BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    custom homes expert witness North Powder Oregon concrete tilt-up expert witness North Powder Oregon parking structure expert witness North Powder Oregon casino resort expert witness North Powder Oregon office building expert witness North Powder Oregon structural steel construction expert witness North Powder Oregon institutional building expert witness North Powder Oregon condominium expert witness North Powder Oregon industrial building expert witness North Powder Oregon Medical building expert witness North Powder Oregon housing expert witness North Powder Oregon hospital construction expert witness North Powder Oregon multi family housing expert witness North Powder Oregon low-income housing expert witness North Powder Oregon mid-rise construction expert witness North Powder Oregon custom home expert witness North Powder Oregon Subterranean parking expert witness North Powder Oregon tract home expert witness North Powder Oregon condominiums expert witness North Powder Oregon townhome construction expert witness North Powder Oregon production housing expert witness North Powder Oregon landscaping construction expert witness North Powder Oregon
    North Powder Oregon reconstruction expert witnessNorth Powder Oregon construction expert witnessNorth Powder Oregon slope failure expert witnessNorth Powder Oregon window expert witnessNorth Powder Oregon building code expert witnessNorth Powder Oregon fenestration expert witnessNorth Powder Oregon soil failure expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    North Powder, Oregon

    Oregon Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (HB 2525 Chap. 701; HB2389) If an owner sends a builder a notice of defect within the time allowed for the owner to commence a court action against that contractor, the time for the owner to commence the action shall be extended, notwithstanding any statute of limitation or statute of ultimate repose, until the later of 120 days after written receipt of builders intention to repair, replace the defect, make monetary compensation or reject the claim. Upon receipt of notice, builder has 14 days to inspect the alleged defect. They then have no more than 90 days to communicate their intention The homebuyer must respond to the builder response within 30 days of receipt. The law requires builder notifies homebuyer of NOR before purchase.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines North Powder Oregon

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Marion and Polk Counties
    Local # 3878
    385 Taylor St NE
    Salem, OR 97301

    North Powder Oregon Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Oregon Home Builders Association
    Local # 3800
    375 Taylor St NE
    Salem, OR 97301

    North Powder Oregon Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Baker County Chapter
    Local # 3802
    3470 10th St
    Baker City, OR 97814
    North Powder Oregon Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Metro Portland
    Local # 3862
    15555 SW Bangy Rd Ste 301
    Lake Oswego, OR 97035

    North Powder Oregon Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Lincoln County Home Builders Association
    Local # 3858
    PO Box 440
    Tangent, OR 97389

    North Powder Oregon Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Willamette Valley Home Builders Association
    Local # 3805
    PO Box 440 32054 Old Hwy 34
    Tangent, OR 97389

    North Powder Oregon Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Northeast Oregon Chapter
    Local # 3860
    PO Box 436
    Hermiston, OR 97838
    North Powder Oregon Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For North Powder Oregon


    A Contract Is a Contract: Releases and Change Orders / Bilateral Modifications Are Construed as Contracts

    A Court-Side Seat: A FACA Fight, a Carbon Pledge and Some Venue on the SCOTUS Menu

    Suit Limitation Provision Upheld

    Largest Per Unit Settlement Ever in California Construction Defect Case?

    Insured's Motion for Reconsideration on Protecting the Integrity of Referral Sources under Florida Statute s. 542.335

    Skanska Will Work With Florida on Barge-Caused Damage to Pensacola Bay Bridge

    Another Defect Found on the Bay Bridge: Water Leakage

    Janus v. AFSCME

    The Five-Step Protocol to Reopening a Business

    Recovering Unabsorbed Home Office Overhead Due to Delay

    Pandemic Magnifies Financial Risk in Construction: What Executives Can Do to Speed up Customer Payments

    Chicago Makes First Major Update to City's Building Code in 70 Years

    Nondelegable Duty of Care Owed to Third Persons

    To Catch a Thief

    Ambiguity Kills in Construction Contracting

    Eleventh Circuit’s Noteworthy Discussion on Bad Faith Insurance Claims

    The Need for Situational Awareness in Construction

    Builder Exposes 7 Myths regarding Millennials and Housing

    Quick Note: Don’t Sue Your Arbitrator

    Earthquake Hits Mid-Atlantic Region; No Immediate Damage Reports

    Wildfire Insurance Coverage Series, Part 5: Valuation of Loss, Sublimits, and Amount of Potential Recovery

    Want to Use Drones in Your Construction Project? FAA Has Just Made It Easier.

