BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    Medical building expert witness Jersey Mills Pennsylvania housing expert witness Jersey Mills Pennsylvania office building expert witness Jersey Mills Pennsylvania casino resort expert witness Jersey Mills Pennsylvania townhome construction expert witness Jersey Mills Pennsylvania condominium expert witness Jersey Mills Pennsylvania hospital construction expert witness Jersey Mills Pennsylvania industrial building expert witness Jersey Mills Pennsylvania parking structure expert witness Jersey Mills Pennsylvania condominiums expert witness Jersey Mills Pennsylvania custom home expert witness Jersey Mills Pennsylvania landscaping construction expert witness Jersey Mills Pennsylvania multi family housing expert witness Jersey Mills Pennsylvania high-rise construction expert witness Jersey Mills Pennsylvania concrete tilt-up expert witness Jersey Mills Pennsylvania production housing expert witness Jersey Mills Pennsylvania Subterranean parking expert witness Jersey Mills Pennsylvania tract home expert witness Jersey Mills Pennsylvania institutional building expert witness Jersey Mills Pennsylvania retail construction expert witness Jersey Mills Pennsylvania custom homes expert witness Jersey Mills Pennsylvania mid-rise construction expert witness Jersey Mills Pennsylvania
    Jersey Mills Pennsylvania window expert witnessJersey Mills Pennsylvania architecture expert witnessJersey Mills Pennsylvania fenestration expert witnessJersey Mills Pennsylvania construction safety expertJersey Mills Pennsylvania contractor expert witnessJersey Mills Pennsylvania consulting general contractorJersey Mills Pennsylvania engineering consultant
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Jersey Mills, Pennsylvania

    Pennsylvania Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB 1875 stipulates that “no later than 90 days before filing an action, serve written notice of claim on the contractor. Upon receipt of notice, builder has 15 days to forward the claim to any subcontractor/supplier and 30 days after service of notice to offer to compromise and settle the claim by monetary payment without inspection, propose to inspect the dwelling that is the subject of the claim; or reject the claim. Contractor has 14 days after inspection to provide written notice of intention.”


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Jersey Mills Pennsylvania

    No state license required. For public works projects, see General Services website.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Pike County Builders Association
    Local # 3953
    209 E Harford St
    Milford, PA 18337

    Jersey Mills Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Mercer Co Builders Association
    Local # 3942
    PO Box 488
    Fredonia, PA 16124
    Jersey Mills Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Lackawanna Home Builders Association
    Local # 3902
    116 N. Washington Ave.
    Scranton, PA 18503

    Jersey Mills Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Wayne County Builders Assoc
    Local # 3965
    PO Box 378
    Hawley, PA 18428

    Jersey Mills Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Building Industry Association of Northeastern PA
    Local # 3932
    411 Main St
    Kingston, PA 18704

    Jersey Mills Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    West Branch-Susquehanna Builders Association
    Local # 3968
    1610 Whitman Street
    Williamsport, PA 17701

    Jersey Mills Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Tri-County Builders Association
    Local # 3962
    5183 Georgetown Rd
    Franklin, PA 16323
    Jersey Mills Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Jersey Mills Pennsylvania


    White and Williams Ranked in Top Tiers of "Best Law Firms"

    Pending Home Sales in U.S. Increase Less Than Forecast

    Heat Exposure Safety and Risk Factors

    Florida Federal Court to Examine Issues of Alleged Arbitrator Conflicts of Interests in Panama Canal Case

    Bill Taylor Co-Authors Chapter in Pennsylvania Construction Law Book

    Contractors: Revisit your Force Majeure Provisions to Account for Hurricanes

    Fifth Circuit Concludes Government’s CAA Legal Claims are Time-Barred But Injunctive-Relief Claims are Not

    Architect Plans to 3D-Print a Two-Story House

    Business Risk Exclusion Dooms Coverage for Construction Defect Claim

    Committeewoman Requests Refund on Attorney Fees after Failed Legal Efforts

    Prison Contractors Did Not Follow the Law

    Hunton Andrews Kurth Promotes Insurance Recovery Lawyer Andrea (Andi) DeField to Partner

    Louisiana State Legislature 2025 Regular Session: Tort Reform - Acts & Vetoed Insurance Bill

    California Court of Appeal Affirms Trial Court’s Denial of anti-SLAPP Motion in Dispute Over Construction of Church Facilities

    Bert L. Howe & Associates Celebrates 21-Year Success Story

    Negligence Per Se Claim Based Upon Failure to Pay Benefits Fails

    Court Affirms Summary Adjudication of Bad Faith Claim Where Expert Opinions Raised a Genuine Dispute

    10 Haight Lawyers Recognized in Best Lawyers in America© 2022 and The Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch 2022

    The California Legislature Passes SB 496 Limiting Design Professional Defense and Indemnity Obligations

    Florida Condo Collapse Shows Town’s Rich, Middle-Class Divide

    Illinois Non-Profit Sues over Defective Roof

    Claim Preclusion: The Doctrine Everyone Thinks They Know But No One Really Knows What it Means in Practice

    Ohio Supreme Court Case to Decide Whether or Not to Expand Insurance Coverage Under GC’s CGL Insurance Policies

    Vacation Rentals: Liability of the Owner for Injury Suffered by the Renter

    Haight’s Kristian Moriarty Selected for Super Lawyers’ 2021 Southern California Rising Stars

    Want to Stay Up on Your Mechanic’s Lien Deadlines? Write a Letter or Two

    Structural Problems May Cause Year-Long Delay Opening New Orleans School

    Illinois Appellate Court Finds That Damages in Excess of Policy Limits Do Not Trigger Right to Independent Counsel

    Builder Must Respond To Homeowner’s Notice Of Claim Within 14 Days Even If Construction Defect Claim Is Not Alleged With The “Reasonable Detail”

    Boston Team Obtains Complete Defense Verdict for Engineering Firm in Professional Liability Matter

    Few Homes Available to Reno Buyers, Plenty of Commercial Properties

    Some Construction Contract Basics- Necessities and Pitfalls

    Construction Employment Rises in Half of the States

    Bribe Charges Take Toll on NY Contractor

    Effectively Managing Project Closeout: It Ends Where It Begins

    20 Years of BHA at West Coast Casualty's CD Seminar: Chronicling BHA's Innovative Exhibits

    Construction Defects and Second Buyers in Pennsylvania

    Arizona Supreme Court Clarifies Area Variance Standard; Property Owners May Obtain an Area Variance When Special Circumstances Existed at Purchase

    A Closer Look at an HOA Board Member’s Duty to Homeowners

    WSHB Secures Victory in Construction Defect Case: Contractor Wins Bench Trial

    Texas Considers a Quartet of Construction Bills

    Gillotti v. Stewart (2017) 2017 WL 1488711 Rejects Liberty Mutual, Holding Once Again that the Right to Repair Act is the Exclusive Remedy for Construction Defect Claims

    The COVID-19 Impact: Navigating the Legal Landscape’s New Normal

    Is Arbitration Final and Binding?

    Noncompete Agreements: How to Navigate the Changing Landscape

    Los Angeles Could Be Devastated by the Next Big Earthquake

    Third Circuit Follows Pennsylvania Law - Damage Caused by Faulty Workmanship Does Not Arise from an Occurrence

    No Coverage for Construction Defects Under Arkansas Law

    Massachusetts Couple Seek to Recuse Judge in Construction Defect Case

    Seven Coats Rose Attorneys Named to Texas Rising Stars List
    Corporate Profile

    JERSEY MILLS PENNSYLVANIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Jersey Mills, Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Drawing from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Jersey Mills' most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Jersey Mills, Pennsylvania

    Andrew Gendron Authors D.C., Maryland Damages Compendium Articles for Defense Counsel Journal’s “Damages Compendium – East of the Mississippi”

    August 24, 2026 —
    Baltimore Partner Andrew Gendron recently penned the District of Columbia (D.C.) and Maryland damages compendium articles for the Defense Counsel Journal’s “Damages Compendium – East of the Mississippi,” which appears in the publication’s June 2026 issue. Mr. Gendron’s articles discuss evolving standards governing various types of damages in commercial litigation across jurisdictions in D.C. and Maryland. In the compendium articles, Mr. Gendron describes the circumstances under which parties may recover various types of damages, citing to the relevant portions of the D.C. Code and Annotated Code of Maryland, as well as to applicable case law. Specifically, he discusses compensatory, consequential, incidental, punitive, liquidated, reliance, and unjust enrichment damages. In doing so, Mr. Gendron details the types of cases in which parties may recover these damages and under what circumstances. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Celebrating Freedom: The Overlooked Freedom to Contract in Commercial Insurance

    July 20, 2026 —
    Happy 4th and 250 years of freedom . . . to contract! Many policyholders assume insurance policies are “standard” and must be accepted as-is. That assumption is often wrong—and dangerously limiting. Unlike many consumer insurance markets, the commercial insurance realm preserves a robust “freedom to contract,” allowing sophisticated policyholders to negotiate terms, exclusions, definitions, and limits before a policy is even issued. Particularly in recent years, high-profile disputes over cyber coverage, business interruption, and war/cyber exclusions have shown not just what happens when coverage is denied, but what could have been done up front to avoid those fights. This post highlights the power policyholders still hold in the negotiation process and illustrates, with concrete examples from recent media-covered disputes, how that freedom can be strategically used. Reprinted courtesy of Michael S. Levine, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP and Andrea DeField, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP Mr. Levine may be contacted at mlevine@hunton.com Ms. DeField may be contacted at adefield@hunton.com Read the full story...

