BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    condominiums expert witness Custer County South Dakota institutional building expert witness Custer County South Dakota mid-rise construction expert witness Custer County South Dakota industrial building expert witness Custer County South Dakota production housing expert witness Custer County South Dakota Medical building expert witness Custer County South Dakota casino resort expert witness Custer County South Dakota hospital construction expert witness Custer County South Dakota housing expert witness Custer County South Dakota tract home expert witness Custer County South Dakota parking structure expert witness Custer County South Dakota office building expert witness Custer County South Dakota Subterranean parking expert witness Custer County South Dakota condominium expert witness Custer County South Dakota landscaping construction expert witness Custer County South Dakota custom home expert witness Custer County South Dakota concrete tilt-up expert witness Custer County South Dakota retail construction expert witness Custer County South Dakota townhome construction expert witness Custer County South Dakota low-income housing expert witness Custer County South Dakota custom homes expert witness Custer County South Dakota structural steel construction expert witness Custer County South Dakota
    Custer County South Dakota expert witness windowsCuster County South Dakota concrete expert witnessCuster County South Dakota construction expertsCuster County South Dakota construction project management expert witnessCuster County South Dakota hospital construction expert witnessCuster County South Dakota construction expert witnessesCuster County South Dakota building code expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Custer County, South Dakota

    South Dakota Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Case law precedent


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Custer County South Dakota

    No state license is required. A license is required for asbestos, plumbing, electrical, and well drilling trades.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of The Sioux Empire
    Local # 4305
    6904 S Lyncrest Pl
    Sioux Falls, SD 57108

    Custer County South Dakota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Mitchell Area Chapter of National Associated Home Builders
    Local # 4340
    PO Box 1152
    Mitchell, SD 57301
    Custer County South Dakota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Black Hills Home Builders Association
    Local # 4301
    3121 W Chicago St
    Rapid City, SD 57702

    Custer County South Dakota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Lewis & Clark Area Home Builders Association
    Local # 4330
    PO Box 582
    Yankton, SD 57078
    Custer County South Dakota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Brookings Regional Builders Association
    Local # 4323
    PO Box 323
    Brookings, SD 57006

    Custer County South Dakota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    South Dakota Home Builders Association
    Local # 4300
    PO Box 1218
    Pierre, SD 57501

    Custer County South Dakota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Oahe Home Builders Association
    Local # 4360
    PO Box 221
    Pierre, SD 57501
    Custer County South Dakota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Custer County South Dakota


    Five Payne & Fears Attorneys Named 2026 Southern California Super Lawyers

    Dave McLain included in the 2023 edition of The Best Lawyers in America

    Hundreds of Coronavirus Coverage Cases Await Determination on Consolidation

    Attorneys’ Fees Are Available in Arizona Eviction Actions

    Texas School System Goes to Court over Construction Defect

    North Carolina Supreme Court Addresses “Trigger of Coverage,” Allocation and Exhaustion-Related Issues Arising Out of Benzene-Related Claims

    Release Language Extended To Successor Entity But Only Covered “Known” Claims

    The Business of Engineering: An Interview with Matthew Loos

    Public Works Bid Protests – Who Is Responsible? Who Is Responsive?

    Firm Sued for Stopping Construction in Indiana Wants Case Tried in Germany

    Motion to Dismiss COVID Claim Granted in Part, Denied in Part

    OH Supreme Court Rules Against General Contractor in Construction Defect Coverage Dispute

    A Property Tax Exemption, Misapplied, in Texas

    Orchestrating Bias: Arbitrator’s Undisclosed Membership in Philharmonic Group with Pauly Shore’s Attorney Not Grounds to Reverse Award in Real Estate Dispute

    Civil Engineers: Montana's Infrastructure Grade Declines to a 'C-'

    Questions of Fact Regarding Collapse of Basement Walls Prevent Insurer's Motion for Summary Judgment

    Liability policy covers negligent construction: GA high court

    Duty to Defend Triggered by Damage to Other Non-Defective Property

    Traub Lieberman Partner Lisa M. Rolle Wins Summary Judgment in Favor of Third-Party Defendant

    New York Team Secures Dismissal of Premises Liability Action Against Client

    Texas Windstorm Insurance Agency Under Scrutiny

    Insurer's Motion for Summary Judgment to Reject Collapse Coverage Denied

    Update: Where Did That Punch List Term Come From Anyway?

    GRSM Named #1 Fastest-Growing Am Law Firm

    Defective Panels Threatening Profit at China Solar Farms: Energy

    Boston Tower Project to Create 450 Jobs

    The Quiet War Between California’s Charter Cities and the State’s Prevailing Wage Law

    HOA Coalition Statement on Construction-Defects Transparency Legislation

    SB800 CONFIRMED AS EXCLUSIVE REMEDY FOR CONSTRUCTION DEFECT CLAIMS

    Washington Supreme Court Interprets Ensuing Loss Exception in All-Risk Property Insurance Policy

    Standard Lifetime Shingle Warranties Aren’t Forever

    Berger: FIGG Is Slow To Hand Over All Bridge Collapse Data

    COVID-19 Could Impact Contractor Performance Bonds

    Federal Court Holds That Other Insurance Analysis Is Unnecessary If Policies Cover Different Risks

    Industry News: New Partner at Burdman Law Group

    California Reinstates COVID-19 Supplemental Paid Sick Leave

    Harmon Tower Demolition on Hold

    White House Seeks $310M To Fix Critical San Diego Wastewater Plant

    Defend Trade Secret Act of 2016–-Federalizing Trade Secret Law

    Mold Due to Construction Defects May Temporarily Close Fire Station

    No Escape: California Court of Appeals Gives a Primary CGL Insurer’s “Other Insurance” Clause Two Thumbs Down

    Congratulations to BWB&O for Ranking #4 in Orange County Business Journal’s 2023 Book of Lists for Law Firms!

    Court Throws Wet Blanket On Prime Contractor's Attorneys' Fees Request In Prompt Payment Case

    Sickened Employees at Kimley-Horn Lead to Multi-million-dollar Rent Dispute

    Emerging Trends in Shortened Statutes of Limitations and Statutes of Repose

    Microsoft Said to Weigh Multibillion-Dollar Headquarters Revamp

    Best Practices for Installing Networks in New Buildings

    Vegas Hi-Rise Not Earthquake Safe

    Three White and Williams Lawyers Named Top Lawyers by Delaware Today

    New York’s Lawsky Proposes Changes to Reduce Home Foreclosures
    Corporate Profile

    CUSTER COUNTY SOUTH DAKOTA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Custer County, South Dakota Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Drawing from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Custer County's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Custer County, South Dakota

    Insured’s Bad Faith Claim Survives Summary Judgment

    July 13, 2026 —
    The insurer’s motion for partial summary judgment to dispose of the insured’s bad faith claim was unsuccessful. Page v. State Farm Lloyds, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102293 (E.D. Texas March 18, 2026). Plaintiff insured alleged that hail and a windstorm caused damage to his property. The damage was reported to the defendant insurer. A claims adjuster inspected the property. Defendant then paid plaintiff $24,493.06, which was the total of the estimated damage minus depreciation and the deductible. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Turning Expert Services into Products

    July 20, 2026 —
    A Finnish engineering, architecture, and project consulting company, AINS Group, recently opened an online store to purchase fixed-price services. The store presents specialist work in a product-like format, with fixed service names, defined scopes, and visible prices, such as a building history report, a zoning plan cost analysis, and a technical preliminary survey for a property transaction. Is this productization a smart move or a sign that expert services are being commoditized? Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    Parking Garage Partially Collapses in Dearborn, Mich., Trapping One

    March 31, 2026 —
    A multi-level parking garage that partially collapsed in Dearborn, Mich., is fenced off and the city has started the legal process allowed under state law to demolish the privately-owned structure due to alleged dangerous conditions. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Annemarie Mannion, Engineering News-Record
    Ms. Mannion may be contacted at manniona@enr.com

    Trend Continues Where Unlicensed Contractors Have No Recourse

    July 13, 2026 —
    There’s been a recent trend in Florida case law that has figuratively “killed” unlicensed contractors. Here’s another one. The moral to this trend and case is simple: make sure you have the proper licenses prior to serving as a contractor under Florida law. Trying to be cute, as seemed to be the situation in this case with a creative argument, is not an argument that will carry the day and your resources will be devoted to being creative versus the ultimate merits of the dispute. In Ramindesign, LLC v. Skarzynski, 2026 WL 1649571 (S.D.Fla. 2026) an owner of real property hired a company to design and construct a spec home on the property. The company and its owner were NOT licensed contractors. The contract stated the company was serving as a “spec developer” and referred to it as the contractor throughout the contract. Other than this, the contract was set up as a cost plus a fee. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Quick Note: Don’t Spoil Evidence!!!!

