BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    tract home expert witness Potts Grove Pennsylvania high-rise construction expert witness Potts Grove Pennsylvania concrete tilt-up expert witness Potts Grove Pennsylvania production housing expert witness Potts Grove Pennsylvania Medical building expert witness Potts Grove Pennsylvania housing expert witness Potts Grove Pennsylvania condominiums expert witness Potts Grove Pennsylvania condominium expert witness Potts Grove Pennsylvania multi family housing expert witness Potts Grove Pennsylvania low-income housing expert witness Potts Grove Pennsylvania institutional building expert witness Potts Grove Pennsylvania industrial building expert witness Potts Grove Pennsylvania retail construction expert witness Potts Grove Pennsylvania casino resort expert witness Potts Grove Pennsylvania parking structure expert witness Potts Grove Pennsylvania hospital construction expert witness Potts Grove Pennsylvania landscaping construction expert witness Potts Grove Pennsylvania mid-rise construction expert witness Potts Grove Pennsylvania structural steel construction expert witness Potts Grove Pennsylvania office building expert witness Potts Grove Pennsylvania custom home expert witness Potts Grove Pennsylvania custom homes expert witness Potts Grove Pennsylvania
    Potts Grove Pennsylvania construction code expert witnessPotts Grove Pennsylvania concrete expert witnessPotts Grove Pennsylvania construction claims expert witnessPotts Grove Pennsylvania stucco expert witnessPotts Grove Pennsylvania architecture expert witnessPotts Grove Pennsylvania architect expert witnessPotts Grove Pennsylvania consulting general contractor
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Potts Grove, Pennsylvania

    Pennsylvania Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB 1875 stipulates that “no later than 90 days before filing an action, serve written notice of claim on the contractor. Upon receipt of notice, builder has 15 days to forward the claim to any subcontractor/supplier and 30 days after service of notice to offer to compromise and settle the claim by monetary payment without inspection, propose to inspect the dwelling that is the subject of the claim; or reject the claim. Contractor has 14 days after inspection to provide written notice of intention.”


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Potts Grove Pennsylvania

    No state license required. For public works projects, see General Services website.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Lawrence County Builders Association
    Local # 3937
    1435 Devils Elbow Rd
    New Castle, PA 16101

    Potts Grove Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Central Susquehanna Builders Association
    Local # 3956
    300 Walnut St
    Mifflinburg, PA 17844

    Potts Grove Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Pocono Builders Association (PA)
    Local # 3939
    745 Main St Ste 203
    Stroudsburg, PA 18360

    Potts Grove Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Clearfield County Chapter
    Local # 3903
    PO Box 512
    Clearfield, PA 16830

    Potts Grove Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Builders Association of Gr Dubois Area
    Local # 3959
    PO Box 664
    Du Bois, PA 15801
    Potts Grove Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Builders Association of Central PA
    Local # 3952
    2038 Sandy Drive Ste 100
    State College, PA 16803

    Potts Grove Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Carbon Bldrs Association
    Local # 3922
    PO Box 218 490 Ore Street
    Bowmanstown, PA 18030

    Potts Grove Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Potts Grove Pennsylvania


    Architect Sues over Bidding Procedure

    Hail Drives Construction Spending in Amarillo

    Will the YIMBY ‘Holy Grail’ Deliver an LA Building Boom?

    Ayushi Neogi Published in ADC Defense Comment on Arbitration in Evolving Plaintiff-Friendly Landscape

    Contractors: Beware the Subordination Clause

    Despite Increased Presence in Construction, Women Lack Size-Appropriate PPE

    Subcontractor's Faulty Workmanship Is Not an "Occurrence"

    Millennials Want Houses, Just Like Everybody Else

    TOLLING AGREEMENTS: Construction Defect Lawyers use them to preserve Association Warranty Claims during Construction Defect Negotiations with Developers

    Explore Legal Immigration Options for Construction Companies

    Drafting or Negotiating A Subcontract–Questions To Consider

    Judge Sentences Roofing Contractor Owner in Florida PPP Fraud Case

    Revised Cause Identified for London's Wobbling Millennium Bridge After Two Decades

    Public Works Bid Protests – Who Is Responsible? Who Is Responsive?

    ACEC Research Institute Releases New Engineering Industry Forecast

    Be Careful How You Terminate: Terminating for Convenience May Limit Your Future Rights

    Ambitious Building Plans in Boston

    How Finns Cut Construction Lead Times in Half

    Hunton Insurance Lawyer, Adriana Perez, Selected to the National Association of Women Lawyers’ 2023 Rising List

    OSHA’s New Severe Injury and Fatality Reporting Requirements, Are You Ready?

