BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    office building expert witness Charles Mix County South Dakota tract home expert witness Charles Mix County South Dakota Medical building expert witness Charles Mix County South Dakota parking structure expert witness Charles Mix County South Dakota townhome construction expert witness Charles Mix County South Dakota casino resort expert witness Charles Mix County South Dakota low-income housing expert witness Charles Mix County South Dakota condominiums expert witness Charles Mix County South Dakota production housing expert witness Charles Mix County South Dakota condominium expert witness Charles Mix County South Dakota high-rise construction expert witness Charles Mix County South Dakota custom home expert witness Charles Mix County South Dakota mid-rise construction expert witness Charles Mix County South Dakota multi family housing expert witness Charles Mix County South Dakota landscaping construction expert witness Charles Mix County South Dakota Subterranean parking expert witness Charles Mix County South Dakota retail construction expert witness Charles Mix County South Dakota custom homes expert witness Charles Mix County South Dakota hospital construction expert witness Charles Mix County South Dakota structural steel construction expert witness Charles Mix County South Dakota institutional building expert witness Charles Mix County South Dakota housing expert witness Charles Mix County South Dakota
    Charles Mix County South Dakota building code compliance expert witnessCharles Mix County South Dakota building consultant expertCharles Mix County South Dakota construction expertsCharles Mix County South Dakota structural engineering expert witnessesCharles Mix County South Dakota OSHA expert witness constructionCharles Mix County South Dakota reconstruction expert witnessCharles Mix County South Dakota construction defect expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Charles Mix County, South Dakota

    South Dakota Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Case law precedent


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Charles Mix County South Dakota

    No state license is required. A license is required for asbestos, plumbing, electrical, and well drilling trades.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Lewis & Clark Area Home Builders Association
    Local # 4330
    PO Box 582
    Yankton, SD 57078
    Charles Mix County South Dakota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of The Sioux Empire
    Local # 4305
    6904 S Lyncrest Pl
    Sioux Falls, SD 57108

    Charles Mix County South Dakota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Mitchell Area Chapter of National Associated Home Builders
    Local # 4340
    PO Box 1152
    Mitchell, SD 57301
    Charles Mix County South Dakota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Black Hills Home Builders Association
    Local # 4301
    3121 W Chicago St
    Rapid City, SD 57702

    Charles Mix County South Dakota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Brookings Regional Builders Association
    Local # 4323
    PO Box 323
    Brookings, SD 57006

    Charles Mix County South Dakota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    South Dakota Home Builders Association
    Local # 4300
    PO Box 1218
    Pierre, SD 57501

    Charles Mix County South Dakota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Oahe Home Builders Association
    Local # 4360
    PO Box 221
    Pierre, SD 57501
    Charles Mix County South Dakota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Charles Mix County South Dakota


    AEC Business Is a Top 25 Podcast in Construction Tech

    A Brief Primer on Perfecting Your Mechanics Lien When the Property Owner Files Bankruptcy

    CA Supreme Court Rejects Proposed Exceptions to Interim Adverse Judgment Rule Defense to Malicious Prosecution Action

    DIR Reminds Public Works Contractors to Renew Registrations Before January 1, 2016 to Avoid Hefty Penalty

    National Engineering and Public Works Roadshow Highlights Low Battery Seawall Restoration Project in Charleston

    Weslaco, Texas Investigating Possible Fraudulent Contractor Invoices

    Private Mediations Do Not Toll The Five-Year Prosecution Statute

    Get Construction Defects in Writing

    Surety Trends to Keep an Eye on in the Construction Industry

    The Long Road to Change: Understanding Resistance to Innovation

    Extreme Flooding Overwhelms New York Roadways, Killing 1 Person

    Revisiting Termination For Convenience Clauses In Uncertain And Ever-Changing Economic Times

    The Greenest U.S. Cities & States

    The Project “Completion” Paradox in California

    “But it’s 2021!” Service of Motion to Vacate Via Email Found Insufficient by the Eleventh Circuit

    Public Works Bid Protests – Who Is Responsible? Who Is Responsive?