    March 10, 2026 —
    The phrase “spoliation of evidence” is a phrase that gets used, sometimes properly and sometimes improperly. The reason is that if evidence is legitimately spoiled, the opposing party wants an adverse inference jury instruction. There are two potential adverse inference jury instructions dealing with spoliation of evidence, neither of which are good, and one of which you definitely don’t want. A recent case discusses these jury instructions (check here) in a slip and fall personal injury case. The bottom line is that you need to preserve evidence relevant to a claim. Don’t lose it. Don’t intentionally destroy it. Don’t pretend it does not exist. Don’t do all the things that hinder the preservation and ultimate production of the relevant evidence. An adverse inference jury instruction (or an adverse inference implication in a non-jury trial) could be much, much worse. The facts are what the facts are. The best thing you can do is confront the facts. Confront the bad facts just like the good facts. The nature of any dispute is that there will be both good and bad facts. Bad facts can hopefully be explained recognizing there will be bad facts on the other side too. Sometimes, the bad facts warrant major strategic considerations and shifting the focus of how a dispute will be handled and presented. Whatever you do, don’t put yourself in a position where you are spoiling evidence. Once you get an adverse inference instruction, that’s it, as it’s very tough to overcome. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    NJ Public Works Contractors Beware – Pay Special Attention When Submitting Your Public Works Contractor Registration

    May 26, 2026 —
    While it is always important to be careful when making submissions to government agencies, recent activity by the New Jersey Department of Labor and Workforce Development (“NJDOL”) reveals considerably increased scrutiny in connection with contractors renewing their New Jersey Public Works Registration. Extra care when completing the registration renewal process is warranted, because the consequences of a misstep can be significant and disruptive. The New Jersey Public Works Contractor Registration Act requires all contractors bidding on or engaging in construction-related public works projects to register with the NJDOL. This registration, which must be resubmitted every 1-2 years, requires contractors to make a number of detailed disclosures relating to, among other things, the entity’s ownership structure, prior state and federal labor law violations, details regarding interests in other businesses, unlawful acts by owners/officers, and participation in apprenticeship programs. Reprinted courtesy of Levi W. Barrett, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and Aaron C. Schlesinger, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. Mr. Barrett may be contacted at lbarrett@pecklaw.com Mr. Schlesinger may be contacted at aschlesinger@pecklaw.com Read the full story...

    Wadsworth v. Regional Rail Partners — Verified Statements of Claim Under the Colorado Public Works Act

    August 25, 2026 —
    Editor’s Note: Wadsworth Revisited In August 2024, following the Colorado Court of Appeals’ decision in Ralph L. Wadsworth Construction Company, LLC v. Regional Rail Partners, we published Colorado Court of Appeals’ Ruling Highlights Dangers of Excessive Public Works Claims. At the time, the decision warranted a significant warning to contractors and subcontractors performing public work in Colorado. The Court of Appeals concluded that Wadsworth’s verified statement of claim improperly included unliquidated delay damages and that, because the claim was excessive, Wadsworth forfeited its right to recover the amounts included in the claim. We cautioned contractors to carefully scrutinize verified statements of claim and to avoid including unliquidated damages or amounts that were not yet due and payable. The Colorado Supreme Court has now reversed that decision. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Olivia Barden, Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC

    GRSM Attorneys Recognized in The Best Lawyers in America® 2027

    August 24, 2026 —
    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani is pleased to announce that 183 of its attorneys were listed in The Best Lawyers in America© 2027 Edition, six of whom received “Lawyer of the Year” recognitions. Additionally, 49 GRSM attorneys were recognized in Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch 2027. Best Lawyers lists are compiled based on peer-review evaluations. For the 2027 edition of The Best Lawyers in America®, results were determined using millions of confidential attorney evaluations. Ones to Watch adopts the same peer-review methodology. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani