BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    institutional building expert witness Effort Pennsylvania structural steel construction expert witness Effort Pennsylvania housing expert witness Effort Pennsylvania Medical building expert witness Effort Pennsylvania tract home expert witness Effort Pennsylvania high-rise construction expert witness Effort Pennsylvania low-income housing expert witness Effort Pennsylvania custom home expert witness Effort Pennsylvania mid-rise construction expert witness Effort Pennsylvania townhome construction expert witness Effort Pennsylvania office building expert witness Effort Pennsylvania concrete tilt-up expert witness Effort Pennsylvania parking structure expert witness Effort Pennsylvania condominium expert witness Effort Pennsylvania Subterranean parking expert witness Effort Pennsylvania condominiums expert witness Effort Pennsylvania custom homes expert witness Effort Pennsylvania production housing expert witness Effort Pennsylvania casino resort expert witness Effort Pennsylvania landscaping construction expert witness Effort Pennsylvania retail construction expert witness Effort Pennsylvania multi family housing expert witness Effort Pennsylvania
    Effort Pennsylvania architectural engineering expert witnessEffort Pennsylvania delay claim expert witnessEffort Pennsylvania engineering expert witnessEffort Pennsylvania engineering consultantEffort Pennsylvania OSHA expert witness constructionEffort Pennsylvania defective construction expertEffort Pennsylvania consulting architect expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Effort, Pennsylvania

    Pennsylvania Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB 1875 stipulates that “no later than 90 days before filing an action, serve written notice of claim on the contractor. Upon receipt of notice, builder has 15 days to forward the claim to any subcontractor/supplier and 30 days after service of notice to offer to compromise and settle the claim by monetary payment without inspection, propose to inspect the dwelling that is the subject of the claim; or reject the claim. Contractor has 14 days after inspection to provide written notice of intention.”


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Effort Pennsylvania

    No state license required. For public works projects, see General Services website.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Pocono Builders Association (PA)
    Local # 3939
    745 Main St Ste 203
    Stroudsburg, PA 18360

    Effort Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Central Susquehanna Builders Association
    Local # 3956
    300 Walnut St
    Mifflinburg, PA 17844

    Effort Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Lawrence County Builders Association
    Local # 3937
    1435 Devils Elbow Rd
    New Castle, PA 16101

    Effort Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Clearfield County Chapter
    Local # 3903
    PO Box 512
    Clearfield, PA 16830

    Effort Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Builders Association of Central PA
    Local # 3952
    2038 Sandy Drive Ste 100
    State College, PA 16803

    Effort Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Carbon Bldrs Association
    Local # 3922
    PO Box 218 490 Ore Street
    Bowmanstown, PA 18030

    Effort Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Builders Association of Gr Dubois Area
    Local # 3959
    PO Box 664
    Du Bois, PA 15801
    Effort Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Effort Pennsylvania


    Connecticut Grapples With Failing Concrete Foundations

    Wildfire Risks Elevated for US Plains Due to Drought Conditions

    Everyone's Moving to Seattle, and It's Stressing Out Sushi Lovers

    Communications between Counsel and PR Firm Hired by Counsel Held Discoverable

    South Carolina Legislature Redefining Occurrences to Include Construction Defects in CGL Policies

    Roof Mounted Solar Panels: Lower Your Risk of Fire

    New Change Order Bill Becomes Law: RCW 39.04.360

    Montana Supreme Court: Insurer Not Bound by Insured's Settlement

    WSHB Ranks No.10 in Law360’s Best of Law Firms for Women

    Rio Olympics Work Was a Mess and Then Something Curious Happened

    UCP Buys Citizen Homes

    Subcontractors Have Remedies, Even if “Pay-if-Paid” Provisions are Enforced

    Insured’s Breach of Contract Claim Survives Motion to Dismiss, but Bad Faith Claim Does Not

    BHA Expands Construction Experts Group

    Why A Jury Found That Contractor 'Retaliated' Against Undocumented Craft Worker

    CARB Issues Proposed Climate Disclosure Regulations

    Arizona Court of Appeals Upholds Judgment on behalf of Homeowners against Del Webb Communities for Homes Riddled with Construction Defects

    A Good Read on Fraud versus Contract

    Colorado Trench Collapse Kills Two

    Care, Custody or Control Exclusion Requires Complete and Exclusive Control by Insured Claiming Coverage

    What is a “Force Majeure” Clause? Do I Need one in my Contract? Three Options For Contractors, Subcontractors and Suppliers to Consider

    Maximizing Contractual Indemnity Rights: Insuring the Indemnitor's Obligation

    But Wait There’s More: Preserving Claims on Commonwealth Projects

    California Ranks As Leading State for Green Building in 2022

    Suit Limitation Provision Upheld

    Prejudice to Insurer After Late Notice of Hurricane Damage Raises Issue of Fact

    New York Court Narrowly Interprets “Expected or Intended Injury” Exclusion in Win for Policyholder

    Identifying Unfair Clauses in Construction Contracts

    Arizona Supreme Court Clarifies Area Variance Standard; Property Owners May Obtain an Area Variance When Special Circumstances Existed at Purchase

    Insureds Prevail on Summary Judgment Addressing Responsibility for Water Leak

    Nevada Supreme Court Clarifies the Litigation Waiver of the One-Action Rule

    Seattle’s Newest Residential Developer

    Contractors with Ties to Trustees Reaped Benefits from LA Community College Modernization Program

    Hudson Tunnel Plan Shows Sign of Life as U.S. Speeds Review

    Recording a Lis Pendens Is Crucial

    Fix for Settling Millennium Tower May Start This Fall

    Shimmick Gets Nod for Second Pilot Pile at Settling Millennium Tower

    Multiple Occurrences Found For Claims Against Supplier of Asbestos Products

    Joint Venture Dispute Over Profits

    Nine Newmeyer & Dillion Attorneys Recognized as Southern California Super Lawyers

    OSHA Reinforces COVID Guidelines for the Workplace

    My Construction Law Wish List

    In Supreme Court Showdown, California Appeals Courts Choose Sides Regarding Whether Right to Repair Act is Exclusive Remedy for Homeowners

    US Energy Dept. Withdraws Federal ‘Zero-Emissions Building’ Definition

    Does the New Jersey Right-To-Repair Law Omit Too Many Construction Defects?

    Insured General Contractor Prevails on Motion for Summary Judgment to Establish Builder’s Risk Coverage

    City and Contractor Disclaim Responsibility for Construction Error that Lead to Blast

    Know Your Burden of Proof in an Insurance Coverage Dispute Dealing With an All Risk Policy

    Surplus Lines Carrier Can Force Arbitration in Louisiana Despite Statute Limiting Arbitration

    Shaken? Stirred? A Primer on License Bond Claims in California
    Corporate Profile

    EFFORT PENNSYLVANIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 7,000 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Effort, Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness Group provides a wide range of trial support and consulting services to Effort's most acknowledged construction practice groups, CGL carriers, builders, owners, and public agencies. Drawing from a diverse pool of construction and design professionals, BHA is able to simultaneously analyze complex claims from the perspective of design, engineering, cost, or standard of care.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Effort, Pennsylvania

    On Checks and Balances

    March 03, 2026 —
    It’s called “checks and balances” for a reason. And, generally, it works well so long as there are clear boundaries between the “co-equal” branches of government. In Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. Department of Industrial Relations, 108 Cal.App.5th 243 (2025), the 3rd District Court of Appeals upheld a set of regulations issued by the California Apprenticeship Council that contradicted an earlier 2015 ruling of the Court of Appeals. The Associated General Contractors of California Case At issue in the case was California’s Prevailing Wage Law which requires public works contractors to hire a certain ratio of apprentices. The purpose of the apprenticeship requirements is to maintain the pipeline of skilled tradespeople on taxpayer-funded projects. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Garret Murai, Nomos LLP
    Mr. Murai may be contacted at gmurai@nomosllp.com

