BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    custom homes expert witness Brodheadsville Pennsylvania casino resort expert witness Brodheadsville Pennsylvania parking structure expert witness Brodheadsville Pennsylvania office building expert witness Brodheadsville Pennsylvania Medical building expert witness Brodheadsville Pennsylvania concrete tilt-up expert witness Brodheadsville Pennsylvania landscaping construction expert witness Brodheadsville Pennsylvania townhome construction expert witness Brodheadsville Pennsylvania custom home expert witness Brodheadsville Pennsylvania multi family housing expert witness Brodheadsville Pennsylvania retail construction expert witness Brodheadsville Pennsylvania condominiums expert witness Brodheadsville Pennsylvania tract home expert witness Brodheadsville Pennsylvania low-income housing expert witness Brodheadsville Pennsylvania mid-rise construction expert witness Brodheadsville Pennsylvania Subterranean parking expert witness Brodheadsville Pennsylvania structural steel construction expert witness Brodheadsville Pennsylvania production housing expert witness Brodheadsville Pennsylvania housing expert witness Brodheadsville Pennsylvania industrial building expert witness Brodheadsville Pennsylvania hospital construction expert witness Brodheadsville Pennsylvania institutional building expert witness Brodheadsville Pennsylvania
    Brodheadsville Pennsylvania structural engineering expert witnessesBrodheadsville Pennsylvania civil engineering expert witnessBrodheadsville Pennsylvania stucco expert witnessBrodheadsville Pennsylvania construction expert witnessBrodheadsville Pennsylvania expert witnesses fenestrationBrodheadsville Pennsylvania building expertBrodheadsville Pennsylvania contractor expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Brodheadsville, Pennsylvania

    Pennsylvania Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB 1875 stipulates that “no later than 90 days before filing an action, serve written notice of claim on the contractor. Upon receipt of notice, builder has 15 days to forward the claim to any subcontractor/supplier and 30 days after service of notice to offer to compromise and settle the claim by monetary payment without inspection, propose to inspect the dwelling that is the subject of the claim; or reject the claim. Contractor has 14 days after inspection to provide written notice of intention.”


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Brodheadsville Pennsylvania

    No state license required. For public works projects, see General Services website.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Pocono Builders Association (PA)
    Local # 3939
    745 Main St Ste 203
    Stroudsburg, PA 18360

    Brodheadsville Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Central Susquehanna Builders Association
    Local # 3956
    300 Walnut St
    Mifflinburg, PA 17844

    Brodheadsville Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Lawrence County Builders Association
    Local # 3937
    1435 Devils Elbow Rd
    New Castle, PA 16101

    Brodheadsville Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Builders Association of Central PA
    Local # 3952
    2038 Sandy Drive Ste 100
    State College, PA 16803

    Brodheadsville Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Carbon Bldrs Association
    Local # 3922
    PO Box 218 490 Ore Street
    Bowmanstown, PA 18030

    Brodheadsville Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Clearfield County Chapter
    Local # 3903
    PO Box 512
    Clearfield, PA 16830

    Brodheadsville Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Builders Association of Gr Dubois Area
    Local # 3959
    PO Box 664
    Du Bois, PA 15801
    Brodheadsville Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Brodheadsville Pennsylvania


    Temporary Obstructions Are a Permanent Problem Under the Americans with Disabilities Act

    Green Investigations Are Here: U.S. Department of Justice Turns Towards Environmental Enforcement Actions, Deprioritizes Compliance Assistance

    Fifth Circuit Reverses Insurers’ Summary Judgment Award Based on "Your Work" Exclusion

    Court Finds That Limitation on Conditional Use Permit Results in Covered Property Damage Due to Loss of Use

    Liquidated Damages Clause Not Enforced

    Nailing Social Media: The Key to Generating Leads for Construction Companies

    From Singapore to Rio Green Buildings Keep Tropical Tenants Cool

    $6 Million in Punitive Damages for Chinese Drywall

    Condo Developers Buy in Washington despite Construction Defect Litigation

    Illinois Appellate Court Holds Causation Can be Addressed in Appraisal Process

    Milwaukee's 25-Story Ascent Stacks Up as Tall Timber Role Model

    Canada’s Largest Homebuilder Sets U.S. Growth Plan

    Limited Number of Insurance-Related Bills Passed by 2014 Hawaii Legislature

    Don’t Let Construction Problems Become Construction Disputes (guest post)

    Texas Allows Wide Scope for Certificate of Merit

    Building in Arizona’s Data Center Boom: How Federal Executive Orders, State Regulation, and National-Security Policy Are Reshaping the Rules for Developers

    Traub Lieberman Partner Colleen Hastie Wins Summary Judgment in Favor of Sub-Contracted Electrical Company

    County Officials Refute Resident’s Statement that Defect Repairs Improper

    Before and After the Storm: Know Your Insurance Rights, Coverages and Obligations

    N.J. Appellate Court Applies Continuous Trigger Theory in Property Damage Case and Determines “Last Pull” for Coverage

    Motion to Dismiss Insurer's Counterclaim for Construction Defects Is Granted

    Scotiabank Is Cautious on Canada Housing as RBC, BMO Seek Action

    Language California Construction Direct Contractors Must Add to Subcontracts Beginning on January 1, 2022, Per Senate Bill 727

    When Every Drop Matters, Cities Turn to Watertech

    Spencer Mayer Receives Miami-Dade Bar Association's '40 Under 40' Award

    Failure to Strictly Adhere to Limitations for Flood Claim Leads to Denial

    Intellectual Property And Employment Law Best Practices: Are You Covering Your Bases In Protecting Construction-Related Trade Secrets?

    US Attorney Alleges ADA Violations in Chicago Cubs Stadium Renovation

    How a 10-Story Wood Building Survived More Than 100 Earthquakes

    Admissions In Answers to Construction Lawsuits Matter

    Couple Sues for Construction Defects in Manufactured Home

    Contractors Set to Implement Air Quality Upgrades for Healthier Buildings

    Labor Code § 2708 Presumption of Employer Negligence is Not Applicable Against Homeowners Who Hired Unlicensed Painting Company

    Maybe California Actually Does Have Enough Water

    Homeowner Allowed to Amend Complaint to Demonstrate Third-Party Beneficiary Status Under Lender-Placed Policy

    Prison Time and Restitution for Construction Fraud

    Turmoil Slows Rebuilding of Puerto Rico's Power Grid

    Housing Advocacy Group Moved to Dissolve New Jersey's Council on Affordable Housing

    Denial of Motion to Dissolve Lis Pendens Does Not Automatically Create Basis for Certiorari Relief

    Settlement Ends Construction Defect Lawsuit for School

    Colorado Introduces Construction Defect Bill for Commuter Communities

    Discovery Requests in Bad Faith Litigation Considered by Court

    Will There Be Construction Defect Legislation Introduced in the 2019 Colorado Legislative Session?

    Sales Pickup Shows Healing U.S. Real Estate Market

    Beyond Inverse Condemnation in Wildfire Litigation: An Oregon Jury Finds Utility Liable for Negligence, Trespass and Nuisance

    SunCal Buys Oak Knoll Development for the Second Time

    California Builders’ Right To Repair Is Alive

    Putting for a Cure: Don’t Forget to Visit BHA’s Booth at WCC to Support Charity

    Commercial Real Estate in 2023: A Snapshot

    FAA Plans Final Regulation on Commercial Drone Use by Mid-2016
    Corporate Profile

    BRODHEADSVILLE PENNSYLVANIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 7,000 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Brodheadsville, Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness Group provides a wide range of trial support and consulting services to Brodheadsville's most acknowledged construction practice groups, CGL carriers, builders, owners, and public agencies. Drawing from a diverse pool of construction and design professionals, BHA is able to simultaneously analyze complex claims from the perspective of design, engineering, cost, or standard of care.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Brodheadsville, Pennsylvania

    Settlement Agreements and Contracts Require a Meeting of the Minds

    July 20, 2026 —
    A settlement agreement does not need to be executed for it to be enforceable as long as there was a MEETING OF THE MINDS. The same rings true for any contract regardless of whether the contract is signed – THERE NEEDS TO BE A MEETING OF THE MINDS. In a recent case dealing with the settlement agreement on a construction lien, the essential settlement terms (money and mutual release) were memorialized in an e-mail exchange between the parties (owner and subcontractor). The settlement required the owner to pay the principal amount plus some attorney’s fees and then a mutual general release would be prepared. In response to the confirmatory email, the owner sent a check, which the subcontractor deposited, but the owner refused to sign the release signed and sent by the subcontractor. The owner further claimed it doesn’t need to pay the attorney’s fees because the lien amount was paid in full. The subcontractor sued arguing the owner breached the terms of the settlement. The appellate court agreed. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Soot Constitutes Property Damage

    March 17, 2026 —
    Applying Missouri law, the Eighth Circuit affirmed the jury verdict awarding damages for the presence of soot after a fire. Maxus Metropolitan, LLC v. Travelers Property Cas. Co. of Am., 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 29921 (8th Cir. Nov, 17, 2025). A fire destroyed Phase 6 of a multi-building apartment complex known as the Metropolitan. At the time of the fire, all six phases of the Metropolitan were at various stages of completion, including some of which were occupied by tenants. Phase 6 was still under construction. The fire caused severe damage to Phase 5. The interiors of Phases 1-4 were unaffected by the fire. Maxus Metropolitan, the owner of the complex, had a policy with Travelers which covered up to $35 million in “direct physical loss, . . or damage.” The policy also provided coverage for up to $5 million in lost business income. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Communication Gaps Can Cost Construction Firms in the Data Center Boom

    June 02, 2026 —
    The data center construction boom is transforming the construction industry at a historic pace. Fueled by cloud computing, artificial intelligence and relentless demand for digital infrastructure, data centers have become one of the fastest-growing project types in the built environment. Billions of dollars are flowing into new facilities and expansions, creating unprecedented opportunities for construction firms positioned to deliver reliably. But opportunity alone does not guarantee success. As competition intensifies, communication failures and poor information management are emerging as some of the most common (and costly) reasons firms lose margins, miss deadlines or fail to secure repeat work. In data center construction, where schedules are compressed and tolerance for error is minimal, even small breakdowns in communication can have outsized consequences. Reprinted courtesy of Mike Lewis, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    The Single Source of Truth in Construction Projects: Reality or Myth?

    March 24, 2026 —
    The idea of a single source of truth has been a fundamental part of the digital vision in the AEC industry for many years. From centralized CAD storage to BIM collaboration platforms and, more recently, Common Data Environments, the goal stays the same. Project teams want a reliable place where everyone can access the latest information. The phrase “single source of truth” comes from database and information management practices in the IT world, where the goal was to maintain one authoritative record of data and eliminate data redundancy. As the AEC industry began adopting digital tools, the same idea was applied to project information and workflows. Despite decades of technological progress, the question remains whether “one ring that rules them all” can actually be implemented in real construction projects. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    HHMR and Every One of its Partners Recognized by Legal 500 in Denver Elite – Real Estate

    April 20, 2026 —
    Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC is pleased to announce its recognition as a Tier 1 firm in the Denver Elite rankings for Real Estate, a category that includes construction law and construction litigation, by The Legal 500. In addition, each of the firm’s partners has been individually recognized in the same rankings. The firm’s individual recognitions include: Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David McLain, Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC
    Mr. McLain may be contacted at mclain@hhmrlaw.com

    Introducing the Updated 2026 Pillsbury Guide to Data Centers

    June 08, 2026 —
    Since the initial publication of the Pillsbury Guide to Data Centers in 2025, the market has continued to evolve—most notably with respect to power availability, energy strategy, tax and incentives planning, and investment activity across the sector. While many of the legal, commercial and regulatory frameworks addressed in the original Guide remain durable and relevant, recent developments warranted targeted updates and additions. The 2026 edition expands and updates our energy-focused content to reflect the increasingly central role of power procurement, interconnection and long-term energy strategy in data center development. We have incorporated new materials addressing power purchase and interconnection agreements, solar and other renewable energy solutions, advanced reactor designs, and nuclear-powered data centers projects, including an updated project tracker. We have also added new analysis covering state and local tax considerations and incentive structures relevant to data center development and operations, as well as current M&A and private equity trends shaping investment in the sector. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gravel2Gavel Team

    Wadsworth v. Regional Rail Partners — Verified Statements of Claim Under the Colorado Public Works Act

    August 25, 2026 —
    Editor’s Note: Wadsworth Revisited In August 2024, following the Colorado Court of Appeals’ decision in Ralph L. Wadsworth Construction Company, LLC v. Regional Rail Partners, we published Colorado Court of Appeals’ Ruling Highlights Dangers of Excessive Public Works Claims. At the time, the decision warranted a significant warning to contractors and subcontractors performing public work in Colorado. The Court of Appeals concluded that Wadsworth’s verified statement of claim improperly included unliquidated delay damages and that, because the claim was excessive, Wadsworth forfeited its right to recover the amounts included in the claim. We cautioned contractors to carefully scrutinize verified statements of claim and to avoid including unliquidated damages or amounts that were not yet due and payable. The Colorado Supreme Court has now reversed that decision. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Olivia Barden, Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC

    Texas Adopts New Procedural Rules for Summary Judgment Motions: What You Need To Know

    July 13, 2026 —
    On March 1, 2026, sweeping amendments to Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 166a took effect, fundamentally changing how Texas courts handle summary judgment motions — from filing and briefing through disposition. Whether representing a plaintiff or defendant, Texas litigants and attorneys must understand these new rules and their impact on case strategy and timelines. These procedural changes carry particular significance for construction litigants. Background: The Prior Rule Texas summary judgment practice has long diverged from the federal model. The Texas Rules of Civil Procedure recognize two types of summary judgment motions: (1) the traditional motion for summary judgment, and (2) the “no-evidence” motion for summary judgment. The no-evidence motion — unique to Texas — may be filed only after adequate time for discovery has passed. No bright-line rule governs that determination; it depends on the unique circumstances of each case. Reprinted courtesy of Conor G. Bateman, Snell & Wilmer and Marsha Cotton, Snell & Wilmer Mr. Bateman may be contacted at cbateman@swlaw.com Ms. Cotton may be contacted at mcotton@swlaw.com Read the full story...