BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    multi family housing expert witness Monroe County Tennessee office building expert witness Monroe County Tennessee mid-rise construction expert witness Monroe County Tennessee high-rise construction expert witness Monroe County Tennessee housing expert witness Monroe County Tennessee tract home expert witness Monroe County Tennessee condominium expert witness Monroe County Tennessee condominiums expert witness Monroe County Tennessee hospital construction expert witness Monroe County Tennessee institutional building expert witness Monroe County Tennessee retail construction expert witness Monroe County Tennessee landscaping construction expert witness Monroe County Tennessee parking structure expert witness Monroe County Tennessee custom home expert witness Monroe County Tennessee casino resort expert witness Monroe County Tennessee Medical building expert witness Monroe County Tennessee townhome construction expert witness Monroe County Tennessee industrial building expert witness Monroe County Tennessee concrete tilt-up expert witness Monroe County Tennessee production housing expert witness Monroe County Tennessee structural steel construction expert witness Monroe County Tennessee Subterranean parking expert witness Monroe County Tennessee
    Monroe County Tennessee contractor expert witnessMonroe County Tennessee defective construction expertMonroe County Tennessee construction expert witnessMonroe County Tennessee ada design expert witnessMonroe County Tennessee expert witness concrete failureMonroe County Tennessee construction cost estimating expert witnessMonroe County Tennessee civil engineering expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Monroe County, Tennessee

    Tennessee Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (HB 2787/SB2931 & HB 2771/SB 2201; Title 66, Chptr 36) Homeowners must serve written notice of a defect 15 days after its discovery; Contractors, upon receipt of the notice, have 10 business days to inspect the residence and inform any subcontractors it believes are reasonably responsible on the defect. Within 10 business days after notice of the claim, the subcontractor must serve a written response to contractor. Within 30 days after receipt of notice of a defect, the contractor must provide written notice of intention (repair, replace, monetarily compensate or reject) to the homeowner.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Monroe County Tennessee

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    South Central Home Builders Association
    Local # 4488
    PO Box 1625
    Tullahoma, TN 37388
    Monroe County Tennessee Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Memphis Area Home Builders Association
    Local # 4466
    7990 Trinity Road Ste 110
    Cordova, TN 38018

    Monroe County Tennessee Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Ocoee Region Builders Association
    Local # 4424
    19 Broad St NW
    Cleveland, TN 37311

    Monroe County Tennessee Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Southern Tennessee
    Local # 4422
    3221 Harrison Pike
    Chattanooga, TN 37406

    Monroe County Tennessee Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Jackson Area Home Builders Association
    Local # 4430
    206 E Main St Ste 204
    Jackson, TN 38302

    Monroe County Tennessee Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Warren County Chapter
    Local # 4495
    PO Box 608
    McMinnville, TN 37111
    Monroe County Tennessee Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Maryville Alcoa Home Builders Association
    Local # 4453
    1719 Kings Cir
    Maryville, TN 37801

    Monroe County Tennessee Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Monroe County Tennessee

    Corporate Profile

    MONROE COUNTY TENNESSEE CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Monroe County, Tennessee Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Drawing from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Monroe County's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Monroe County, Tennessee

    Contract Interpretation – Determining What the Contract Requires

    March 24, 2026 —
    A good ole dispute on contract interpretation in government contracting. Contract interpretation disputes happen all the time in every jurisdiction under the sun. Think about that. Now, what’s the best way to avoid a contract interpretation dispute? Naturally, invest in the contract language and fully understand the scope of work. Make all of this clear. But, of course, this isn’t foolproof meaning you could still be doing this and you could still find yourself in a contract interpretation dispute. Although, if you are doing this, and being proactive, the contract interpretation disputes should be minimal and more streamlined. In Liberty Technical Services, LLC v. Department of Veterans Affairs, CBCA 8385, 2026 WL 407656 (CBCA 2026), the dispute centered on whether the government owed the contractor for certain, necessary equipment (largely controllers, but also tanks and pumps) not specified in the contract. The government countered that this should be a non-issue because the contractor always acknowledged it was responsible for furnishing the unspecified, necessary equipment, and the contractor did actually provide the equipment without direction from the government. Each party claimed the contract was unambiguous when construed in context. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    The AVOID Act: A New Timeline for Liability in New York Construction Projects

