BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    casino resort expert witness Government Camp Oregon multi family housing expert witness Government Camp Oregon tract home expert witness Government Camp Oregon office building expert witness Government Camp Oregon structural steel construction expert witness Government Camp Oregon production housing expert witness Government Camp Oregon townhome construction expert witness Government Camp Oregon custom homes expert witness Government Camp Oregon mid-rise construction expert witness Government Camp Oregon institutional building expert witness Government Camp Oregon condominiums expert witness Government Camp Oregon landscaping construction expert witness Government Camp Oregon parking structure expert witness Government Camp Oregon Medical building expert witness Government Camp Oregon low-income housing expert witness Government Camp Oregon retail construction expert witness Government Camp Oregon condominium expert witness Government Camp Oregon industrial building expert witness Government Camp Oregon custom home expert witness Government Camp Oregon high-rise construction expert witness Government Camp Oregon hospital construction expert witness Government Camp Oregon concrete tilt-up expert witness Government Camp Oregon
    Government Camp Oregon ada design expert witnessGovernment Camp Oregon engineering consultantGovernment Camp Oregon window expert witnessGovernment Camp Oregon construction scheduling and change order evaluation expert witnessGovernment Camp Oregon building consultant expertGovernment Camp Oregon OSHA expert witness constructionGovernment Camp Oregon eifs expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Government Camp, Oregon

    Oregon Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (HB 2525 Chap. 701; HB2389) If an owner sends a builder a notice of defect within the time allowed for the owner to commence a court action against that contractor, the time for the owner to commence the action shall be extended, notwithstanding any statute of limitation or statute of ultimate repose, until the later of 120 days after written receipt of builders intention to repair, replace the defect, make monetary compensation or reject the claim. Upon receipt of notice, builder has 14 days to inspect the alleged defect. They then have no more than 90 days to communicate their intention The homebuyer must respond to the builder response within 30 days of receipt. The law requires builder notifies homebuyer of NOR before purchase.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Government Camp Oregon

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Metro Portland
    Local # 3862
    15555 SW Bangy Rd Ste 301
    Lake Oswego, OR 97035

    Government Camp Oregon Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Marion and Polk Counties
    Local # 3878
    385 Taylor St NE
    Salem, OR 97301

    Government Camp Oregon Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Oregon Home Builders Association
    Local # 3800
    375 Taylor St NE
    Salem, OR 97301

    Government Camp Oregon Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Baker County Chapter
    Local # 3802
    3470 10th St
    Baker City, OR 97814
    Government Camp Oregon Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Northeast Oregon Chapter
    Local # 3860
    PO Box 436
    Hermiston, OR 97838
    Government Camp Oregon Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    North Coast Home Builders Association
    Local # 3811
    PO Box 2547
    Seaside, OR 97138

    Government Camp Oregon Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Lincoln County Home Builders Association
    Local # 3858
    PO Box 440
    Tangent, OR 97389

    Government Camp Oregon Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Government Camp Oregon


    Insureds’ Altering Dates for Hailstorm Damage Justifies Denial of Claim

    Is It Time to Revisit Construction Defects in Kentucky?

    Appeals Court Affirms Civil Engineer Owes No Duty of Care to General Contractor

    New Megablimp to Deliver to Remote Alaskan Construction Sites

    Safety Data: Noon Presents the Hour of Greatest Danger

    Top Five General Tips for All Construction Contracts

    DoD Will Require New Cybersecurity Standards in 2020: Could Other Agencies Be Next?

    Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLC Recognized Among The Top 50 Construction Law FirmsTM of 2023 by Construction Executive

    Construction Contract’s Scope of Work Should Be Written With Clarity

    Is Equipment Installed as Part of Building Renovations a “Product” or “Construction”?

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (1/28/25) – FTC Suing Greystar, DOJ Investigating Top Residential Landlords and Trump Facing Housing Conundrum

    Top 10 Take-Aways from the 2024 Fall Forum Meeting in Pittsburgh

    Insurer Fails to Establish Prejudice Due to Late Notice

    Why the Total Recordable Incident Rate Doesn’t Tell the Whole Safety Story

    Significant Ruling in PFAS Litigation Could Impact Insurance Coverage

    Margins May Shrink for Home Builders

    False Implied Certifications in Making Payment Requests: What We Can Learn from Lance Armstrong

    The Problem with One Year Warranties

    Diggin’ Ain’t Easy: Remember to Give Notice Before You Excavate in California

    Digitalizing Cross-Laminated Timber Construction

    BWB&O Recognized Among 2026 Best Law Firms® in the United States

    California Mechanics’ Lien Case Treads Both Old and New Ground

    Illinois Joins the Pack on Defective Construction as an Occurrence

    Insurers Can Sue One Another for Defense Costs on Equitable Indemnity and Equitable Contribution Basis

    Is the Event You Are Claiming as Unforeseeable Delay Really Unforeseeable?

    Product Liability Alert: “Sophisticated User” Defense Not Available by Showing Existence of a “Sophisticated Intermediary”

    #11 CDJ Topic: Cortez Blu Community Association, Inc. v. K. Hovnanian at Cortez Hill, LLC, et al.

    The Future of Pandemic Coverage for Real Estate Owners and Developers

    Sewage Treatment Agency Sues Insurer and Contractor after Wall Failure and Sewage Leak

    A Third of U.S. Homebuyers Are Bidding Sight Unseen

    July 1, 2015 Statutory Changes Affecting Virginia Contractors and Subcontractors

    Has Hydrogen's Time Finally Come?

    New Year’s Resolution: Engineering the “Tee-Up Day” for Complex Construction Mediations

    Does a No-Damage-for-Delay Clause Also Preclude Acceleration Damages?

    “To Indemnify, or Not to Indemnify, that is the Question: California Court of Appeal Addresses Active Negligence in Indemnity Provisions”

    Seattle Council May Take a New Look at Micro-Housing

    Scope of Alaska’s Dump Lien Statute Substantially Reduced For Natural Gas Contractors

    Insurer Entitled to Reimbursement of Defense Costs Under Unjust Enrichment Theory

    Breach of Fiduciary Duty Claim Against Insurer Survives Motion to Dismiss

    Homeowner may pursue negligence claim for construction defect, Oregon Supreme Court holds

    Insurer's Motion to Dismiss "Redundant Claims" Denied

    Penalty for Failure to Release Expired Liens

    Making the Construction Industry a Safer place for Women

    Suffolk Construction Drywall Suits Involve Claim for $3 Million in Court Costs

    Hawaii Court of Appeals Affirms Broker's Liability for Failure to Renew Coverage

    Congratulations to BWB&O’s Newport Beach Team for Prevailing on a Highly Contested Motion to Quash!

    New Case Law Alert: Licensed General Contractors Cannot Sue Owners to Recover Funds for Work Performed by An Unlicensed Subcontractor

    Fifth Circuit Certifies Questions to Texas Supreme Court on Concurrent Causation Doctrine

    Consulting Firm Indicted and Charged with Falsifying Concrete Reports

    Washington Supreme Court Expands Contractor Notice Obligations
    Corporate Profile

    GOVERNMENT CAMP OREGON CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Government Camp, Oregon Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Drawing from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Government Camp's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Government Camp, Oregon

    Fraud Allegations Stymie Additional Insured’s Request for a Defense

    May 14, 2026 —
    The Federal District Court granted the insurer’s motion to dismiss the insured’s complaint seeking a defense of the underlying case alleging fraud. Renovation Realty, Inc. v. Colony Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21409 (S.D. Cal. Jan. 30, 2026). Mara Fortin sued Renovation Realty and others (“Fortin litigation”) from the fraudulent sale of a residence. The underlying complaint alleged Renovation “deliberately misrepresented of the residence as ‘completely remodeled’ and ‘meticulously maintained’.” The defendants, however, including Renovation, “knew from sources including a pre-renovation termite report documenting fungus and dry rot . . . that the Property harbored pre-existing material defects.” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Wisconsin Supreme Court Finds Coverage Under Ensuing Loss Provisions

    September 29, 2026 —
    Reversing the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to the insurer, the Wisconsin Supreme Court determined that genuine issues of material fact existed on whether ensuing losses as defined in the policy were covered. Cincinnati Ins. Co. v. Ropicky, 2026 Wisc. LEXIS 302 (Wis. July 7, 2026). The insured suffered damage during a storm on May 11, 2018, when rainwater poured into the home. The insureds gave notice to their insurer, Cincinnati. Upon inspection, Cincinnati determined that water intrusion resulted from multiple construction defects in the home. In the front of the home, water entered through a gap in the stone veneer. The inspector also concluded that the damage from rainwater was not just from the May 11, 2018, storm, but damage had occurred from prior storm events. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Insufficient Notice of Commencement and Construction Lien Rights

    August 03, 2026 —
    When a party is preserving their construction lien rights, the party will look to the recorded Notice of Commencement. This is the recorded document that provides the lienor with the information for purposes of preserving construction lien rights. A Notice to Owner company will typically rely on the Notice of Commencement to serve Notices to Owners from lower tiers not in contract with the owner. However, when it comes to preparing the lien, a lienor should look beyond just the Notice of Commencement and also look to the property appraiser’s website as a backstop. In a recent case, a window company had the homeowner sign the Notice of Commencement and then filled in the information. The company naturally did this for the convenience of the homeowner that probably was unfamiliar with the Notice of Commencement process. Regardless, information in the Notice of Commencement was inaccurate. It failed to include all the real property owners. Thus, when a payment dispute arose and a construction lien was prepared, it did not identify all of the real property owners. All of the real property owners were added later during the pendency of a lien foreclosure lawsuit. The trial court denied the lien because of the defective / insufficient Notice of Commencement — the lienor assumed the risk of error by filling out the information in the Notice of Commencement. The trial court further denied the lien holding that because the work did not commence within 90 days of the Notice of Commencement, the Notice of Commencement is void. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Four HHMR Attorneys Recognized in the 2027 Editions of Best Lawyers®

    September 21, 2026 —
    Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC is proud to announce that Best Lawyers® has recognized four HHMR attorneys in the 2027 editions of The Best Lawyers in America® and Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch® in America for their work in construction law and construction litigation. David M. McLain, Lisa Bondy Dunn, and Steven L. Heisdorffer earned recognition in the 2027 edition of The Best Lawyers in America®. Ricky L. Nolen, Jr. earned recognition in the 2027 edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch® in America. For a firm that has deliberately focused its practice on construction law and construction litigation for nearly 25 years, we take particular pride in seeing that focus reflected in the recognition of lawyers across different generations of HHMR. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC

    Chambers USA Recognizes GRSM as 2026 Industry Leader

    June 29, 2026 —
    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani has once again been recognized by Chambers USA, a prestigious directory of the country’s top law firms. In addition to the firm’s practice recognitions, eight partners, David Capell, Nancy Erfle, Matthew Foy, Ashlee Grant, Craig Heryford, Andrew Port, Todd Regan, and Angela Richie, were recognized among the nation’s top lawyers in their respective fields. Chambers USA recognized the firm in the following eight categories: USA – Nationwide – Insurance: Dispute Resolution: Insurer, Band 4 The firm is widely sought after by national insurance sector clients facing a wide array of coverage disputes as well as bad faith claims. The firm has additional capabilities in class actions and appellate litigation. Its broad base of experience includes professional liability, construction, and bankruptcy-related issues. This is the third year the firm has received this recognition. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    $356 Million Judgement Against Developer for Defective Construction of DC Condominium

    August 16, 2026 —
    On July 31, 2026, the Superior Court of the District of Columbia entered a $356,085,513.00 judgment against developers JBG Smith for defective construction and renovation of the Wardman Tower Residential Condominium in Washington, D.C. The case is Wardman Tower Residential Condominium Unit Owners Association v. JBG Smith Properties, et al., No. 2020 CA 004807 B (D.C. Super. Ct.). In a 148-page Trial Order, the D.C. Superior Court awarded $118,695,171.00 in damages in favor of the condominium association and against the condominium developers, including JBG Smith. The Court trebled those damages pursuant to the District of Columbia Consumer Protection Procedures Act (“CPPA”) to reach an ultimate judgment of $356,085,513.00. See Cowie Law Group: DC Condominium Construction Defects: Recovering Attorney’s Fees, Litigation Expenses & Treble Damages Under the Consumer Protection Procedures Act. Cowie Law Group, P.C. filed the lawsuit on behalf of the Association in 2020. The firm represented the Association throughout years of pretrial discovery and ultimately served as trial counsel with Williams & Connolly LLP during a lengthy bench trial before the Honorable Yvonne Williams. The Cowie Law Group team included attorneys, George A. Bealefeld, III, Albert G. McCarraher, Stanford L. Kimmel, III and Nicholas D. Cowie. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Nicholas D. Cowie, Cowie Law Group
    Mr. Cowie may be contacted at ndc@cowielawgroup.com

    Global Insights Center: Monthly Newsletter

    June 15, 2026 —
    May in Review Last month, inflation moved higher, with Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation rising to 3.8% year over year, up from 3.3% the prior month. The increase was driven primarily by energy prices, particularly gasoline, reflecting ongoing disruptions tied to the Middle East conflict. Labor market data were broadly stable. The unemployment rate remained unchanged at 4.3%, wage growth increased modestly to 3.6%, while job growth continued to be geographically concentrated in the Southern states, particularly cities in Texas. On an occupational basis, healthcare once again led job gains, especially in home health services, a trend we have consistently highlighted. Business formations increased during the month, with notable strength in e commerce and digital services firms. Manufacturing activity also improved, particularly in semiconductors, IT equipment, and natural gas–related energy infrastructure. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Global Insights Center Staff, The Hartford

    The Goal Is the Repair, Not the Lawsuit: What Colorado HOA Boards Should Consider Before Suing a Builder

    September 08, 2026 —
    Fourteen years ago, we cautioned Colorado homeowners associations against a “ready, fire, aim” approach to construction-defect litigation. In The Hidden Dangers of Construction Defect Litigation, we suggested a fairly simple proposition: when legitimate construction defects exist, the goal should be to get them repaired. Litigation should be a last resort, not an end in itself. Much has changed in Colorado construction-defect law since then. But a recent Douglas County case, and significant amendments to the Colorado Common Interest Ownership Act (“CCIOA”) enacted in 2025, provide good reasons for HOA board members and owners to revisit that basic premise. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gail Gudder, Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC
    Ms. Gudder may be contacted at gudder@hhmrlaw.com