    Ball Janik LLP Welcomes Construction Defect Attorney and U.S. Air Force Veteran Jake Scott to its Fort Lauderdale Office

    June 02, 2026 —
    Ball Janik LLP, a leading construction defect and insurance recovery law firm, has welcomed Jake Scott as an associate in its Fort Lauderdale office. Scott joins the Construction Defect Practice Group, bringing experience across construction litigation that includes construction defect, contract dispute, and negligence matters, along with a track record of representing construction professionals through depositions, court appearances, and trial preparation to support the firm's steady growth and client service statewide. "We're excited to welcome Jake Scott to our Fort Lauderdale office and Construction Defect Practice Group," said James C. Prichard, Managing Partner at Ball Janik LLP. "We look forward to the fresh perspectives and legal solutions he will provide for community associations across South Florida." Scott is a results-driven attorney dedicated to providing strategic counsel for complex legal challenges. He has experience managing all phases of a case, from early investigation and discovery through trial preparation and settlement negotiations. Prior to joining Ball Janik, Scott served as an associate attorney in Fort Lauderdale, where he represented clients in construction litigation matters, handled depositions and court appearances, conducted legal research, and drafted pleadings, motions, and briefs. He also worked as an attorney in Tampa, where he represented contractors, subcontractors, and construction firms in defending claims involving construction defects, contractual disputes, and negligence, and worked closely with expert witnesses, engineers, and consultants to develop and present technical evidence. Scott's experience representing the development and building sides of construction disputes provides a valuable, contrast-driven perspective that supports the strategic evaluation of claims and practical approaches to resolution for Ball Janik's clients. A proud veteran, Scott served in the United States Air Force for eight years, including roles as an Airspace Control Officer and in Space Systems Operations, supporting safe space flight operations and satellite communications. Carrying the discipline of airborne operations, Scott worked in the aerospace sector as a Satellite Engineer and Orbital Analyst. He also held a role in the housing sector, supporting marketing and business development initiatives. Scott received his law degree from Stetson University College of Law. He attended American Military University, where he earned degrees in marketing, business management, and related support services. About Ball Janik LLP Ball Janik LLP is a Florida-based law firm offering construction defect, construction law, insurance recovery, and commercial litigation counsel to its local and national clients. The firm was founded in 1982 and has expanded its capabilities, professionals, and geographic footprint. What started as a small firm focused on real property, land use, and litigation (known then as Ball Janik & Novack) has grown to a team of 50-plus attorneys and paralegals in 5 offices in Florida, with centuries of combined experience and capabilities. The firm has been recognized by Chambers USA, U.S. News & World Report and Best Lawyers®, The Best Lawyers in America©, and Corporate International. Read more here: https://www.balljanik.com.

    The Modern Nuclear Renaissance Reaches New England

    April 14, 2026 —
    On March 31, 2026, the governors of all six New England states issued a joint, bipartisan statement committing the region to explore deployment of advanced nuclear energy technologies while supporting the continued safe, affordable and reliable operation of New England’s existing nuclear generation facilities. This coordinated regional initiative follows a major policy announcement in June 2025 by New York Governor Kathy Hochul directing the New York Power Authority to pursue development of at least 1,000 MW of advanced nuclear generation to support statewide reliability needs and New York’s zero‑carbon mission. Less than one year after New York formally embraced a modern nuclear renaissance, that renaissance has now expanded across the New England states—signaling a broader Northeast regional pivot toward nuclear as a core element of long‑term reliability, affordability and decarbonization strategies. For utilities and power generators, this shift creates both opportunities and planning imperatives that warrant immediate attention. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Stephen J. Humes, Pillsbury
    Mr. Humes may be contacted at stephen.humes@pillsburylaw.com

    Colorado Supreme Court Reverses Course on Public Project Liens: Key Takeaways From Wadsworth v. Regional Rail Partners

