BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    mid-rise construction expert witness Pocono Lake Preserve Pennsylvania casino resort expert witness Pocono Lake Preserve Pennsylvania condominiums expert witness Pocono Lake Preserve Pennsylvania tract home expert witness Pocono Lake Preserve Pennsylvania custom home expert witness Pocono Lake Preserve Pennsylvania high-rise construction expert witness Pocono Lake Preserve Pennsylvania office building expert witness Pocono Lake Preserve Pennsylvania Subterranean parking expert witness Pocono Lake Preserve Pennsylvania hospital construction expert witness Pocono Lake Preserve Pennsylvania concrete tilt-up expert witness Pocono Lake Preserve Pennsylvania multi family housing expert witness Pocono Lake Preserve Pennsylvania low-income housing expert witness Pocono Lake Preserve Pennsylvania retail construction expert witness Pocono Lake Preserve Pennsylvania Medical building expert witness Pocono Lake Preserve Pennsylvania industrial building expert witness Pocono Lake Preserve Pennsylvania production housing expert witness Pocono Lake Preserve Pennsylvania housing expert witness Pocono Lake Preserve Pennsylvania condominium expert witness Pocono Lake Preserve Pennsylvania landscaping construction expert witness Pocono Lake Preserve Pennsylvania custom homes expert witness Pocono Lake Preserve Pennsylvania structural steel construction expert witness Pocono Lake Preserve Pennsylvania townhome construction expert witness Pocono Lake Preserve Pennsylvania
    Pocono Lake Preserve Pennsylvania architect expert witnessPocono Lake Preserve Pennsylvania engineering consultantPocono Lake Preserve Pennsylvania architectural engineering expert witnessPocono Lake Preserve Pennsylvania consulting general contractorPocono Lake Preserve Pennsylvania construction expert testimonyPocono Lake Preserve Pennsylvania reconstruction expert witnessPocono Lake Preserve Pennsylvania stucco expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Pocono Lake Preserve, Pennsylvania

    Pennsylvania Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB 1875 stipulates that “no later than 90 days before filing an action, serve written notice of claim on the contractor. Upon receipt of notice, builder has 15 days to forward the claim to any subcontractor/supplier and 30 days after service of notice to offer to compromise and settle the claim by monetary payment without inspection, propose to inspect the dwelling that is the subject of the claim; or reject the claim. Contractor has 14 days after inspection to provide written notice of intention.”


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Pocono Lake Preserve Pennsylvania

    No state license required. For public works projects, see General Services website.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Clearfield County Chapter
    Local # 3903
    PO Box 512
    Clearfield, PA 16830

    Pocono Lake Preserve Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Builders Association of Gr Dubois Area
    Local # 3959
    PO Box 664
    Du Bois, PA 15801
    Pocono Lake Preserve Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Clinton Co Builders Association
    Local # 3980
    PO Box 147
    Lock Haven, PA 17745

    Pocono Lake Preserve Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Lawrence County Builders Association
    Local # 3937
    1435 Devils Elbow Rd
    New Castle, PA 16101

    Pocono Lake Preserve Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Central Susquehanna Builders Association
    Local # 3956
    300 Walnut St
    Mifflinburg, PA 17844

    Pocono Lake Preserve Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Pocono Builders Association (PA)
    Local # 3939
    745 Main St Ste 203
    Stroudsburg, PA 18360

    Pocono Lake Preserve Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    West Branch-Susquehanna Builders Association
    Local # 3968
    1610 Whitman Street
    Williamsport, PA 17701

    Pocono Lake Preserve Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Pocono Lake Preserve Pennsylvania


    Colorado Supreme Court Reverses Course on Public Project Liens: Key Takeaways From Wadsworth v. Regional Rail Partners

    California Supreme Court Rejects Insurers' Bid for Horizontal Exhaustion Rule in New Montrose Decision

    New Jersey Law regarding Prior Expert’s Testimony

    Congratulations to Reno Partner Karen Baytosh for Securing a Complete Dismissal via a Motion for Summary Judgment

    Lasso Needed to Complete Vegas Hotel Implosion

    Client Alert: Expert Testimony in Indemnity Action Not Limited to Opinions Presented in Underlying Matter

    Oregon Duty to Defend Triggered by Potential Timing of Damage

    Insurer's Motion for Summary Judgment in Collapse Case Denied

    Damages to Property That is Not the Insured's Work Product Are Covered

    Guilty Pleas Draw Renewed Interest In Nevada’s Construction Defect Laws

    Know Your Burden of Proof in an Insurance Coverage Dispute Dealing With an All Risk Policy

    Illinois Earns C- on its 2022 Infrastructure Report Card while Making Strides on Roads and Transit

    ASCE Statement on Passing of Senator Dianne Feinstein

    Commercial Construction Lenders Rejoice: The Pennsylvania Legislature Provides a Statutory fix for the “Kessler” Decision

    Contractor Allegedly Stole Construction Materials

    Sellers' Alleged Misrepresentation Does Not Amount To An Occurrence

    General Contractor Intervening to Compel Arbitration Per the Subcontract

    Coverage Issues: When You Need Your Own Lawyer in a Construction Defect Suit

    Wilke Fleury Attorneys Recognized by 2026 Northern California Super Lawyers and Rising Stars!

    Rulemaking to Modernize, Expand DOI’s “Type A” Natural Resource Damage Assessment Rules Expected Fall 2023

    Is Your Construction Business Feeling the Effects of the Final DBA Rule?

    BKV Barnett, LLC v. Electric Drilling Technologies, LLC: Analyzing the Impact of Colorado’s Anti-Indemnification Statute

    Federal District Court Addresses Anti-concurrent Cause Language in Property Policy

    No Coverage Where Cracks in Basement Walls Do Not Amount to Sudden Collapse

    The Investors Profiting Off Water Scarcity

    Failure to Allege Property Damage Within Policy Period Defeats Insured's Claim

    Cape Town Seeks World Cup Stadium Construction Collusion Damages

    Safety Accusations Fly in Dispute Between New York Developer and Contractor

    Parking Garage Collapse May Be Due to Construction Defect

    Banks Loosening U.S. Mortgage Standards: Chart of the Day

    In Matter of First Impression, California Appellate Court Finds a Claim for a Real Estate Professional’s Breach of Fiduciary Duty is Assignable

    Absence of Property Damage During Policy Period Equates to No Coverage

    Beware of Statutory Limits on Change Orders

    Giant Floating Solar Flowers Offer Hope for Coal-Addicted Korea

    In Texas, a General Contractor May be Liable in Tort to a Third-Party Lessee for Property Damage Caused by a Subcontractor’s Work

    Evacuations in Santa Barbara County as more Mudslides are Predicted

    Defective Sprinklers Not Cause of Library Flooding

    Snell & Wilmer’s Orange County Office Recognized as One of the “Best Places to Work” by the Orange County Business Journal

    Mortgage Battle Flares as U.K. Homebuying Loses Allure

    Understanding the Miller Act

    At the Border of Contract and Torts in Construction Disputes

    Key Economic & Geopolitical Themes To Monitor In 2024

    PPP Loan Extension Ending Aug. 8

    The Courts and Changing Views on Construction Defect Coverage

    Legal Battle Kicks Off to Minimize Baltimore Bridge Liabilities

    Texas Federal Court Upholds Professional Services Exclusion to Preclude Duty to Defend

    Discussion of the Discovery Rule and Tolling Statute of Limitations

    What Startup Funding Reveals About the Future of Construction Technology

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (08/15/23) – Manufacturing Soars with CHIPS Act, New Threats to U.S. Infrastructure and AI Innovation for One Company

    Insureds’ Altering Dates for Hailstorm Damage Justifies Denial of Claim
    Corporate Profile

    POCONO LAKE PRESERVE PENNSYLVANIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Pocono Lake Preserve, Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness Group is comprised from a number of credentialed construction professionals possessing extensive trial support experience relevant to construction defect and claims matters. Leveraging from more than 25 years experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to the nation's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, Fortune 500 builders, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, and a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Pocono Lake Preserve, Pennsylvania

    Potential Gap in Workers Compensation Immunity Statutory Framework

    June 02, 2026 —
    Workers compensation insurance is important. As an owner, you want to ensure the contractors you hire have workers compensation insurance. Assuming you hire a contractor that is statutorily exempt from workers compensation, you want to make sure, no exception, that any subcontractor that is hired has workers compensation insurance. (Regardless, you always want subcontractors to have workers compensation insurance.). In construction, the prime contractor serves as the “statutory employer” for purposes of workers compensation insurance. With workers compensation comes workers compensation immunity. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Consider The Limited Warranty from Your Homebuilder

    July 06, 2026 —
    When purchasing a home from a homebuilder, there is an important consideration when it comes to the limited warranty you receive around the time you close on the home. That limited warranty likely includes an arbitration provision requiring you to arbitrate your disputes, such as construction defect claims, against the homebuilder. That arbitration provision will most likely include all claims, including statutory claims (such as a statutory violation of a building code claim), requiring you to arbitrate, as opposed to litigate, your disputes against the homebuilder. This is an important consideration. If the arbitration provision does not allow you to arbitrate all of your claims, and eliminates your rights to legitimate statutory claims, the arbitration provision could be unenforceable. By way of example, in a residential construction defect dispute, Anderson v. Taylor Morrison of Florida, Inc., 223 So.3d 1088 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017), the appeal turned on whether the arbitration provision in the homebuilder’s limited warranty was valid. The homeowners took possession of their home in 2009. In 2015, the homeowners served a Florida Statutes Chapter 558 notice of construction defects that included a statutory violation of a building code claim under Florida Statute §553.84. The limited warranty included an arbitration provision that specified it was the “exclusive remedy” for all disputes arising out of or related to the warranty or issues with the home and property. When read together with the warranty’s disclaimer that precluded claims not covered by the warranty “whether in contract, tort, or otherwise,” the statutory building code violation claim could not be remedied through arbitration because it fell outside the warranty’s coverage. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    The Grenfell & Champlain Towers: Risk Management Considerations in the Wake of Catastrophic Loss — A UK/US Comparison

    June 02, 2026 —
    1. Introduction As part of the multinational collaborative relationship between Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. and Fenchurch Law, we continually find ourselves in conversations about the sometimes subtle but sometimes drastic differences between risk management and coverage considerations from one country to the next. These differences are often highlighted by the fallout from large catastrophic losses that are widely publicized and illuminate sometimes widespread risks and perils that many others may be facing in the coming years. The response of governments and their subdivisions to the needs of victims and/or commercial parties, and insurance markets’ evaluation of and reactions to catastrophic losses vary widely from country to country and jurisdiction. In this article, we discuss these responses and reactions in the cases of the Grenfell Tower Fire in London, England, and the Champlain Tower collapse in Surfside, Florida, within the United States. These two widely publicized losses involved different risk management and insurance considerations based on where they occurred. They also saw substantially different government responses and raised varied questions about what the next steps are for their respective commercial and insurance markets. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Eric M. Clarkson, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C.
    Mr. Clarkson may be contacted at EClarkson@sdvlaw.com

    Insured’s Failure to Determine Depreciation When Presenting Claim for Replacement Cost Value

    August 16, 2026 —
    The Third Circuit affirmed the district court’s granting of summary judgment to the insurer when the insured submitted replacement cost value of the loss but did not include a determination of depreciation. Kimmel v. Massachusetts Bay Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 16569 (3d Cir. June 9, 2026). A lightning strike downed a tree on the insured’s property, causing extensive damage to the home. The insured had a homeowner’s policy with Massachusetts Bay Insurance Company (MBIC). MBIC denied the claim, determining that much of the claimed damage already existed and that several policy exclusions otherwise barred coverage. The insured filed suit for breach of contract and bad faith. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    New York Enacts First-in-the-Nation Statewide Data Center Moratorium

    August 03, 2026 —
    As of May 2026, nearly 12 gigawatts of data center load requests were in the New York Independent System Operator interconnection queue, with more than two-thirds of capacity requests entering the queue in 2025 alone. On July 14, 2026, in response to concerns over this rapid growth, Governor Kathy Hochul issued Executive Order No. 62 (the “Order”) imposing a temporary moratorium on data centers in New York State. Among the concerns cited in the Order are the cost burden on ratepayers associated with transmission upgrades required to accommodate large loads, potential environmental impacts, and large-scale water use. The moratorium is intended to halt activities while the state government develops a comprehensive legal framework for data center development. While dozens of municipal and county-level moratoriums are in place throughout the U.S., and while the legislatures of several states, including Maine, have proposed moratoriums, the Order is the first statewide moratorium to be enacted nationally. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Joshua L. Sturtevant, Sheppard
    Mr. Sturtevant may be contacted at jsturtevant@sheppard.com

    It’s More Than a Feeling: Proving Construction Damages and When You Should Hire an Expert to Help Do It

    July 27, 2026 —
    When you win a bid, you might be singing that everything is going your way. Then something goes wrong. The owner hands you defective plans, sits on RFI responses or other critical information, or otherwise upends the work. The costs pile up through no fault of your own. You feel wronged, and you want to be made whole. But a feeling that you got burned is not enough. To recover, that feeling has to become something the law recognizes as damages. So, what are damages, and how do you prove them? At bottom, contract damages are the money that puts the non-breaching party (i.e., the party that doesn’t breach the contract) in the position it would have occupied had the contract been performed. Reprinted courtesy of Bradley E. Sands, Jones Walker LLP and Katie McCracken, Summer Associate, University of Georgia School of Law Read the full story...
    Mr. Sands may be contacted at bsands@joneswalker.com

    Why Construction Tendering Needs Specialized Intelligence

    March 31, 2026 —
    The construction industry has never lacked data; it lacks usable intelligence at the moments that matter most. In the high-stakes phases of tendering and pre-construction, the industry still relies on manual “Control-F” searches through thousands of pages of unstructured documents. I recently spoke with Herman Smith, a civil engineer and former Chief Digital Officer at Multiconsult, who left the corporate world to solve this specific bottleneck. His startup, Volve, isn’t just another AI wrapper; it is a specialized “drill” designed to penetrate the complexity of construction documentation. The Paradox of Digitalization without a Productivity Boost For years, the AEC industry has faced a frustrating paradox: we have more digital tools than ever, yet productivity has not improved. Herman observed this from the inside, managing hundreds of unique software licenses while seeing companies struggle to adapt to new workflows. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    Fraud Allegations Stymie Additional Insured’s Request for a Defense

    May 14, 2026 —
    The Federal District Court granted the insurer’s motion to dismiss the insured’s complaint seeking a defense of the underlying case alleging fraud. Renovation Realty, Inc. v. Colony Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21409 (S.D. Cal. Jan. 30, 2026). Mara Fortin sued Renovation Realty and others (“Fortin litigation”) from the fraudulent sale of a residence. The underlying complaint alleged Renovation “deliberately misrepresented of the residence as ‘completely remodeled’ and ‘meticulously maintained’.” The defendants, however, including Renovation, “knew from sources including a pre-renovation termite report documenting fungus and dry rot . . . that the Property harbored pre-existing material defects.” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com