BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    housing expert witness Pendleton Oregon Medical building expert witness Pendleton Oregon custom home expert witness Pendleton Oregon casino resort expert witness Pendleton Oregon office building expert witness Pendleton Oregon retail construction expert witness Pendleton Oregon tract home expert witness Pendleton Oregon mid-rise construction expert witness Pendleton Oregon low-income housing expert witness Pendleton Oregon industrial building expert witness Pendleton Oregon parking structure expert witness Pendleton Oregon structural steel construction expert witness Pendleton Oregon landscaping construction expert witness Pendleton Oregon multi family housing expert witness Pendleton Oregon Subterranean parking expert witness Pendleton Oregon concrete tilt-up expert witness Pendleton Oregon high-rise construction expert witness Pendleton Oregon hospital construction expert witness Pendleton Oregon production housing expert witness Pendleton Oregon custom homes expert witness Pendleton Oregon condominium expert witness Pendleton Oregon townhome construction expert witness Pendleton Oregon
    Pendleton Oregon expert witness concrete failurePendleton Oregon testifying construction expert witnessPendleton Oregon construction defect expert witnessPendleton Oregon concrete expert witnessPendleton Oregon construction scheduling expert witnessPendleton Oregon construction expert witnessesPendleton Oregon structural engineering expert witnesses
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Pendleton, Oregon

    Oregon Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (HB 2525 Chap. 701; HB2389) If an owner sends a builder a notice of defect within the time allowed for the owner to commence a court action against that contractor, the time for the owner to commence the action shall be extended, notwithstanding any statute of limitation or statute of ultimate repose, until the later of 120 days after written receipt of builders intention to repair, replace the defect, make monetary compensation or reject the claim. Upon receipt of notice, builder has 14 days to inspect the alleged defect. They then have no more than 90 days to communicate their intention The homebuyer must respond to the builder response within 30 days of receipt. The law requires builder notifies homebuyer of NOR before purchase.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Pendleton Oregon

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Metro Portland
    Local # 3862
    15555 SW Bangy Rd Ste 301
    Lake Oswego, OR 97035

    Pendleton Oregon Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Northeast Oregon Chapter
    Local # 3860
    PO Box 436
    Hermiston, OR 97838
    Pendleton Oregon Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    North Coast Home Builders Association
    Local # 3811
    PO Box 2547
    Seaside, OR 97138

    Pendleton Oregon Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Marion and Polk Counties
    Local # 3878
    385 Taylor St NE
    Salem, OR 97301

    Pendleton Oregon Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Oregon Home Builders Association
    Local # 3800
    375 Taylor St NE
    Salem, OR 97301

    Pendleton Oregon Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Baker County Chapter
    Local # 3802
    3470 10th St
    Baker City, OR 97814
    Pendleton Oregon Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Lincoln County Home Builders Association
    Local # 3858
    PO Box 440
    Tangent, OR 97389

    Pendleton Oregon Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Pendleton Oregon


    Ivanhoe Cambridge Plans Toronto Office Towers, Terminal

    West Coast Casualty’s Quarter Century of Service

    Arbitration and Mediation: What’s the Difference? What to Expect.

    The Miller Act Explained

    Embattled SNC-Lavalin Files Ethics Appeal, Realigns Structure

    Wildfire Insurance Coverage Series, Part 3: Standard Form Policy Exclusions

    Builders Can’t Rely on SB800

    Quick Note: Remember to Timely Foreclose Lien Against Lien Transfer Bond

    Quick Note: Procure Worker’s Compensation in the Name of Your Company If You Are a General Contractor

    Court Agrees to Stay Coverage Matter While Underlying State Action is Pending

    Duty to Defend Bodily Injury Evolving Over Many Policy Periods Prorated in Louisiana

    Roof's "Cosmetic" Damage From Hail Storm Covered

    Federal Court Upholds Privity Requirement in Additional Insured Endorsement; Finds No Equitable Estoppel

    Navigating Threshold Arbitration Issues in Construction Contracts

    A Court-Side Seat: Appeals and Agency Developments at the Close of 2020

    Federal Lawsuit Accuses MOX Contractors of Fraud

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (1/24/24) – Long-Term Housing Issues in Hawaii, Underperforming REITs, and Growth in a Subset of the Hotel Sector

    Application of Set-Off When Determining Prevailing Party for Purposes of Attorney’s Fees

