BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    mid-rise construction expert witness Buffalo South Dakota concrete tilt-up expert witness Buffalo South Dakota townhome construction expert witness Buffalo South Dakota multi family housing expert witness Buffalo South Dakota custom home expert witness Buffalo South Dakota casino resort expert witness Buffalo South Dakota industrial building expert witness Buffalo South Dakota production housing expert witness Buffalo South Dakota Subterranean parking expert witness Buffalo South Dakota low-income housing expert witness Buffalo South Dakota landscaping construction expert witness Buffalo South Dakota condominium expert witness Buffalo South Dakota condominiums expert witness Buffalo South Dakota retail construction expert witness Buffalo South Dakota housing expert witness Buffalo South Dakota parking structure expert witness Buffalo South Dakota Medical building expert witness Buffalo South Dakota custom homes expert witness Buffalo South Dakota institutional building expert witness Buffalo South Dakota high-rise construction expert witness Buffalo South Dakota structural steel construction expert witness Buffalo South Dakota hospital construction expert witness Buffalo South Dakota
    Buffalo South Dakota construction scheduling and change order evaluation expert witnessBuffalo South Dakota roofing construction expertBuffalo South Dakota consulting architect expert witnessBuffalo South Dakota building consultant expertBuffalo South Dakota building envelope expert witnessBuffalo South Dakota window expert witnessBuffalo South Dakota construction claims expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Buffalo, South Dakota

    South Dakota Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Case law precedent


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Buffalo South Dakota

    No state license is required. A license is required for asbestos, plumbing, electrical, and well drilling trades.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Aberdeen Home Builders Association
    Local # 4315
    PO Box 201
    Aberdeen, SD 57402

    Buffalo South Dakota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Watertown Area Home Builders
    Local # 4375
    PO Box 1271 1017 6th Ave SE
    Watertown, SD 57201

    Buffalo South Dakota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    South Dakota Home Builders Association
    Local # 4300
    PO Box 1218
    Pierre, SD 57501

    Buffalo South Dakota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Oahe Home Builders Association
    Local # 4360
    PO Box 221
    Pierre, SD 57501
    Buffalo South Dakota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Brookings Regional Builders Association
    Local # 4323
    PO Box 323
    Brookings, SD 57006

    Buffalo South Dakota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Black Hills Home Builders Association
    Local # 4301
    3121 W Chicago St
    Rapid City, SD 57702

    Buffalo South Dakota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Mitchell Area Chapter of National Associated Home Builders
    Local # 4340
    PO Box 1152
    Mitchell, SD 57301
    Buffalo South Dakota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Buffalo South Dakota


    Integration Can Inoculate in Utah

    Meet BWB&O’s Mountain States Rising Stars!

    Insured's Motion for Reconsideration on Protecting the Integrity of Referral Sources under Florida Statute s. 542.335

    Idaho Business Review Names VF Law Attorney Brittaney Bones Women of the Year Honoree

    Congratulations Bryan Stofferahn, August Hotchkin, and Eileen Gaisford on Their Promotion to Partner!

    Unlicensed Contractors Caught in a Sting Operation

    Supreme Court Upholds Prevailing Wage Statute

    Largest Dam Removal Program in US History Reaches Milestone

    Hartford Stadium Controversy Still Unresolved

    Limitations on the Ability to Withdraw and De-Annex Property from a Common Interest Community

    Ivanhoe Cambridge Plans Toronto Office Towers, Terminal

    Insurer’s Motion for Summary Judgment Based on Earth Movement Exclusion Denied

    Stucco Contractor Trying to Limit Communication in Construction Defect Case

    Las Vegas Harmon Hotel to be Demolished without Opening

    New Proposed Regulations Expand CFIUS Jurisdiction Regarding Real Estate

    Research Illuminates Pollution Problem in Tijuana River Valley

    Texas Shortens Cut-Off Date for Suits Against Homebuilders Who Provide a 6-Year Written Warranty

    Sales of U.S. Existing Homes Rise to One-Year High

    Natural Disasters’ Impact on Construction in the United States

    Port Authority Approves Subsidies for 2 World Trade Project

    William Lyon Homes Unites with Polygon Northwest Company

    Congratulations to Partners Nicole Whyte, Keith Bremer, Peter Brown, Karen Baytosh, and Associate Matthew Cox for Their Inclusion in 2022 Best Lawyers!

