BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    institutional building expert witness Hegins Pennsylvania Medical building expert witness Hegins Pennsylvania office building expert witness Hegins Pennsylvania condominium expert witness Hegins Pennsylvania custom homes expert witness Hegins Pennsylvania low-income housing expert witness Hegins Pennsylvania parking structure expert witness Hegins Pennsylvania industrial building expert witness Hegins Pennsylvania townhome construction expert witness Hegins Pennsylvania condominiums expert witness Hegins Pennsylvania hospital construction expert witness Hegins Pennsylvania Subterranean parking expert witness Hegins Pennsylvania landscaping construction expert witness Hegins Pennsylvania high-rise construction expert witness Hegins Pennsylvania custom home expert witness Hegins Pennsylvania retail construction expert witness Hegins Pennsylvania production housing expert witness Hegins Pennsylvania mid-rise construction expert witness Hegins Pennsylvania casino resort expert witness Hegins Pennsylvania tract home expert witness Hegins Pennsylvania structural steel construction expert witness Hegins Pennsylvania multi family housing expert witness Hegins Pennsylvania
    Hegins Pennsylvania reconstruction expert witnessHegins Pennsylvania forensic architectHegins Pennsylvania expert witnesses fenestrationHegins Pennsylvania expert witness roofingHegins Pennsylvania slope failure expert witnessHegins Pennsylvania consulting architect expert witnessHegins Pennsylvania construction project management expert witnesses
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Hegins, Pennsylvania

    Pennsylvania Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB 1875 stipulates that “no later than 90 days before filing an action, serve written notice of claim on the contractor. Upon receipt of notice, builder has 15 days to forward the claim to any subcontractor/supplier and 30 days after service of notice to offer to compromise and settle the claim by monetary payment without inspection, propose to inspect the dwelling that is the subject of the claim; or reject the claim. Contractor has 14 days after inspection to provide written notice of intention.”


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Hegins Pennsylvania

    No state license required. For public works projects, see General Services website.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Indiana-Armstrong Builders Association
    Local # 3914
    1380 Route 286 Highway East Suite 502
    Indiana, PA 15701

    Hegins Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Lehigh Valley Builders Association
    Local # 3904
    1524 W Linden St
    Allentown, PA 18102

    Hegins Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Schuylkill Builders Assn
    Local # 3954
    1036 Schylkill Mountain Rd
    Schuylkill Haven, PA 17972

    Hegins Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Mifflin-Juniata Chapter
    Local # 3926
    5 Oak Drive
    Thompsontown, PA 17094

    Hegins Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Huntingdon Co Builders Association
    Local # 3917
    PO Box 399
    Huntingdon, PA 16652

    Hegins Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Carbon Bldrs Association
    Local # 3922
    PO Box 218 490 Ore Street
    Bowmanstown, PA 18030

    Hegins Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Builders Association of Central PA
    Local # 3952
    2038 Sandy Drive Ste 100
    State College, PA 16803

    Hegins Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Hegins Pennsylvania


    Kahana Feld Obtains Favorable Result in High-Exposure NY Premises Liability Case

    Agent Not Liable for Loss Given Insured’s Vague Instructions for Coverage

    Comparative Breach of Contract – The New Benefit of the Bargain in Construction?

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (7/23/25) – Builders Look for Startups, AI Transforms Real Estate and Interest Rates Stall Construction Momentum

    PAGA Right of Action Not Applicable to Construction Workers Under Collective Bargaining Agreement

    Construction Defects Uncertain Role in Coverage in Pennsylvania

    California Supreme Court Holds that Design Immunity Does Not Protect a Public Entity for Failure to Warn of Dangerous Conditions

    Mega-Consulate Ties U.S. to Convicted Billionaire in Nigeria

    Best Lawyers® Recognizes 29 White and Williams Lawyers

    An Era of Legends

    A Court-Side Seat: Flint Failures, Missed Deadlines, Toad Work and a Game of Chicken

    Foreclosure Deficiency: Construction Loan vs. Home Improvement Loan

    New York Court Finds Insurers Cannot Recover Defense Costs Where No Duty to Indemnify

    Avoid Delay or Get Ready to Pay: The Risks of “Time-Is-of-The-Essence” Clauses

    In Massachusetts, the Statute of Repose Applies to Consumer Protection Claims Against Building Contractors

    The Great Fallacy: If Builders Would Just Build It Right There Would Be No Construction Defect Litigation

    Perovskite: The Super Solar Cells

    Library to Open with Roof Defect Lawsuit Pending

    Iowa Apartment Complex Owners Awarded Millions for Building Defects

    White House Seeks $310M To Fix Critical San Diego Wastewater Plant

    Federal District Court Issues Preliminary Injunction Against Implementation of the Fair Pay and Safe Workplaces Final Rule

    Brian Newberry Accepted into ABOTA

    Contractor’s Coverage For Additional Insured Established by Unilateral Contract

    From Both Sides Now: Looking at Contracts Through a Post-Pandemic Lens

    More Details Emerge in Fatal Charlotte, NC, Scaffold Collapse

    Claims for Bad Faith and Punitive Damages Survive Insurer's Motion for Summary Judgment

    Is There Direct Physical Loss Under A Property Policy When COVID-19 is Present?

