BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    concrete tilt-up expert witness Spraggs Pennsylvania institutional building expert witness Spraggs Pennsylvania Subterranean parking expert witness Spraggs Pennsylvania Medical building expert witness Spraggs Pennsylvania custom home expert witness Spraggs Pennsylvania production housing expert witness Spraggs Pennsylvania high-rise construction expert witness Spraggs Pennsylvania tract home expert witness Spraggs Pennsylvania condominiums expert witness Spraggs Pennsylvania mid-rise construction expert witness Spraggs Pennsylvania industrial building expert witness Spraggs Pennsylvania hospital construction expert witness Spraggs Pennsylvania custom homes expert witness Spraggs Pennsylvania landscaping construction expert witness Spraggs Pennsylvania condominium expert witness Spraggs Pennsylvania multi family housing expert witness Spraggs Pennsylvania office building expert witness Spraggs Pennsylvania housing expert witness Spraggs Pennsylvania low-income housing expert witness Spraggs Pennsylvania parking structure expert witness Spraggs Pennsylvania structural steel construction expert witness Spraggs Pennsylvania casino resort expert witness Spraggs Pennsylvania
    Spraggs Pennsylvania expert witness commercial buildingsSpraggs Pennsylvania OSHA expert witness constructionSpraggs Pennsylvania construction scheduling expert witnessSpraggs Pennsylvania testifying construction expert witnessSpraggs Pennsylvania building code compliance expert witnessSpraggs Pennsylvania roofing construction expertSpraggs Pennsylvania reconstruction expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Spraggs, Pennsylvania

    Pennsylvania Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB 1875 stipulates that “no later than 90 days before filing an action, serve written notice of claim on the contractor. Upon receipt of notice, builder has 15 days to forward the claim to any subcontractor/supplier and 30 days after service of notice to offer to compromise and settle the claim by monetary payment without inspection, propose to inspect the dwelling that is the subject of the claim; or reject the claim. Contractor has 14 days after inspection to provide written notice of intention.”


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Spraggs Pennsylvania

    No state license required. For public works projects, see General Services website.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Adams County
    Local # 3920
    PO Box 3321
    Gettysburg, PA 17325
    Spraggs Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Builders Association of Fayette County
    Local # 3961
    PO Box 1323
    Uniontown, PA 15401
    Spraggs Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Somerset Co Builders Association
    Local # 3958
    PO Box 221
    Berlin, PA 15530

    Spraggs Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Franklin County Builders Association
    Local # 3912
    1102 Sheller Ave Ste C
    Chambersburg, PA 17201

    Spraggs Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Building Industry Association of Philadelphia
    Local # 3946
    1735 Market St Ste A432
    Philadelphia, PA 19103

    Spraggs Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Chester & Delaware Co
    Local # 3941
    1502 McDaniel Dr
    West Chester, PA 19380

    Spraggs Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    York County Builders Assn
    Local # 3972
    540 Greebriar Road
    York, PA 17404

    Spraggs Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Spraggs Pennsylvania


    Contractor Prevails in Part Against CalOSHA in Valley Fever Case

    Formal Request for Time Extension Not Always Required to Support Constructive Acceleration

    Know What’s Under Ground and Make Smarter Planning Decisions

    Tennessee Civil Engineers Give the State's Infrastructure a "C" Grade

    Check The Boxes Regarding Contractual Conditions Precedent to Payment

    Can Baltimore Get a Great Bridge?

    Professional Liability Alert: Joint Client Can't Claim Privilege For Communications With Attorney Sued By Another Joint Client

    Temecula Office Secures Approval for Development of 972-Acre Community on Behalf of Pulte Homes

    The Heat Is On

    Court Rules in Favor of Treasure Island Developers in Environmental Case

    Behavioral Science Meets Construction: Insights from Whistle Rewards

    Ninth Circuit Affirms Duty to Defend CERCLA Section 104 (e) Letter

    ASLA Receives Two 2025 Power of Associations Silver Awards

    Californians Swarm Few Listings Cuts to Affordable Homes

    California Courts Call a “Time Out” During COVID-19 –New Emergency Court Rules on Civil Litigation

    Vallagio v. Metropolitan Homes: Colorado Supreme Court Upholds Declarant Consent Provision to Amend Arbitration Out of Declarations

    Is Privity of Contract with the Owner a Requirement of a Valid Mechanic’s Lien? Not for GC’s

    CGL Policy Covering Attorney’s Fees in Property Damage Claims

    What Rich Millennials Want in a Luxury Home: 20,000 Square Feet

    Washington State Enacts Law Restricting Non-Compete Agreements

    Cybersecurity "Flash" Warning for Construction and Manufacturing Businesses

    The Enforceability of “Pay-If-Paid” Provisions Affirmed in New Jersey

    Housing Starts in U.S. Beat 1 Million Pace for Second Month

    Ohio Court of Appeals: Absolute Pollution Exclusion Bars Coverage For Workplace Coal-Tar Pitch Exposure Claims

    Thank You for 14 Consecutive Years of Legal Elite Elections

    Reinsurer Must Reimburse Health Care Organization for Settlement Costs

    NLRB Broadens the Joint Employer Standard

    Anchorage Building Codes Credited for Limited Damage After Quakes

    What to Expect From the New Self-Retracting Devices Standard

    Housing Sales Hurt as Fewer Immigrants Chase Owner Dream

    Micromobility in Smart Cities: Keeping the Wheels in Motion

    Herman Russell's Big Hustle

    Damp Weather Not Good for Wood

    Construction Professionals Could Face More Liability Exposure Following California Appellate Ruling

    Facts about Chinese Drywall in Construction

    Traub Lieberman Partner Adam Joffe Named to 2022 Emerging Lawyers List

    Quick Note: Burden of Proving and Defending All Risk Property Insurance Claims

    Texas School District Accepts Settlement Agreement in Construction Defect Case

    Companies Move to Houston Area and Spur Home Building

    TOLLING AGREEMENTS: Construction Defect Lawyers use them to preserve Association Warranty Claims during Construction Defect Negotiations with Developers

    GOP, States, Industry Challenge EPA Project Water Impact Rule

    New York Signs Biggest Offshore Wind Project Deal in the Nation

    North Carolina Appeals Court Threatens Long-Term Express Warranties

    Hold on Just One Second: Texas Clarifies Starting Point for Negligence Statute of Limitations

    Construction Defect Leads to Death, Jury Awards $39 Million

    Congratulations to Haight Attorneys Selected to the 2021 Southern California Super Lawyers List

    Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell Recognized in 2024 Best Law Firm® Rankings

    Kushner Cos. Probed Over Harassment of Low-Income Tenants

    New World Cup Stadiums Failed at their First Trial

    Congratulations to Nine Gibbs Giden Partners Selected to the 2023 Southern California Super Lawyers List
    Corporate Profile

    SPRAGGS PENNSYLVANIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Spraggs, Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness Group is comprised from a number of credentialed construction professionals possessing extensive trial support experience relevant to construction defect and claims matters. Leveraging from more than 25 years experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to the nation's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, Fortune 500 builders, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, and a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Spraggs, Pennsylvania

    Underlying Complaint Alleges Possibility of Coverage, Triggering Duty to Defend

    September 15, 2026 —
    In a dispute among insurers for various defendants in the underlying case regarding the providing of a defense, the Second Circuit vacated, in part, the district court’s judgment and remanded the case. New Your Marine and Gen. Ins. Co. v. Fed. Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 18087 (2nd Cir. June 23, 2026). Mary Guzman, who worked for a cleaning company, PBM, LLC, alleged that she was injured when a glass panel in a revolving door fell onto her as she cleaned the door. She filed suit in state court against the owners of the building as well as the lessee of the fifteenth floor where the accident occurred, Bank of New York Mellon (Bank). She alleged the owners and the Bank were negligent in creating the dangerous condition that caused her injury. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Prefatory Contract Language Cannot Be Used to Create an Ambiguity with Operative Provisions

    May 12, 2026 —
    Contract drafting and interpretation matters. A case dealt with the potential conflict with prefatory language in an agreement compared with operative provisions in the agreement. The trial court held that the operative provisions control. I discussed this case here where the appellate court reversed based on the prefatory language. But, through a motion for rehearing, the appellate court reconsidered its position and affirmed the trial court based on the operative provisions, mainly that the prefatory language cannot be used to create an ambiguity with operative provisions. Consider this explanation in affirming the trial court:
    Because the trial court correctly found that the initial language in the contract was prefatory and could not be used to create an ambiguity in the remainder of the contract, we affirm the final judgment.
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Fourth Circuit Extends Coverage to Contractor

    May 14, 2026 —
    The Fourth Circuit in APAC-Atlantic, Inc. v. Owners Insurance Co., No. 24-1969, 2026 WL 458402 (4th Cir. Feb. 18, 2026) recently endorsed broad coverage for additional insureds, interpreting “arising out of” broadly under North Carolina law to extend coverage to a repaving company under its subcontractor’s liability insurance policy. The court held that an additional insured’s liability “arising out of” a named insured’s work in an additional-insured endorsement means liability “relating to” or “causally connected to” the named insured’s operations, rather than liability defined more narrowly as “caused by” or “the fault of” the named insured. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP

    Snell & Wilmer’s San Diego Office Ranked #1 “Best Place to Work” by the San Diego Business Journal

    September 01, 2026 —
    SAN DIEGO – Snell & Wilmer is proud to announce that its San Diego office has been named the #1 Best Place to Work in the Large Business category by the San Diego Business Journal as part of its 2026 Best Places to Work awards. The annual recognition honors outstanding employers across the San Diego region that are setting the standard for workplace culture and employee engagement. Rankings are based on confidential employee surveys conducted by Workforce Research Group, which evaluate organizations on leadership, corporate culture, communication, employee engagement, and other key workplace factors. “Being recognized as the #1 Best Place to Work in the Large Business category is an incredible honor because it reflects the experiences and feedback of our own team,” said Bardia Moayedi, managing partner of Snell & Wilmer’s San Diego office. “Our people are the foundation of everything we do, and this recognition speaks to the collaborative, inclusive, and supportive culture they have helped create. I am grateful to every member of our San Diego office for making this an exceptional place to build a career, serve our clients, and give back to our community.” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Snell & Wilmer

    AI Data Centers Become City-Scale Infrastructure, Prompting New Industry Playbook

    August 11, 2026 —
    AI data centers are no longer just buildings. They are increasingly reaching power-demand levels more commonly associated with municipalities, prompting industry groups to launch a new framework they say is needed to keep pace with rapidly changing power, cooling and reliability requirements. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Gottlieb may be contacted at gottliebb@enr.com

    RONI: What You Lose by Not Investing in AI – With Sam Zolfagharian

    September 21, 2026 —
    Sam Zolfagharian returns to the AEC Business Podcast for her second appearance. She is an AI strategist, keynote speaker, and the author of two books, Disrupt It and Future by Design. She spoke at the AI in AEC conference in Helsinki in March, and we picked up the conversation where that keynote left off. The starting point was a question her clients keep raising. Executives are being asked by their boards about the return on their AI investments, and many of them do not have an answer they trust. This episode is about what to measure instead, and when the dollar figure finally becomes the right number to look at. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    That’s a Wrap! Pennsylvania Court Holds Arbitration Clause in Online Agreement Unenforceable

    May 14, 2026 —
    In Duffy v. Tatum, 2026 Pa. Super. LEXIS 112, 2026 PA Super 41, the Superior Court of Pennsylvania (Superior Court) considered whether an arbitration provision contained in the online Terms of Service on the defendant’s website were enforceable. The plaintiff, Daniel Duffy (Duffy), visited the website of defendant, Dolly, Inc. (Dolly), to purchase moving services. Duffy selected the number of movers, items to be moved and the type of vehicle needed. To complete the booking, the website required Duffy to checkmark a box labeled “By checking this box I accept the Dolly Terms of Service.” Duffy did not have to open the link or scroll to the bottom of the agreement before being able to click on the checkmark box. The Terms of Service included an arbitration provision requiring that any dispute related to the moving services to be resolved by arbitration in accordance with the American Arbitration Association. The Terms of Service did not include any statement that the user was waiving the right to a jury trial. The Superior Court found the internet Terms of Service unenforceable. During the moving process, an accident occurred and injured Duffy. In May 2024, Duffy and his wife sued Dolly and other related entities alleging negligence and loss of consortium. Dolly filed preliminary objections alleging that the parties agreed to alternative dispute resolution. The lower court overruled the preliminary objections, finding that Dolly’s website did not provide reasonably obvious notice of its Terms of Service to Duffy and, as such, Duffy never agreed to waive his constructional right to a jury trial. Dolly filed an appeal to the Superior Court. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gus Sara, White and Williams LLP
    Mr. Sara may be contacted at sarag@whiteandwilliams.com

    Los Angeles Times Ranks Lewis Brisbois Third Largest Firm in LA County, Largest for Litigation

    June 08, 2026 —
    The Los Angeles Times has ranked Lewis Brisbois the third largest firm in LA County by attorney headcount, and first for number of litigation attorneys. Lewis Brisbois, whose Los Angeles office is led by Co-Managing Partners Jana I. Lubert and Kathleen Walker, has 273 attorneys working in LA County, including 167 partners. The firm ranked No. 1 for Litigation in the county, with 206 attorneys under the leadership of Partner Craig Holden. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois