BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    industrial building expert witness Van Wyck South Carolina parking structure expert witness Van Wyck South Carolina retail construction expert witness Van Wyck South Carolina tract home expert witness Van Wyck South Carolina custom home expert witness Van Wyck South Carolina condominium expert witness Van Wyck South Carolina housing expert witness Van Wyck South Carolina low-income housing expert witness Van Wyck South Carolina casino resort expert witness Van Wyck South Carolina multi family housing expert witness Van Wyck South Carolina institutional building expert witness Van Wyck South Carolina hospital construction expert witness Van Wyck South Carolina landscaping construction expert witness Van Wyck South Carolina concrete tilt-up expert witness Van Wyck South Carolina condominiums expert witness Van Wyck South Carolina office building expert witness Van Wyck South Carolina high-rise construction expert witness Van Wyck South Carolina mid-rise construction expert witness Van Wyck South Carolina custom homes expert witness Van Wyck South Carolina Medical building expert witness Van Wyck South Carolina Subterranean parking expert witness Van Wyck South Carolina production housing expert witness Van Wyck South Carolina
    Van Wyck South Carolina expert witness roofingVan Wyck South Carolina construction expert witness public projectsVan Wyck South Carolina building code expert witnessVan Wyck South Carolina slope failure expert witnessVan Wyck South Carolina engineering expert witnessVan Wyck South Carolina construction scheduling and change order evaluation expert witnessVan Wyck South Carolina delay claim expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Van Wyck, South Carolina

    South Carolina Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (Amend HB446/SB433; §40-59-850) Applies only to single-family and multi-family dwellings (not to exceed 16 units or three stories). Claimant to provide written notice to contractor of subcontractor no later that 90 days before filing action; Contractor must respond within 15 days if claim description not sufficient; Contractor has 30 days from service of notice to inspect and offer remedy/settlement


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Van Wyck South Carolina

    A state license is required for commercial work over $5,000.00, and residential work over $200.00


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Spartanburg
    Local # 4272
    PO Box 2592 341 E Kennedy S
    Spartanburg, SC 29304

    Van Wyck South Carolina Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of York County Inc
    Local # 4264
    PO Box 2881
    Rock Hill, SC 29732

    Van Wyck South Carolina Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Greenville
    Local # 4240
    5 Creekside Park Ct Suite A
    Greenville, SC 29615

    Van Wyck South Carolina Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Cherokee County
    Local # 4220
    PO Box 218
    Gaffney, SC 29342
    Van Wyck South Carolina Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association Lancaster Cty SC
    Local # 4230
    305 W Dunlap St C
    Lancaster, SC 29720
    Van Wyck South Carolina Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Oconee
    Local # 4280
    PO Box 337 106 East North First Street
    Seneca, SC 29679

    Van Wyck South Carolina Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Union Co Chapter - SC
    Local # 4290
    1501 Whitmire Hwy
    Union, SC 29379
    Van Wyck South Carolina Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Van Wyck South Carolina


    Slump in U.S. Housing Starts Led by Multifamily: Economy

    Party Loses Additional Insured Argument by Improper Pleading

    A Chicago Skyscraper Cements the Legacy of a Visionary Postmodern Architect

    Contrasting Expert Opinions Result in Denial of Cross Motions for Summary Judgment

    General Commercial Liability Coverage Depends on Facts - Not Labels

    Quick Note: Do Your Homework When it Comes to Selecting Your Arbitrator

    Kushner Cos. Probed Over Harassment of Low-Income Tenants

    Commercial Construction Heating Up

    Montana Supreme Court Tackles Decade-Old Coverage Dispute Concerning Asbestos Mineworker Claims

    Colorado Supreme Court Reverses Course on Public Project Liens: Key Takeaways From Wadsworth v. Regional Rail Partners

    White and Williams Announces Lawyer Promotions

    Warranty of Workmanship and Habitability Cannot Be Disclaimed or Waived Under Any Circumstance

    Lack of Flood Insurance for New York’s Poorest Residents

    Fire Raging North of Los Angeles Is Getting Fuel From Dry Winds

    But Wait There’s More: Preserving Claims on Commonwealth Projects

    Contractors May be Entitled to Both Prompt Payment Act Relief and Prejudgment Interest for a Cumulative 24%!

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (05/10/23) – Wobbling Real Estate, Booming (and Busting) Construction, and Eye-Watering Insurance Premiums

    Manhattan Condos at Half Price Reshape New York’s Harlem

    Traub Lieberman Partner Bradley T. Guldalian Wins Summary Judgment

    Court Concludes That COVID-19 Losses Can Qualify as “Direct Physical Loss”

    Consumer Protection Act Whacks Seattle Roofing Contractor

    Georgia State and Local Governments Receive Expanded Authority for Conservation Projects

    Even Fraud in the Inducement is Tough in Construction

    How a $1,400 Humanoid Hints at Construction’s Robotic Future

    California Court of Appeal Adopts Horizontal Exhaustion Rule

    California Home Sellers Have Duty to Disclose Construction Defect Lawsuits

    Hunton Insurance Practice, Attorneys Recognized in 2024 Edition of The Legal 500 United States

    The Top 3 Trends That Will Impact the Construction Industry in 2024

    Denial of Coverage For Bodily Injury After Policy Period Does Not Violate Public Policy

    Alaska Civil Engineers Give the State's Infrastructure a "C-" Grade

    Harmon Hotel Construction Defect Update

    How to Properly Fill Out and Use the Unconditional Waiver and Release on Final Payment Form Used in California Construction

    TV Kitchen Remodelers Sued for Shoddy Work

    Arbitrator May Use Own Discretion in Consolidating Construction Defect Cases

    No Bad Faith Despite Insurer’s Appraisal Award Exceeding Initial Payment

    Can Baltimore Get a Great Bridge?