    February 23, 2026 —
    By April 18, 2026, New York construction litigation will operate on a faster—and far less forgiving—timeline. The Avoiding Vexatious Overuse of Impleading to Delay (the “AVOID Act”), signed into law on December 19, 2025, fundamentally rewrites third‑party practice under CPLR § 1007 by imposing strict deadlines to bring subcontractors, suppliers, and other responsible parties into a case. For owners, developers, general contractors, and their in‑house counsel, this change will shift risk assessment, contract enforcement, and litigation strategy to the very front end of a claim—particularly in New York Labor Law and construction defect cases. What Changed—and Why It Matters to Construction Cases Historically, New York defendants could implead subcontractors and other players well into discovery. The AVOID Act ends that practice. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Meghan Douris, Seyfarth Shaw LLP
    Ms. Douris may be contacted at mdouris@seyfarth.com

    How Mobile Tools Are Capturing Safety Data on Jobsites

    April 08, 2026 —
    Traditionally, construction safety management is “reactive compliance”—reporting on an incident, filling out a form on paper or electronically, taking a picture and filing it away for compliance purposes. Safety management is shifting from reactive to proactive. Forward-thinking companies are using data and leading indicators to identify risks before incidents happen, not just document injuries after the fact. Mobile tools have completely changed the way safety operations work on construction sites, enabling that transition to proactive safety management. Reprinted courtesy of Michael Bruns, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    GRSM Team Obtains Defense Verdict for Homeowners’ Association in Orange County Superior Court

    August 11, 2026 —
    A Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani multi-state team, including Partners Christine Barker, Sean Ferron, and Keith Cramer, obtained a defense verdict on behalf of a homeowners’ association (HOA) in an Orange County Superior Court bench trial spanning two months. The case began in 2022 when a homeowner sued after the Architectural Review Committee and HOA Board of Directors declined his teardown-and-rebuild plans due to view and aesthetic concerns. After a motion for summary judgment ruling in which the court found that the existing covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&Rs) did not protect views, the HOA held a special election to add explicit view protections to the CC&Rs. At the February 2025 trial call, the plaintiff sought leave to file a third amended complaint challenging the validity of that vote, drastically reframing the case from CC&R enforcement to one of election validity. A second plaintiff then filed a parallel action toward the end of the limitations period, and the two cases were consolidated. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    Lawmakers Vote to Reauthorize Programs to Support Water Quality, Coastal Protection

    April 20, 2026 —
    The U.S. House of Representatives has passed a package of 14 bills that includes measures to reauthorize several U.S. Environmental Protection Agency programs to protect and restore critical water ecosystems, expand access to broadband, reduce regulatory requirements on airport projects and programs and lower costs of federal buildings. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Pam McFarland, Engineering News-Record
    Ms. McFarland may be contacted at mcfarlandp@enr.com

    “The Superintendent Told Us to Do It:” Why Verbal Approval May Not Be Enough

    June 02, 2026 —
    In construction defect litigation, one scenario appears repeatedly: a subcontractor installs work in a manner that differs from the plans, specifications, manufacturer instructions, or industry standards after being verbally directed to do so by the general contractor, superintendent, architect, or owner’s representative. At the time, the decision may seem minor. The project is moving quickly, the field team wants to maintain progress, and nobody wants to stop working over what appears to be a small issue. The subcontractor may trust the superintendent or project manager and assume the conversation will be remembered later if questions arise. Years later, however, when the project experiences problems, the people involved may deny the conversation occurred, remember it differently, or simply no longer remember the project. Without written documentation, the subcontractor can find itself defending claims for defective work, even though it performed the installation exactly as directed. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Andrew Lintner, Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC
    Mr. Lintner may be contacted at alintner@hhmrlaw.com

    Bad Faith Claim Survives Summary Judgment

    June 08, 2026 —
    The court denied the insurer’s motion for partial summary judgment on the insured’s bad faith claim, but granted the motion on the insured’s claim for punitive damages. Serbian Orthodox Church v. Brotherhood Mut. Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58234 (S.D. Cal. March 19, 2026). On February 1, 2023, the Church filed a claim for water damage with Brotherhood Mutual Insurance Company (BMIC). The claim was based on rain and wind that caused extensive water intrusion into the Sanctuary, damaging its plaster walls and ceilings and fresco paintings. The claim was assigned to Patrick Hurley. Hurley sent a letter discussing potential bars to coverage and requesting further information and documents from the Church. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Supreme Court Rules Tariffs Unconstitutional: Why the Construction Industry Shouldn’t Expect Calm Just Yet

