BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    custom home expert witness Arock Oregon concrete tilt-up expert witness Arock Oregon mid-rise construction expert witness Arock Oregon Subterranean parking expert witness Arock Oregon industrial building expert witness Arock Oregon low-income housing expert witness Arock Oregon Medical building expert witness Arock Oregon structural steel construction expert witness Arock Oregon casino resort expert witness Arock Oregon high-rise construction expert witness Arock Oregon townhome construction expert witness Arock Oregon condominiums expert witness Arock Oregon institutional building expert witness Arock Oregon hospital construction expert witness Arock Oregon office building expert witness Arock Oregon housing expert witness Arock Oregon custom homes expert witness Arock Oregon parking structure expert witness Arock Oregon production housing expert witness Arock Oregon retail construction expert witness Arock Oregon condominium expert witness Arock Oregon multi family housing expert witness Arock Oregon
    Arock Oregon soil failure expert witnessArock Oregon construction expert testimonyArock Oregon construction cost estimating expert witnessArock Oregon construction claims expert witnessArock Oregon fenestration expert witnessArock Oregon construction safety expertArock Oregon expert witness structural engineer
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Arock, Oregon

    Oregon Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (HB 2525 Chap. 701; HB2389) If an owner sends a builder a notice of defect within the time allowed for the owner to commence a court action against that contractor, the time for the owner to commence the action shall be extended, notwithstanding any statute of limitation or statute of ultimate repose, until the later of 120 days after written receipt of builders intention to repair, replace the defect, make monetary compensation or reject the claim. Upon receipt of notice, builder has 14 days to inspect the alleged defect. They then have no more than 90 days to communicate their intention The homebuyer must respond to the builder response within 30 days of receipt. The law requires builder notifies homebuyer of NOR before purchase.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Arock Oregon

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Central Oregon Builders Association
    Local # 3810
    61396 S Hwy 97 Ste 203
    Bend, OR 97702

    Arock Oregon Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Lane County
    Local # 3824
    1065 River Rd
    Eugene, OR 97404

    Arock Oregon Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Southwestern Oregon
    Local # 3888
    PO Box 696
    Coos Bay, OR 97420

    Arock Oregon Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Lincoln County Home Builders Association
    Local # 3858
    PO Box 440
    Tangent, OR 97389

    Arock Oregon Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Willamette Valley Home Builders Association
    Local # 3805
    PO Box 440 32054 Old Hwy 34
    Tangent, OR 97389

    Arock Oregon Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Umpqua Valley Home Builders Association
    Local # 3816
    3000 Stewart Parkway Suite 206
    Roseburg, OR 97471

    Arock Oregon Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Baker County Chapter
    Local # 3802
    3470 10th St
    Baker City, OR 97814
    Arock Oregon Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Arock Oregon


    Damage Control: Major Rebuilds After Major Weather Events

    Groundbreaking New York Law Regulates Third-Party Litigation Funding for the First Time

    Chambers USA 2025 Recognizes Four Partners and Three Practices at Lewis Brisbois

    Rescission of Policy for Misrepresentation in Application Reversed

    Business Risk Exclusions (j) 5 and (j) 6 Found Ambiguous

    Building Growth Raises Safety Concerns

    Recording “Un-Neighborly” Documents

    CDJ’s #7 Topic of the Year: The Las Vegas Harmon Hotel Year-Long Demolition & Trial Begins

    Congratulations to Newport Beach Partner Tyler D. Offenhauser and Associate Therese M. Ellis for Securing a Dismissal on a Premises Liability and Negligence Case!

    Value In Being Deemed “Statutory Employer” Under Workers Compensation Law

    Appraisal Ordered After Carrier Finds Loss Even if Cause Disputed

    Insurer in Bad Faith For Refusing to Commit to Appraisal

    One Shot to Get It Right: Navigating the COVID-19 Vaccine in the Workplace

    Prejudice to Insurer After Late Notice of Hurricane Damage Raises Issue of Fact

    Eleven Newmeyer Dillion Attorneys Named to 2023 U.S. News Best Lawyers in Multiple Practice Areas

    Boston Team Obtains Complete Defense Verdict for Engineering Firm in Professional Liability Matter

    Failure to Meet Code Case Remanded to Lower Court for Attorney Fees

    Construction Expert and Judge Living in the Same Hood Is Not Grounds For Recusal

    Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell Attorneys Recognized in the 2026 Edition of The Best Lawyers in America®

    Sales of U.S. New Homes Decline After Record May Revision

    CA Homeowners Challenging Alternate Pre-Litigation Procedures

    Greg Dillion & Newmeyer Dillion Named 2019 Good Scout Award Recipient

    Where Mechanic’s Liens and Contracts Collide

    NY Supreme Court Rules City Not Liable for Defective Sidewalk

    California Appeals Court Says Loss of Use Is “Property Damage” Under Liability Policy, and Damages Can be Measured by Diminished Value

    Top 10 Insurance Cases of 2023

    Limitations: There is a Point of No Return

    Atlanta Hawks Billionaire Owner Plans $5 Billion Downtown Transformation

    Mexico’s Construction Industry Posts First Expansion Since 2012

    Women Make Slow Entry into Building Trades

    Helsinki is Building a Digital Twin of the City

    What The U.S. Can Learn from China to Bring Its Buildings to New Heights

    Even Fraud in the Inducement is Tough in Construction

    PSA: Pay If Paid Ban Goes into Effect on January 1, 2023

    Supreme Court Opens Door for Challenges to Older Federal Regulations

    Haight Brown & Bonesteel Attorneys Named Best Lawyers in America ® 2016

    Condo Buyers Seek to Void Sale over Construction Defect Lawsuit

    Malerie Anderson Named to D Magazine’s 2023 Best Lawyers Under 40

    “Good Faith” May Not Be Good Enough: California Supreme Court to Decide When General Contractors Can Withhold Retention

    Manhattan Trophy Home Sellers Test Buyer Limits on Price

    Affirmed: Insureds Bear the Burden of Allocating Covered Versus Uncovered Losses

    Architectural Firm, Fired by School District, Launches Lawsuit

    Navigating Timelines and Technology: Patent Strategies for Space and Earth

    Traub Lieberman Partner Jessica Kull Obtains Favorable Arbitration Award In Year-Long High-Stakes Construction Defect Case

    OSHA/VOSH Roundup

    Traub Lieberman Partner Katie Keller and Associate Steven Hollis Obtain Summary Judgment Based on Plaintiff’s Failure to Comply with Policy Conditions

    Weather Delay Claim - Owner Delay Pushes Contractor into Worse Seasonal Adverse Weather

    Nationwide Immigrant Strike May Trigger Excusable Delay and Other Contract Provisions

    Yellen Has Scant Power to Relieve U.S. Housing Slowdown

    Toolbox Talk Series Recap - The Mediator's Proposal
    Corporate Profile

    AROCK OREGON CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Arock, Oregon Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Leveraging from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Arock's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Arock, Oregon

    Contract Disputes Act and Jurisdictional Requirements

    March 17, 2026 —
    When dealing with a claim on a federal construction project, there are a couple of key background jurisdictional points. These points were briefly highlighted in the recent appeal, Mega Star Logistics Service Co. v. Department of State, CBCA 8232, 2026 WL 253738 (CBCA 2026). Here are the two points. FIRST, when it comes to jurisdiction, for a board of contract appeals “to exercise jurisdiction over a claim, the CDA [Contract Disputes Act] requires the contractor to submit a written claim to the contracting officer for a COFD [contracting officer final decision], with a subsequent appeal of the COFD or deemed denial if the CO [contracting officer] does not issue a COFD.” Thus, you need to submit a formal claim under the Contract Disputes Act to the contracting officer to get a final decision from the contracting officer (or the contracting officer waiving the final decision by not timely furnishing one). Mega Star Logistics, supra. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    IEEPA Tariff Refunds: CBP Launches CAPE Process

    April 27, 2026 —
    On April 20, 2026, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) launched the first phase of the Consolidated Administration and Processing of Entries (CAPE) tool in the Automated Commercial Environment (ACE) portal to administer refunds of duties imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) through a streamlined electronic filing process. Background In February 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court held that certain tariffs imposed under IEEPA were unlawful. Subsequent proceedings before the U.S. Court of International Trade required CBP to develop a scalable refund process applicable not only to litigants but also to non-plaintiffs. According to CBP and court filings, approximately 330,000 importers paid or deposited an estimated $166 billion in IEEPA duties across more than 53 million entries. In response, CBP developed CAPE as an electronic, consolidated refund mechanism within ACE. Reprinted courtesy of David J. Creagan, White and Williams LLP, Guido Antolini, White and Williams LLP, Bruce W. MacLennan, White and Williams LLP and Gary P. Biehn, White and Williams LLP Mr. Creagan may be contacted at creagand@whiteandwilliams.com Mr. Antolini may be contacted at antolinig@whiteandwilliams.com Mr. MacLennan may be contacted at maclennanb@whiteandwilliams.com Mr. Biehn may be contacted at biehng@whiteandwilliams.com Read the full story...

    White and Williams LLP Secures a Clean Sweep Dismissal of Architect's Professional Liability Coverage Lawsuit

    August 16, 2026 —
    White and Williams LLP achieved a complete dismissal of professional liability coverage claims through a strategic defense led by Insurance Coverage and Bad Faith Practice Group attorneys Daniel E. Bryer, Partner and Brendaliz Minaya Ruiz, Associate. In a nuanced action styled, Vincent Cusumano Architect P.C., et al. v. Berkshire Hathaway Direct Insurance Company, et al., decided in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, plaintiffs asserted twelve pre-contractual and contractual-based causes of action against their liability insurer, Berkshire Hathaway Direct Insurance Company, and its insurance agent (collectively, “Defendants”) for denying a professional liability claim arising from plaintiffs’ prior work. Reprinted courtesy of Daniel E. Bryer, White and Williams LLP and Brendaliz Minaya Ruiz, White and Williams LLP Mr. Bryer may be contacted at bryerd@whiteandwilliams.com Ms. Ruiz may be contacted at minayaruizb@whiteandwilliams.com Read the full story...

    Insurer Dispenses with Bad Faith Claim on Summary Judgment

    June 22, 2026 —
    The court granted the insurer’s motion for partial summary judgment because the insured failed to present evidence that the insurer failed to conduct a reasonable investigation. PSY Burger, LLC v. State Farm General Insurance Company, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66991(C.D. Cal. March 20, 2026). The insured’s commercial property suffered heavy damage from tropical storm Hilary. State Farm denied coverage to repair the damage. The insured sued State Farm alleging breach of contract and bad faith due to an inadequate investigation. Apparently, the insured did not retain an expert to opine on claims handling. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Construction Robotics Works Where Variation Ends

    August 11, 2026 —
    BuiltWorlds published its 2026 Robotics Top 50 this summer, and the list is genuinely wide. Fifty solutions across nine categories, from 3D printing and prefabricated component manufacturing to earthmoving, demolition, material transport, layout, installation, inspection, and drilling. The honorees come from sixteen countries. It looks like robotics has finally spread across the whole project lifecycle. However, having vendors in nine categories does not mean that contractors are robotizing their work en masse. Zacua Ventures, in its 2026 construction robotics report, estimates that on-site robotics accounted for less than 0.03% of global construction spending in 2025. Zacua says: “That is not a failed market. It is a market at the beginning of an adoption S-curve”, while warning that its estimates rest on private vendor data and may be high if vendors overstate how widely their machines are deployed. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (3/18/25) – Data Center Frenzy, China’s Expanding REIT Market and Tariff-Affected Construction Costs

    March 31, 2026 —
    In our latest roundup, relistings reached highest total in a decade, Florida State Legislature passes bill to increase the state’s housing supply, data center construction adapts to changes and more!
    • The data center construction frenzy and a new, potentially larger highway bill were top of mind for builders during the latest round of contractor earnings calls and financial reports. (Joe Bousquin, Construction Dive)
    • Tariffs and associated policy uncertainty have increased construction costs and delayed leasing and investment choices. (J.P. Morgan)
    • Relistings hit the highest January figure since Redfin began tracking this metric a decade ago. (Diana Olick, CNBC).
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Pillsbury's Construction & Real Estate Law Team

    Moving in Before Substantial Completion? The Risks of Early Owner Occupancy

    March 24, 2026 —
    Introduction On many construction projects, particularly large projects facing schedule pressure, owners may begin occupying or using portions of the project before the work reaches substantial completion. This is often due to operational needs, phased turnover, or market demands that drive owners to take possession of all or part of a project while construction activities are ongoing. While early occupancy may seem practical, it can blur the lines of responsibility between owner and contractor and can create significant legal and practical complications. These disputes are especially common on large, complex projects where punch list work, system commissioning, and closeout activities overlap with owner use. Without clear documentation and carefully drafted contract provisions, early occupancy can undermine an owner’s ability to enforce completion requirements while simultaneously exposing the contractor to claims of delay, inefficiency, or interference. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Sydney Koby, Jones Walker
    Ms. Koby may be contacted at skoby@joneswalker.com

    PJM’s Reliability Backstop Procurement Proposal—Fast-Track Capacity to Meet Rising Large-Load Demand

    May 12, 2026 —
    In January, we discussed the Statement of Principles jointly signed by the National Energy Dominance Council and governors across the mid-Atlantic region—framing accelerating demand (especially from large-scale data centers) as an emergency reliability issue for PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. (PJM), the nation’s largest power grid operator. That policy signal is now becoming a near-term, accelerated procurement and contracting exercise. On April 8, 2026, PJM notified stakeholders of a critical issue fast path reliability backstop procurement process. PJM subsequently released a request for information (RFI) with respect to a proposed Reliability Backstop Procurement (RBP)—a one-time mechanism intended to attract significant new capacity to address projected reliability shortfalls driven by large-load growth. RBP compresses what is often a multiyear market and regulatory conversation into a fast-moving set of commercial choices. Developers, large loads, utilities and capital providers should be preparing now for (i) an accelerated bilateral contracting window and (ii) a standardized PJM-led backstop procurement if bilateral deals do not clear enough capacity. Reprinted courtesy of Stephen J. Humes, Pillsbury, Alicia M. McKnight, Pillsbury, Jason Drogin Atwood, Pillsbury and Andrew H. Jacobs, Pillsbury Mr. Humes may be contacted at stephen.humes@pillsburylaw.com Ms. McKnight may be contacted at alicia.mcknight@pillsburylaw.com Mr. Atwood may be contacted at jason.atwood@pillsburylaw.com Mr. Jacobs may be contacted at andrew.jacobs@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...