    July 27, 2026 —
    On April 6, 2026, the Colorado Supreme Court issued a unanimous opinion in Ralph L. Wadsworth Construction Company, LLC v. Regional Rail Partners, 2026 CO 19, reversing the Colorado Court of Appeals and providing much-needed clarity regarding verified statements of claim (VSOCs) under the Colorado Public Works Act, C.R.S. §§ 38-26-101 et seq. The decision resolves two issues that have generated significant concern among construction industry professionals since the Court of Appeals issued its opinion on August 1, 2024. Under C.R.S. § 38-26-107(1), a subcontractor on a public works project may file a VSOC with the contracting public entity for amounts due and unpaid for “…furnished labor, materials, sustenance, or other supplies used or consumed by a contractor or his or her subcontractor in or about the performance of the work contracted to be done or that supplies laborers, rental machinery, tools, or equipment to the extent used in the prosecution of the work….” If a claimant files a VSOC for “an amount greater than the amount due” without a reasonable possibility that the amount is due and with knowledge that the claim is excessive, the claimant “shall forfeit all rights to the amount claimed” and becomes liable for the opposing party’s costs and attorneys’ fees. C.R.S. § 38-26-110. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Amanda E. McKinlay, Snell & Wilmer
    Ms. McKinlay may be contacted at amckinlay@swlaw.com

    World's Longest Immersed Tunnel Passes Milestone, But Faces Delays

    August 03, 2026 —
    Work on the $8-billion Fehmarnbelt Tunnel, which is planned to link Germany and Denmark as the world’s longest immersed tunnel, is progressing as crews achieved a milestone last month with the successful immersion of its first precast concrete element. But Danish state-owned project owner Femern A/S says the plan is now running at least two years behind schedule and the tunnel’s road and rail portions will open in two separate stages. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of James Leggate, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Leggate may be contacted at leggatej@enr.com

    Structural Concerns Force Emergency Closure of Maryland Office Building

    August 16, 2026 —
    A 10-story Baltimore-area office building was evacuated after an underground parking structure was compromised during construction work. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Jim Parsons, Engineering News-Record
    ENR may be contacted at enr@enr.com

    High-Rise Design and Construction: Then, Now, and Next

    March 16, 2026 —
    The Empire State Building was built in 14 months. Since 2010, the average completion time for a 200-meter-plus building has increased from 4.3 to 5.8 years. Buildings have become more complex, and there's more regulation than in the 1930s. Still, there are ways to make high-rise construction more efficient. An Unlikely Benchmark From 1930 When construction began on the Empire State Building on March 17, 1930, the world was in the midst of the Great Depression. That turned out to be an advantage. Contractors Starrett Brothers & Eken had access to a vast, motivated workforce, peaking at 3,439 workers on a single day in August 1930. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    New Executive Order on AI Innovation and Security: Key Takeaways for the Construction Industry

    June 15, 2026 —
    On June 2, 2026, President Trump signed an Executive Order titled “Promoting Advanced Artificial Intelligence Innovation and Security.” At its core, the Order is a cybersecurity and national-security measure rather than a broad regulation of how private companies develop or use AI. It directs federal agencies to harden government systems against AI-enabled cyber threats, establishes voluntary frameworks for collaboration between the federal government and the AI and critical-infrastructure sectors, and strengthens criminal enforcement against the malicious use of AI. Notably, the Order expressly disclaims any intent to create a “mandatory governmental licensing, preclearance, or permitting” regime for the “development, publication, release, or distribution of new AI models.” Instead, the Executive Order seeks to “promote AI innovation and security” by working with the private sector to modernize government and private-sector information systems and harden them against external threats, protect intellectual property from exploitation or theft, and cultivate American AI capabilities. Reprinted courtesy of Richard R. Volack, Peckar & Abramson, PC and Denis Serkin, Peckar & Abramson, PC Mr. Volack may be contacted at rvolack@pecklaw.com Mr. Serkin may be contacted at dserkin@pecklaw.com Read the full story...