BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    industrial building expert witness Brookings County South Dakota townhome construction expert witness Brookings County South Dakota mid-rise construction expert witness Brookings County South Dakota high-rise construction expert witness Brookings County South Dakota condominium expert witness Brookings County South Dakota hospital construction expert witness Brookings County South Dakota concrete tilt-up expert witness Brookings County South Dakota landscaping construction expert witness Brookings County South Dakota parking structure expert witness Brookings County South Dakota institutional building expert witness Brookings County South Dakota low-income housing expert witness Brookings County South Dakota retail construction expert witness Brookings County South Dakota housing expert witness Brookings County South Dakota custom homes expert witness Brookings County South Dakota condominiums expert witness Brookings County South Dakota multi family housing expert witness Brookings County South Dakota casino resort expert witness Brookings County South Dakota custom home expert witness Brookings County South Dakota production housing expert witness Brookings County South Dakota office building expert witness Brookings County South Dakota Subterranean parking expert witness Brookings County South Dakota tract home expert witness Brookings County South Dakota
    Brookings County South Dakota soil failure expert witnessBrookings County South Dakota construction expert testimonyBrookings County South Dakota multi family design expert witnessBrookings County South Dakota expert witness structural engineerBrookings County South Dakota construction expert witness public projectsBrookings County South Dakota structural concrete expertBrookings County South Dakota civil engineer expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Brookings County, South Dakota

    South Dakota Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Case law precedent


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Brookings County South Dakota

    No state license is required. A license is required for asbestos, plumbing, electrical, and well drilling trades.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Brookings Regional Builders Association
    Local # 4323
    PO Box 323
    Brookings, SD 57006

    Brookings County South Dakota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    South Dakota Home Builders Association
    Local # 4300
    PO Box 1218
    Pierre, SD 57501

    Brookings County South Dakota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Oahe Home Builders Association
    Local # 4360
    PO Box 221
    Pierre, SD 57501
    Brookings County South Dakota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Black Hills Home Builders Association
    Local # 4301
    3121 W Chicago St
    Rapid City, SD 57702

    Brookings County South Dakota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Mitchell Area Chapter of National Associated Home Builders
    Local # 4340
    PO Box 1152
    Mitchell, SD 57301
    Brookings County South Dakota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Watertown Area Home Builders
    Local # 4375
    PO Box 1271 1017 6th Ave SE
    Watertown, SD 57201

    Brookings County South Dakota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of The Sioux Empire
    Local # 4305
    6904 S Lyncrest Pl
    Sioux Falls, SD 57108

    Brookings County South Dakota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Brookings County South Dakota


    Temporary Obstructions Are a Permanent Problem Under the Americans with Disabilities Act

    Green Investigations Are Here: U.S. Department of Justice Turns Towards Environmental Enforcement Actions, Deprioritizes Compliance Assistance

    Fifth Circuit Reverses Insurers’ Summary Judgment Award Based on "Your Work" Exclusion

    Court Finds That Limitation on Conditional Use Permit Results in Covered Property Damage Due to Loss of Use

    Liquidated Damages Clause Not Enforced

    Nailing Social Media: The Key to Generating Leads for Construction Companies

    From Singapore to Rio Green Buildings Keep Tropical Tenants Cool

    $6 Million in Punitive Damages for Chinese Drywall

    Condo Developers Buy in Washington despite Construction Defect Litigation

    Illinois Appellate Court Holds Causation Can be Addressed in Appraisal Process

    Milwaukee's 25-Story Ascent Stacks Up as Tall Timber Role Model

    Canada’s Largest Homebuilder Sets U.S. Growth Plan

    Limited Number of Insurance-Related Bills Passed by 2014 Hawaii Legislature

    Don’t Let Construction Problems Become Construction Disputes (guest post)

    Texas Allows Wide Scope for Certificate of Merit

    Building in Arizona’s Data Center Boom: How Federal Executive Orders, State Regulation, and National-Security Policy Are Reshaping the Rules for Developers

    Traub Lieberman Partner Colleen Hastie Wins Summary Judgment in Favor of Sub-Contracted Electrical Company

    County Officials Refute Resident’s Statement that Defect Repairs Improper

    Before and After the Storm: Know Your Insurance Rights, Coverages and Obligations

    N.J. Appellate Court Applies Continuous Trigger Theory in Property Damage Case and Determines “Last Pull” for Coverage

    Motion to Dismiss Insurer's Counterclaim for Construction Defects Is Granted

    Scotiabank Is Cautious on Canada Housing as RBC, BMO Seek Action

    Language California Construction Direct Contractors Must Add to Subcontracts Beginning on January 1, 2022, Per Senate Bill 727

    When Every Drop Matters, Cities Turn to Watertech

    Spencer Mayer Receives Miami-Dade Bar Association's '40 Under 40' Award

    Failure to Strictly Adhere to Limitations for Flood Claim Leads to Denial

    Intellectual Property And Employment Law Best Practices: Are You Covering Your Bases In Protecting Construction-Related Trade Secrets?

    US Attorney Alleges ADA Violations in Chicago Cubs Stadium Renovation

    How a 10-Story Wood Building Survived More Than 100 Earthquakes

    Admissions In Answers to Construction Lawsuits Matter

    Couple Sues for Construction Defects in Manufactured Home

    Contractors Set to Implement Air Quality Upgrades for Healthier Buildings

    Labor Code § 2708 Presumption of Employer Negligence is Not Applicable Against Homeowners Who Hired Unlicensed Painting Company

    Maybe California Actually Does Have Enough Water

    Homeowner Allowed to Amend Complaint to Demonstrate Third-Party Beneficiary Status Under Lender-Placed Policy

    Prison Time and Restitution for Construction Fraud

    Turmoil Slows Rebuilding of Puerto Rico's Power Grid

    Housing Advocacy Group Moved to Dissolve New Jersey's Council on Affordable Housing

    Denial of Motion to Dissolve Lis Pendens Does Not Automatically Create Basis for Certiorari Relief

    Settlement Ends Construction Defect Lawsuit for School

    Colorado Introduces Construction Defect Bill for Commuter Communities

    Discovery Requests in Bad Faith Litigation Considered by Court

    Will There Be Construction Defect Legislation Introduced in the 2019 Colorado Legislative Session?

    Sales Pickup Shows Healing U.S. Real Estate Market

    Beyond Inverse Condemnation in Wildfire Litigation: An Oregon Jury Finds Utility Liable for Negligence, Trespass and Nuisance

    SunCal Buys Oak Knoll Development for the Second Time

    California Builders’ Right To Repair Is Alive

    Putting for a Cure: Don’t Forget to Visit BHA’s Booth at WCC to Support Charity

    Commercial Real Estate in 2023: A Snapshot

    FAA Plans Final Regulation on Commercial Drone Use by Mid-2016
    Corporate Profile

    BROOKINGS COUNTY SOUTH DAKOTA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Brookings County, South Dakota Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Drawing from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Brookings County's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Brookings County, South Dakota

    Settlement Agreements and Contracts Require a Meeting of the Minds

    July 20, 2026 —
    A settlement agreement does not need to be executed for it to be enforceable as long as there was a MEETING OF THE MINDS. The same rings true for any contract regardless of whether the contract is signed – THERE NEEDS TO BE A MEETING OF THE MINDS. In a recent case dealing with the settlement agreement on a construction lien, the essential settlement terms (money and mutual release) were memorialized in an e-mail exchange between the parties (owner and subcontractor). The settlement required the owner to pay the principal amount plus some attorney’s fees and then a mutual general release would be prepared. In response to the confirmatory email, the owner sent a check, which the subcontractor deposited, but the owner refused to sign the release signed and sent by the subcontractor. The owner further claimed it doesn’t need to pay the attorney’s fees because the lien amount was paid in full. The subcontractor sued arguing the owner breached the terms of the settlement. The appellate court agreed. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Soot Constitutes Property Damage

    March 17, 2026 —
    Applying Missouri law, the Eighth Circuit affirmed the jury verdict awarding damages for the presence of soot after a fire. Maxus Metropolitan, LLC v. Travelers Property Cas. Co. of Am., 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 29921 (8th Cir. Nov, 17, 2025). A fire destroyed Phase 6 of a multi-building apartment complex known as the Metropolitan. At the time of the fire, all six phases of the Metropolitan were at various stages of completion, including some of which were occupied by tenants. Phase 6 was still under construction. The fire caused severe damage to Phase 5. The interiors of Phases 1-4 were unaffected by the fire. Maxus Metropolitan, the owner of the complex, had a policy with Travelers which covered up to $35 million in “direct physical loss, . . or damage.” The policy also provided coverage for up to $5 million in lost business income. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Communication Gaps Can Cost Construction Firms in the Data Center Boom

    June 02, 2026 —
    The data center construction boom is transforming the construction industry at a historic pace. Fueled by cloud computing, artificial intelligence and relentless demand for digital infrastructure, data centers have become one of the fastest-growing project types in the built environment. Billions of dollars are flowing into new facilities and expansions, creating unprecedented opportunities for construction firms positioned to deliver reliably. But opportunity alone does not guarantee success. As competition intensifies, communication failures and poor information management are emerging as some of the most common (and costly) reasons firms lose margins, miss deadlines or fail to secure repeat work. In data center construction, where schedules are compressed and tolerance for error is minimal, even small breakdowns in communication can have outsized consequences. Reprinted courtesy of Mike Lewis, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    The Single Source of Truth in Construction Projects: Reality or Myth?