    Harmon Tower Demolition on Hold

    Duty to Defend Negligent Misrepresentation Claim

    Acquisition, Development, and Construction Lending Conditions Ease

    Chesapeake Bay Water Quality Is Still in Trouble, Two Major Reviews Say

    Fifth Circuit Requires Causal Distinction for Ensuing Loss Exception to Faulty Work Exclusion

    Massachusetts Settlement Targets Mortgage-Backed “Homeowner Benefit” Agreements

    Fourth Circuit Clarifies What Qualifies As “Labor” Under The Miller Act

    Contractors Prepare for a Strong 2021 Despite Unpredictability

    The NAR asks FAA to Amend their Drone Rules for Real Estate Use

    Court of Appeals Discusses the Difference Between “Claims-Made” and “Occurrence-Based” Insurance Policies

    Certificates of Merit: Is Your Texas Certificate Sufficient?

    Consumer Protections for California Residential Solar Energy Systems

    South Dakota Supreme Court Holds That Faulty Workmanship Constitutes an “Occurrence”

    Georgia Court Reaffirms Construction Defect Decision
    Corporate Profile

    VAN WYCK SOUTH CAROLINA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 7,000 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Van Wyck, South Carolina Construction Expert Witness Group provides a wide range of trial support and consulting services to Van Wyck's most acknowledged construction practice groups, CGL carriers, builders, owners, and public agencies. Drawing from a diverse pool of construction and design professionals, BHA is able to simultaneously analyze complex claims from the perspective of design, engineering, cost, or standard of care.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Van Wyck, South Carolina

    The GKN Aerospace Chemical Release and the Laws Designed to Address It

    July 06, 2026 —
    On May 21, 2026, a 34,000-gallon storage tank at the GKN Aerospace facility in Garden Grove, California began leaking methyl methacrylate (MMA), a volatile and highly flammable industrial chemical used to manufacture high-strength acrylic plastics. GKN Aerospace makes advanced military and commercial transparencies, such as aircraft canopies, windshields, cabin windows, bullet-resistant glass, and spacecraft windows. In polymer chemistry lingo, MMA is known as a monomer. Monomers are like individual links to a chain. Under the right conditions they link up (react) with each other to form long-chained polymers, or plastics. MMA is an unstable monomer that requires controlled storage conditions to avoid setting off a polymerization (chain) reaction. According to early reports, the MMA tank at GKN Aerospace overheated. The cause of the overheating is not yet clear, but the overheating may have created conditions enabling the MMA to initiate polymerization, which in turn generated heat, which in turn generated pressure, activating the tank’s pressure-relief system and releasing MMA vapor into the atmosphere. Concerns about a runaway reaction, massive release, and explosion led the Orange County Fire Authority to order evacuation of approximately 40,000 residents and closure of thirteen schools. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Sean M. Sherlock, Snell & Wilmer
    Mr. Sherlock may be contacted at ssherlock@swlaw.com

    Building the Research and Healthcare Facilities of Tomorrow Without Impacting the Progress of Today

    August 16, 2026 —
    Research labs run experiments that can’t be paused. Hospitals treat patients around the clock. Yet these same facilities constantly need upgrades—new infrastructure, modernized systems, renovated spaces—to meet the demands of twenty-first century science and medicine. The challenge for construction teams isn’t just building. It’s building without ever turning the lights off. This unique dynamic creates an environment where construction activities are happening adjacent to sensitive testing and treatment, a complex setting where disruptions can have serious consequences. Skanska continues to successfully navigate these challenges across multiple sectors, including from occupied lab space at the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality’s (NCDEQ) Reedy Creek Laboratory in Raleigh to hospital corridors alongside staff and patients in various hospital locations across the country. Reprinted courtesy of Jason Tobias, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Pay-If-Paid: What You Need to Know Before Signing on the Dotted Line

    August 03, 2026 —
    Buried deep in the fine print of a subcontract, a pay-if-paid clause may be looming. If you are a subcontractor or supplier, misreading these clauses can put your cash flow at risk. If you are an owner or general contractor, drafting them incorrectly can leave you with obligations you never intended — or unenforceable protections you were counting on. It is more important than ever to understand when pay-if-paid clauses hold up and when they do not, as well as recent litigation and drafting trends. Whether you are negotiating a new agreement, reviewing your standard form contracts, or staring down a payment dispute, understanding how Arizona law treats pay-if-paid clauses is essential. In this article, we break down key considerations, walk through the legal standards Arizona courts apply, and offer practical tips to consider to help you protect your payment rights on the next project. Reprinted courtesy of Christian Fernandez, Snell & Wilmer and Matthew Racioppo, Snell & Wilmer Mr. Fernandez may be contacted at cfernandez@swlaw.com Mr. Racioppo may be contacted at mracioppo@swlaw.com Read the full story...

    Wilke Fleury Attorneys Recognized by 2026 Northern California Super Lawyers and Rising Stars!

    July 20, 2026 —
    Wilke Fleury is pleased to announce that 18 of the firm’s attorneys have been selected for inclusion on the 2026 Northern California Super Lawyers and Rising Stars lists. The annual Super Lawyers and Rising Stars selections recognize attorneys across a wide range of practice areas. This year’s honorees reflect the depth of Wilke Fleury’s litigation, business, healthcare, employment, bankruptcy, appellate, real estate, construction, and estate planning practices. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Wilke Fleury

    Course of Construction Exclusions and the CGL Policy

    July 20, 2026 —
    I. Course of Construction Exclusions Course of Construction (“COC”) exclusions are found on General Liability and excess liability policies, typically a wrap-up or project specific policy, and generally exclude “all property damage occurring during the course of construction.” Insurers claim COC exclusions are not problematic because they are intended to prevent an overlap in coverage between the general liability policy and first-party property Builder’s Risk policy. However, because General Liability policies and Builder’s Risk policies provide coverage for different risks, COC exclusions can create a gap in coverage for owners and contractors. Therefore, any exclusion on a wrap-up or project specific policy that limits coverage for property damage liability should be scrutinized, and amendments sought when warranted and commercially achievable, for owners, developers and contractors because General Liability policies do not cover the same risk as that of a Builder’s Risk policy. General liability policies provide defense and indemnity to the insured(s) for claims made by a third-party against the insured. Broad COC exclusions serve to preclude coverage for all property damage, not just property damage to the insured project. This includes property damage to property other than the insured project, e.g. an adjacent property. On the other hand, Builder’s Risk policies provide first-party property coverage for direct physical loss to the project during the course of construction. The Builder’s Risk policy will not provide coverage for property other than the project itself (e.g., adjacent property) and it will not provide a defense or indemnity in the event the owner of the damaged property brings a claim against a potentially at-fault party. Reprinted courtesy of Anna M. Perry, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C., Rachel S. Kindseth, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. and Nina Catanzaro, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. Ms. Perry may be contacted at APerry@sdvlaw.com Ms. Kindseth may be contacted at rkindseth@sdvlaw.com Ms. Catanzaro may be contacted at NCatanzaro@sdvlaw.com Read the full story...

    Celebrating Freedom: The Overlooked Freedom to Contract in Commercial Insurance

    July 20, 2026 —
    Happy 4th and 250 years of freedom . . . to contract! Many policyholders assume insurance policies are “standard” and must be accepted as-is. That assumption is often wrong—and dangerously limiting. Unlike many consumer insurance markets, the commercial insurance realm preserves a robust “freedom to contract,” allowing sophisticated policyholders to negotiate terms, exclusions, definitions, and limits before a policy is even issued. Particularly in recent years, high-profile disputes over cyber coverage, business interruption, and war/cyber exclusions have shown not just what happens when coverage is denied, but what could have been done up front to avoid those fights. This post highlights the power policyholders still hold in the negotiation process and illustrates, with concrete examples from recent media-covered disputes, how that freedom can be strategically used. Reprinted courtesy of Michael S. Levine, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP and Andrea DeField, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP Mr. Levine may be contacted at mlevine@hunton.com Ms. DeField may be contacted at adefield@hunton.com Read the full story...

    Moving in Before Substantial Completion? The Risks of Early Owner Occupancy

    March 24, 2026 —
    Introduction On many construction projects, particularly large projects facing schedule pressure, owners may begin occupying or using portions of the project before the work reaches substantial completion. This is often due to operational needs, phased turnover, or market demands that drive owners to take possession of all or part of a project while construction activities are ongoing. While early occupancy may seem practical, it can blur the lines of responsibility between owner and contractor and can create significant legal and practical complications. These disputes are especially common on large, complex projects where punch list work, system commissioning, and closeout activities overlap with owner use. Without clear documentation and carefully drafted contract provisions, early occupancy can undermine an owner’s ability to enforce completion requirements while simultaneously exposing the contractor to claims of delay, inefficiency, or interference. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Sydney Koby, Jones Walker
    Ms. Koby may be contacted at skoby@joneswalker.com

    Congratulations to Las Vegas Partner Jeffrey Saab and Senior Associate Shanna Carter on Winning Another Motion for Summary Judgment!

    March 17, 2026 —
    Partner Jeffrey Saab and Senior Associate Shanna Carter’s client owned a condo, which he rented out. The tenant allegedly assaulted Plaintiff across the street from the condo, resulting in personal injury, including nerve damage. Shanna did the research and writing, and Jeff argued the Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court ruled, in pertinent part, that the subject assault off property was not foreseeable, resulting in a complete dismissal of the lawsuit with prejudice. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Dolores Montoya, Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara LLP