BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    housing expert witness Joseph Oregon industrial building expert witness Joseph Oregon structural steel construction expert witness Joseph Oregon parking structure expert witness Joseph Oregon condominiums expert witness Joseph Oregon institutional building expert witness Joseph Oregon landscaping construction expert witness Joseph Oregon condominium expert witness Joseph Oregon Medical building expert witness Joseph Oregon townhome construction expert witness Joseph Oregon low-income housing expert witness Joseph Oregon casino resort expert witness Joseph Oregon Subterranean parking expert witness Joseph Oregon tract home expert witness Joseph Oregon custom home expert witness Joseph Oregon custom homes expert witness Joseph Oregon production housing expert witness Joseph Oregon office building expert witness Joseph Oregon mid-rise construction expert witness Joseph Oregon hospital construction expert witness Joseph Oregon multi family housing expert witness Joseph Oregon high-rise construction expert witness Joseph Oregon
    Joseph Oregon defective construction expertJoseph Oregon building code compliance expert witnessJoseph Oregon engineering consultantJoseph Oregon slope failure expert witnessJoseph Oregon consulting general contractorJoseph Oregon eifs expert witnessJoseph Oregon construction expert witnesses
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Joseph, Oregon

    Oregon Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (HB 2525 Chap. 701; HB2389) If an owner sends a builder a notice of defect within the time allowed for the owner to commence a court action against that contractor, the time for the owner to commence the action shall be extended, notwithstanding any statute of limitation or statute of ultimate repose, until the later of 120 days after written receipt of builders intention to repair, replace the defect, make monetary compensation or reject the claim. Upon receipt of notice, builder has 14 days to inspect the alleged defect. They then have no more than 90 days to communicate their intention The homebuyer must respond to the builder response within 30 days of receipt. The law requires builder notifies homebuyer of NOR before purchase.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Joseph Oregon

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Metro Portland
    Local # 3862
    15555 SW Bangy Rd Ste 301
    Lake Oswego, OR 97035

    Joseph Oregon Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Marion and Polk Counties
    Local # 3878
    385 Taylor St NE
    Salem, OR 97301

    Joseph Oregon Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Oregon Home Builders Association
    Local # 3800
    375 Taylor St NE
    Salem, OR 97301

    Joseph Oregon Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Northeast Oregon Chapter
    Local # 3860
    PO Box 436
    Hermiston, OR 97838
    Joseph Oregon Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Baker County Chapter
    Local # 3802
    3470 10th St
    Baker City, OR 97814
    Joseph Oregon Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    North Coast Home Builders Association
    Local # 3811
    PO Box 2547
    Seaside, OR 97138

    Joseph Oregon Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Lincoln County Home Builders Association
    Local # 3858
    PO Box 440
    Tangent, OR 97389

    Joseph Oregon Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Joseph Oregon


    New Florida Law Adds Licensing Risk to Contractor/Subcontractor Payment Disputes

    Performance Bond Primer: Need to Knows and Need to Dos

    Real Estate & Construction News Round-Up 04/13/22

    Subcontractor Not Estopped from Enforcing Lien Not Listed In Bankruptcy Petition

    Contractual Indemnification Limitation on Florida Public Projects

    Texas Granted Primacy Over Class VI Carbon Storage Wells

    Vacation during a Project? Time for your Construction Documents to Shine!

    ACEC Supports BUILD America 250 Act as Important First Step on Surface Reauthorization

    Approaches in the Absence of a Differing Site Conditions Clause

    Rescission of Policy for Misrepresentation in Application Reversed

    Free Texas MCLE Seminar at BHA Houston June 13th

    Berkeley Researchers Look to Ancient Rome for Greener Concrete

    Traub Lieberman Partner Jessica Kull and Associate Jonathan Powell Win Motion to Dismiss in Favor of General Contractor

    Is a Violation of a COVID-19 Order the Basis For Civil Liability?

    Foreclosures Decreased Nationally in September

    From Ashes to Action: LA Fire Recovery Enters New Phase

    New York Office Secures Appellate Win in Labor Law 240(1) Fall in Basement Accident Case

    Options When there is a Construction Lien on Your Property

    Utah’s Highest Court Holds That Plaintiffs Must Properly Commence an Action to Rely on the Relation-Back Doctrine to Overcome the Statute of Repose

    Ex-Construction Firm That Bought a $75m Michelangelo to Delist

    Remote Depositions in the Post-Covid-19 World

    Insured Does Not Prevail on Summary Judgment Motion Invoking Ensuing Loss Provision

    OSHA’s Multi-Employer Citation Policy: What Employers on Construction Sites Need to Know

    Homeowner’s Policy Excludes Coverage for Loss Caused by Chinese Drywall

    Seventh Circuit Confirms that Appraisers May Determine Cause of Loss in Addition to Amount of Loss

    Congratulations to Wilke Fleury’s 2025 Super Lawyers and Rising Stars!

    COVID-19 Vaccine Considerations for Employers in the Construction Industry

    California Supreme Court Adopts Vertical Exhaustion for Long-Tail Claims

    What Buyers Want in a Green Home—and What They Don’t

    CGL Policies and the Professional Liabilities Exclusion

    Facts about Chinese Drywall in Construction

    Attention Contractors: U.S. Department of Labor Issues Guidance on Avoiding Discrimination When Using AI in Hiring

    Insurers Dispute Sharing of Defense in Construction Defect Case

    Traub Lieberman Attorneys Recognized as 2025 New York – Metro Super Lawyers® and Rising Stars

    "Ordinance or Law" Provision Mandates Coverage for Roof Repair

    D.R. Horton Earnings Rise as Sales and Order Volume Increase

    The Benefits of Trash Talking: A Cautionary Tale of Demolition Gone Wrong

    How Slow and Steady Can Lose the Race - Pacing and Delay Claims

    The Sensible Resurgence of the Multigenerational Home

    Hawaiian Electric Finalizes $2 Billion Maui Fire Settlement

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “You May Want an Intervention …”

    Negligent Failure to Respond to Settlement Offer Is Not Bad Faith

    Visual Construction Diaries – Interview with Jeff Sassinsky of Fovea Aero

    Manhattan to Get Tall, Skinny Tower

    Builders Beware: Smart Homes Under Attack by “Hide ‘N Seek” Botnet

    Fifth Circuit Asks Texas Supreme Court to Clarify Construction Defect Decision

    Lien Actions Versus Lien Foreclosure Actions

    New Jersey Court Upholds Registration Requirement for Joint Ventures Bidding on Public Works Contracts

    Homeowner Protection Act of 2007 Not Just for Individual Homeowners Anymore?

    Traub Lieberman Partner Greg Pennington and Associate Kevin Sullivan Win Summary Judgment Dismissing Homeowner’s Claim that Presented an Issue of First Impression in New Jersey
    Corporate Profile

    JOSEPH OREGON CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Joseph, Oregon Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Drawing from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Joseph's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Joseph, Oregon

    Arizona Court of Appeals Clarifies Homeowners Association Open Meeting Requirements

    June 29, 2026 —
    A Z N H Revocable Trust v. Sunland Springs Village Homeowners Association, No. 1 CA-CV 25-0424 (Ariz. Ct. App. Apr. 28, 2026) OVERVIEW The Arizona Court of Appeals issued an opinion clarifying how homeowners associations must conduct meetings under A.R.S. § 33-1804. The decision reinforces the legislative policy favoring transparency in association governance, bringing association meeting requirements more in line with the open meeting standards applicable to public bodies under A.R.S. § 38-431 et seq. (Arizona’s Open Meeting Law). KEY HOLDINGS 1. All Voting and Formal Actions Must Occur in Open Meetings The Court affirmed that association boards cannot vote or take formal action during closed (executive) sessions. Under A.R.S. § 33-1804(A), associations may close portions of meetings only for “consideration” of certain enumerated topics, such as legal advice, pending litigation, or personal/financial information about individual members. The Court interpreted “consideration” to mean discussion and deliberation, not voting. The Court noted that dictionaries define “consider” as “spending time thinking about a possibility” and “formulating an opinion,” which are processes that precede formal action. This interpretation mirrors how Arizona’s Open Meeting Law (A.R.S. § 38-431.03(D)) prohibits public bodies from voting in executive session. Reprinted courtesy of Jill Casson Owen, Snell & Wilmer, Benjamin J. Hawkins, Snell & Wilmer and Stephen Wright, Snell & Wilmer Ms. Owen may be contacted at jowen@swlaw.com Mr. Hawkins may be contacted at bhawkins@swlaw.com Mr. Wright may be contacted at swright@swlaw.com Read the full story...

    Prefatory Contract Language Cannot Be Used to Create an Ambiguity with Operative Provisions

    May 12, 2026 —
    Contract drafting and interpretation matters. A case dealt with the potential conflict with prefatory language in an agreement compared with operative provisions in the agreement. The trial court held that the operative provisions control. I discussed this case here where the appellate court reversed based on the prefatory language. But, through a motion for rehearing, the appellate court reconsidered its position and affirmed the trial court based on the operative provisions, mainly that the prefatory language cannot be used to create an ambiguity with operative provisions. Consider this explanation in affirming the trial court:
    Because the trial court correctly found that the initial language in the contract was prefatory and could not be used to create an ambiguity in the remainder of the contract, we affirm the final judgment.
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    2026 Top Business Risks for Construction and Engineering Companies

    May 26, 2026 —
    The 2026 Allianz Risk Barometer revealed some surprising findings for construction and engineering businesses. Now in its fifteenth year, this annual business risk ranking by corporate insurer Allianz Commercial incorporates the views of 3,338 global risk management professionals on the main perils on their radar for the year. Survey respondents included construction and engineering risk experts who identified the threats keeping them up at night. Here is how they ranked the top industry risks for 2026: Natural Catastrophes Natural catastrophe risk retains the top spot, with 38% of construction and engineering respondents citing this risk as their leading concern for 2026. From the insurance perspective, economic and insured losses remained high, albeit lower than the 10-year average. The evolving nature of natural catastrophes continues to pose significant challenges to businesses and the (re)insurance industry. Insured losses from natural catastrophes are set to reach $107 billion for 2025, according to Swiss Re—the sixth year in a row they have exceeded $100 billion, while economic losses are well in excess of $200 billion. Reprinted courtesy of Darren Tasker, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    White and Williams LLP Ranked in the Chambers USA 2026 Guide

    June 15, 2026 —
    White and Williams LLP is proud to celebrate the Chambers USA 2026 Guide which has ranked several of the Firm's attorneys and practice groups, underscoring the Firm's overall commitment to providing client service excellence. The Chambers USA 2026 Guide recognized attorneys Tim Davis, Managing Partner, and Nancy Frantz, Chair of the Real Estate Group, for Real Estate: Finance in the state of Pennsylvania. Randy Maniloff, Partner, Patricia Santelle, Chair Emeritus/Former Managing Partner, and Robert Walsh, Partner were ranked for Insurance in Pennsylvania, and Thomas Pinney, Partner, was ranked in Pennsylvania for Bankruptcy/Restructuring. In the state of Maryland, Partners David Gilliss and Eric Korphage were recognized for their work in Construction. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of White and Williams LLP

    Consider The Limited Warranty from Your Homebuilder

    July 06, 2026 —
    When purchasing a home from a homebuilder, there is an important consideration when it comes to the limited warranty you receive around the time you close on the home. That limited warranty likely includes an arbitration provision requiring you to arbitrate your disputes, such as construction defect claims, against the homebuilder. That arbitration provision will most likely include all claims, including statutory claims (such as a statutory violation of a building code claim), requiring you to arbitrate, as opposed to litigate, your disputes against the homebuilder. This is an important consideration. If the arbitration provision does not allow you to arbitrate all of your claims, and eliminates your rights to legitimate statutory claims, the arbitration provision could be unenforceable. By way of example, in a residential construction defect dispute, Anderson v. Taylor Morrison of Florida, Inc., 223 So.3d 1088 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017), the appeal turned on whether the arbitration provision in the homebuilder’s limited warranty was valid. The homeowners took possession of their home in 2009. In 2015, the homeowners served a Florida Statutes Chapter 558 notice of construction defects that included a statutory violation of a building code claim under Florida Statute §553.84. The limited warranty included an arbitration provision that specified it was the “exclusive remedy” for all disputes arising out of or related to the warranty or issues with the home and property. When read together with the warranty’s disclaimer that precluded claims not covered by the warranty “whether in contract, tort, or otherwise,” the statutory building code violation claim could not be remedied through arbitration because it fell outside the warranty’s coverage. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Labor Shortages in Construction: Managing Legal and Operational Risks

    April 14, 2026 —
    Labor shortages in the construction industry have become more than a scheduling headache—they are a legal and financial risk multiplier. As contractors scramble to meet deadlines with limited manpower, shortcuts in compliance, safety and subcontractor oversight become more likely. These gaps can expose companies to regulatory penalties, contractual disputes and reputational damage. Understanding how workforce constraints intersect with labor laws and contractual obligations is critical to mitigating the risks and navigating these challenges without compromising compliance or project integrity. The construction industry has faced persistent workforce challenges for years, but recent trends have intensified the problem. Factors such as an aging workforce, reduced immigration and post-pandemic recovery pressures have left contractors struggling to find skilled labor. According to Associated Builders and Contractors, the construction workforce shortage surpassed half a million workers in 2024; in the same year, Associated General Contractors reported 88% of construction companies had difficulty finding qualified workers. Reprinted courtesy of Meghan Douris, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Appeals Court Upholds Skanska, Granite Win in ‘I-4 Ultimate’ JV Dispute

    June 15, 2026 —
    A federal appeals court has upheld a lower court’s decision requiring The Lane Construction Corp. to pay roughly $79 million in damages, plus interest, to joint venture partners Skanska USA Civil Southeast and Granite Construction for work on Florida’s I-4 Ultimate highway megaproject in Orlando, which was completed in 2022. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Gottlieb may be contacted at gottliebb@enr.com

    Kahana Feld Announces Key Partner Additions Coast to Coast

    June 22, 2026 —
    IRVINE, CA – June 10, 2026 – Kahana Feld is pleased to announce Yvette Davis, Evan Kalooky, Beth Obra-White, Sean Paden, Michael Parme, Jeffrey Schmid, and Julieanne Yanez have joined the firm as partners. Four of these partners are joining the San Diego office, which further strengthens the firm’s General Liability and Construction Litigation practices and enhances Kahana Feld’s ability to serve clients across a broad range of complex matters in the region. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Kahana Feld