    Subcontractor Strikes Out in its Claims Against Federal Government

    FEMA Offers Recovery Tips for California Wildfire Survivors

    Housing Starts Fall as U.S. Single-Family Projects Decline

    Subrogation Waiver Unconscionable in Residential Fuel Delivery Contract

    Hotel Owner Makes Construction Defect Claim

    Prison Time and Restitution for Construction Fraud

    Law Firm Fails to Survive Insurer's and Agent's Motions to Dismiss

    DIR Reminds Public Works Contractors to Renew Registrations Before January 1, 2016 to Avoid Hefty Penalty

    National Coalition to Provide Boost for Building Performance Standards

    U.K. High Court COVID-19 Victory for Policyholders May Set a Trend in the U.S.

    Understanding Indiana’s New Home Construction Warranty Act

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “The Jury Is Still Out”

    Cultivating a Company Culture Committed to Safety, Mentorship and Education

    Companies Move to Houston Area and Spur Home Building

    The Johnstown Dam Failure, as Seen in the Pages of ENR in 1889

    Brandy Price, Dean Pillarella Named to Lawdragon's "Next Generation" List

    The Dangers of an Unlicensed Contractor from Every Angle

    The General Assembly Adds Some Clarity to Contracts and Unlicensed Contractors

    Michigan Civil Engineers Give the State's Infrastructure a "C-" Grade, Improving from "D+" Grade in 2018

    Port Authority Reaches Deal on Silverstein 3 World Trade

    Insured's Failure to Challenge Trial Court's Application of Exclusion Makes Appeal Futile

    Tenn. Court of Appeals Finally Clarifies Contractor Licensing Laws, Holding An “Underlicensed” Contractor Is Violation of Tennessee’s Consumer Protection Act

    COVID-19 Response: Essential Business Operations: a High-Stakes Question Under Proliferating “Stay at Home” Orders

    New Jersey Supreme Court Issue Important Decision for Homeowners and Contractors

    The Leaning Tower of San Francisco

    Primer Debuts on Life-Cycle Assessments of Embodied Carbon in Buildings

    A Deep Dive Into an Undervalued Urban Marvel

    Motion for Summary Judgment Gets Pooped Upon

    New York Court Discusses Evidentiary Standards for Policy Rescission Based on Material Misrepresentation

    Four Kahana Feld Attorneys Selected to 2026 Southern California Super Lawyers List
    Corporate Profile

    POTTS GROVE PENNSYLVANIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Potts Grove, Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Drawing from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Potts Grove's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Potts Grove, Pennsylvania

    A Win for Clarity: What a Recent Federal Court Decision Means for Davis-Bacon Compliance

    July 13, 2026 —
    Following the Department of Labor’s 2023 Davis-Bacon rule changes, federal construction contractors faced a pressing question: not whether paying prevailing wages is required, but how far those obligations could extend. Could they reach off-site material suppliers? Delivery drivers? Contracts that omitted Davis-Bacon clauses entirely? A recent federal court decision in AGC of America v. US Department of Labor answers these questions in important ways, vacating several disputed provisions and giving contractors greater certainty when pricing, bidding, and administering federal construction projects. The ruling addresses three aspects of the 2023 regulations that sought to extend Davis-Bacon obligations beyond their traditional scope. By vacating those provisions, the decision creates a more predictable compliance environment and reinforces an important principle: Davis-Bacon enforcement works best when contractors, workers, and regulators operate under clear, objective rules. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Stephen E. Irving, Peckar & Abramson, P.C.
    Mr. Irving may be contacted at sirving@pecklaw.com

    Seventh Circuit, With an Assist From the Illinois Supreme Court, Finds That “Pollution Exclusion” Bars Coverage For Emissions Allowed Under Regulatory Permit

    April 20, 2026 —
    In Griffith Foods Int’l Inc. v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, PA, 24-1217 & 24-1223 (7th Cir. Mar. 13, 2026), the Seventh Circuit addressed the meaning and scope of a pollution exclusion in a standard-form commercial general liability insurance policy for underlying injuries caused by ethylene oxide (EtO) emissions. The insurance dispute arose out of underlying tort litigation involving bodily injury claims, including cancer, allegedly caused by emissions of ethylene oxide over a 35-year period from 1984 through 2019 by Griffith Foods International and later Sterigenics U.S. The pollution exclusion at issue generally barred coverage for “bodily injury” arising out of the discharge, dispersal, release or escape of smoke, vapors, soot, fumes, acids, alkalis, toxic chemicals, or other irritants, contaminants or pollutants. Interpreting similar exclusions, the Illinois Supreme Court has previously held that the standard CGL pollution exclusion bars coverage for bodily injuries caused by traditional environmental pollution (essentially industrial emissions of pollutants), but not by more commonplace emissions (such as carbon monoxide from a residential furnace or excess chlorine in a backyard swimming pool). See American States Insurance Co. v. Koloms, 177 Ill. 2d 473 (Ill. 1997). In Griffith Foods, the District Court initially concluded that the pollution exclusion did not apply because the companies emitted EtO pursuant to a permit issued by the IEPA. The District Court reached this latter conclusion by applying Erie Insurance Exchange v. Imperial Marble Corp., 957 N.E.2d 1214 (Ill. App. Ct. 2011), an Illinois intermediate appellate court decision finding it ambiguous whether a CGL policy’s pollution exclusion barred coverage for emissions authorized by regulatory permit. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Jason Taylor, Traub Lieberman
    Mr. Taylor may be contacted at jtaylor@tlsslaw.com

    Data Center Construction and the AEC Partner of the Future

    April 14, 2026 —
    During my involvement in designing mobile phone production facilities, the speed of design and construction was critical. Any delay could directly translate into lost revenue. That same logic now applies to data centers, though the stakes are much higher. Instead of optimizing physical production lines, we are constructing infrastructure for digital production. The global data center capacity is expected to nearly double by 2030, and with this level of demand, the traditional project-by-project delivery model begins to show its limitations. Data centers are no longer isolated projects in the traditional sense. They are evolving into repeatable, scalable production systems, making them ideal environments for AEC process and business model innovation. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    Wilke Fleury Attorneys Recognized by 2026 Northern California Super Lawyers and Rising Stars!

    July 20, 2026 —
    Wilke Fleury is pleased to announce that 18 of the firm’s attorneys have been selected for inclusion on the 2026 Northern California Super Lawyers and Rising Stars lists. The annual Super Lawyers and Rising Stars selections recognize attorneys across a wide range of practice areas. This year’s honorees reflect the depth of Wilke Fleury’s litigation, business, healthcare, employment, bankruptcy, appellate, real estate, construction, and estate planning practices. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Wilke Fleury

    Labor Shortages in Construction: Managing Legal and Operational Risks

    April 14, 2026 —
    Labor shortages in the construction industry have become more than a scheduling headache—they are a legal and financial risk multiplier. As contractors scramble to meet deadlines with limited manpower, shortcuts in compliance, safety and subcontractor oversight become more likely. These gaps can expose companies to regulatory penalties, contractual disputes and reputational damage. Understanding how workforce constraints intersect with labor laws and contractual obligations is critical to mitigating the risks and navigating these challenges without compromising compliance or project integrity. The construction industry has faced persistent workforce challenges for years, but recent trends have intensified the problem. Factors such as an aging workforce, reduced immigration and post-pandemic recovery pressures have left contractors struggling to find skilled labor. According to Associated Builders and Contractors, the construction workforce shortage surpassed half a million workers in 2024; in the same year, Associated General Contractors reported 88% of construction companies had difficulty finding qualified workers. Reprinted courtesy of Meghan Douris, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Sixth Circuit Revives Builder’s Risk Coverage, Refusing to Let Insurer Escape on a Technicality

    July 27, 2026 —
    In 3371 Reading, LLC v. Liberty Mutual Group, the Sixth Circuit did something courts do not always do in coverage disputes: it refused to let an insurer avoid liability based on a technical policy condition that could never actually be satisfied. The decision is a straightforward reminder of two core principles. First, policies must be interpreted from the standpoint of a reasonably prudent insured. Second, hyper-technical conditions cannot be used to deny coverage where compliance is never possible. Reprinted courtesy of Kevin V. Small, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP and Adriana A. Perez, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP Mr. Small may be contacted at ksmall@hunton.com Ms. Perez may be contacted at pereza@hunton.com Read the full story...

    USDOT’s DBE Interim Final Rule: How It Affects Current and Out-to-Bid DOT and Airport Projects

    June 15, 2026 —
    In our April 16, 2026 post, we discussed the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Interim Final Rule (IFR) concerning Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) and Airport Concession Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (ACDBE) certification, specifically as it concerns transportation and airport projects in California. This post addresses a broader question: What does the IFR mean for current and out-to-bid DOT projects operating under pre-existing DBE goals? The answer is that the IFR did more than change who qualifies as a DBE. It also changed how federally funded transportation and airport projects must be handled during the re-evaluation period. This affects active contracts, pending procurements, airport projects, design-build teams, and anyone relying on old assumptions about DBE goals and counting of DBE and ACDBE credit. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Zachary F. Jacobson, Seyfarth Shaw LLP
    Mr. Jacobson may be contacted at zjacobson@seyfarth.com

    Fraud Allegations Stymie Additional Insured’s Request for a Defense

    May 14, 2026 —
    The Federal District Court granted the insurer’s motion to dismiss the insured’s complaint seeking a defense of the underlying case alleging fraud. Renovation Realty, Inc. v. Colony Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21409 (S.D. Cal. Jan. 30, 2026). Mara Fortin sued Renovation Realty and others (“Fortin litigation”) from the fraudulent sale of a residence. The underlying complaint alleged Renovation “deliberately misrepresented of the residence as ‘completely remodeled’ and ‘meticulously maintained’.” The defendants, however, including Renovation, “knew from sources including a pre-renovation termite report documenting fungus and dry rot . . . that the Property harbored pre-existing material defects.” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com