BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    institutional building expert witness Dunlevy Pennsylvania landscaping construction expert witness Dunlevy Pennsylvania production housing expert witness Dunlevy Pennsylvania Subterranean parking expert witness Dunlevy Pennsylvania multi family housing expert witness Dunlevy Pennsylvania industrial building expert witness Dunlevy Pennsylvania hospital construction expert witness Dunlevy Pennsylvania custom home expert witness Dunlevy Pennsylvania structural steel construction expert witness Dunlevy Pennsylvania custom homes expert witness Dunlevy Pennsylvania office building expert witness Dunlevy Pennsylvania condominiums expert witness Dunlevy Pennsylvania Medical building expert witness Dunlevy Pennsylvania high-rise construction expert witness Dunlevy Pennsylvania retail construction expert witness Dunlevy Pennsylvania parking structure expert witness Dunlevy Pennsylvania condominium expert witness Dunlevy Pennsylvania townhome construction expert witness Dunlevy Pennsylvania concrete tilt-up expert witness Dunlevy Pennsylvania tract home expert witness Dunlevy Pennsylvania low-income housing expert witness Dunlevy Pennsylvania housing expert witness Dunlevy Pennsylvania
    Dunlevy Pennsylvania construction defect expert witnessDunlevy Pennsylvania construction project management expert witnessDunlevy Pennsylvania construction cost estimating expert witnessDunlevy Pennsylvania engineering expert witnessDunlevy Pennsylvania construction project management expert witnessesDunlevy Pennsylvania slope failure expert witnessDunlevy Pennsylvania concrete expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Dunlevy, Pennsylvania

    Pennsylvania Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB 1875 stipulates that “no later than 90 days before filing an action, serve written notice of claim on the contractor. Upon receipt of notice, builder has 15 days to forward the claim to any subcontractor/supplier and 30 days after service of notice to offer to compromise and settle the claim by monetary payment without inspection, propose to inspect the dwelling that is the subject of the claim; or reject the claim. Contractor has 14 days after inspection to provide written notice of intention.”


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Dunlevy Pennsylvania

    No state license required. For public works projects, see General Services website.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Building Industry Association of Lancaster
    Local # 3936
    204 Butler Ave Ste 200
    Lancaster, PA 17601

    Dunlevy Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Washington Co Builders Association
    Local # 3964
    30 E Beau St Room #321
    Washington, PA 15301

    Dunlevy Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Bucks & Montgomery Counties
    Local # 3945
    721 Dresher Road Suite 1200
    Horsham, PA 19044

    Dunlevy Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    York County Builders Assn
    Local # 3972
    540 Greebriar Road
    York, PA 17404

    Dunlevy Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Chester & Delaware Co
    Local # 3941
    1502 McDaniel Dr
    West Chester, PA 19380

    Dunlevy Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Pennsylvania Builders Association
    Local # 3900
    600 N 12th St
    Lemoyne, PA 17043

    Dunlevy Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Building Industry Association of Philadelphia
    Local # 3946
    1735 Market St Ste A432
    Philadelphia, PA 19103

    Dunlevy Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Dunlevy Pennsylvania


    The Burden of Betterment

    Georgia Court Clarifies Landlord Liability for Construction Defects

    Oregon Courthouse Reopening after Four Years Repairing Defects

    GRSM Team Obtains Defense Verdict for Homeowners’ Association in Orange County Superior Court

    Doctrine of Superior Knowledge in Government Contracting

    Connecticut Appellate Court Breaks New Ground on Policy Exhaustion

    A Bill for an Act Concerning Workers’ Compensation – 2014 Edition

    Bridging Documents and Design-Build Warranties: Building Bridges to Avoid Pitfalls

    Professional Services Exclusion Bars Coverage After Carbon Monoxide Leak

    Client Alert: Restaurant Owed Duty of Care to Driver Killed by Third-Party on Street Adjacent to Restaurant Parking Lot

    Newport Beach Partners Jeremy Johnson, Courtney Serrato, and Associate Joseph Real Prevailed on a Demurrer in a Highly Publicized Shooting Case!

    When is Construction Put to Its “Intended Use”?

    Nashville Stadium Bond Deal Tests Future of Spectator Sports

    Home Repair Firms Sued for Fraud

    Las Vegas Partner Jeffrey Saab and Team Leader D. Ryan Efros Secure a $0.00 Settlement on a Multimillion-Dollar Construction Defect Case!

    Let’s Get Specific: Rhode Island Court Asserts Jurisdiction Over Out-of-State Manufacturer

    Eight Ways to Protect a Construction Company Before a Claim Is Filed

    Fine Art Losses – “Canvas” the Subrogation Landscape

    The Most Expensive Signature to Not Get: Why Change Orders Matter

    $356 Million Judgement Against Developer for Defective Construction of DC Condominium

    Insurer Rejecting Construction Defect Claim Must Share in Defense Costs

    Colorado Court of Appeals Provides Guidance on What Arbitration-Related Orders are Appealable

    Newmeyer Dillion Announces Jason Moberly Caruso As Its Newest Partner

    Reconstructing the Francis Scott Key Bridge Utilizing the Progressive Design-Build Method

    Todd Ehrenreich Inducted as Fellow of International Academy of Trial Lawyers

    Alaska Supreme Court Rules That “Total Pollution Exclusion” in Homeowners Insurance Policy Does Not Bar Coverage for Carbon Monoxide Poisoning

    Don’t Believe Everything You Hear: Liability of Asbestos Pipe Manufacturer Upheld Despite Exculpatory Testimony of Plaintiff

    Arbitration Clause Found Ambiguous in Construction Defect Case

    Examination of the Product Does Not Stop a Pennsylvania Court From Applying the Malfunction Theory

    Home-Building Climate Warms in U.S. as Weather Funk Lifts

    Wisconsin Supreme Court Holds that Subrogation Waiver Does Not Violate Statute Prohibiting Limitation on Tort Liability in Construction Contracts

    Defend Now, Allocate Later? An Unresolved Tension in Colorado Construction Law

    Background Owner of Property Cannot Be Compelled to Arbitrate Construction Defects

    CA Supreme Court Finds “Consent-to-Assignment” Clauses Unenforceable After Loss Occurs During the Policy Period

    Insurer Dispenses with Bad Faith Claim on Summary Judgment

    Illinois Appellate Court Finds That Damages in Excess of Policy Limits Do Not Trigger Right to Independent Counsel

    Novation Agreements Under Federal Contracts

    Disjointed Proof of Loss Sufficient

    Construction Contract Basics: No Damages for Delay

    Statutory Bad Faith and an Insured’s 60 Day Notice to Cure

    Wisconsin Supreme Court Finds Coverage Under Ensuing Loss Provisions

    Hiring Subcontractors with Workers Compensation Insurance

    Insurer Must Defend Where Possible Continuing Property Damage Occurred

    Predict Risk, Not Incidents: A New Analytics Framework for Your Construction Safety Data

    Hidden Risks Behind Today’s Stadium Construction Boom

    Vincent Alexander Named to Florida Trend’s Legal Elite

    Design Professional Asserting Copyright Infringement And Contributory Copyright Infringement

    They Say Nothing Lasts Forever, but What If Decommissioning Does?

    Sun, Sand and Stir-Fry? Miami Woos Chinese for Property: Cities

    Exclusions Bar Coverage for Damage Caused by Chinese Drywall
    Corporate Profile

    DUNLEVY PENNSYLVANIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 7,000 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Dunlevy, Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness Group provides a wide range of trial support and consulting services to Dunlevy's most acknowledged construction practice groups, CGL carriers, builders, owners, and public agencies. Drawing from a diverse pool of construction and design professionals, BHA is able to simultaneously analyze complex claims from the perspective of design, engineering, cost, or standard of care.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Dunlevy, Pennsylvania