    March 24, 2026 —
    The idea of a single source of truth has been a fundamental part of the digital vision in the AEC industry for many years. From centralized CAD storage to BIM collaboration platforms and, more recently, Common Data Environments, the goal stays the same. Project teams want a reliable place where everyone can access the latest information. The phrase “single source of truth” comes from database and information management practices in the IT world, where the goal was to maintain one authoritative record of data and eliminate data redundancy. As the AEC industry began adopting digital tools, the same idea was applied to project information and workflows. Despite decades of technological progress, the question remains whether “one ring that rules them all” can actually be implemented in real construction projects. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    HHMR and Every One of its Partners Recognized by Legal 500 in Denver Elite – Real Estate

    April 20, 2026 —
    Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC is pleased to announce its recognition as a Tier 1 firm in the Denver Elite rankings for Real Estate, a category that includes construction law and construction litigation, by The Legal 500. In addition, each of the firm’s partners has been individually recognized in the same rankings. The firm’s individual recognitions include: Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David McLain, Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC
    Mr. McLain may be contacted at mclain@hhmrlaw.com

    Introducing the Updated 2026 Pillsbury Guide to Data Centers

    June 08, 2026 —
    Since the initial publication of the Pillsbury Guide to Data Centers in 2025, the market has continued to evolve—most notably with respect to power availability, energy strategy, tax and incentives planning, and investment activity across the sector. While many of the legal, commercial and regulatory frameworks addressed in the original Guide remain durable and relevant, recent developments warranted targeted updates and additions. The 2026 edition expands and updates our energy-focused content to reflect the increasingly central role of power procurement, interconnection and long-term energy strategy in data center development. We have incorporated new materials addressing power purchase and interconnection agreements, solar and other renewable energy solutions, advanced reactor designs, and nuclear-powered data centers projects, including an updated project tracker. We have also added new analysis covering state and local tax considerations and incentive structures relevant to data center development and operations, as well as current M&A and private equity trends shaping investment in the sector. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gravel2Gavel Team

    Wadsworth v. Regional Rail Partners — Verified Statements of Claim Under the Colorado Public Works Act

    August 25, 2026 —
    Editor’s Note: Wadsworth Revisited In August 2024, following the Colorado Court of Appeals’ decision in Ralph L. Wadsworth Construction Company, LLC v. Regional Rail Partners, we published Colorado Court of Appeals’ Ruling Highlights Dangers of Excessive Public Works Claims. At the time, the decision warranted a significant warning to contractors and subcontractors performing public work in Colorado. The Court of Appeals concluded that Wadsworth’s verified statement of claim improperly included unliquidated delay damages and that, because the claim was excessive, Wadsworth forfeited its right to recover the amounts included in the claim. We cautioned contractors to carefully scrutinize verified statements of claim and to avoid including unliquidated damages or amounts that were not yet due and payable. The Colorado Supreme Court has now reversed that decision. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Olivia Barden, Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC

    Texas Adopts New Procedural Rules for Summary Judgment Motions: What You Need To Know

    July 13, 2026 —
    On March 1, 2026, sweeping amendments to Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 166a took effect, fundamentally changing how Texas courts handle summary judgment motions — from filing and briefing through disposition. Whether representing a plaintiff or defendant, Texas litigants and attorneys must understand these new rules and their impact on case strategy and timelines. These procedural changes carry particular significance for construction litigants. Background: The Prior Rule Texas summary judgment practice has long diverged from the federal model. The Texas Rules of Civil Procedure recognize two types of summary judgment motions: (1) the traditional motion for summary judgment, and (2) the “no-evidence” motion for summary judgment. The no-evidence motion — unique to Texas — may be filed only after adequate time for discovery has passed. No bright-line rule governs that determination; it depends on the unique circumstances of each case. Reprinted courtesy of Conor G. Bateman, Snell & Wilmer and Marsha Cotton, Snell & Wilmer Mr. Bateman may be contacted at cbateman@swlaw.com Ms. Cotton may be contacted at mcotton@swlaw.com Read the full story...