    Nomos LLP Partner Garret Murai Recognized by Super Lawyers

    July 13, 2026 —
    Nomos LLP Partner Garret Murai has been recognized as a 2026 Northern California Super Lawyer honoree in the area of Construction Litigation. This is the thirteenth consecutive year he has been recognized by Super Lawyers. Super Lawyers, an annual listing of outstanding lawyers from more than 70 practice areas who have attained a high degree of peer recognition and personal achievement, is limited to no more than five percent (5%) of lawyers in a state who are selected through a multiphase process that includes a statewide survey of lawyers, independent research evaluation and peer reviews by practice area. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Garret D. Murai, Nomos LLP
    Mr. Murai may be contacted at gmurai@nomosllp.com

    Southwest Super Lawyers Recognizes 50 Snell & Wilmer Attorneys in 2026 Rankings

    June 15, 2026 —
    PHOENIX (April 22, 2026) – Snell & Wilmer is pleased to announce that 50 attorneys in the Phoenix and Tucson offices have been selected for inclusion in the 2026 Southwest Super Lawyers publication. Of those 50, four were recognized for the first time and 24 were recognized as Southwest Rising Stars. Super Lawyers is a listing of lawyers from more than 70 practice areas who have attained a high degree of peer recognition and professional achievement. The selection process is multi-phased and includes independent research, peer nominations, and peer evaluations. Super Lawyers was first published in 1991 by Law & Politics and was acquired by Thomson Reuters, Legal in February 2010. Thomson Reuters is a leading source of information for businesses and professionals. The below Snell & Wilmer attorneys have been selected for inclusion in the 2026 Southwest Super Lawyers rankings. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Snell & Wilmer

    The Grenfell & Champlain Towers: Risk Management Considerations in the Wake of Catastrophic Loss — A UK/US Comparison

    June 02, 2026 —
    1. Introduction As part of the multinational collaborative relationship between Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. and Fenchurch Law, we continually find ourselves in conversations about the sometimes subtle but sometimes drastic differences between risk management and coverage considerations from one country to the next. These differences are often highlighted by the fallout from large catastrophic losses that are widely publicized and illuminate sometimes widespread risks and perils that many others may be facing in the coming years. The response of governments and their subdivisions to the needs of victims and/or commercial parties, and insurance markets’ evaluation of and reactions to catastrophic losses vary widely from country to country and jurisdiction. In this article, we discuss these responses and reactions in the cases of the Grenfell Tower Fire in London, England, and the Champlain Tower collapse in Surfside, Florida, within the United States. These two widely publicized losses involved different risk management and insurance considerations based on where they occurred. They also saw substantially different government responses and raised varied questions about what the next steps are for their respective commercial and insurance markets. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Eric M. Clarkson, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C.
    Mr. Clarkson may be contacted at EClarkson@sdvlaw.com

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (3/11/25) – An AI Inflection Point for Hotels, Investor Pivot in Build-to-Rent and Looming Legislation for Single-Family Investors

    March 24, 2026 —
    In our latest roundup, lodging demand for World Cup brings growth, commercial property management firms use of AI becomes firmer, construction industry shows slow start to the year, and more! Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Pillsbury's Construction & Real Estate Law Team

    Predict Risk, Not Incidents: A New Analytics Framework for Your Construction Safety Data

    August 03, 2026 —
    Behind every “zero-incidents” company report, hidden hazards may already be accumulating—risks that could become serious injuries tomorrow. The question every executive should be asking is not, “Did anything go wrong last month?” It is: “Where is risk building on my projects right now?” Most construction organizations cannot answer that question. Not because the data does not exist—it does. Every active project generates daily inspection findings, labor records, near-miss reports and audit results. The problem is that standard safety systems collect this data and then report it in ways that make it operationally useless for prevention. They describe the past. They predict nothing. The predictive safety analytics framework (PSAF) is a practical, deployable system developed from years of applying data science to large-scale construction portfolio operations that takes the safety data construction organizations already collect and transforms it into a forward-looking risk signal. The result? A single weekly score that tells executives where risk is concentrating across their portfolio before anyone gets hurt. Reprinted courtesy of Tabrez Zahoor, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Idaho Contractor Registration: Lessons from the Ward v. Bishop Decision

    April 20, 2026 —
    The Idaho Supreme Court’s recent decision in Ward v. Bishop Constr., Ltd. Liab. Co., No. 51118, 2025 Ida. LEXIS 143 (Dec. 31, 2025) offers valuable guidance for contractors and construction attorneys navigating the Idaho Contractor Registration Act (ICRA). The December 2025 ruling clarifies critical questions about when and how defendants may raise contractor registration defenses, the weight of pretrial stipulations, and the consequences of procedural missteps in construction litigation. This article examines the key takeaways from the decision and offers practical actions for consideration by those working in Idaho’s construction industry. The Facts Behind the Dispute The case arose from a long-standing working relationship between cousins Joel Ward and Ren Bishop dating to the 1990s. Ward performed general construction work for Bishop Construction, LLC, including building, plumbing, electrical, framing, roofing, and siding work on projects in Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming. Bishop agreed to pay Ward $10 per hour, later increased to $12 per hour, plus one-way travel expenses. Between 2017 and 2019, Ward worked over 1,100 hours but was never paid, totaling $12,443.54 in claimed damages. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tara Martens Miller, Snell & Wilmer
    Ms. Miller may be contacted at tmmiller@swlaw.com