    Delay Matters: Florida’s Fourth DCA Reverses Hurricane Irma Dismissal

    June 08, 2026 —
    The mantra “delay, deny, defend” is frequently referenced in discussions of insurance claims handling, though insurers will invariably disavow these tactics. While it would be facially improper for an insurer to delay a coverage decision to gain a tactical advantage, empirical examples nonetheless exist. This very dynamic was addressed by Florida’s Fourth District Court of Appeals when it handed policyholders a win in Hypoluxo Mariner’s Cay Condo. Assoc’n, Inc. v. Underwriters at Lloyd’s London, No. 4D2024‑2250 (Fla. 4th DCA Apr. 1, 2026), reversing a trial court order dismissing a condominium association’s Hurricane Irma coverage lawsuit against its property insurer. Delay to Run the Statute of Limitations Following Hurricane Irma, a condominium association suffered roof and exterior envelope damage, reported an insurance claim, and submitted a sworn proof of loss to its property insurer in compliance with Florida Statute § 627.70132 (2020). The statute establishes a timeframe within which a policyholder must submit a claim for hurricane damage. Reprinted courtesy of Andrea DeField, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP, Machaella Reisman, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP and Cary D. Steklof, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP Ms. DeField may be contacted at adefield@hunton.com Ms. Reisman may be contacted at reismanm@hunton.com Mr. Steklof may be contacted at csteklof@hunton.com Read the full story...

    Lost in Translation: AEC Tech’s Missing Role

    May 12, 2026 —
    I once visited a construction site where the contractor’s headquarters had commissioned a tech company to build an on-site quality-inspection application. The developer had admitted to the site engineer that they had never set foot on a construction site before. The engineer showed me what he was actually using: his own phone camera and an Excel sheet. The new app did not map to how work actually happened on site. This is not an isolated story. The vendor builds something technically coherent but operationally disconnected. The client, somewhere up the chain, had fallen in love with the idea of the solution before anyone had built an honest business case for it. The result is a tool that gets demonstrated at a board meeting but isn’t used in the field. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    Ninth Circuit Holds That Policies Covering Environmental Claims Do Not Have Aggregate Limits

    May 12, 2026 —
    In the case of County of San Bernardino v. Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania, the Ninth Circuit recently addressed the issue of whether general liability policies issued in the 1960s and 1970s included aggregate limits for claims arising under the premises-operations coverage in CGL policies. The difference between the policyholder’s interpretation of the policies’ limits clauses and the insurer’s interpretation was worth hundreds of millions of dollars in exposure for the insurer. The Court closely examined the policy language and extrinsic evidence from both the insurance industry’s drafting history and the parties before concluding that the policies were ambiguous. The Court construed that ambiguity in favor of the policyholder and ruled that aggregate limits did not apply to the claims at issue. The Court’s decision underscores the importance of carefully examining a policy’s limits, especially for older policies written before 1986 when the insurance industry revised the standard-form CGL policy to state the aggregate limits apply not only to products liability claims but to premises-operations claims as well. Decades of insurance industry drafting history confirms, as the policyholder’s submissions in this case indicate, that the industry well understood that operations claims like the environmental waste-disposal claims at issue here typically were not subject to aggregate limits. Reprinted courtesy of Lorelie S. Masters, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP and Joseph T. Niczky, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP Ms. Masters may be contacted at lmasters@hunton.com Mr. Niczky may be contacted at jniczky@hunton.com Read the full story...

    AI in AEC 2026: Doing AI Right and Rethinking Your Business Model

    April 08, 2026 —
    The sixth AI at the AEC 2026 conference showcased the evolution of AI discussions. There were, naturally, many talks about software and technologies. But more than before, there were conversations about realizing AI’s business value. Two themes appeared in nearly every session I attended. First, many companies struggle with AI adoption, not because they lack tools, but because their thinking isn’t right. Second, when AI works, it disrupts the business model that brought them there. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    Actual Controversy Without Actual Exhaustion: California Supreme Court Allows Declaratory Relief and Bad Faith Claims Against Excess Insurers

    August 24, 2026 —
    California courts were previously split on the issue of whether an insured may bring declaratory relief claims against excess insurers prior to the exhaustion of underlying insurance. Some California courts held that the actual exhaustion of underlying insurance was necessary, whereas other courts allowed for these types of claims to proceed.[1] Recently, the California Supreme Court addressed this split of authority and, in doing so, handed down a significant win for policyholders. In Fox Paine & Company, LLC, et al. v. Twin City Fire Insurance Company et al., the Court held that insureds may proceed with bringing forth viable declaratory relief and bad faith claims against excess insurers prior to the exhaustion of underlying insurance.[2] A summary of the Court’s opinion is provided below. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Kyle A. Rudolph, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C.
    Mr. Rudolph may be contacted at KRudolph@sdvlaw.com

    Kahana Feld Obtains Favorable Result in High-Exposure NY Premises Liability Case

    June 15, 2026 —
    Kahana Feld partner Leigh Katz obtained a significant victory in a recent matter involving a videotaped alleged trip and fall on the sidewalk in front of the client’s commercial residence. The plaintiff claimed he suffered a knee injury that necessitated surgery, along with other assorted injuries that prevented him from continuing high-level athletic activities. Leigh was able to demonstrate that the fall was staged and received a voluntary discontinuance with prejudice. At mediation, Leigh emphasized that KF’s expert witness challenged the plaintiff’s claim that the fall was caused by a sidewalk height differential after reviewing the videotape footage and determining the plaintiff’s fall began before his feet made contact with the alleged defect. Based on this analysis, the expert concluded the reported height differential did not initiate the fall, which supported KF’s position that the incident depicted in the video was unrealistic and appeared staged. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Leigh Katz, Kahana Feld
    Ms. Katz may be contacted at lkatz@kahanafeld.com

    Micromobility in Smart Cities: Keeping the Wheels in Motion

    May 26, 2026 —
    Mobility is the lifeblood of any city. How people are able to travel in, out and within a metropolitan area is vital to its citizens, businesses, supply chains and social services. And as U.S. cities have expanded in size and population density, the strategies for addressing mobility have evolved. Many have taken different approaches to public transit, and each city boasts a dense tapestry of roadways, walking paths and various parking options. But as cities continue to reexamine infrastructure strategies through smart city technology, a new field of transportation has emerged—micromobility. Designed for short-distance travel using lightweight vehicles (bikes, e-bikes, e-scooters, etc.), the industry’s global net worth has grown exponentially in recent years to the tune of hundreds of billions, with one forecast predicting it could reach $340 billion by 2030. Micromobility also finds itself at the forefront of various smart city technological improvements. Geofencing has been implemented in U.S. cities to determine where micromobility vehicles can operate, control speed limits, and park utilizing the vehicles’ GPS location. Internet of Things (IoT) technologies (satellite-based location receivers, cloud communication, internet links, etc.) have improved vehicle lifespans by keeping track of when vehicles require service and prevent vandalism and theft. Data collected from vehicles’ location tracking is routinely used for urban planning and smart city development. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of James P. Bobotek, Pillsbury
    Mr. Bobotek may be contacted at james.bobotek@pillsburylaw.com

    Newark Team Obtains Appellate Ruling Affirming Summary Judgment for Lawyer and Firm in Professional Negligence Lawsuit

    April 14, 2026 —
    Newark Partner Meredith Kaplan Stoma and Associate Anthony Doss recently secured a decision from the New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division, affirming summary judgment for their clients, a lawyer and her firm, in a lawsuit alleging professional negligence in connection with the administration of a commercial loan. The circumstances giving rise to the lawsuit date back to September 2020, when the plaintiff was approached by members of a real estate investment company regarding a short-term loan opportunity whereby he would loan the company $200,000. The company provided the plaintiff with a “bridge loan package,” which stated that the requested funds would be held in the escrow account of their counsel and her firm (Lewis Brisbois’ clients), and returned to him with interest within six months once the company was “capitalized” by a senior lender. The company subsequently prepared two notes, each for $100,000, in connection with the agreement. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois