BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    retail construction expert witness Munson Pennsylvania concrete tilt-up expert witness Munson Pennsylvania Subterranean parking expert witness Munson Pennsylvania production housing expert witness Munson Pennsylvania industrial building expert witness Munson Pennsylvania high-rise construction expert witness Munson Pennsylvania parking structure expert witness Munson Pennsylvania custom home expert witness Munson Pennsylvania low-income housing expert witness Munson Pennsylvania structural steel construction expert witness Munson Pennsylvania tract home expert witness Munson Pennsylvania mid-rise construction expert witness Munson Pennsylvania Medical building expert witness Munson Pennsylvania multi family housing expert witness Munson Pennsylvania condominium expert witness Munson Pennsylvania condominiums expert witness Munson Pennsylvania landscaping construction expert witness Munson Pennsylvania office building expert witness Munson Pennsylvania casino resort expert witness Munson Pennsylvania institutional building expert witness Munson Pennsylvania custom homes expert witness Munson Pennsylvania hospital construction expert witness Munson Pennsylvania
    Munson Pennsylvania multi family design expert witnessMunson Pennsylvania ada design expert witnessMunson Pennsylvania fenestration expert witnessMunson Pennsylvania defective construction expertMunson Pennsylvania forensic architectMunson Pennsylvania concrete expert witnessMunson Pennsylvania construction defect expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Munson, Pennsylvania

    Pennsylvania Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB 1875 stipulates that “no later than 90 days before filing an action, serve written notice of claim on the contractor. Upon receipt of notice, builder has 15 days to forward the claim to any subcontractor/supplier and 30 days after service of notice to offer to compromise and settle the claim by monetary payment without inspection, propose to inspect the dwelling that is the subject of the claim; or reject the claim. Contractor has 14 days after inspection to provide written notice of intention.”


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Munson Pennsylvania

    No state license required. For public works projects, see General Services website.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Pocono Builders Association (PA)
    Local # 3939
    745 Main St Ste 203
    Stroudsburg, PA 18360

    Munson Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Central Susquehanna Builders Association
    Local # 3956
    300 Walnut St
    Mifflinburg, PA 17844

    Munson Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Lawrence County Builders Association
    Local # 3937
    1435 Devils Elbow Rd
    New Castle, PA 16101

    Munson Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Clearfield County Chapter
    Local # 3903
    PO Box 512
    Clearfield, PA 16830

    Munson Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Builders Association of Central PA
    Local # 3952
    2038 Sandy Drive Ste 100
    State College, PA 16803

    Munson Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Carbon Bldrs Association
    Local # 3922
    PO Box 218 490 Ore Street
    Bowmanstown, PA 18030

    Munson Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Builders Association of Gr Dubois Area
    Local # 3959
    PO Box 664
    Du Bois, PA 15801
    Munson Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Munson Pennsylvania


    Not Just Another Client Alert about Cyber-Risk and Effective Cybersecurity Insurance Regulatory Guidance

    Condos Down in Denver Due to Construction Defect Litigation

    Risk Associated with Design-Build Project Delivery Method

    Second Circuit Denies Petitions for Review of EPA’s Final Regulations to Establish Requirements for Cooling Water Intake Structures

    Recent Supreme Court Decision Could Have Substantial Impact on Builders

    Thank You for 14 Consecutive Years of Legal Elite Elections

    Clean Energy and Conservation Collide in California Coastal Waters

    California Fears El Nino's Dark Side Will Bring More Trouble

    Dust Infiltration Due to Construction Defect Excluded from Policy

    Hunton Insurance Practice Receives Top (Tier 1) National Ranking by US News & World Report

    Presidential Memorandum Promotes Reliable Supply and Delivery of Water in the West

    “Pay When Paid” Provisions May Not Be Dead, at Least Not Yet

    Congratulations to Wilke Fleury’s 2025 Super Lawyers and Rising Stars!

    GRSM Named Among 2026 “Best Law Firms” by Best Lawyers®

    Background Owner of Property Cannot Be Compelled to Arbitrate Construction Defects

    Mich. AG Says Straits of Mackinac Tunnel Deal Unconstitutional

    Making Construction Innovation Stick

    Georgia Federal Court Holds That Pollution Exclusion Bars Coverage Under Liability Policy for Claims Arising From Discharge of PFAS Into Waterways

    Beware of Design Pitfalls In Unfamiliar Territory

    Bertha – The Tunnel is Finished, but Her Legacy Continues

    Brown and Caldwell Appoints Stigers as Design Chief Engineer

    Subcontractor Default Insurance (“SDI”): What Is It?

    Smart Home Products go Mainstream as Consumer Demand Increases

    How AI Can Become a Design Adviser

    NEHRP Recommendations Likely To Improve Seismic Design

    Time is Money: Escalating Stalled Termination Cost Negotiations

    Collapse Claim Dismissed as Untimely

    Back to Basics: What is a Changes Clause?

    Evolving Climate Patterns and Extreme Weather Demand New Building Methods

    Deadlines Count for Construction Defects in Florida

    School Blown Down by Wind Still Set to Open on Schedule

    Ohio Court of Appeals: Absolute Pollution Exclusion Bars Coverage For Workplace Coal-Tar Pitch Exposure Claims

    Is Arbitration Final and Binding?

    Note on First-Party and Third-Party Spoliation of Evidence Claims

    Florida Appellate Courts Holds Underwriting Manuals are Discoverable in Breach of Contract Case

    Thomson Reuters Construction Law (Virginia Practice Series)

    The Impact of Nuclear Verdicts on Construction Businesses

    Insurer Has No Obligation to Cover Arbitration Award in Construction Defect Case

    As Climate Changes, 'Underwater Mortgage' May Take on New Meaning

    2021 Real Estate Trends: New Year, New Reality—A Day of Reckoning for Borrowers and Tenants

    What is a Civil Dispute?

    Enerpac Plays Critical Role in Industry-changing Discovery for Long Span Bridges at The University of Nebraska-Lincoln

    City of Pawtucket Considering Forensic Investigation of Tower

    Taking Service Network Planning to the Next Level

    Contractor Manslaughter? Safety Shortcuts Are Not Worth It

    From Ashes to Action: LA Fire Recovery Enters New Phase

    The Anatomy of a Construction Dispute Stage 3- The Last Straw

    Think Twice Before Hedging A Position Or Defense On A Speculative Event Or Occurrence

    Avoid Delay or Get Ready to Pay: The Risks of “Time-Is-of-The-Essence” Clauses

    Delaware Settlements with Minors and the Uniform Transfer to Minor Act
    Corporate Profile

    MUNSON PENNSYLVANIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Munson, Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Drawing from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Munson's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Munson, Pennsylvania

    Court Denies Cross Summary Judgment Motions on Coverage for Odors in Newly Purchased Home

    October 06, 2026 —
    The federal district court denied cross motions seeking to establish whether the policy covered damage due to smells in the insureds’ newly purchased home. Akina v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Ins. Co., 2026 U.S Dist. LEXIS 162817 (W. D. Wash. July 22, 2026). Plaintiffs bought a home in May 2024 but never conducted an inspection before purchasing the property. Before moving in, plaintiffs secured a homeowners’ polilcy from State Farm. After moving in, plaintiffs began noticing smells in the house and started suffering from health symptoms. Plaintiffs learned from neighbors that the prior occupants had been witnessed in “drug activity.” Plaintiffs moved out of the house and had testing done. The home tested positive for methamphetamine pollution. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Louisiana Enacts Important Tort Reform Legislation

    May 12, 2026 —
    The Louisiana legislature enacted tort reform legislation in 2025 to address the increasing cost of insurance in Louisiana and to provide some predictability to the Louisiana legal system. While our colleagues, Jenny Michel and Jennifer Kretschmann, have provided an excellent and comprehensive analysis of the legislation in their article entitled “Louisiana State Legislature 2025 Regular Session: Tort Reform - Acts & Vetoed Insurance Bill,” which can be found here, this article examines the anticipated impact of the tort reform legislation on personal injury trials in federal and state courts in Louisiana. The most significant reform involves the institution of a modified defense of contributory negligence, which went into effect on January 1, 2026. Since 1996, Louisiana had operated as a pure comparative fault state; the liability of each party whose fault caused damages was to be allocated among the respective parties based upon their appropriate percentage of fault, regardless of the legal theory of liability asserted against each party. Thus, a plaintiff 55 percent at fault could recover 45 percent of their damages from the liable defendants. The 2025 Tort Reform Amendments now prohibit a plaintiff in a personal injury action from recovering any damages if they are found to be 51 percent or more at fault for their damages. The 55 percent at-fault party in the example above is now prohibited from recovering any damages from any party. Importantly, this new legislation now requires the trial court to instruct the jury that if they find a plaintiff to be more than 50 percent at fault, then the plaintiff will not recover any damages. Reprinted courtesy of Lee M. Peacocke, Lewis Brisbois and Benjamin Perkins, Lewis Brisbois Mr. Peacocke may be contacted at Lee.Peacocke@lewisbrisbois.com Mr. Perkins may be contacted at Benjamin.Perkins@lewisbrisbois.com Read the full story...

    Every High-Tech Building Has Many Lifespans

    August 16, 2026 —
    When I worked as an architect, our team designed a laboratory for fuel research. The facility included a large research hall where various boilers and other devices were tested and analyzed. The setup required extensive floor channeling under the thick concrete floor. We suggested building a modular system that would allow flexibility in the future, when requirements would certainly change. They did not want that because of budget constraints. The high-tech construction trend is spreading. Data centers, semiconductor fabs, battery plants, and life science facilities share one property that sets them apart from ordinary buildings. The technology inside turns over faster than the structure around it. Server generations change every three to five years. Rack densities have risen from 10 or 20 kW to 130 kW and beyond in just a few years. A high-tech facility is really several buildings with different lifespans inside one envelope, and we keep designing them as if they were one. The failure is not that things become obsolete. It is that we never say when each layer is expected to. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    Samuel Alhadeff Represents LGI Homes in Acquisition and Re-Entitlement of Maravilla Estates

    July 06, 2026 —
    Temecula Partner Samuel Alhadeff recently represented LGI Homes in its acquisition and re-entitlement of Maravilla Estates, a 169-lot active adult community located in San Jacinto, California. The acquisition and re-entitlement of the project provide LGI Homes with the opportunity to deliver much-needed age-qualified housing in one of Riverside County's growing residential markets. The community includes a recorded final map and finished lots, as well as future development inventory and planned amenities, positioning the project for continued development and completion. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Balancing the Right to Repair With Evidence Preservation in Construction Defect Litigation

    April 20, 2026 —
    Every major construction project comes with risk, whether it’s a warehouse build, a multifamily development or a major renovation. Parties tend to be aligned when things are proceeding as planned. But when something goes wrong—cracked concrete, water intrusion, systems that don’t perform as expected—those interests can quickly diverge. Property owners are often caught in the middle when construction defects surface. They’re expected to act quickly to limit damage and costs. But they also have legal obligations to preserve evidence and allow potentially responsible parties, such as contractors or designers, to observe testing, demolition and repairs. Additionally, owners often have duties to lenders and investors to fix problems promptly and pursue claims against those responsible. Meanwhile, contractors and other parties have obligations of their own—not to interfere with repairs and not to delay mitigation efforts while investigations are underway. What follows will examine how those competing responsibilities play out in construction defect disputes. Reprinted courtesy of Benton Wheatley & Anna Spicer, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Wilke Fleury Attorneys Recognized by 2026 Northern California Super Lawyers and Rising Stars!

    July 20, 2026 —
    Wilke Fleury is pleased to announce that 18 of the firm’s attorneys have been selected for inclusion on the 2026 Northern California Super Lawyers and Rising Stars lists. The annual Super Lawyers and Rising Stars selections recognize attorneys across a wide range of practice areas. This year’s honorees reflect the depth of Wilke Fleury’s litigation, business, healthcare, employment, bankruptcy, appellate, real estate, construction, and estate planning practices. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Wilke Fleury

    Two Important Points Regarding the Miller Act

    September 15, 2026 —
    A recent Miller Act case, U.S. f/u/b/o Boundless Management Outsourcing Group, LLC v. Endurance Assurance Corp, 2026 WL 2241491 (D. Puerto Rico 2026), confirms two important points when it comes to the Miller Act. In this case, a subcontractor pursued a Miller Act payment bond lawsuit more than one year after its work was finished. The subcontractor also asserted a claim against the federal government. The lawsuit was dismissed. Below are two takeaway points to consider if you are dealing with a Miller Act payment bond lawsuit. First, as it relates the claim against the federal government, the federal district court followed authority that held that the Miller Act does NOT include a waiver of sovereign immunity against the federal government. “[T]he Court does not identify any clear language in the Miller Act expressly waiving the United States or its agencies’ sovereign immunity.” Endurance Assurance Corp., supra at *3. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    EPA, Maryland Sue DC Water Over Massive Potomac River Sewage Spill

    May 14, 2026 —
    The state of Maryland and the federal government have filed separate lawsuits against the District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority (DC Water), both alleging that the agency’s failure to address longstanding deterioration in the Potomac Interceptor contributed to a weeklong release of more than 240 million gallons of raw sewage into the Potomac River this past January. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Jim Parsons, Engineering News-Record
    ENR may be contacted at enr@enr.com