claim “No Nos!”

    October 06, 2026 —
    A recent federal district court opinion, Sauer Construction, LLC v. United Structures of Georgia, LLC, 2026 WL 2522849 (M.D.Fla. 2026), addressed two worthy considerations when it comes to a Miller Act payment bond claim. And, when I am talking about considerations, I am really talking about “no-nos.” These are things you don’t do. First, don’t file an untimely Miller Act payment bond lawsuit. Make sure, as a claimant, you file that lawsuit within one year from your final furnishing. In this case, the subcontractor claimant did not and tried to argue around the statute of limitations with an equitable tolling argument, i.e., that the statute of limitations should be equitably tolled to accommodate the late filing of the lawsuit. Guess what? The subcontractor was not successful. You are fighting an uphill (losing) battle when arguing equitable tolling because “traditional equitable tolling principles require that the claimant demonstrate extraordinary circumstances, such as fraud, misinformation, or deliberate concealment.” Sauer Construction, supra. This means you need ultra-persuasive evidence to support such equitable tolling principles. Actually, having this evidence is doubtful. Thus, timely file the Miller Act payment bond lawsuit. There is no legitimate reason not to. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Trend Continues Where Unlicensed Contractors Have No Recourse

    July 13, 2026 —
    There’s been a recent trend in Florida case law that has figuratively “killed” unlicensed contractors. Here’s another one. The moral to this trend and case is simple: make sure you have the proper licenses prior to serving as a contractor under Florida law. Trying to be cute, as seemed to be the situation in this case with a creative argument, is not an argument that will carry the day and your resources will be devoted to being creative versus the ultimate merits of the dispute. In Ramindesign, LLC v. Skarzynski, 2026 WL 1649571 (S.D.Fla. 2026) an owner of real property hired a company to design and construct a spec home on the property. The company and its owner were NOT licensed contractors. The contract stated the company was serving as a “spec developer” and referred to it as the contractor throughout the contract. Other than this, the contract was set up as a cost plus a fee. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Wadsworth v. Regional Rail Partners — Verified Statements of Claim Under the Colorado Public Works Act

    August 25, 2026 —
    Editor’s Note: Wadsworth Revisited In August 2024, following the Colorado Court of Appeals’ decision in Ralph L. Wadsworth Construction Company, LLC v. Regional Rail Partners, we published Colorado Court of Appeals’ Ruling Highlights Dangers of Excessive Public Works Claims. At the time, the decision warranted a significant warning to contractors and subcontractors performing public work in Colorado. The Court of Appeals concluded that Wadsworth’s verified statement of claim improperly included unliquidated delay damages and that, because the claim was excessive, Wadsworth forfeited its right to recover the amounts included in the claim. We cautioned contractors to carefully scrutinize verified statements of claim and to avoid including unliquidated damages or amounts that were not yet due and payable. The Colorado Supreme Court has now reversed that decision. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Olivia Barden, Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC

    EPA Expands PFAS Reporting Requirements with Addition of New Chemical to Toxics Release Inventory, Published by Law360

    June 08, 2026 —
    The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) addition of sodium perfluorohexanesulfonate (PFHxS-Na) to the Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) introduces new federal reporting requirements for businesses that manufacture, process, or use the chemical. Because reporting obligations apply retroactively to the start of the year, affected facilities must quickly evaluate their compliance and recordkeeping practices. In a recent Law360 article, Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani Senior Counsel, Ayodeji Ayolola, explains why PFHxS-Na was automatically added to the TRI, how the EPA’s public reporting system works, and which businesses may be affected by the new rule. The article also touches upon key compliance considerations, including supply chain reviews, reporting thresholds for chemicals of special concern, and preparation for public disclosure requirements. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    OC Streetcar Project Mediation Sets $50M Payment to Walsh

    July 20, 2026 —
    Walsh Construction told a California state court judge last month that lawsuit mediation of its claims on an Orange County light-rail project—known as OC Streetcar—had produced a settlement of some claims under which the county agreed to pay the contractor almost an additional $50 million. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Richard Korman, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Korman may be contacted at kormanr@enr.com

    Nationwide Preliminary Injunction Ordering Department of Defense to Resume Review of Wind Energy Projects

    September 21, 2026 —
    On August 6, 2026, the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon granted a preliminary injunction in Renewable Northwest v. Hegseth, Case No. 3:26-cv-01092-IM, ordering the Department of Defense (DoD) to resume processing wind energy project applications under the existing statutory and regulatory framework and staying DoD’s review freeze pending final adjudication on the merits. Background In 2011, Congress created the Military Aviation and Installation Assurance Siting Clearinghouse (Clearinghouse) within DoD to review wind energy projects that might affect military operations. When a wind project developer files an application with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the FAA refers it to DoD to determine whether the project poses an “unacceptable risk to the national security.” Reprinted courtesy of Victor J. Roehm III, Snell & Wilmer, Christopher P. Colyer, Snell & Wilmer and Sara M. Ajeti, Snell & Wilmer Mr. Roehm may be contacted at vroehm@swlaw.com Mr. Colyer may be contacted at ccolyer@swlaw.com Ms. Ajeti may be contacted at sajeti@swlaw.com Read the full story...

    Ahlers Cressman & Sleight named one of the Top 50 Construction Law Firms

    August 11, 2026 —
    Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLC is pleased to announce its fifth consecutive year of recognition by Construction Executive as one of The Top 50 Construction Law Firms. Since its first publication in 2003, Construction Executive magazine has served as the leading source for news, market developments, and business issues impacting the construction industry. Construction Executive established the rankings by asking over 600 U.S. construction law firms to complete a survey. Constructive Executive’s data collection includes: 2025 revenues from the firm’s construction practice; the number of attorneys in the firm’s construction practice; the percentage of the firm’s total revenues derived from its construction practice; the number of states in which the firm is licensed to practice; the year in which the construction practice was established; and the number of construction industry clients served during the fiscal year 2025. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLC

    EPA, Maryland Sue DC Water Over Massive Potomac River Sewage Spill

    May 14, 2026 —
    The state of Maryland and the federal government have filed separate lawsuits against the District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority (DC Water), both alleging that the agency’s failure to address longstanding deterioration in the Potomac Interceptor contributed to a weeklong release of more than 240 million gallons of raw sewage into the Potomac River this past January. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Jim Parsons, Engineering News-Record
    ENR may be contacted at enr@enr.com