    Bad Faith in the First Party Insurance Context

    Earth Movement Exclusion Bars Coverage

    Climate Disasters Are an Affordable Housing Problem

    Substantial Completion Explained: What Contractors & Owners Should Know

    Pennsylvania Considers Changes to Construction Code Review

    Home Building Likely to Stick to Slow Pace

    Denver’s Proposed Solution to the Affordable Housing Crisis

    Home Prices in U.S. Rose 0.3% in August From July, FHFA Says

    A Court-Side Seat: A FACA Fight, a Carbon Pledge and Some Venue on the SCOTUS Menu

    Practical Pointers for Change Orders on Commercial Construction Contracts

    Florida Accuses Pool Contractor of Violating Laws

    Gordon & Rees Ranks #5 in Top 50 Construction Law Firms in the Nation

    No Duty to Indemnify When Discovery Shows Faulty Workmanship Damages Insured’s Own Work

    Determination That Title Insurer Did Not Act in Bad Faith Vacated and Remanded

    Negligence of Property Appraiser

    Anthony Luckie Speaks With Columbia University On Receiving Graduate Degree in Construction Administration Alongside His Father

    Who Decides Who Can Arbitrate? The Court . . . Sometimes

    An Overview of the New EPA HVAC Refrigerant Regulations and Its Implications for the Construction Industry

    Builders Beware: A New Class Of Defendants In Asbestos Lawsuits

    Celebrating Dave McLain’s Recognition in the Best Lawyers in America® 2025

    Depreciation of Labor in Calculating Actual Cash Value Against Public Policy

    Watchdog Opens Cartel Probe Into Eight British Homebuilders

    ASCE Statement On White House "Accelerating Infrastructure Summit"

    Citigroup Reaches $1.13 Billion Pact Over Mortgage Bonds

    When Does a Contractor Legally Abandon a Construction Project?

    Colorado Court of Appeals Defines “Substantial Completion” for Subcontractors’ Work so as to Shorten the Period of Time in Which They Can Be Sued

    Congratulations to BWB&O’s Orange County Team for Securing a Strong MSJ Result in a Residential Gas Explosion Matter!

    Discussing Parametric Design with Shajay Bhooshan of Zaha Hadid Architects

    Road Project to Improve Access to Peru's Machu Picchu Site

    Crowdfunding Comes to Manhattan’s World Trade Center

    Eleventh Circuit Affirms Jury Verdict on Covered Property Loss

    Reinsurer Must Reimburse Health Care Organization for Settlement Costs

    Subcontractor Not Estopped from Enforcing Lien Not Listed In Bankruptcy Petition

    A Good Read on Fraud versus Contract
    Corporate Profile

    CHARLES MIX COUNTY SOUTH DAKOTA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Charles Mix County, South Dakota Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Leveraging from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Charles Mix County's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Charles Mix County, South Dakota

    Generic Complaint Alleging Bad Faith is Insufficient

    August 24, 2026 —
    The federal district court granted the insurer’s motion for judgment on the pleadings after determining that the insured’s claims for bad faith and unfair claims settlement practices were insufficiently pled. Navia v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 111261 (W.D. N. C. May 20, 2026). The insured submitted a claim for damages to real property owned by the insured allegedly caused by Hurricane Helene. State Farm advised the insured that only some of the claimed damages were covered by the policy and payment for such damages were denied because the estimate for the covered damages did not exceed the policy’s deductible. The insured sued asserting claims for breach of contract, bad faith, and unfair claim settlement practices. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    The Most Expensive Signature to Not Get: Why Change Orders Matter

    August 16, 2026 —
    George Bernard Shaw has a quote we use a lot in my family: “The single biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place.” This is pertinent to contractors and homeowners alike because the cost of failing to get proper signatures on documents like construction contracts, and particularly, change orders, is heavy. Both contractors and homeowners are in the same boat as far as wanting to complete a job as swiftly as possible: contractors go on to their next job and homeowners can return to peace in their home. This is prime territory for either party to suggest the work be completed today and the contract or change order executed tomorrow, or even later. However, without a contract, there is no memorialization of the communication between the parties, which can lead to confusion and missed expectations on both sides. Construction plans are rarely as neat and tidy as they originally seem to be. A contractor may uncover unforeseen conditions, an owner may request additional work or changes that require additional work, or weather interferes with project schedules or the work itself. Unfortunately, the signature that never gets collected can become one of the most expensive omissions on a project – for both sides. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Kathryne E. Baldwin, Wilke Fleury
    Ms. Baldwin may be contacted at kbaldwin@wilkefleury.com

    Inaccurate Representations Can Lead to Differing Site Conditions Claim

    May 26, 2026 —
    In the prior posting, I discussed a case dealing with a differing site condition. In that case, the owner did not have an affirmative duty to make a representation and there was no inaccurate representation made by the owner that misled the contractor. Well, what about when there is an inaccurate misrepresentation regarding the site? This was the circumstance in an older Florida case where a dredging contractor had a successful differing site conditions claim. See Jacksonville Port Authority v. Parkhill-Goodloe, Co., Inc., 362 So.2d 1009 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). The government provided inaccurate information as to the lack of rock that would be encountered during the dredging that was relied on by the dredging contractor. But the government had “superior knowledge” that there was rock in an adjacent location based on a prior claim from a contractor, yet the government did not disclose the possibility that rock could be encountered. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Federal Court Highlights the Strategic Value of Additional Insured Coverage

    June 22, 2026 —
    A recent decision from the District of Maryland underscores a recurring—but often underutilized—opportunity for policyholders: securing and enforcing additional insured coverage under another party’s liability policy. In Charter Oak Fire Insurance Co. v. Builders Premier Insurance Co., the court held that an equipment lessor qualified as an additional insured under the lessee’s policy and was entitled to a primary defense. The decision is a useful reminder that additional insured coverage can fundamentally shift defense obligations and materially reduce a policyholder’s exposure. We build on the decision to highlight the practical steps policyholders should take to ensure that all potentially available insurance is identified and pursued. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Michael S. Levine, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
    Mr. Levine may be contacted at mlevine@hunton.com

    Potential Gap in Workers Compensation Immunity Statutory Framework

    June 02, 2026 —
    Workers compensation insurance is important. As an owner, you want to ensure the contractors you hire have workers compensation insurance. Assuming you hire a contractor that is statutorily exempt from workers compensation, you want to make sure, no exception, that any subcontractor that is hired has workers compensation insurance. (Regardless, you always want subcontractors to have workers compensation insurance.). In construction, the prime contractor serves as the “statutory employer” for purposes of workers compensation insurance. With workers compensation comes workers compensation immunity. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Insufficient Notice of Commencement and Construction Lien Rights

    August 03, 2026 —
    When a party is preserving their construction lien rights, the party will look to the recorded Notice of Commencement. This is the recorded document that provides the lienor with the information for purposes of preserving construction lien rights. A Notice to Owner company will typically rely on the Notice of Commencement to serve Notices to Owners from lower tiers not in contract with the owner. However, when it comes to preparing the lien, a lienor should look beyond just the Notice of Commencement and also look to the property appraiser’s website as a backstop. In a recent case, a window company had the homeowner sign the Notice of Commencement and then filled in the information. The company naturally did this for the convenience of the homeowner that probably was unfamiliar with the Notice of Commencement process. Regardless, information in the Notice of Commencement was inaccurate. It failed to include all the real property owners. Thus, when a payment dispute arose and a construction lien was prepared, it did not identify all of the real property owners. All of the real property owners were added later during the pendency of a lien foreclosure lawsuit. The trial court denied the lien because of the defective / insufficient Notice of Commencement — the lienor assumed the risk of error by filling out the information in the Notice of Commencement. The trial court further denied the lien holding that because the work did not commence within 90 days of the Notice of Commencement, the Notice of Commencement is void. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Building in Arizona’s Data Center Boom: How Federal Executive Orders, State Regulation, and National-Security Policy Are Reshaping the Rules for Developers

    June 02, 2026 —
    Developers and practitioners evaluating data center projects in Arizona face a regulatory environment shifting on three fronts simultaneously. Federal executive orders are opening new land, streamlining permitting, and channeling financial incentives toward qualifying projects — but they are not preempting the state and local rules that most directly affect project economics. A carve-out in the December 2025 Artificial Intelligence (AI) Framework Executive Order preserves Arizona’s authority over data center infrastructure, meaning the Arizona Corporation Commission’s (ACC) rate-classification docket, municipal zoning restrictions, water-use ordinances, and pending grid cost-allocation legislation remain the binding constraints on project feasibility. Understanding where federal tailwinds end and state and local headwinds begin is essential for any developer sizing risk or selecting sites in the state. The Federal Landscape: An Interlocking Framework of Executive Orders Five interlocking executive orders are accelerating data center development nationally, but none overrides Arizona’s authority over siting energy, or infrastructure. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Ryan J. Regula, Snell & Wilmer
    Mr. Regula may be contacted at rregula@swlaw.com

    Research Illuminates Pollution Problem in Tijuana River Valley

    June 29, 2026 —
    The Tijuana River watershed between southern California and northern Mexico has been the epicenter of an environmental and public health crisis for more than two decades. Since October 2023 alone, more than 31 billion gallons of raw sewage and polluted water have flowed into the U.S. and, eventually, the Pacific Ocean. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Jeff Yoders, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Yoders may be contacted at yodersj@enr.com