    The CA Supreme Court Grants Petition for Review of McMillin Albany LLC v. Super Ct. 2015 F069370 (Cal.App.5 Dist.) As to Whether the Right to Repair Act (SB800) is the Exclusive Remedy for All Defect Claims Arising Out of New Residential Construction

    Formal Request for Time Extension Not Always Required to Support Constructive Acceleration

    Wonder How 2021 May Differ From 2020? Federal Data Privacy May Be Enacted - Be Prepared

    No Coverage for Construction Defect Claim Only Impacting Insured's Work

    After Breaching Its Duty to Defend, Insurer Must Pay Market Rates for Defense Counsel

    Use of Dispute Review Boards in the Construction Process

    Florida’s Fourth District Appeals Court Clarifies What Actions Satisfy Florida’s Construction Defect Statute of Repose

    Bay Area Firm Offers Construction Consulting to Remodels

    Flint Water Crisis Prompts Call for More Federal Oversight

    Sources of Insurance Recovery for Emerging PFAS Claims

    Carin Ramirez and David McLain recognized among the Best Lawyers in America© for 2021

    S&P Near $1 Billion Mortgage Ratings Settlement With U.S.

    Assignment of Claim not Precluded by Policy’s Anti-Assignment Clause

    Congratulations to Newport Beach Lawyers Rick Peterson and Lindsey Wells on an Outstanding Trial Victory in a Habitability Case!

    Pennsylvania Modular Home Builder Buys Maine Firm

    How to Prevent Forest Fires by Building Cities With More Wood

    Does a Broker Forfeit His or Her Commission for Technical Non-Compliance with Department of Real Estate Statutory Requirements?

    Foreclosing Junior Lienholders and Recording A Lis Pendens

    Newmeyer Dillion Announces Jason Moberly Caruso As Its Newest Partner

    Drones Used Despite Uncertain Legal Consequences

    Best Lawyers® Recognizes 43 White and Williams Lawyers

    Can a Contractor be Liable to Second Buyers of Homes for Construction Defects?

    ABA’s False Claims in Construction Contracts, 2nd Edition

    Georgia HB 676: A Bill Property Owners and Contractors Should Watch

    Real Estate & Construction News Round-Up (10/06/21)

    Third Circuit Affirms Use of Eminent Domain by Natural Gas Pipeline

    Massive Fire Destroys Building, Firefighters Rescue Construction Worker

    Seventh Circuit Finds Allegations of Occurrence and Property Damage Require a Defense

    Drilling Rig Topples at Citadel Miami Headquarters Site, Injuring Four

    Recession Graduates’ Six-Year Gap in Homeownership

    BHA Attending the Construction Law Conference in San Antonio, Texas

    Reminder: Know Your Contractor Licensing Rules
    Corporate Profile

    PENDLETON OREGON CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 7,000 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Pendleton, Oregon Construction Expert Witness Group provides a wide range of trial support and consulting services to Pendleton's most acknowledged construction practice groups, CGL carriers, builders, owners, and public agencies. Drawing from a diverse pool of construction and design professionals, BHA is able to simultaneously analyze complex claims from the perspective of design, engineering, cost, or standard of care.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Pendleton, Oregon

    Segal McCambridge Shareholders and Associates Recognized in 2027 Best Lawyers in America®