    One Shot to Get It Right: Navigating the COVID-19 Vaccine in the Workplace

    Be Mindful Accepting Payment When Amounts Owed Are In Dispute

    As Laura Wreaks Havoc Along The Gulf, Is Your Insurance Ready to Respond?

    Enforceability of Contract Provisions Extending Liquidated Damages Beyond Substantial Completion

    OSHA COVID-19 Vaccination and Testing ETS Unveiled

    Builder Pipeline in U.S. at Eight-Year High: Under the Hood

    Construction Robots 2023

    LAX Runway Lawsuit a Year Too Late?

    The Anatomy of a Construction Dispute- The Claim

    Showdown Over Landmark Housing Law Looms at U.S. Supreme Court

    Real Estate & Construction News Round-Up (06/29/22)

    Motion to Strike Insureds' Experts Denied, Unfair Claim Settlement Claims Survive Summary Judgment

    Homebuyers Get Break as Loan Rates Defy Fed Tapering: Mortgages

    Did You Really Accept That Bid? – How Contractors Can Avoid Post-Acceptance Bid Disputes Over Contract Terms

    Contractors: Revisit your Force Majeure Provisions to Account for Hurricanes

    Revel Closing Shows Gambling Is No Sure Thing for Renewal

    What is the True Value of Rooftop Solar Panels?

    Manhattan Condo Lists for Record $150 Million

    Application of Set-Off When a Defendant Settles in Multiparty Construction Dispute

    Why and When Construction Robotics Makes Sense

    Plehat Brings Natural Environments into Design Tools

    VF Law Strengthens Litigation Practice with Experienced Litigation Attorney Andre Egle in the Seattle Office

    The Firm Turns 16!
    ty Claims for Design Builders

    Weslaco, Texas Investigating Possible Fraudulent Contractor Invoices

    Remodel Gets Pricey for Town

    Digitalizing the Construction Site – Interview with Tenderfield’s Jason Kamha

    Cracked Girders Trigger Scrutiny of Salesforce Transit Center's Entire Structure

    Living With a Millennial. Or Grandma.

    Building in the Age of Technology: Improving Profitability and Jobsite Safety

    Bremer Whyte Brown & O’Meara, LLP is Proud to Announce Jeannette Garcia Has Been Elected as Secretary of the Hispanic Bar Association of Orange County!

    Bad Faith Claim Dismissed as Insurer’s Actions Found Reasonable

    New Jersey/New York “Occurrence”

    MDL for Claims Against Manufacturers and Distributors of PFAS-Containing AFFFs Focuses Attention on Key Issues

    Colorado’s Abbreviated Legislative Session Offers Builders a Reprieve

    Bad Faith and a Partial Summary Judgment in Seattle Construction Defect Case

    Mandatory Energy Benchmarking is On Its Way

    California’s Right To Repair Act Is The Sole Remedy For Damages For Construction Defects In New Residential Construction

    U.S. Construction Spending Rose in 2017 by Least in Six Years

    Liability policy covers negligent construction: GA high court

    What You Need to Know About Additional Insured Endorsements

    Insurers' Motion to Void Coverage for Failure to Attend EUO Denied

    Governmental Immunity Waived for Independent Contractor - Lopez v. City of Grand Junction

    The AI Knows Too Much: When Employees Feed Trade Secrets into Generative AI Tools

    Revised Federal Rule Regarding Class-Wide Settlements
    Corporate Profile

    HEGINS PENNSYLVANIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Hegins, Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Drawing from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Hegins' most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Hegins, Pennsylvania

    GRSM Trial Team Holds Alameda County Asbestos Verdict to $900,000 Against $50 Million Demand

    July 27, 2026 —
    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani Partners John Katerndahl and Vincent Gunter recently obtained an outstanding trial result for a manufacturer of asbestos-containing electrical cable, holding a jury verdict to $900,000 against a $50 million demand following an eight-week trial in Alameda County Superior Court, which is among the most challenging asbestos venues in the country. The GRSM team also included Associate Brandon Sanchez, on-site trial Paralegal Laura Vitanova, and Paralegal Kerrie Lease. The plaintiffs, the surviving spouse and four children of a former painter who died of mesothelioma, alleged that the decedent was exposed to asbestos from the company’s electrical cable during construction of a California nuclear power facility. GRSM’s client was the sole remaining defendant at trial. The plaintiffs asked the jury for $50 million and called 15 witnesses across their case-in-chief and rebuttal. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    The Most Expensive Signature to Not Get: Why Change Orders Matter

    August 16, 2026 —
    George Bernard Shaw has a quote we use a lot in my family: “The single biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place.” This is pertinent to contractors and homeowners alike because the cost of failing to get proper signatures on documents like construction contracts, and particularly, change orders, is heavy. Both contractors and homeowners are in the same boat as far as wanting to complete a job as swiftly as possible: contractors go on to their next job and homeowners can return to peace in their home. This is prime territory for either party to suggest the work be completed today and the contract or change order executed tomorrow, or even later. However, without a contract, there is no memorialization of the communication between the parties, which can lead to confusion and missed expectations on both sides. Construction plans are rarely as neat and tidy as they originally seem to be. A contractor may uncover unforeseen conditions, an owner may request additional work or changes that require additional work, or weather interferes with project schedules or the work itself. Unfortunately, the signature that never gets collected can become one of the most expensive omissions on a project – for both sides. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Kathryne E. Baldwin, Wilke Fleury
    Ms. Baldwin may be contacted at kbaldwin@wilkefleury.com

    Contractor Entitled to Defense Under Subcontractor’s Policy

    March 10, 2026 —
    The appellate court affirmed the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to the contractor’s insurer finding that the sumcontractor’s insurer had a duty to defend the contractor. Navigators Specialty Ins. Co. v. TBR Construction, LLC, et al., 2025 Ill. App. Unpub. LEXIS 2177 (Ill. Ct. App. Dec. 3, 2025). Greenscape Homes, LLC was the general contractor for a residential development. Greenscape hired TBR Construction, LLC as a carpentry-framing subcontractor pursuant to a “Trade Contractor Agreement.” The Trade Agreement required TBR to name Greenscape as an additional insured. TBR was insured by Utica. Greenscape was insured by Navigators. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Lost in Translation: AEC Tech’s Missing Role

    May 12, 2026 —
    I once visited a construction site where the contractor’s headquarters had commissioned a tech company to build an on-site quality-inspection application. The developer had admitted to the site engineer that they had never set foot on a construction site before. The engineer showed me what he was actually using: his own phone camera and an Excel sheet. The new app did not map to how work actually happened on site. This is not an isolated story. The vendor builds something technically coherent but operationally disconnected. The client, somewhere up the chain, had fallen in love with the idea of the solution before anyone had built an honest business case for it. The result is a tool that gets demonstrated at a board meeting but isn’t used in the field. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    Newark Team Obtains Appellate Ruling Affirming Summary Judgment for Lawyer and Firm in Professional Negligence Lawsuit

    April 14, 2026 —
    Newark Partner Meredith Kaplan Stoma and Associate Anthony Doss recently secured a decision from the New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division, affirming summary judgment for their clients, a lawyer and her firm, in a lawsuit alleging professional negligence in connection with the administration of a commercial loan. The circumstances giving rise to the lawsuit date back to September 2020, when the plaintiff was approached by members of a real estate investment company regarding a short-term loan opportunity whereby he would loan the company $200,000. The company provided the plaintiff with a “bridge loan package,” which stated that the requested funds would be held in the escrow account of their counsel and her firm (Lewis Brisbois’ clients), and returned to him with interest within six months once the company was “capitalized” by a senior lender. The company subsequently prepared two notes, each for $100,000, in connection with the agreement. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Jonathan Aihie Named to The National Bar Association’s “Top 40 Under 40” List

    August 03, 2026 —
    Fort Lauderdale Partner Jonathan Aihie was recently named to The National Bar Association (NBA) “Top 40 Under 40” list. The NBA “Top 40 Under 40” recognizes the nation's top lawyers under the age of 40 who demonstrate professional excellence, leadership, and commitment to the community. Recipients represent a broad cross-section of the legal profession, including private practice, government, academia, the judiciary, corporate counsel, and public service. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    HHMR Honored as a 2026 Denver Business Journal Best Places to Work Recipient

    March 10, 2026 —
    We are pleased to share that Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell has been named a 2026 Denver Business Journal Best Places to Work honoree, a recognition grounded entirely in direct feedback from our own team members. The Denver Business Journal Best Places to Work program, in partnership with Quantum Workplace, ranks organizations based on anonymous employee engagement survey results that measure culture, leadership, communication, trust, team dynamics, and satisfaction. This year’s list includes 65 companies across the Denver metropolitan area, judged by the people who know these workplaces best: their employees. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David McLain, Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell
    Mr. McLain may be contacted at mclain@hhmrlaw.com

    Ninth Circuit Affirms District Court’s Finding of No Coverage for Interior Leak

    March 24, 2026 —
    Applying California law, the Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court’s finding that water damage caused by a leaking pipe over time was not covered under the insured’s homeowners’ policy. Mojica v. State Farm General Ins. Co., 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 32405 (9th Cir. Dec. 11, 2025). A small hole, slightly larger than a pen tip in size, developed in a pressurized hot water pipe. The resulting leak lasted for nearly six days and released enough water to saturate and ruin all the subflooring and flooring in the insureds’ home. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com