BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    Medical building expert witness Lancaster Pennsylvania mid-rise construction expert witness Lancaster Pennsylvania institutional building expert witness Lancaster Pennsylvania low-income housing expert witness Lancaster Pennsylvania Subterranean parking expert witness Lancaster Pennsylvania townhome construction expert witness Lancaster Pennsylvania parking structure expert witness Lancaster Pennsylvania retail construction expert witness Lancaster Pennsylvania office building expert witness Lancaster Pennsylvania custom home expert witness Lancaster Pennsylvania multi family housing expert witness Lancaster Pennsylvania high-rise construction expert witness Lancaster Pennsylvania custom homes expert witness Lancaster Pennsylvania condominiums expert witness Lancaster Pennsylvania industrial building expert witness Lancaster Pennsylvania tract home expert witness Lancaster Pennsylvania production housing expert witness Lancaster Pennsylvania hospital construction expert witness Lancaster Pennsylvania casino resort expert witness Lancaster Pennsylvania structural steel construction expert witness Lancaster Pennsylvania landscaping construction expert witness Lancaster Pennsylvania condominium expert witness Lancaster Pennsylvania
    Lancaster Pennsylvania architect expert witnessLancaster Pennsylvania construction expert witness public projectsLancaster Pennsylvania forensic architectLancaster Pennsylvania construction project management expert witnessesLancaster Pennsylvania building expertLancaster Pennsylvania fenestration expert witnessLancaster Pennsylvania roofing construction expert
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Lancaster, Pennsylvania

    Pennsylvania Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB 1875 stipulates that “no later than 90 days before filing an action, serve written notice of claim on the contractor. Upon receipt of notice, builder has 15 days to forward the claim to any subcontractor/supplier and 30 days after service of notice to offer to compromise and settle the claim by monetary payment without inspection, propose to inspect the dwelling that is the subject of the claim; or reject the claim. Contractor has 14 days after inspection to provide written notice of intention.”


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Lancaster Pennsylvania

    No state license required. For public works projects, see General Services website.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    York County Builders Assn
    Local # 3972
    540 Greebriar Road
    York, PA 17404

    Lancaster Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Chester & Delaware Co
    Local # 3941
    1502 McDaniel Dr
    West Chester, PA 19380

    Lancaster Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Building Industry Association of Lancaster
    Local # 3936
    204 Butler Ave Ste 200
    Lancaster, PA 17601

    Lancaster Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Building Industry Association of Philadelphia
    Local # 3946
    1735 Market St Ste A432
    Philadelphia, PA 19103

    Lancaster Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Franklin County Builders Association
    Local # 3912
    1102 Sheller Ave Ste C
    Chambersburg, PA 17201

    Lancaster Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Somerset Co Builders Association
    Local # 3958
    PO Box 221
    Berlin, PA 15530

    Lancaster Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Washington Co Builders Association
    Local # 3964
    30 E Beau St Room #321
    Washington, PA 15301

    Lancaster Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Lancaster Pennsylvania


    Everyone Wins When a Foreclosure Sale Generates Excess Proceeds

    Pennsylvania Modular Home Builder Buys Maine Firm

    Florida County Suspends Impact Fees to Spur Development

    Understanding the California Consumer Privacy Act

    Summary Findings of the Fourth National Climate Assessment

    Colorado homebuilders target low-income buyers with bogus "affordable housing" bill

    Welcome to SubTropolis: The Massive Business Complex Buried Under Kansas City

    Order for Appraisal Affirmed After Insureds Comply with Post-Loss Obligations

    Detect and Prevent Construction Fraud

    Florida Supreme Court Adopts Federal Summary Judgment Standard, Substantially Conforming Florida’s Rule 1.510 to Federal Rule 56

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (7/17/24) – Housing Inflation to Remain High, Proptech Investment to Fall and Office Vacancy Rates to Reach Peak in 2025

    Seattle Council May Take a New Look at Micro-Housing

    California Supreme Court Approves of Annual Civility Oath for Attorneys, Rejects Incivility As Basis for Disciplinary Measures

    Harmon Towers to Be Demolished without Being Finished

    World’s Biggest Crane Lifts Huge Steel Ring at U.K. Nuclear Site

    Let’s Get Specific: Rhode Island Court Asserts Jurisdiction Over Out-of-State Manufacturer

    The Five-Step Protocol to Reopening a Business

    Florida Accuses Pool Contractor of Violating Laws

    California Makes Big Changes to the Discovery Act

    An Era of Legends

    Why Should Businesses Seek Legal Help Early On?

    School District Gets Expensive Lesson on Prompt Payment Law. But Did the Court Get it Right?

    Construction Defect Bill a Long Shot in Nevada

    Gone Fishing: Tenant’s Insurer Casts A Line Seeking To Subrogate Against The Landlord

    In a Win for Design Professionals, California Court of Appeals Holds That Relation-Back Doctrine Does Not Apply to Certificate of Merit Law

    California MCLE Seminar at BHA Sacramento July 11th

    Coverage for Named Windstorm Removed by Insured, Terminating Such Coverage

    What is a Personal Injury?