    September 01, 2026 —
    Segal McCambridge is pleased to announce that 24 firm shareholders and associates have been recognized in the 2027 editions of the Best Lawyers in America® and Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch® in America. Best Lawyers® is an elite global network of legal professionals recognized through a trusted, peer-reviewed distinction. For more than four decades, its Purely Peer Review® methodology has upheld the principle that recognition should be earned through the opinions of fellow attorneys, not marketing influence or paid listings. No fees are accepted for consideration or inclusion.    "This Best Lawyers recognition is especially meaningful because it reflects the caliber of advocacy our attorneys bring to clients every day, across a wide range of practice areas," said Jason P. Eckerly, Segal McCambridge Managing Shareholder. "We are proud to see so many of our colleagues honored for their legal skills, dedication, and professionalism. This continued recognition underscores the strength of our national platform and the depth of talent across our firm." Segal McCambridge's attorneys named in Best Lawyers in America® include: Jason P. Eckerly; Chicago, IL; Product Liability Litigation - Defendants Scott R. Emery; New York, NY; Mass Tort Litigation / Class Actions - Defendants Jay Evans; Pittsburgh, PA; Mass Tort Litigation / Class Actions - Defendants; Product Liability Litigation - Defendants Richard H. Glucksman; Los Angeles, CA; Construction Law Nathan R. Horne; Austin, TX; Construction Law; Litigation - Construction Alice Sacks Johnston; Pittsburgh, PA; Commercial Litigation; Mass Tort Litigation / Class Actions - Defendants; Product Liability Litigation - Defendants Patrick M. Kemp; Austin, TX; Litigation - Insurance Mitchell P. Morinec; Chicago, IL; Commercial Litigation Anthony J. Sbarra, Jr.; Milton, MA; Mass Tort Litigation / Class Actions - Defendants; Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants; Product Liability Litigation - Defendants Alan J. Taylor; Southfield, MI; Litigation - Construction; Real Estate Law Kenneth P. Williams; Southfield, MI; Insurance Law; Litigation - Insurance; Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants David J. Yates; Southfield, MI; Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Segal McCambridge's attorneys named in Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America® include: Masood Syed Ali; Chicago, IL; Labor and Employment Law - Management Mari Bryn Dowdy; Austin, TX; Product Liability Litigation - Defendants Chaniece M. Hill; Chicago, IL; Medical Malpractice Law - Defendants Mandy Kolodkin; Indianapolis, IN; Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Jeffrey M. Marchese; New York, NY; Litigation - Construction Courtney C. McLaren; Memphis, TN; Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Benjamin J. Nellans; Chicago, IL; Commercial Litigation Christopher P. Norton; Los Angeles, CA; Commercial Litigation Nelson T. Rainey; Memphis, TN; Family Law; Health Care Law; Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Nicholas E. Richardson; Tampa, FL; Insurance Law Jordan B. Rosenberg; Philadelphia, PA; Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Ian M. Sadler; Austin, TX; Commercial Litigation; Insurance Law About Best Lawyers® Best Lawyers® is an elite global network of legal professionals recognized through trusted, peer-reviewed distinction. For over four decades, its Purely Peer Review® methodology has upheld the principle that recognition should be earned through the opinions of fellow attorneys, not marketing influence or paid listings. Each year, millions of confidential evaluations are collected worldwide, contributing to one of the legal industry's most rigorous and trusted vetting processes. Only about 5% of lawyers in the United States and 3% globally are recognized, reflecting the selectivity and credibility of the results. No fees are accepted for consideration or inclusion, maintaining the integrity and independence of all recognitions. For more information, visit: www.bestlawyers.com. About Segal McCambridge Segal McCambridge has built a reputation as a national law firm of accomplished trial attorneys for almost four decades. Founded in 1986, the firm has grown from a four-lawyer shop in Chicago to a firm with more than 20 offices nationwide. The firm routinely counsels and defends clients, including Fortune 500 companies, corporations, and individuals, across the United States in complex litigation matters including, but not limited to: asbestos, class action, construction, employment, environmental, food and beverage, insurance coverage and bad faith, life sciences, product liability, professional liability, technology and cyber risk, transportation, and warranty. For more information, visit: www.segalmccambridge.com.

    HDR Agreed to $12M Settlement With Miami Bridge Design-Build Team

    May 12, 2026 —
    HDR last year agreed to pay $12 million to the design-build construction contractor Archer Western-de Moya Group to settle its claims that the engineer had incompletely designed and under-designed Miami's new Signature Bridge when the joint venture committed to a fixed price prior to construction in 2018. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Richard Korman, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Korman may be contacted at kormanr@enr.com

    Five Snell & Wilmer Partners Named to Utah Business’ 2026 Legal Elite

    September 29, 2026 —
    SALT LAKE CITY – Snell & Wilmer is pleased to announce that five partners have been named to Utah Business’ 2026 “Legal Elite.” The annual recognition honors leading Utah attorneys who are making a meaningful impact in their respective areas of practice. Honorees are peer-nominated and selected by a panel of experienced legal and law enforcement professionals based on their legal knowledge, commitment to ethical standards, and professional achievements. Wade R. Budge is a land use and real estate lawyer with significant experience advising developers and owners in all aspects of real estate development. He has negotiated entitlements for master planned communities, industrials projects, retail centers, office buildings, subdivisions, and mountain resorts throughout Utah. He also regularly represents clients in the use, acquisition, and disposition of real estate projects throughout the Western United States. Budge has advised developers in obtaining public incentives and using public finance tools, including tax increment financing, to facilitate new and redevelopment projects, and regularly advises clients with government relations matters involving state and local governments. Budge has negotiated public-private partnerships with dozens of local governments and with every one of the state’s development agencies, including the Point of the Mountain State Land Authority, the Military Installation Development Authority, and the Utah Fairpark Area Investment and Restoration District. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Snell & Wilmer

    Balancing the Right to Repair With Evidence Preservation in Construction Defect Litigation

    April 20, 2026 —
    Every major construction project comes with risk, whether it’s a warehouse build, a multifamily development or a major renovation. Parties tend to be aligned when things are proceeding as planned. But when something goes wrong—cracked concrete, water intrusion, systems that don’t perform as expected—those interests can quickly diverge. Property owners are often caught in the middle when construction defects surface. They’re expected to act quickly to limit damage and costs. But they also have legal obligations to preserve evidence and allow potentially responsible parties, such as contractors or designers, to observe testing, demolition and repairs. Additionally, owners often have duties to lenders and investors to fix problems promptly and pursue claims against those responsible. Meanwhile, contractors and other parties have obligations of their own—not to interfere with repairs and not to delay mitigation efforts while investigations are underway. What follows will examine how those competing responsibilities play out in construction defect disputes. Reprinted courtesy of Benton Wheatley & Anna Spicer, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (8/19/26) – Single-Family Housing Investors Worry, Confidence in Multifamily REITs and Construction Backlog Falls

    September 08, 2026 —
    In our latest roundup, U.S. Chamber of Commerce creates Housing Advisory Council, a legal battle develops over new federal rules related to mortgage escrow accounts, hospitality dealmakers pursue ‘bigger, higher-conviction’ M&A, and more!
    • In the wake of the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act becoming law, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce has created a Housing Advisory Council with the goal of advancing market-driven policies that help increase housing supply and promote affordability. (Julie Strupp, Multifamily Dive)
    • Investors in the single-family housing market are increasingly concerned about interest rates, rising insurance and home costs, and the ongoing war with Iran. (Diana Olick, CNBC)
    • A legal battle is brewing over new federal rules related to accounts that hold money to pay homeowners’ property taxes and insurance payments. (Sarah Agostino, CNBC)
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Pillsbury's Construction & Real Estate Law Team

    Generic Complaint Alleging Bad Faith is Insufficient

    August 24, 2026 —
    The federal district court granted the insurer’s motion for judgment on the pleadings after determining that the insured’s claims for bad faith and unfair claims settlement practices were insufficiently pled. Navia v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 111261 (W.D. N. C. May 20, 2026). The insured submitted a claim for damages to real property owned by the insured allegedly caused by Hurricane Helene. State Farm advised the insured that only some of the claimed damages were covered by the policy and payment for such damages were denied because the estimate for the covered damages did not exceed the policy’s deductible. The insured sued asserting claims for breach of contract, bad faith, and unfair claim settlement practices. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    World's Longest Immersed Tunnel Passes Milestone, But Faces Delays

    August 03, 2026 —
    Work on the $8-billion Fehmarnbelt Tunnel, which is planned to link Germany and Denmark as the world’s longest immersed tunnel, is progressing as crews achieved a milestone last month with the successful immersion of its first precast concrete element. But Danish state-owned project owner Femern A/S says the plan is now running at least two years behind schedule and the tunnel’s road and rail portions will open in two separate stages. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of James Leggate, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Leggate may be contacted at leggatej@enr.com

    Are “Financial Hardship” Damages Recoverable?

    June 08, 2026 —
    In a case out of the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, F.O.G., LLC v. Department of the Interior, CBCA 8203, 2026 WL 1191881 (CBCA 2026) a contractor claimed damages that included “financial hardship” damages due to slow payments. The financial hardship damages included personal damages to the contractor’s president and his wife. Are these damages recoverable? Drumroll…The Board ruled that the contractor cannot recover such financial hardship damages. As it relates the personal financial hardship damages, the Board ruled, “Neither [the contractor’s] president nor his wife are a party to this contract, are in privity of contract with [the government], or are the beneficiaries under this contract. [The contractor], therefore, cannot recover for any losses that either one has suffered individually and that [the contractor] claimed in this appeal.” F.O.G., LLC, supra. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com