BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    low-income housing expert witness Morristown Tennessee condominium expert witness Morristown Tennessee structural steel construction expert witness Morristown Tennessee casino resort expert witness Morristown Tennessee Medical building expert witness Morristown Tennessee condominiums expert witness Morristown Tennessee mid-rise construction expert witness Morristown Tennessee parking structure expert witness Morristown Tennessee industrial building expert witness Morristown Tennessee retail construction expert witness Morristown Tennessee hospital construction expert witness Morristown Tennessee multi family housing expert witness Morristown Tennessee custom home expert witness Morristown Tennessee housing expert witness Morristown Tennessee landscaping construction expert witness Morristown Tennessee office building expert witness Morristown Tennessee townhome construction expert witness Morristown Tennessee custom homes expert witness Morristown Tennessee tract home expert witness Morristown Tennessee institutional building expert witness Morristown Tennessee Subterranean parking expert witness Morristown Tennessee concrete tilt-up expert witness Morristown Tennessee
    Morristown Tennessee building code expert witnessMorristown Tennessee structural engineering expert witnessesMorristown Tennessee civil engineer expert witnessMorristown Tennessee architectural engineering expert witnessMorristown Tennessee expert witnesses fenestrationMorristown Tennessee construction project management expert witnessMorristown Tennessee defective construction expert
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Morristown, Tennessee

    Tennessee Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (HB 2787/SB2931 & HB 2771/SB 2201; Title 66, Chptr 36) Homeowners must serve written notice of a defect 15 days after its discovery; Contractors, upon receipt of the notice, have 10 business days to inspect the residence and inform any subcontractors it believes are reasonably responsible on the defect. Within 10 business days after notice of the claim, the subcontractor must serve a written response to contractor. Within 30 days after receipt of notice of a defect, the contractor must provide written notice of intention (repair, replace, monetarily compensate or reject) to the homeowner.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Morristown Tennessee

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Tennessee
    Local # 4400
    213 5th Ave N Ste 200
    Nashville, TN 37219

    Morristown Tennessee Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Upper Cumberland
    Local # 4491
    PO Box 243
    Cookeville, TN 38503

    Morristown Tennessee Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Greene County Chapter of National Associated Home Builders
    Local # 4464
    70 Afton Road
    Afton, TN 37616
    Morristown Tennessee Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Johnson City Area Home Builders Association
    Local # 4494
    1001 N Roan St
    Johnson City, TN 37601

    Morristown Tennessee Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Dyer Co
    Local # 4425
    1075 Cooper Dr
    Dyersburg, TN 38024
    Morristown Tennessee Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Middle Tennessee
    Local # 4477
    9007 Overlook Blvd Suite 201
    Brentwood, TN 37027

    Morristown Tennessee Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Greater Knoxville
    Local # 4455
    221 Clark St
    Knoxville, TN 37921

    Morristown Tennessee Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Morristown Tennessee


    Basement Foundation Systems’ Getting an Overhaul

    Congratulations to Partners Nicole Whyte, Keith Bremer, Peter Brown, Karen Baytosh, and Associate Matthew Cox for Their Inclusion in 2022 Best Lawyers!

    Peckar & Abramson Once Again Recognized Among Construction Executive’s “Top 50 Construction Law Firms™”

    Construction Costs Up

    Demonstrating A Fraudulent Inducement Claim Or Defense

    Seller's Silence on Unfinished Repairs Sinks Summary Judgment in Real Estate Dispute

    Labor Shortage Confirmed Through AGC Poll

    Winning Attorney Fees in Litigation as a California Construction Contractor or Subcontractor

    Weed Property Owner Gets Smoked Under Insurance Policy

    Reminder: Quantum Meruit and Breach of Construction Contract Don’t Mix

    Recording a Lis Pendens Is Crucial

    DC District Court Follows Ninth Circuit’s Lead Dismissing NABA’s Border Wall Case

    California Plant Would Convert Wood Waste Into Hydrogen Fuel

    Determining Occurrence for Injury Under Commercial General Liability Policy Without Applying “Trigger Theory”

    Condo Owners Allege Construction Defects

    California Court of Appeal Vacates $30M Non-Economic Damages Award Due to Failure to Properly Apportion Liability and Attorney Misconduct During Closing Argument

    Contract Not So Clear in South Carolina Construction Defect Case

    'Drywall Isn't Light': Peter Lupo on Safety Management at Standard Drywall

    City of Aspen v. Burlingame Ranch II Condominium Owners Association: Clarifying the Application of the Colorado Governmental Immunity Act

    Court of Appeal Holds That Higher-Tiered Party on Construction Project Can be Held Liable for Intentional Interference with Contract

    Additional Insured’s Claim for a Defense Is Dismissed

    Nonparty Discovery in California Arbitration: How to Get What You Want

    School District Gets Expensive Lesson on Prompt Payment Law. But Did the Court Get it Right?

    New WA Law Caps Retainage on Private Projects at 5%

    Does the Russia Ukraine War Lead to a Consideration in Your Construction Contracts?

    Contractual Warranty Agreements May Preclude Future Tort Recovery

    Insurance Policy Language Really Does Matter

    Quick Note: Submitting Civil Remedy Notice

    Get Your Contracts Lean- Its Better than Dieting

    EPA Proposes New WOTUS Definition, Narrowing Clean Water Act Jurisdiction

    Smart Home Products go Mainstream as Consumer Demand Increases

    Why Insurers and Their Attorneys Need to Pay Close Attention to Their Discovery Burden in Washington

    Jana Lubert & Kathleen Walker Named to Los Angeles Business Journal’s LA500 List

    U.S. Housing Starts Exceed Estimates After a Stronger December

    Power Hungry: AI-Fueled Data Center Boom Sets Energy Delivery’s New Course

    Confidence Among U.S. Homebuilders Declines to Eight-Month Low

    Insurer's Motion in Limine to Dismiss Case for Lack of Expert Denied

    Hollywood Legend Betty Grable’s Former Home for Sale

    Florida District Court Finds That “Unrelated” Design Errors Sufficient to Trigger “Related Claims” Provision in Architects & Engineers Policy

    Blog Completes Sixteenth Year

    Breaking Down Homeowners Association Laws In California

    Survey: Workers Lack Awareness of Potentially Hazardous Nanomaterials

    Federal Court Holds that Demolition Exclusion Does Not Apply and Carrier Has Duty to Defend Additional Insureds

    Improvements to AIA Contracts?

    Although Property Damage Arises From An Occurrence, Coverage Barred By Business Risk Exclusions

    AIA Releases State-Specific Waiver and Release Forms

    Connecting Construction Project Information: Open Technology Databases Improve Project Communication, Collaboration and Visibility

    Anti-Concurrent Causation Endorsements in CGL Insurance Policies: A Word of Caution

    CDJ’s Year-End Review: The Top 10 CD Topics of 2014

    The EEOC Targets Construction Industry For Heightened Enforcement
    Corporate Profile

    MORRISTOWN TENNESSEE CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Morristown, Tennessee Construction Expert Witness Group is comprised from a number of credentialed construction professionals possessing extensive trial support experience relevant to construction defect and claims matters. Leveraging from more than 25 years experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to the nation's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, Fortune 500 builders, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, and a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Morristown, Tennessee

    Shane Singh Named One of Los Angeles Business Journal's 'Top 100 Lawyers of Los Angeles' for 2026

    April 27, 2026 —
    Sacramento Partner Shane Singh has been named one of the Los Angeles Business Journal's "Top 100 Lawyers of Los Angeles" for 2026. The LABJ’s annual list honors Los Angeles' top lawyers for their achievements within the city's business community. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    A Couple of Mechanic’s Lien Bills in VA [UPDATED]

    February 23, 2026 —
    Well, its that time of year again, the Virginia General Assembly is in session and looking to make changes to all kinds of things here in the Commonwealth. While most of those changes are well outside of the subject of Construction Law Musings, changes to the mechanic’s lien statutes certainly are not. This year, the Virginia General Assembly is poised to make some big changes if certain legislation gets out of committee and passes the legislature, a description and some comments on these follow: HB752 – Mechanics’ liens; liens attaching to property; memorandum of lien. [Original Description] Removes the exclusion of the attachment of a mechanic’s lien to property improved or repaired when the lien is based on a claim for repairs or existing structures. The bill further removes (i) the ability of a lien claimant to file any number of memoranda of lien including the details relating to the lien and (ii) the provisions of the Code specifying that no memorandum filed shall include sums due for (a) labor or materials furnished more than 150 days prior to the last day labor was performed or (b) material furnished to the job preceding the filing of such memorandum. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of The Law Office of Christopher G. Hill
    Mr. Hill may be contacted at chrisghill@constructionlawva.com

    “He Chose…Poorly: How Bad DSC Clauses Lead to Project Doom in the Last Crusade of Construction Risk”

    March 10, 2026 —
    “We do not follow maps to buried treasure, and X never, ever marks the spot.” That’s the advice that Indiana Jones offered in the Last Crusade film. But what’s beneath the surface isn’t just important to adventure archaeologists. It has real-world application to our industry, where success depends on the stability of materials below the surface. The study of geology and soils has ancient roots. Egyptians relied on soil stability for the pyramids; Rome built a continent-wide roadway system utilizing subgrade preparation techniques; Medieval builders implemented a rudimentary foundation pier system; Henri Gautier studied what is now called the “angle of repose” for French retaining walls in the early 18th Century. Through the 19th Century, contractors bore the risk of the stability of their work, and the attendant peril of unforeseen site conditions. But in the early 20th Century, design trades continued to develop increased understanding of soil and underground conditions. In the 1920’s US federal contracts began employing “differing site conditions” clauses, which provided for cost/time adjustments if subsurface conditions differed from expectations. Industry forms followed the federal policy, and these clauses became almost universally accepted. Reprinted courtesy of Curt Martin, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and Lee Banta, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. Mr. Martin may be contacted at cmartin@pecklaw.com Mr. Banta may be contacted at lbanta@pecklaw.com Read the full story...

    Fraud Allegations Stymie Additional Insured’s Request for a Defense

    May 14, 2026 —
    The Federal District Court granted the insurer’s motion to dismiss the insured’s complaint seeking a defense of the underlying case alleging fraud. Renovation Realty, Inc. v. Colony Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21409 (S.D. Cal. Jan. 30, 2026). Mara Fortin sued Renovation Realty and others (“Fortin litigation”) from the fraudulent sale of a residence. The underlying complaint alleged Renovation “deliberately misrepresented of the residence as ‘completely remodeled’ and ‘meticulously maintained’.” The defendants, however, including Renovation, “knew from sources including a pre-renovation termite report documenting fungus and dry rot . . . that the Property harbored pre-existing material defects.” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Construction Contract Negotiation & Drafting: A Practical Checklist (and Where State-Specific Issues Can Surprise You)

    April 20, 2026 —
    Construction contract negotiation is often treated as a “forms exercise,” especially when the parties start from familiar templates (e.g., AIA forms). In practice, though, the biggest problems tend to arise not from the existence of a form, but from (i) misalignment among the project’s governing documents and participants, (ii) ambiguity in pricing and payment mechanics, and (iii) state-specific statutory requirements that override negotiated terms. This article includes a practical checklist intended to help owners, developers, and contractors streamline contract negotiations, reduce downstream disputes, and avoid unpleasant surprises during payment administration. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Michelle Cooper, Sheppard
    Ms. Cooper may be contacted at mcooper@sheppard.com

    4th Department Narrowly Interprets Professional Services

    August 11, 2026 —
    In the recent case of Cty. of Erie v. Selective Ins. Co. of Am., 2026 NY Slip Op 04092 (App. Div. 4th Dept.), New York’s Appellate Division, Fourth Department held that a general liability carrier for a construction manager owed additional insured coverage to the County of Erie, notwithstanding an exclusion in the construction manager’s policy for injuries arising out of professional services. The underlying case involved injuries sustained when the underlying plaintiff fell off of her bicycle at a park owned by the County when she transitioned from the pavement edge to grass. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Craig Rokuson, Traub Lieberman
    Mr. Rokuson may be contacted at crokuson@tlsslaw.com

    New York Team Secures Dismissal of Premises Liability Action Against Client

    May 26, 2026 —
    New York Associate Nicole Koch and Partner Jennine Gerrard recently secured a complete dismissal of a plaintiff’s claims for injuries following a fall in front of a client’s business at an outdoor mall. The plaintiff alleged that she was walking on the sidewalk outside of the client's hair care supply store in the Bronx in May 2024 when she tripped and fell on a broken/defective portion of the sidewalk. As a result of the accident, the plaintiff suffered injuries to her spine, hip, wrist, and both knees. She proceeded to file suit in New York County Supreme Court against Lewis Brisbois’ client and the landlord for the property. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Georgia HB 676: A Bill Property Owners and Contractors Should Watch

    March 24, 2026 —
    Property owners, contractors, and others dealing with mechanics and materialmen’s liens in Georgia should keep an eye on HB 676, which is currently making its way through the Georgia General Assembly. The bill aims to curb misuse of the lien process and provide additional remedies to those challenging a frivolous lien filing. What HB 676 Would Do HB 676 would add a new Code section (O.C.G.A. § 44-14-366.6) to the mechanics and materialmen’s lien statutes. If a lien is filed “without substantial justification or that is not made in good faith or that is made with malice or a wrongful purpose,” this new Code section would impose a fine of $1,500 per lien on the lien claimant, in addition to any attorney’s fees or court costs incurred by the party challenging the lien. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Robert Lafayette, Seyfarth Shaw LLP
    Mr. Lafayette may be contacted at rlafayette@seyfarth.com