    Claims Made Insurance Policies

    Disgruntled Online Reviews of Attorney by Disgruntled Former Client Ordered Removed from Yelp.com

    Attorney-Client Privilege in the Age of Cyber Breaches

    The Problem with One Year Warranties

    Nevada Supreme Court Reverses Decision against Grader in Drainage Case

    Toolbox Talk Series Recap – Arbitration Motion Practice

    The Riskiest Housing Markets in the U.S.

    The Argument for Solar Power

    Federal District Court Addresses Material Misrepresentation in First Party Property Damage Claim

    Ninth Circuit Affirms Duty to Defend CERCLA Section 104 (e) Letter

    Scary Movie: Theatre Developer Axed By Court of Appeal In Prevailing Wage Determination Challenge

    Newmeyer & Dillion’s Alan Packer Selected to 2018 Northern California Super Lawyers List

    Project Team Upgrades Va. General Assembly

    Florida Governor Signs Construction Defect Amendments into Law

    The Court of Appeals Holds That Indifference to Safety Satisfies the Standard for a Willful Violation Under WISHA

    Home Prices Expected to Increase All Over the U.S.

    New York Court Rules on Architect's Duty Under Contract and Tort Principles

    Manhattan’s Property Boom Pushes Landlords to Sell Early

    Workers Compensation Insurance: Dangers of the Audit Process

    Don’t Kick the Claim Until the End of the Project: Timely Give Notice and Preserve Your Claims on Construction Projects

    Kahana & Feld P.C. Enhances Client Offerings, Expands Litigation Firm Leadership

    The International Codes Development Process is Changing to Continue Building Code Modernization

    No One to Go After for Construction Defects at Animal Shelter

    Sellers' Alleged Misrepresentation Does Not Amount To An Occurrence

    No Coverage for Alleged Misrepresentation Claim

    Brookfield Wins Disputed Bid to Manage Manhattan Marina

    Contract Change #8: Direct Communications between Owners and Contractors (law note)

    Traub Lieberman Partner Michael K. Kiernan and Associate Brandon Christian Obtain Dismissal with Prejudice in Favor of Defendant
    Corporate Profile

    BUFFALO SOUTH DAKOTA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 7,000 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Buffalo, South Dakota Construction Expert Witness Group provides a wide range of trial support and consulting services to Buffalo's most acknowledged construction practice groups, CGL carriers, builders, owners, and public agencies. Drawing from a diverse pool of construction and design professionals, BHA is able to simultaneously analyze complex claims from the perspective of design, engineering, cost, or standard of care.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Buffalo, South Dakota

    The “Pay When Paid” Clause in California Construction—Strategies as the Battle Continues

    August 03, 2026 —
    It is well known in California Construction circles that the “Pay If Paid” clause is illegal in this state. There is a great distinction, though, between this clause and a similar clause, known as a “Pay When Paid” clause. A pay if paid clause allows a contractor to tell a subcontractor that if the contractor is unpaid for the subcontractor’s work, then the contractor has no legal obligation to pay the subcontractor, ever. For a great variety of reasons, the California Supreme Court, in the case of Wm. R. Clarke Corp v. Safeco Ins. Co. of America (1997) 15 Cal.4th 882, declared this type of clause illegal in California Construction. Although the pay if paid clause is illegal in California, the pay when paid clause is still perfectly legal and is found in many subcontracts that contractors issue to their subcontractors. The pay when paid clause allows a contractor to delay paying its subcontractors until the dispute between the contractor and the property owner over payment has been resolved and the contractor is paid by the property owner. Although seemingly reasonable (since it merely delays payment until the contractor is paid by the owner, thereby providing a funding source to pay subcontractors), significant problems still arise. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of William L. Porter, Porter Law Group
    Mr. Porter may be contacted at bporter@porterlaw.com

    World's Longest Immersed Tunnel Passes Milestone, But Faces Delays

    August 03, 2026 —
    Work on the $8-billion Fehmarnbelt Tunnel, which is planned to link Germany and Denmark as the world’s longest immersed tunnel, is progressing as crews achieved a milestone last month with the successful immersion of its first precast concrete element. But Danish state-owned project owner Femern A/S says the plan is now running at least two years behind schedule and the tunnel’s road and rail portions will open in two separate stages. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of James Leggate, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Leggate may be contacted at leggatej@enr.com

    Defend Now, Allocate Later? An Unresolved Tension in Colorado Construction Law

    August 16, 2026 —
    For decades, Colorado law has recognized an important distinction between the duty to defend and the duty to indemnify. The former ordinarily arises at the beginning of litigation; the latter generally cannot be determined until the underlying liability is known. That distinction makes intuitive sense. A defense that becomes due only after litigation concludes is not much of a defense. But Colorado’s construction anti-indemnity statute, C.R.S. § 13-21-111.5(6), raises an interesting question about how that familiar rule operates in construction disputes. The statute expressly regulates contractual obligations not only to indemnify, but also to insure and defend, and it reflects a legislative policy that construction businesses should bear financial responsibility for their own negligence. Those principles have developed along separate tracks. At some point, a Colorado appellate court may have to decide precisely how they fit together. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David McLain, Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC
    Mr. McLain may be contacted at mclain@hhmrlaw.com

    GRSM Secures Illinois Appellate Victory for Architectural Firm in Implied Warranty Dispute

    May 14, 2026 —
    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani Partner Jonathan Federman, Partner Thomas Cronin, and Senior Counsel Garrett Lee recently secured a victory in the Illinois Appellate Court, Fifth District, on behalf of the firm’s client, an architectural firm, in a liability dispute. The case arose following an entity’s purchase of a 111-unit building for use as an investment or rental property. The plaintiff made claims against the architect of the building, alleging that there were design defects that breached an implied warranty, as well as a negligence claim. GRSM argued that an architect could not be liable for implied warranties, particularly for an implied warranty which no Illinois court has ever recognized. GRSM further argued that Illinois law bars an architect from liability for negligence arising from a duty pursuant to contract under the economic loss doctrine. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    Cuomo Bridge Lawsuit Adversaries Weigh Mediated Settlement

    July 06, 2026 —
    Rival legal teams have reached a critical juncture as they consider a mediated settlement in one of two major payment lawsuits pending between a design-build contracting team and the New York State Thruway Authority over construction of the more than $3-billion Mario M. Cuomo Bridge north of New York City. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Richard Korman, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Korman may be contacted at kormanr@enr.com

    Nomos LLP Partner Garret Murai Recognized by Super Lawyers

    July 13, 2026 —
    Nomos LLP Partner Garret Murai has been recognized as a 2026 Northern California Super Lawyer honoree in the area of Construction Litigation. This is the thirteenth consecutive year he has been recognized by Super Lawyers. Super Lawyers, an annual listing of outstanding lawyers from more than 70 practice areas who have attained a high degree of peer recognition and personal achievement, is limited to no more than five percent (5%) of lawyers in a state who are selected through a multiphase process that includes a statewide survey of lawyers, independent research evaluation and peer reviews by practice area. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Garret D. Murai, Nomos LLP
    Mr. Murai may be contacted at gmurai@nomosllp.com

    Substantial Evidence of Flood Loss is Not a Substitute for Required Proof of Loss

    April 20, 2026 —
    The court found that the insurer properly denied the insured’s claim for loss due to flood because a proof of loss was never submitted. Bay Haven at Coco Bay Condominium Association, Inc. v. Hartford Ins. Co. of the Midwest, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6847 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 14, 2026). Bay Haven managed several condo buildings. When Hurricane Ian hit, it caused significant flood damage to these properties. Bay Haven held federal flood insurance policies through Hartford under “Write-Your-Own” policies. This meant Hartford was essentially a fiscal agent that managed policies and handled claims but paid them using federal funds. Following the storm, FEMA extended the usual 60-day deadline for filing a proof of loss to one year, or until September 28, 2023. Bay Haven did not submit its proofs of loss until November 2023. FEMA granted an extension but only for the specific amounts in the November requests. Hartford did not waive the 60-day proof of loss requirement for any other proof of loss. Hartford paid the amounts reflected in the November submissions. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    HHMR and Every One of its Partners Recognized by Legal 500 in Denver Elite – Real Estate

    April 20, 2026 —
    Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC is pleased to announce its recognition as a Tier 1 firm in the Denver Elite rankings for Real Estate, a category that includes construction law and construction litigation, by The Legal 500. In addition, each of the firm’s partners has been individually recognized in the same rankings. The firm’s individual recognitions include: Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David McLain, Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC
    Mr. McLain may be contacted at mclain@hhmrlaw.com