BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    condominium expert witness Tamassee South Carolina townhome construction expert witness Tamassee South Carolina mid-rise construction expert witness Tamassee South Carolina housing expert witness Tamassee South Carolina custom homes expert witness Tamassee South Carolina landscaping construction expert witness Tamassee South Carolina hospital construction expert witness Tamassee South Carolina low-income housing expert witness Tamassee South Carolina Subterranean parking expert witness Tamassee South Carolina multi family housing expert witness Tamassee South Carolina Medical building expert witness Tamassee South Carolina parking structure expert witness Tamassee South Carolina custom home expert witness Tamassee South Carolina structural steel construction expert witness Tamassee South Carolina institutional building expert witness Tamassee South Carolina retail construction expert witness Tamassee South Carolina tract home expert witness Tamassee South Carolina office building expert witness Tamassee South Carolina concrete tilt-up expert witness Tamassee South Carolina condominiums expert witness Tamassee South Carolina industrial building expert witness Tamassee South Carolina high-rise construction expert witness Tamassee South Carolina
    Tamassee South Carolina reconstruction expert witnessTamassee South Carolina construction scheduling and change order evaluation expert witnessTamassee South Carolina construction project management expert witnessesTamassee South Carolina construction forensic expert witnessTamassee South Carolina eifs expert witnessTamassee South Carolina civil engineer expert witnessTamassee South Carolina civil engineering expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Tamassee, South Carolina

    South Carolina Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (Amend HB446/SB433; §40-59-850) Applies only to single-family and multi-family dwellings (not to exceed 16 units or three stories). Claimant to provide written notice to contractor of subcontractor no later that 90 days before filing action; Contractor must respond within 15 days if claim description not sufficient; Contractor has 30 days from service of notice to inspect and offer remedy/settlement


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Tamassee South Carolina

    A state license is required for commercial work over $5,000.00, and residential work over $200.00


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Greenville
    Local # 4240
    5 Creekside Park Ct Suite A
    Greenville, SC 29615

    Tamassee South Carolina Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Spartanburg
    Local # 4272
    PO Box 2592 341 E Kennedy S
    Spartanburg, SC 29304

    Tamassee South Carolina Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of York County Inc
    Local # 4264
    PO Box 2881
    Rock Hill, SC 29732

    Tamassee South Carolina Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association Lancaster Cty SC
    Local # 4230
    305 W Dunlap St C
    Lancaster, SC 29720
    Tamassee South Carolina Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Cherokee County
    Local # 4220
    PO Box 218
    Gaffney, SC 29342
    Tamassee South Carolina Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Oconee
    Local # 4280
    PO Box 337 106 East North First Street
    Seneca, SC 29679

    Tamassee South Carolina Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Union Co Chapter - SC
    Local # 4290
    1501 Whitmire Hwy
    Union, SC 29379
    Tamassee South Carolina Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Tamassee South Carolina


    Non-compliance With Endorsement Means No Indemnity Coverage

    Presenting a “Total Time” Delay Claim Is Not Sufficient

    Key Takeaways For Employers in the Aftermath of the Supreme Court’s Halt to OSHA’s Vax/Testing Mandate

    Verdict In Favor Of Insured Homeowner Reversed For Improper Jury Instructions

    Indemnity Provision Provides Relief to Contractor; Additional Insured Provision Does Not

    Massachusetts Construction Industry Continues to Wait While Prompt Payment Law Is Put to the Test

    Claims Litigated Under Government Claims Act Must “Fairly Reflect” Factual Claims Made in Underlying Government Claim

    Insurer Rejects Claim on Dolphin Towers

    Faulty Workmanship may be an Occurrence in Indiana CGL Policies

    Insurance Policy Provides No Coverage For Slab Collapse in Vision One

    Two Years, Too Late: Time-Barred Hurricane Loss is Timely Reminder to Insureds

    Tiny Houses Big With U.S. Owners Seeking Economic Freedom

    Render Unto Caesar: Considerations for Returning Withheld Sums

    Mechanics Lien Release Bond – What Happens Now? What exactly is a Mechanics Lien and Why Might it Need to be Released?

    Five Types of Structural Systems in High Rise Buildings

    Project Labor Agreements: A New Bid Protest Forum Split

    The Future of Airport Infrastructure in a Post-Pandemic World

    Floating Cities May Be One Answer to Rising Sea Levels

    “Time Is Money!” In Construction and This Is Why There Is a Liquidated Damages Provision

    Liability Policy’s Arbitration Endorsement Applies to Third Party Beneficiaries, Including Additional Insureds

    Construction Defect Claim Survives Insurer's Summary Judgment Motion Due to Lack of Evidence

    Canadian Developer Faces Charges After Massive Fire on Construction Site

    Sales of New U.S. Homes Surged in August to Six-Year High

    Does the Miller Act Trump Subcontract Dispute Provisions?

    Anti-Concurrent Causation Clause Bars Coverage for Pool Damage

    New York Court Enforces Construction Management Exclusion

    Feds Move To Indict NY Contractor Execs, Developer, Ex-Cuomo Aide

    Fifth Circuit Affirms District Court's Grant of Summary Judgment to Insurer on Property Loss Claim

    New York’s Highest Court Reverses Lower Court Ruling That Imposed Erroneous Timeliness Requirement For Disclaimers of Coverage

    Beyond the Disneyland Resort: Dining

    Application of Efficient Proximate Cause Doctrine Supports Coverage

    Builder Must Respond To Homeowner’s Notice Of Claim Within 14 Days Even If Construction Defect Claim Is Not Alleged With The “Reasonable Detail”

    Contract Not So Clear in South Carolina Construction Defect Case

    Collaborating or Competing with Construction Tech Startups

    Can Foreclosure Sale Be Overturned Because Sale Price Is Grossly Inadequate?

    Toolbox Talk Series Recap – Considerations for Optimizing Dispute Resolution Clauses

    Connecticut’s New False Claims Act Increases Risk to Public Construction Participants

    The Golden State Commits to Going Green – Why Contractors Will be in High Demand to Build the State’s Infrastructure

    Former Superintendent Sentenced in Rhode Island Tainted Fill Case

    Eight Ways to Protect a Construction Company Before a Claim Is Filed

    Policy Lanuage Expressly Prohibits Replacement of Undamaged Material to Match Damaged Material

    GSA Releases Updated Standards to Accelerate Federal Buildings Toward Zero Emissions

    Violation of Prompt Payment Statutes is Not a Breach of Contract. But That’s Not the Most Interesting Part

    SunEdison Gets Shinsei Bank Funding for Japan Solar Power Plant

    Triable Issue of Fact Exists as to Insurer’s Obligation to Provide Coverage Under Occurrence Policy

    Seventh Circuit Finds “Additional Insured” Requirements Met Where Non-Party Subcontractor Was Proximate Cause of Underlying Injuries

    New FAR Rule Mandates the Use of PLAs on Large Construction Projects

    Congratulations 2019 DE, MA, NJ, NY and PA Super Lawyers and Rising Stars

    Toll Brothers Climbs After Builder Reports Higher Sales

    Difficulty in Defending Rental Supplier’s Claim Under Credit Application
    Corporate Profile

    TAMASSEE SOUTH CAROLINA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 7,000 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Tamassee, South Carolina Construction Expert Witness Group provides a wide range of trial support and consulting services to Tamassee's most acknowledged construction practice groups, CGL carriers, builders, owners, and public agencies. Drawing from a diverse pool of construction and design professionals, BHA is able to simultaneously analyze complex claims from the perspective of design, engineering, cost, or standard of care.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Tamassee, South Carolina

    Powering Data Centers in a Moving Regulatory Landscape: Positioning Deals Before FERC’s Next Move

    April 27, 2026 —
    The explosive growth of data‑center load—driven by artificial intelligence, cloud computing and the expansion of digital infrastructure across industries—has forced U.S. energy regulators into unfamiliar territory. Nowhere is this more evident than at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), which is actively considering how large, concentrated loads can be powered without compromising grid reliability or shifting costs to other customers. FERC has not yet issued a standalone rulemaking on data centers. But make no mistake, the regulatory framework is quietly and deliberately being built. For developers, hyperscalers, utilities and investors, the period before FERC finalizes its next round of decisions represents the critical window to crystallize advocacy and structure transactions in ways that anticipate regulatory change. Reprinted courtesy of Stephen J. Humes, Pillsbury, Alicia M. McKnight, Pillsbury and Andrew H. Jacobs, Pillsbury Mr. Humes may be contacted at stephen.humes@pillsburylaw.com Ms. McKnight may be contacted at alicia.mcknight@pillsburylaw.com Mr. Jacobs may be contacted at andrew.jacobs@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    HHMR Attorneys Steve Heisdorffer and Dave McLain Named to 2026 Super Lawyers List

    April 08, 2026 —
    Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC is pleased to announce that Steve Heisdorffer and Dave McLain have been selected to the 2026 Colorado Super Lawyers list for construction litigation. Mr. Heisdorffer has been consistently recognized in recent years for his work in construction litigation and related business disputes. Mr. McLain has been recognized by Super Lawyers each year from 2020 through 2026, following his earlier inclusion on the Rising Stars list from 2009 through 2012. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC

    Construction Liens: Liening for Amounts Not Yet Technically Due Does Not Mean Lien Is Fraudulent

    August 11, 2026 —
    A 2024 bankruptcy ruling, In re Edgewater Construction Group, Inc., 657 B.R. 668 (S.D.Fla. 2024), touched upon an interesting issue when it comes to construction liens. Is a construction lien fraudulent simply because the lien includes amounts not yet due? Not necessarily. In this bankruptcy dispute, the subcontractor debtor (that filed for bankruptcy) recorded two construction liens on projects. The general contractor argued in the bankruptcy court that the subcontractor debtor’s liens were fraudulent. As to the first lien, the general contractor argued that the lien was fraudulent because it included amounts that the debtor knew the general contractor had already paid to the debtor’s subcontractors/suppliers. The bankruptcy court disagreed: “The Court finds that, although the Debtor had been told that [the general contractor] had paid these subcontractors, in light of the ongoing dispute between Debtor and [the general contractor], it was reasonable for the Debtor to demand proof. Debtor’s subsequent filing of a partial satisfaction of lien once the Debtor received the requested proof of payment from [the general contractor] counters any claim of willful exaggeration.” In re Edgewater Construction Group, supra, at 672-673. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Why Construction Tendering Needs Specialized Intelligence

    March 31, 2026 —
    The construction industry has never lacked data; it lacks usable intelligence at the moments that matter most. In the high-stakes phases of tendering and pre-construction, the industry still relies on manual “Control-F” searches through thousands of pages of unstructured documents. I recently spoke with Herman Smith, a civil engineer and former Chief Digital Officer at Multiconsult, who left the corporate world to solve this specific bottleneck. His startup, Volve, isn’t just another AI wrapper; it is a specialized “drill” designed to penetrate the complexity of construction documentation. The Paradox of Digitalization without a Productivity Boost For years, the AEC industry has faced a frustrating paradox: we have more digital tools than ever, yet productivity has not improved. Herman observed this from the inside, managing hundreds of unique software licenses while seeing companies struggle to adapt to new workflows. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    Samuel Alhadeff Represents LGI Homes in Acquisition and Re-Entitlement of Maravilla Estates

    July 06, 2026 —
    Temecula Partner Samuel Alhadeff recently represented LGI Homes in its acquisition and re-entitlement of Maravilla Estates, a 169-lot active adult community located in San Jacinto, California. The acquisition and re-entitlement of the project provide LGI Homes with the opportunity to deliver much-needed age-qualified housing in one of Riverside County's growing residential markets. The community includes a recorded final map and finished lots, as well as future development inventory and planned amenities, positioning the project for continued development and completion. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Course of Construction Exclusions and the CGL Policy

    July 20, 2026 —
    I. Course of Construction Exclusions Course of Construction (“COC”) exclusions are found on General Liability and excess liability policies, typically a wrap-up or project specific policy, and generally exclude “all property damage occurring during the course of construction.” Insurers claim COC exclusions are not problematic because they are intended to prevent an overlap in coverage between the general liability policy and first-party property Builder’s Risk policy. However, because General Liability policies and Builder’s Risk policies provide coverage for different risks, COC exclusions can create a gap in coverage for owners and contractors. Therefore, any exclusion on a wrap-up or project specific policy that limits coverage for property damage liability should be scrutinized, and amendments sought when warranted and commercially achievable, for owners, developers and contractors because General Liability policies do not cover the same risk as that of a Builder’s Risk policy. General liability policies provide defense and indemnity to the insured(s) for claims made by a third-party against the insured. Broad COC exclusions serve to preclude coverage for all property damage, not just property damage to the insured project. This includes property damage to property other than the insured project, e.g. an adjacent property. On the other hand, Builder’s Risk policies provide first-party property coverage for direct physical loss to the project during the course of construction. The Builder’s Risk policy will not provide coverage for property other than the project itself (e.g., adjacent property) and it will not provide a defense or indemnity in the event the owner of the damaged property brings a claim against a potentially at-fault party. Reprinted courtesy of Anna M. Perry, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C., Rachel S. Kindseth, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. and Nina Catanzaro, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. Ms. Perry may be contacted at APerry@sdvlaw.com Ms. Kindseth may be contacted at rkindseth@sdvlaw.com Ms. Catanzaro may be contacted at NCatanzaro@sdvlaw.com Read the full story...

    Insureds’ Altering Dates for Hailstorm Damage Justifies Denial of Claim

    June 02, 2026 —
    The Firth Circuit affirmed the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the insurer due to the insureds’ failure to establish the date of loss after a hailstorm. Cutchall v. Chubb Lloyds Ins. Co. of Texas, 2026 WL 625633 (5th Cir. March 5, 2026). In September 2021, the Cutchalls made a claim on their policy for interior water damage due to a hailstorm that breached their roof. Chubb retained two engineers to inspect the home, but neither found evidence that a hailstorm caused the damage. Instead, the engineers concluded a variety of other causes, such as poor ventilation and as-built defects, caused the damage. Because Chubb concluded that some of these other causes were covered by the policy, it paid only for the covered portions. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Potential Gap in Workers Compensation Immunity Statutory Framework

    June 02, 2026 —
    Workers compensation insurance is important. As an owner, you want to ensure the contractors you hire have workers compensation insurance. Assuming you hire a contractor that is statutorily exempt from workers compensation, you want to make sure, no exception, that any subcontractor that is hired has workers compensation insurance. (Regardless, you always want subcontractors to have workers compensation insurance.). In construction, the prime contractor serves as the “statutory employer” for purposes of workers compensation insurance. With workers compensation comes workers compensation immunity. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com