    March 31, 2026 —
    The U.S. Supreme Court’s 6–3 decision in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump did what many expected: It held that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not authorize the President to impose tariffs. What few anticipated was the speed of what followed: Within hours of the ruling, the administration announced replacement tariffs under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, imposed a 10% global surcharge effective February 24, and signaled forthcoming Section 301 investigations against most major trading partners. For those in the construction industry hoping the Learning Resources ruling would restore market stability, the message was unambiguous. The constitutional question may be settled, but the market disruption is not. Reprinted courtesy of Christopher Barnett, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...
    House Passes $25B Water Resources Development Bill

    Condo Owners Allege Construction Defects at Trump Towers

    Deadlines Count for Construction Defects in Florida

    Traub Lieberman Partner Michael K. Kiernan and Associate Brandon Christian Obtain Dismissal with Prejudice in Favor of Defendant

    Pay-If-Paid: What You Need to Know Before Signing on the Dotted Line

    Seattle Condos, Close to Waterfront, Construction Defects Included

    County Officials Refute Resident’s Statement that Defect Repairs Improper

    America’s Infrastructure Gets a D+

    Illinois Appellate Court Addresses Professional Services Exclusion in Homeowners Policy

    Kumagai Drops Most in 4 Months on Building Defect: Tokyo Mover

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (1/10/24) – New Type of Nuclear Reactor, Big Money Surrounding Sports Stadiums, and Positivity from Fannie Mae’s Monthly Consumer Survey

    Haight Brown & Bonesteel Attorneys Named Super Lawyers in 2016

    Detroit Showed What ‘Build Back Better’ Can Look Like

    New Mexico Holds One-Sided Dispute Resolution Provisions Are Unenforceable

    We've Surveyed Video Conferencing Models to See Who Fits the CCPA Bill: Here's What We Found

    California MCLE Seminar at BHA Sacramento July 11th

    Construction Defects and Second Buyers in Pennsylvania

    St. Mary & St. John Coptic Orthodox Church v. SBS Insurance Services, Inc.

    This New Indicator Shows There's No Bubble Forming in U.S. Housing

    Top Talked-About Tech at the 2023 ABC Joint Tech Summit

    Quick Note: Charting Your Contractual Rights With Respect To The Coronavirus

    Separation of Insureds Provision in CGL Policies

    Manhattan to Get Tall, Skinny Tower

    Are These Negotiations in Bad Faith? What to Watch For

    Contractors Sued for Slip

    SCOTUS Opens Up Federal Courts to Land Owners

    Mendocino Hospital Nearing Completion

    How New York City Plans to Soak Up the Rain

    Quick Note: October 1, 2023 Changes to Florida’s Construction Statutes

    In Review: SCOTUS Environmental and Administrative Decisions in the 2020 Term

    Mechanic’s Liens and Contracts: A Roundup

    NY Gov. Sets Industry Advisory Council to Fix Public Contracts Process

    The Privette Doctrine, the Hooker Exception, and an Attack at a Construction Site

    Design and Construction Defects Not a Breach of Contract

    Business Interruption Claim Granted in Part, Denied in Part

    AI in AEC 2026: Doing AI Right and Rethinking Your Business Model

    Facing Manslaughter Charges In Worker's 2021 Trench Collapse Death, Colorado Contractor Who Willfully Ignored Federal Law Surrenders To Police

    Top 10 Insurance Cases of 2020

    The Role of Code Officials in the Design-Build Process

    Court Finds that Subcontractor Lacks Standing to Appeal Summary Judgment Order Simply Because Subcontractor “Might” Lose at Trial Due to Order

    Hunton Andrews Kurth Insurance Attorney, Latosha M. Ellis, Honored by Business Insurance Magazine

    Want to Make Your Jobsite Safer? Look to the Skies.

    Governor Bob Ferguson’s Recent Executive Orders – A Positive Sign for Washington’s Construction Industry

    Insurer's Motion for Summary Judgment to Reject Collapse Coverage Denied

    Berkeley Researchers Look to Ancient Rome for Greener Concrete

    The Legal 500 U.S. 2024 Guide Names Peckar & Abramson a Top Tier Firm in Construction Law and Recognizes Nine Attorneys

    Don’t Be Lazy with Your Tenders

    Real Estate Developer Convicted in $1.3 Billion Tax Case After Juror Removed

    New York Construction Practice Team Obtains Summary Judgment and Dismissal of Labor Law Claims

    History of Defects Leads to Punitive Damages for Bankrupt Developer