BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    landscaping construction expert witness Garland Pennsylvania Medical building expert witness Garland Pennsylvania multi family housing expert witness Garland Pennsylvania mid-rise construction expert witness Garland Pennsylvania casino resort expert witness Garland Pennsylvania condominium expert witness Garland Pennsylvania tract home expert witness Garland Pennsylvania concrete tilt-up expert witness Garland Pennsylvania industrial building expert witness Garland Pennsylvania institutional building expert witness Garland Pennsylvania office building expert witness Garland Pennsylvania structural steel construction expert witness Garland Pennsylvania hospital construction expert witness Garland Pennsylvania housing expert witness Garland Pennsylvania custom home expert witness Garland Pennsylvania condominiums expert witness Garland Pennsylvania custom homes expert witness Garland Pennsylvania retail construction expert witness Garland Pennsylvania production housing expert witness Garland Pennsylvania Subterranean parking expert witness Garland Pennsylvania high-rise construction expert witness Garland Pennsylvania townhome construction expert witness Garland Pennsylvania
    Garland Pennsylvania roofing and waterproofing expert witnessGarland Pennsylvania construction project management expert witnessGarland Pennsylvania construction defect expert witnessGarland Pennsylvania consulting architect expert witnessGarland Pennsylvania reconstruction expert witnessGarland Pennsylvania construction code expert witnessGarland Pennsylvania hospital construction expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Garland, Pennsylvania

    Pennsylvania Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB 1875 stipulates that “no later than 90 days before filing an action, serve written notice of claim on the contractor. Upon receipt of notice, builder has 15 days to forward the claim to any subcontractor/supplier and 30 days after service of notice to offer to compromise and settle the claim by monetary payment without inspection, propose to inspect the dwelling that is the subject of the claim; or reject the claim. Contractor has 14 days after inspection to provide written notice of intention.”


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Garland Pennsylvania

    No state license required. For public works projects, see General Services website.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Bradford County Chapter
    Local # 3930
    PO Box 213
    Monroeton, PA 18832
    Garland Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Builders Association of Northwestern PA
    Local # 3916
    PO BOX 9549
    Erie, PA 16506

    Garland Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Tri-County Builders Association
    Local # 3962
    5183 Georgetown Rd
    Franklin, PA 16323
    Garland Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Wayne County Builders Assoc
    Local # 3965
    PO Box 378
    Hawley, PA 18428

    Garland Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Lackawanna Home Builders Association
    Local # 3902
    116 N. Washington Ave.
    Scranton, PA 18503

    Garland Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Pike County Builders Association
    Local # 3953
    209 E Harford St
    Milford, PA 18337

    Garland Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Mercer Co Builders Association
    Local # 3942
    PO Box 488
    Fredonia, PA 16124
    Garland Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Garland Pennsylvania


    Orange County Home Builder Dead at 93

    Steel-Fiber Concrete Link Beams Perform Well in Tests

    Oregon Supreme Court Confirms Broad Duty to Defend

    Leaky Wells Spur Call for Stricter Rules on Gas Drilling

    Rooftop Owners Sue Cubs Consultant for Alleged False Statements

    Lawmakers Strike Deal on New $38B WRDA

    Bridging Documents and Design-Build Warranties: Building Bridges to Avoid Pitfalls

    Couple Sues Attorney over Construction Defect Case, Loses

    Is Your Home Improvement Contract Putting You At Risk?

    Five Facts About Housing That Will Make People In New York City and San Francisco Depressed

    General Contractors Must Plan to Limit Liability for Subcontractor Injury

    EPA Fines Ivory Homes for Storm Water Pollution

    Colorado Introduces Construction Defect Bill for Commuter Communities

    Ornate Las Vegas Palace Rented by Michael Jackson for Sale

    U.S. Supreme Court Limits the Powers of the Nation’s Bankruptcy Courts

    Flying Solo: How it Helps My Construction Clients

    Statutory Bad Faith and an Insured’s 60 Day Notice to Cure

    Best Practices: Commercial Lockouts in Arizona

    Claim for Consequential Damages Survives Motion to Dismiss

    BWBO Celebrating Attorney Award and Two New Partners

    Motion to Strike Insureds' Experts Denied, Unfair Claim Settlement Claims Survive Summary Judgment

    EPA Coal Ash Cleanup Rule Changes Send Utilities, Agencies Back to Drawing Board

    Want More Transit (and Federal Funding)? Build Housing That Supports It

    Re-Entering the Workplace: California's Guideline for Employers

    Examination of the Product Does Not Stop a Pennsylvania Court From Applying the Malfunction Theory

    Washington State Enacts Law Restricting Non-Compete Agreements

    A New Tariffs Twist: Aggressive Enforcement of False Claims Act Violations Could Potentially Trip Up Construction Companies

    Los Angeles County Sues Utility Edison Over Deadly Wildfire

    Sixth Circuit Affirms Liability Insurer's Broad Duty to Defend and Binds Insurer to Judgment Against Landlord

    Coverage for Construction Defects Barred by Business Risk Exclusions

    Chambers USA 2020 Ranks White and Williams as a Leading Law Firm

    Court Finds No Coverage for Workplace “Prank” With Nail Gun

    Recent Federal Court Decision Favors Class Action Defendants

    Armor Up: Fortifying Your Business Against California Litigation

    Notice and Claims Provisions In Contracts Matter…A Lot

    The Deadline to File Suit on a Public Works Payment Payment Bond is Triggered by a Claimant’s Work on a Project Not by a Claimant’s Work Under a Contract

    Quick Note: Notice of Contest of Claim Against Payment Bond

    California Contractors: Amended Section 7141.5 Provides Important License Renewal Safety Net

    Just Because I May Be An “Expert” Does Not Mean I Am Giving Expert Testimony

    Where-Forum Art Thou? Is the Chosen Forum Akin to No Forum at All?

    NYC Luxury-Condo Buyers Await New Towers as Sales Slow

    How Long Does a Civil Lawsuit Take?

    Eighth Circuit Finds that “Ensuing Loss” Clause Does Not Restore Coverage for Faulty Subcontractor Work

    NARI Addresses Construction Defect Claim Issues for Remodeling Contractors

    Court Holds That Public Entity Can Unilaterally Replace Subcontractor Under California’s Subletting and Subcontracting Fair Practices Act

    Court Clarifies Sequence in California’s SB800

    Segal McCambridge Recognized in 2026 Chambers USA Rankings

    Louisiana District Court Declines to Apply Total Pollution Exclusion

    When Does it End?

    Attorneys Fees Under California’s Prompt Payment Statutes. Contractor’s “Win” Fails the Sniff Test
    Corporate Profile

    GARLAND PENNSYLVANIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Garland, Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Drawing from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Garland's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Garland, Pennsylvania

    Executive Insights 2026: Leaders in Construction Law

    October 06, 2026 —
    What advice would you give contractors regarding documentation and recordkeeping to better protect themselves during disputes? Jim Archibald Partner Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP Disputes over payment, scope and delays are among the biggest risks contractors face. Thorough documentation doesn’t just help win these disputes; it may prevent them from happening at all. Start with the contract: Every project should begin with a written agreement that clearly defines scope, schedule, payment terms and change-order procedures. Verbal understandings are difficult to enforce. Track changes in real time: Change orders, change directives, RFIs and scope clarifications should always be documented in writing. Reprinted courtesy of Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Generic Complaint Alleging Bad Faith is Insufficient

    August 24, 2026 —
    The federal district court granted the insurer’s motion for judgment on the pleadings after determining that the insured’s claims for bad faith and unfair claims settlement practices were insufficiently pled. Navia v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 111261 (W.D. N. C. May 20, 2026). The insured submitted a claim for damages to real property owned by the insured allegedly caused by Hurricane Helene. State Farm advised the insured that only some of the claimed damages were covered by the policy and payment for such damages were denied because the estimate for the covered damages did not exceed the policy’s deductible. The insured sued asserting claims for breach of contract, bad faith, and unfair claim settlement practices. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Steel Cooling: Steel Costs Steadily Decline After Pandemic Price Shock

    May 12, 2026 —
    Steel prices have continued trending downward after several years of volatility, according to Gordian’s latest analysis based on RSMeans Data. After dramatic spikes during the pandemic-era supply disruptions, the market has gradually stabilized as supply chains improve and demand softens in some construction segments. However, selective volatility and tariff uncertainty continue to influence pricing across the sector. Key findings from the report include:
    • Steel prices declining: The national average price of structural steel fell to about $2,343.93 per ton in January 2026, down 5.38% from the previous quarter and 7.18% year over year.
    • Longer-term price correction: Steel costs have been trending downward since 2024 after earlier volatility driven by inflation, supply shortages and global demand swings.
    Reprinted courtesy of Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Wadsworth v. Regional Rail Partners — Verified Statements of Claim Under the Colorado Public Works Act

    August 25, 2026 —
    Editor’s Note: Wadsworth Revisited In August 2024, following the Colorado Court of Appeals’ decision in Ralph L. Wadsworth Construction Company, LLC v. Regional Rail Partners, we published Colorado Court of Appeals’ Ruling Highlights Dangers of Excessive Public Works Claims. At the time, the decision warranted a significant warning to contractors and subcontractors performing public work in Colorado. The Court of Appeals concluded that Wadsworth’s verified statement of claim improperly included unliquidated delay damages and that, because the claim was excessive, Wadsworth forfeited its right to recover the amounts included in the claim. We cautioned contractors to carefully scrutinize verified statements of claim and to avoid including unliquidated damages or amounts that were not yet due and payable. The Colorado Supreme Court has now reversed that decision. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Olivia Barden, Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC

    'Drywall Isn't Light': Peter Lupo on Safety Management at Standard Drywall

    May 26, 2026 —
    Peter Lupo has been safety director since 2019 at San Diego-based Standard Drywall Inc., a major wall and ceiling contractor. He draws on over two decades of safety experience across a wide range of commercial construction work, having previously served as safety director for general contractor T.B. Penick & Sons. He has also previously operated Peter Lupo Consulting, where he reviewed legal cases and provided expert testimony, and blogged on safety for ENR.com. Lupo recently spoke to ENR Correspondent Elaine Silver about the weight of drywall, heat hazard control, bilingual crews and how he supports safety creativity and learning on the Standard Drywall staff. The conversation has been edited. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Elaine Silver, Engineering News-Record
    ENR may be contacted at enr@enr.com

    Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. Expands with New Office in Foxborough, Massachusetts

    June 08, 2026 —
    Foxborough, MA — April 1st, 2026— Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. (SDV), a national law firm focused exclusively on representing policyholders in insurance coverage disputes, is pleased to announce the opening of its new office in Foxborough, Massachusetts. The expansion marks another milestone in the firm’s continued growth and deepens SDV’s ability to serve clients across the region. The new location strengthens SDV’s presence in Massachusetts and expands the firm’s capacity to support both existing and anticipated client needs in an increasingly complex insurance landscape. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C.

    What Massachusetts Contractors and Developers Can Learn from Cannistraro v. Columbia Construction

    July 13, 2026 —
    Introduction On June 26, 2026 the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court issued its decision in J.C. Cannistraro, LLC v. Columbia Construction Co.—a holding that sits at the intersection of Prompt Pay Act compliance and the Massachusetts Arbitration Act.[1] Most already know that the Massachusetts Prompt Pay Act (PPA) imposes strict timing and certification requirements for rejecting payment applications and proposed change orders on projects valued at $3 million or more. Most notably, the PPA requires the paying party to give the payee written notice of its approval or rejection of progress applications and proposed changes within 15 days of receipt, which notice must include a “factual and contractual basis for the rejection” and must be “certified as made in good faith.”[2] In the absence of a timely certified notice, payment is “deemed to be approved” unless the payor properly rejects payment before it comes due.[3] Reprinted courtesy of Anthony LaPlaca, Seyfarth Shaw LLP and Luke Marston, Seyfarth Shaw LLP Mr. LaPlaca may be contacted at alaplaca@seyfarth.com Mr. Marston may be contacted at lmarston@seyfarth.com Read the full story...

    Legal 500 US Ranks Hunton’s Insurance Coverage Team Among Top Policyholder Practices in 2026 Guide

    July 06, 2026 —
    Hunton’s insurance coverage practice was once again recognized among the nation’s top policyholder insurance practices, receiving a Band 2 national ranking in the 2026 United States Edition of The Legal 500 for Insurance: Advice to Policyholders. The Legal 500 recognizes firms solely based on merit through numerous factors including client feedback and peer input. Bolstering the team’s national recognition, several coverage lawyers received individual accolades: special counsel Lorelie “Lorie” S. Masters was named to The Legal 500’s Hall of Fame; team head Syed S. Ahmad and partner Michael S. Levine were named Leading Lawyers; and partners Andrea DeField and Latosha M. Ellis were named Next Generation Partners. In addition, partners Walter J. Andrews, Lawrence J. Bracken II, and Koorosh “KT” Talieh were recognized as Key Lawyers on the team. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP