BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    custom homes expert witness Covington Pennsylvania custom home expert witness Covington Pennsylvania landscaping construction expert witness Covington Pennsylvania housing expert witness Covington Pennsylvania production housing expert witness Covington Pennsylvania high-rise construction expert witness Covington Pennsylvania tract home expert witness Covington Pennsylvania industrial building expert witness Covington Pennsylvania casino resort expert witness Covington Pennsylvania townhome construction expert witness Covington Pennsylvania Medical building expert witness Covington Pennsylvania condominiums expert witness Covington Pennsylvania office building expert witness Covington Pennsylvania condominium expert witness Covington Pennsylvania multi family housing expert witness Covington Pennsylvania mid-rise construction expert witness Covington Pennsylvania Subterranean parking expert witness Covington Pennsylvania low-income housing expert witness Covington Pennsylvania parking structure expert witness Covington Pennsylvania retail construction expert witness Covington Pennsylvania hospital construction expert witness Covington Pennsylvania concrete tilt-up expert witness Covington Pennsylvania
    Covington Pennsylvania construction scheduling expert witnessCovington Pennsylvania construction expert witnessesCovington Pennsylvania stucco expert witnessCovington Pennsylvania expert witness roofingCovington Pennsylvania concrete expert witnessCovington Pennsylvania construction cost estimating expert witnessCovington Pennsylvania window expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Covington, Pennsylvania

    Pennsylvania Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB 1875 stipulates that “no later than 90 days before filing an action, serve written notice of claim on the contractor. Upon receipt of notice, builder has 15 days to forward the claim to any subcontractor/supplier and 30 days after service of notice to offer to compromise and settle the claim by monetary payment without inspection, propose to inspect the dwelling that is the subject of the claim; or reject the claim. Contractor has 14 days after inspection to provide written notice of intention.”


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Covington Pennsylvania

    No state license required. For public works projects, see General Services website.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Bradford County Chapter
    Local # 3930
    PO Box 213
    Monroeton, PA 18832
    Covington Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Tri-County Builders Association
    Local # 3962
    5183 Georgetown Rd
    Franklin, PA 16323
    Covington Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Wayne County Builders Assoc
    Local # 3965
    PO Box 378
    Hawley, PA 18428

    Covington Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Lackawanna Home Builders Association
    Local # 3902
    116 N. Washington Ave.
    Scranton, PA 18503

    Covington Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Builders Association of Northwestern PA
    Local # 3916
    PO BOX 9549
    Erie, PA 16506

    Covington Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Pike County Builders Association
    Local # 3953
    209 E Harford St
    Milford, PA 18337

    Covington Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Mercer Co Builders Association
    Local # 3942
    PO Box 488
    Fredonia, PA 16124
    Covington Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Covington Pennsylvania


    Anti-Concurrent Causation Clause Bars Coverage for Pool Damage

    Construction Defects could become Issue in Governor’s Race

    Reporting Requirements for Architects under California Business and Professions Code Section 5588

    Ex-Engineered Products Firm Executive Convicted of Bid Rigging

    How the Cumulative Impact Theory has been Defined

    COVID-19 Win for Policyholders! Court Approves "Direct Physical Loss" Argument

    Architect Sues over Bidding Procedure

    Quick Note: Independent Third-Party Spoliation Of Evidence Claim

    Is There Direct Physical Loss Under A Property Policy When COVID-19 is Present?

    The Construction Industry's Health Kick

    Course of Conduct Can Serve as Waiver or Modification of Parties’ Contract

    Identifying Unfair Clauses in Construction Contracts

    Navigating the Construction Burrito: OCIP Policies in California’s Construction Defect Cases

    Trade Contract Revisions to Address COVID-19

    LA’s Wildfire Recovery Shifts to Costly and Chaotic Rebuilding

    Ninth Circuit Court Weighs In On Insurance Coverage For COVID-19 Business Interruption Losses

    How to Build a Water-Smart City

    Court of Appeals Finds Additional Insured Coverage Despite “Care, Custody or Control” Exclusion

    BWB&O Partners are Recognized as 2022 AV Preeminent Attorneys by Martindale-Hubbell!

    Matthew Graham Named to Best Lawyers in America

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (05/10/23) – Wobbling Real Estate, Booming (and Busting) Construction, and Eye-Watering Insurance Premiums

    Best Lawyers Recognizes Hundreds of Lewis Brisbois Attorneys, Honors Four Partners as ‘Lawyers of the Year’

    Federal Court Sets High Bar for Pleading Products Liability Cases in New Jersey

    Hazards Ahead: OSHA's Top 10 Citations of 2024

    Leveraging the 50-State Initiative, Connecticut and Maine Team Secure Full Dismissal of Coverage Claim for Catastrophic Property Loss

    Turner, Subcontractor Reach $23.5M Settlement in Worker Death on Chicago Project

    Architect Responds to Defect Lawsuit over Defects at Texas Courthouse

    Chutes and Ladders...and Contracts.

    The Best Laid Plans: Contingency in a Construction Contract

    (Don’t) Go Fish

    Statute of Limitations Upheld in Construction Defect Case

    Tender the Defense of a Lawsuit to your Liability Carrier

    Contractor Haunted by “Demonized” Flooring

    US Court Questions 102-Mile Transmission Project Over River Crossing

    Todd Ehrenreich Joins International Academy of Trial Lawyers

    Chairman of the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Calls for CFPB Investigation into Tenant Screening Businesses

    US-Mexico Border Wall Bids Include Tourist Attraction, Solar Panels

    Eleventh Circuit Vacates District Court Decision Finding No Duty to Defend Faulty Workmanship Claims

    In Personal Injury Actions, Prejudgment Interest on Costs Not Recoverable

    Ten Firm Members Recognized as Super Lawyers or Rising Stars

    Claim for Collapse After Demolition of Building Fails

    CA Supreme Court Expands Scope of Lawyers’ Statute of Limitations to Non-Legal Malpractice Claims – Confusion Predicted for Law and Motion Judges

    Jury Trials and Mediation in Philadelphia County: Virtually in Person

    Haight Welcomes Elizabeth Lawley

    New Recommendations for Healthy and Safe Housing Conditions

    What a Difference a Day Makes: Mississippi’s Discovery Rule

    Mitsubishi Estate to Rebuild Apartments After Defects Found

    Florida High-Rise for Sale, Construction Defects Possibly Included

    Chambers USA 2025 Recognizes Four Partners and Three Practices at Lewis Brisbois

    Penn Station’s Revival Gets a $1.6 Billion Down Payment
    Corporate Profile

    COVINGTON PENNSYLVANIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 7,000 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Covington, Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness Group provides a wide range of trial support and consulting services to Covington's most acknowledged construction practice groups, CGL carriers, builders, owners, and public agencies. Drawing from a diverse pool of construction and design professionals, BHA is able to simultaneously analyze complex claims from the perspective of design, engineering, cost, or standard of care.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Covington, Pennsylvania

    Contract Disputes Act and Jurisdictional Requirements

    March 17, 2026 —
    When dealing with a claim on a federal construction project, there are a couple of key background jurisdictional points. These points were briefly highlighted in the recent appeal, Mega Star Logistics Service Co. v. Department of State, CBCA 8232, 2026 WL 253738 (CBCA 2026). Here are the two points. FIRST, when it comes to jurisdiction, for a board of contract appeals “to exercise jurisdiction over a claim, the CDA [Contract Disputes Act] requires the contractor to submit a written claim to the contracting officer for a COFD [contracting officer final decision], with a subsequent appeal of the COFD or deemed denial if the CO [contracting officer] does not issue a COFD.” Thus, you need to submit a formal claim under the Contract Disputes Act to the contracting officer to get a final decision from the contracting officer (or the contracting officer waiving the final decision by not timely furnishing one). Mega Star Logistics, supra. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Two Snell & Wilmer Attorneys Selected as 2026 San Diego Super Lawyers Rising Stars

    May 14, 2026 —
    SAN DIEGO – Snell & Wilmer is pleased to announce that two attorneys in the San Diego office have been selected for inclusion in the 2026 San Diego Super Lawyers Rising Stars publication. Rising Stars is a listing of lawyers from more than 70 practice areas who have attained a high degree of peer recognition and professional achievement. To be eligible for inclusion, a candidate must be either 40 years old or younger or in practice for 10 years or less. The selection process is multi-phased and includes independent research and peer nominations, with no more than 2.5 percent of the lawyers in the state named to the Rising Stars list. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Snell & Wilmer

    That’s a Wrap! Pennsylvania Court Holds Arbitration Clause in Online Agreement Unenforceable

    May 14, 2026 —
    In Duffy v. Tatum, 2026 Pa. Super. LEXIS 112, 2026 PA Super 41, the Superior Court of Pennsylvania (Superior Court) considered whether an arbitration provision contained in the online Terms of Service on the defendant’s website were enforceable. The plaintiff, Daniel Duffy (Duffy), visited the website of defendant, Dolly, Inc. (Dolly), to purchase moving services. Duffy selected the number of movers, items to be moved and the type of vehicle needed. To complete the booking, the website required Duffy to checkmark a box labeled “By checking this box I accept the Dolly Terms of Service.” Duffy did not have to open the link or scroll to the bottom of the agreement before being able to click on the checkmark box. The Terms of Service included an arbitration provision requiring that any dispute related to the moving services to be resolved by arbitration in accordance with the American Arbitration Association. The Terms of Service did not include any statement that the user was waiving the right to a jury trial. The Superior Court found the internet Terms of Service unenforceable. During the moving process, an accident occurred and injured Duffy. In May 2024, Duffy and his wife sued Dolly and other related entities alleging negligence and loss of consortium. Dolly filed preliminary objections alleging that the parties agreed to alternative dispute resolution. The lower court overruled the preliminary objections, finding that Dolly’s website did not provide reasonably obvious notice of its Terms of Service to Duffy and, as such, Duffy never agreed to waive his constructional right to a jury trial. Dolly filed an appeal to the Superior Court. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gus Sara, White and Williams LLP
    Mr. Sara may be contacted at sarag@whiteandwilliams.com

    Doctrine of Substantial Performance When It Comes to Payment

    July 27, 2026 —
    A recent non-construction case touches upon the doctrine of substantial performance when it comes to payment. In this case, a club was to make two payments to secure a rapper’s attendance. The first payment was made. The second payment was made but was a few hundred dollars short of the agreed amount. The rapper did not show up. The club claimed it substantially performed its obligations. At first glance, the argument makes sense because the second payment fell only a few hundred dollars short. But that wasn’t the case when it comes to pre-commencement payment obligations:
    Substantial performance applies only when the variance from the contract terms “is inadvertent or unintentional and unimportant so that the work actually performed is substantially what was called for in the contract.” However, when one party agrees to pay the other on or before a specific date, time is of the essence, and the payor is required to pay the payee on or before that date. “There is almost always no such thing as ‘substantial performance’ of payment between commercial parties when the duty is simply the general one to pay. Payment is either made in the amount and on the date due, or it is not.”
    Big Gate Records, LLC v. Washington, 51 Fla.L.Weekly D1281a (Fla. 2nd DCA 2026) (internal citations omitted).
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    2026 Colorado Super Lawyers Recognizes 11 Snell & Wilmer Attorneys

    May 05, 2026 —
    DENVER – Snell & Wilmer is pleased to announce that eleven attorneys in its Denver office have been selected for inclusion in the 2026 Colorado Super Lawyers publication. Of those eleven, four were recognized as Rising Stars. Super Lawyers is a listing of lawyers from more than 70 practice areas who have attained a high degree of peer recognition and professional achievement. The selection process is multi-phased and includes independent research, peer nominations, and peer evaluations. The final published list represents no more than 5 percent of the lawyers in the state. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Snell & Wilmer

    Soot Constitutes Property Damage

    March 17, 2026 —
    Applying Missouri law, the Eighth Circuit affirmed the jury verdict awarding damages for the presence of soot after a fire. Maxus Metropolitan, LLC v. Travelers Property Cas. Co. of Am., 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 29921 (8th Cir. Nov, 17, 2025). A fire destroyed Phase 6 of a multi-building apartment complex known as the Metropolitan. At the time of the fire, all six phases of the Metropolitan were at various stages of completion, including some of which were occupied by tenants. Phase 6 was still under construction. The fire caused severe damage to Phase 5. The interiors of Phases 1-4 were unaffected by the fire. Maxus Metropolitan, the owner of the complex, had a policy with Travelers which covered up to $35 million in “direct physical loss, . . or damage.” The policy also provided coverage for up to $5 million in lost business income. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    NJ Public Works Contractors Beware – Pay Special Attention When Submitting Your Public Works Contractor Registration

    May 26, 2026 —
    While it is always important to be careful when making submissions to government agencies, recent activity by the New Jersey Department of Labor and Workforce Development (“NJDOL”) reveals considerably increased scrutiny in connection with contractors renewing their New Jersey Public Works Registration. Extra care when completing the registration renewal process is warranted, because the consequences of a misstep can be significant and disruptive. The New Jersey Public Works Contractor Registration Act requires all contractors bidding on or engaging in construction-related public works projects to register with the NJDOL. This registration, which must be resubmitted every 1-2 years, requires contractors to make a number of detailed disclosures relating to, among other things, the entity’s ownership structure, prior state and federal labor law violations, details regarding interests in other businesses, unlawful acts by owners/officers, and participation in apprenticeship programs. Reprinted courtesy of Levi W. Barrett, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and Aaron C. Schlesinger, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. Mr. Barrett may be contacted at lbarrett@pecklaw.com Mr. Schlesinger may be contacted at aschlesinger@pecklaw.com Read the full story...

    Introducing the Updated 2026 Pillsbury Guide to Data Centers

    June 08, 2026 —
    Since the initial publication of the Pillsbury Guide to Data Centers in 2025, the market has continued to evolve—most notably with respect to power availability, energy strategy, tax and incentives planning, and investment activity across the sector. While many of the legal, commercial and regulatory frameworks addressed in the original Guide remain durable and relevant, recent developments warranted targeted updates and additions. The 2026 edition expands and updates our energy-focused content to reflect the increasingly central role of power procurement, interconnection and long-term energy strategy in data center development. We have incorporated new materials addressing power purchase and interconnection agreements, solar and other renewable energy solutions, advanced reactor designs, and nuclear-powered data centers projects, including an updated project tracker. We have also added new analysis covering state and local tax considerations and incentive structures relevant to data center development and operations, as well as current M&A and private equity trends shaping investment in the sector. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gravel2Gavel Team