    Arbitration: For Whom the Statute of Limitations Does Not Toll in Pennsylvania

    Colorado Rejects Bill to Shorten Statute of Repose

    Water Intrusion Judged Not Related to Construction

    Architect Named Grand Custom Home Winner for Triangular Design

    Partner John Toohey and Senior Associate Sammy Daboussi Obtain a Complete Defense Verdict for Their Contractor Client!

    Guessing as to your Construction Damages is Not the Best Approach

    Forcible Entry and Detainer Actions: Courts May Not Consider Tenant’s Hardship

    Remote Work Issues to Consider in Light of COVID-19

    Certificates of Merit: Is Your Texas Certificate Sufficient?

    Safety Guidance for the Prevention of the Coronavirus on Construction Sites

    Word of the Day: “Contractor”

    Even Where Fraud and Contract Mix, Be Careful With Timing

    What You Need to Know About CARB’s In-Use Off-Road Diesel Regulations

    When Does it End?

    First Circuit Limits Insurers’ Right to Recoup Defense Costs or Settlement Payments

    Embattled SNC-Lavalin Files Ethics Appeal, Realigns Structure

    Local Government’s Claims on Developer Bonds Dismissed for Failure to Pursue Administrative Remedies

    Three lawyers from Haight were recognized in The Best Lawyers in America© 2020 Edition

    Proving & Defending Lost Profit Damages

    No Friday Night Lights at $60 Million Texas Stadium: Muni Credit

    Shoring of Problem Girders at Salesforce Transit Center Taking Longer than Expected

    NYC Billionaires’ Row Tower Could Need $160M Fix Amid Cracking
    Corporate Profile

    LANCASTER PENNSYLVANIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Lancaster, Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Leveraging from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Lancaster's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Lancaster, Pennsylvania

    Denis Serkin and Michael S. Zicherman Co-Edit/Author Lexology Panoramic: Construction 2027

    August 03, 2026 —
    P&A partners Denis Serkin and Michael S. Zicherman served as co-editors and authors of Lexology’s Panoramic: Construction 2027 – US and Global guide. Formerly Getting the Deal Through, Lexology Panoramic provides members of the construction industry and construction-related legal and business providers with side-by-side comparison of key industry issues in 19 jurisdictions worldwide. Reprinted courtesy of Denis Serkin, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and Michael S. Zicherman, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. Mr. Serkin may be contacted at dserkin@pecklaw.com Mr. Zicherman may be contacted at mzicherman@pecklaw.com Read the full story...

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (4/1/26) – President Trump’s EO Affects Federal Funding, Fannie Mae Accepts Crypto-Backed Mortgages, Private Sector Construction Weakness Offsets Public Sector Gains

    April 08, 2026 —
    In our latest roundup, California to pursue office-to-housing conversions, hoteliers to increase investment in artificial intelligence, private credit exodus to boost commercial real estate capital, and more!
    • President Donald Trump’s executive order to remove regulatory barriers to affordable home construction could affect federal funding for cities and states that don’t follow what the order calls “regulatory best practices,” including faster permitting, fewer green building mandates and relaxed limits on exurban development. (Robyn Griggs Lawrence, Multifamily Dive)
    • California state policymakers have been pursuing policy changes that remove barriers to converting older commercial buildings into housing. (Keith Loria, Construction Dive)
    • Private sector weakness largely offset modest gains in public construction spending, despite data center gains. (Sebastian Obando, Construction Dive)
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Pillsbury's Construction & Real Estate Law Team

    HHMR and Every One of its Partners Recognized by Legal 500 in Denver Elite – Real Estate

    April 20, 2026 —
    Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC is pleased to announce its recognition as a Tier 1 firm in the Denver Elite rankings for Real Estate, a category that includes construction law and construction litigation, by The Legal 500. In addition, each of the firm’s partners has been individually recognized in the same rankings. The firm’s individual recognitions include: Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David McLain, Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC
    Mr. McLain may be contacted at mclain@hhmrlaw.com

    Ahlers Cressman & Sleight named one of the Top 50 Construction Law Firms

    August 11, 2026 —
    Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLC is pleased to announce its fifth consecutive year of recognition by Construction Executive as one of The Top 50 Construction Law Firms. Since its first publication in 2003, Construction Executive magazine has served as the leading source for news, market developments, and business issues impacting the construction industry. Construction Executive established the rankings by asking over 600 U.S. construction law firms to complete a survey. Constructive Executive’s data collection includes: 2025 revenues from the firm’s construction practice; the number of attorneys in the firm’s construction practice; the percentage of the firm’s total revenues derived from its construction practice; the number of states in which the firm is licensed to practice; the year in which the construction practice was established; and the number of construction industry clients served during the fiscal year 2025. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLC

    It’s More Than a Feeling: Proving Construction Damages and When You Should Hire an Expert to Help Do It

    July 27, 2026 —
    When you win a bid, you might be singing that everything is going your way. Then something goes wrong. The owner hands you defective plans, sits on RFI responses or other critical information, or otherwise upends the work. The costs pile up through no fault of your own. You feel wronged, and you want to be made whole. But a feeling that you got burned is not enough. To recover, that feeling has to become something the law recognizes as damages. So, what are damages, and how do you prove them? At bottom, contract damages are the money that puts the non-breaching party (i.e., the party that doesn’t breach the contract) in the position it would have occupied had the contract been performed. Reprinted courtesy of Bradley E. Sands, Jones Walker LLP and Katie McCracken, Summer Associate, University of Georgia School of Law Read the full story...
    Mr. Sands may be contacted at bsands@joneswalker.com

    U.S. Supreme Court Decision May Negate State Law Requirement to File a Certificate of Merit with the Complaint in a Federal Action Against a Design Professional

    April 27, 2026 —
    To deter frivolous and unfounded claims against design professionals, states throughout the country have enacted statutes which generally require litigants to furnish a formal certification of merit (“COM”) from a qualified expert or face potential dismissal of their lawsuit. These COM statutes can impose a significant front-end burden on claimants who must pay an expert to review project records, interview the project team, and prepare a formal report before the lawsuit can be filed—often regardless of the amount in controversy. However, in light of a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision in a medical malpractice case, most, if not all of these statutes, may no longer be enforceable in federal court. This article examines the recent decision in Berk v. Choy, 146 S. Ct. 546 (2026), the decisions thus far which have applied Berk to invalidate COM statutes, and other categories of statutes applicable to the construction industry which may face a similar fate. The U.S. Supreme Court Decision (Berk v. Choy) In Berk, the plaintiff, Harold Berk, sued a doctor for medical malpractice under Delaware law in Delaware federal court. 146 S. Ct. at 551. Under Del. Code, Tit. 18, § 6853(a)(1), an affidavit of merit (like a COM) must accompany a complaint alleging medical malpractice. Id. Berk failed to include an affidavit of merit with his complaint. Id. at 552. Applying Delaware state law, the federal court dismissed Berk’s medical malpractice claim. Berk appealed to the Third Circuit, arguing that the affidavit of merit required by § 6853(a)(1) is unenforceable in federal court because it is more onerous than the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Third Circuit affirmed the District Court’s ruling, finding § 6853(a)(1) enforceable in federal court. Reprinted courtesy of Christopher Olsen, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and Phillip Boldt, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. Mr. Olsen may be contacted at colsen@pecklaw.com Mr. Boldt may be contacted at pboldt@pecklaw.com Read the full story...

    Insurance Coverage and Bad Faith Practice Earns Prestigious Band One Ranking in the Chambers USA 2026 Guide

    June 22, 2026 —
    White and Williams LLP's Insurance Coverage and Bad Faith Practice Group is pleased to share that it has received a Band One ranking in the Chambers USA 2026 Guide for Insurance, Pennsylvania. Additionally, Patricia B. Santelle, Chair Emeritus, Randy Maniloff, Partner, and Robert Walsh, Partner have all been individually ranked on the Chambers USA 2026 Guide in Insurance in Pennsylvania. The Insurance Coverage and Bad Faith Practice's consistent focus on their clients and handling of complex claims were just two of the attributes contributing to their elite Band One ranking, after 11 years on the Chambers USA list. When asked about their experience working with White and Williams’ Pennsylvania Insurance Practice, one client stated, “What distinguishes White and Williams is the high level of service and accountability. The team is responsive, organized and reliable, which allows our internal teams to move quickly and make informed decisions with confidence.” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of White and Williams LLP

    Powering Data Centers in a Moving Regulatory Landscape: Positioning Deals Before FERC’s Next Move

    April 27, 2026 —
    The explosive growth of data‑center load—driven by artificial intelligence, cloud computing and the expansion of digital infrastructure across industries—has forced U.S. energy regulators into unfamiliar territory. Nowhere is this more evident than at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), which is actively considering how large, concentrated loads can be powered without compromising grid reliability or shifting costs to other customers. FERC has not yet issued a standalone rulemaking on data centers. But make no mistake, the regulatory framework is quietly and deliberately being built. For developers, hyperscalers, utilities and investors, the period before FERC finalizes its next round of decisions represents the critical window to crystallize advocacy and structure transactions in ways that anticipate regulatory change. Reprinted courtesy of Stephen J. Humes, Pillsbury, Alicia M. McKnight, Pillsbury and Andrew H. Jacobs, Pillsbury Mr. Humes may be contacted at stephen.humes@pillsburylaw.com Ms. McKnight may be contacted at alicia.mcknight@pillsburylaw.com Mr. Jacobs may be contacted at andrew.jacobs@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...