    Sinking Floor Does Not Meet Strict Definition of Collapse

    ICC/ASHRAE/USGBC/IES Green Model Code Integrates Existing Standards

    EPA Fines Ivory Homes for Storm Water Pollution

    Maximizing Contractual Indemnity Rights: Insuring the Indemnitor's Obligation

    Congratulations to Las Vegas Partner Jeffrey Saab and Senior Associate Shanna Carter on Winning Another Motion for Summary Judgment!

    Insurance Law Client Alert: California Appeals Court Refuses to Apply Professional Services Exclusion to Products-Completed Operations Loss

    Verdict In Favor Of Insured Homeowner Reversed For Improper Jury Instructions

    GRSM Team Wins Summary Judgment in Million-Dollar HOA Dispute

    Filing Lien Foreclosure Lawsuit After Serving Contractor’s Final Payment Affidavit

    English v. RKK. . . The Saga Continues

    Don’t Just Document- Document Right!

    How A Contractor Saved The Day On A Troubled Florida Condo Project

    Illinois Supreme Court Finds Construction Defect Claim Triggers Initial Grant of Coverage

    Luxury-Apartment Boom Favors D.C.’s Millennial Renters

    'Drywall Isn't Light': Peter Lupo on Safety Management at Standard Drywall

    Insurer's Attempt to Strike Experts in Collapse Case Fails

    The A, B and C’s of Contracting and Self-Performing Work Under California’s Contractor’s License Law

    Testimony from Insureds' Expert Limited By Motion In Limine

    Margins May Shrink for Home Builders

    ASCE Statement On House Passage Of The Precip Act

    The Roads to Justice: Building New Bridges

    California’s SB 61: New Limits on Retention Payments in Private Construction Contracts

    No Coverage for Additional Insured After Completion of Operations

    MSJ Granted Equates to a Huge Victory for BWB&O & City of Murrieta Fire Department!

    Construction Industry Survey Says Optimism Hits All-Time High

    Signed, Sealed and (Almost) Delivered: EU Council Authorizes Signing of U.S. – EU Bilateral Insurance Agreement

    One World Trade Center Tallest Building in US

    Illinois Appellate Court Holds Causation Can be Addressed in Appraisal Process
    Corporate Profile

    NORTH POWDER OREGON CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 7,000 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the North Powder, Oregon Construction Expert Witness Group provides a wide range of trial support and consulting services to North Powder's most acknowledged construction practice groups, CGL carriers, builders, owners, and public agencies. Drawing from a diverse pool of construction and design professionals, BHA is able to simultaneously analyze complex claims from the perspective of design, engineering, cost, or standard of care.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    North Powder, Oregon

    Why Construction Tendering Needs Specialized Intelligence

    March 31, 2026 —
    The construction industry has never lacked data; it lacks usable intelligence at the moments that matter most. In the high-stakes phases of tendering and pre-construction, the industry still relies on manual “Control-F” searches through thousands of pages of unstructured documents. I recently spoke with Herman Smith, a civil engineer and former Chief Digital Officer at Multiconsult, who left the corporate world to solve this specific bottleneck. His startup, Volve, isn’t just another AI wrapper; it is a specialized “drill” designed to penetrate the complexity of construction documentation. The Paradox of Digitalization without a Productivity Boost For years, the AEC industry has faced a frustrating paradox: we have more digital tools than ever, yet productivity has not improved. Herman observed this from the inside, managing hundreds of unique software licenses while seeing companies struggle to adapt to new workflows. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    White and Williams LLP is Proud to Host the 20th Anniversary Virginia Barton Wallace Award and Reception

    May 05, 2026 —
    White and Williams LLP is proud to host the 20th Anniversary Virginia Barton Wallace (VBW) Award and Reception, which will celebrate this year’s honoree, The Rendell Center for Civics & Civic Engagement. This award was created to celebrate the remarkable career of Virginia “Ginny” Barton Wallace, the first woman to be elected to partnership not only at White and Williams but also at any law firm in Philadelphia. The VBW Award is presented to a woman or organization that embodies the same qualities that Ginny possessed: leadership, drive, exemplary work ethic, overall excellence in her field, or an ability to inspire other women to succeed. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of White and Williams LLP

    Fourth Circuit Extends Coverage to Contractor

    May 14, 2026 —
    The Fourth Circuit in APAC-Atlantic, Inc. v. Owners Insurance Co., No. 24-1969, 2026 WL 458402 (4th Cir. Feb. 18, 2026) recently endorsed broad coverage for additional insureds, interpreting “arising out of” broadly under North Carolina law to extend coverage to a repaving company under its subcontractor’s liability insurance policy. The court held that an additional insured’s liability “arising out of” a named insured’s work in an additional-insured endorsement means liability “relating to” or “causally connected to” the named insured’s operations, rather than liability defined more narrowly as “caused by” or “the fault of” the named insured. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP

    Collapse Claim Dismissed as Untimely

    January 26, 2026 —
    The insureds’ suit for coverage due to a collapse of their barn was dismissed while the bad faith against the insurer survived. Funaro v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 227346 (W. D. Pa. Nov 19, 2025). The insureds’ barn was insured by State Farm. The insureds alleged that the barn roof collapsed from the weight of snow, causing damage to the structure of the barn itself and the contents of the barn (including a custom French stove that the insureds alleged was worth between $90,000 and $100,000). Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    New LA Home Designs, Reimagined By Fire

    January 13, 2026 —
    One year after wildfires tore through neighborhoods in Los Angeles County, killing at least 31 people and destroying more than 10,000 buildings, architects and developers are rethinking what home looks like in LA, and how resilient residential architecture evolves. Recovery from the costly disaster is a long way away. So far, hundreds of new homes have been submitted for permitting, but it’s a process shaping out to be an uneven one, based on damage, insurance and wealth. Affected homeowners are grappling with the details of fire-resilient construction and landscaping techniques, along with some more fundamental questions about what their communities should look like. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Patrick Sisson, Bloomberg

    Arizona Court of Appeals Clarifies Homeowners Association Open Meeting Requirements

    June 29, 2026 —
    A Z N H Revocable Trust v. Sunland Springs Village Homeowners Association, No. 1 CA-CV 25-0424 (Ariz. Ct. App. Apr. 28, 2026) OVERVIEW The Arizona Court of Appeals issued an opinion clarifying how homeowners associations must conduct meetings under A.R.S. § 33-1804. The decision reinforces the legislative policy favoring transparency in association governance, bringing association meeting requirements more in line with the open meeting standards applicable to public bodies under A.R.S. § 38-431 et seq. (Arizona’s Open Meeting Law). KEY HOLDINGS 1. All Voting and Formal Actions Must Occur in Open Meetings The Court affirmed that association boards cannot vote or take formal action during closed (executive) sessions. Under A.R.S. § 33-1804(A), associations may close portions of meetings only for “consideration” of certain enumerated topics, such as legal advice, pending litigation, or personal/financial information about individual members. The Court interpreted “consideration” to mean discussion and deliberation, not voting. The Court noted that dictionaries define “consider” as “spending time thinking about a possibility” and “formulating an opinion,” which are processes that precede formal action. This interpretation mirrors how Arizona’s Open Meeting Law (A.R.S. § 38-431.03(D)) prohibits public bodies from voting in executive session. Reprinted courtesy of Jill Casson Owen, Snell & Wilmer, Benjamin J. Hawkins, Snell & Wilmer and Stephen Wright, Snell & Wilmer Ms. Owen may be contacted at jowen@swlaw.com Mr. Hawkins may be contacted at bhawkins@swlaw.com Mr. Wright may be contacted at swright@swlaw.com Read the full story...

    Damage from Frozen Pipes Excluded from Coverage

    March 31, 2026 —
    Applying Texas law, the federal district court found there was no coverage for damage to the insured’s commercial building due to the bursting of frozen pipes. Barona v. State Farm Lloyds, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 257379 (S.D. Texas Dec. 12, 2025). Freezing weather froze Barona’s plumbing fixtures, causing significant water damage to the commercial property when the plumbing eventually expanded and burst. State Farm sent an inspector. During the inspection, Barona stated that he turned off the heat to his building but did not shut off the water supply or drain the pipes. State Farm denied covered based on the policy’s exclusion for frozen plumbing. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Document Everything! Always! No Exceptions! (AKA, Help Your Lawyer Help You!)

    April 14, 2026 —
    I had a case last year in which once again I found myself thinking: if only my client had better documented the verbal agreements, we would have had a much easier time defending his work. I know this is often easier said than done— you are in the middle of building a project, and you get a call, and you need to keep the project moving. No time for written change directives or a special bulletin. And yet—it is simply amazing to me the number of people who develop “litigation amnesia” about things when a lawsuit is involved. Your documentation system does not need to be perfect. You can use a simple Field notebook and handwritten notations. A text memo to yourself or, better yet, an email confirmation to the owner/contractor/whoever. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Melissa Dewey Brumback, Ragsdale Liggett PLLC
    Ms. Brumback may be contacted at mbrumback@rl-law.com