Late Notice Bars Insured’s Claim for Water Leak Damage
August 11, 2026 —
Tred R. Eyerly - Insurance Law HawaiiThe federal district court granted the insurer’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the insured’s claim due to late notice. Global Approach, Inc. v. Scottsdale Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120183 (S. D. Fla. June 1, 2026).
Global suffered water damage on September 3, 2021, which originated in the bathroom of one of its rental properties. Global reported the claim to its insurer, Scottsdale, on October 19, 2021. Prior to reporting the claim, Global hired a handyman to inspect the property and then demolished the damaged area and repaired the bathroom.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak HastertMr. Eyerly may be contacted at
te@hawaiilawyer.com
The “Pay When Paid” Clause in California Construction—Strategies as the Battle Continues
August 03, 2026 —
William L. Porter - Porter Law GroupIt is well known in California Construction circles that the “Pay If Paid” clause is illegal in this state. There is a great distinction, though, between this clause and a similar clause, known as a “Pay When Paid” clause. A pay if paid clause allows a contractor to tell a subcontractor that if the contractor is unpaid for the subcontractor’s work, then the contractor has no legal obligation to pay the subcontractor, ever. For a great variety of reasons, the California Supreme Court, in the case of Wm. R. Clarke Corp v. Safeco Ins. Co. of America (1997) 15 Cal.4th 882, declared this type of clause illegal in California Construction.
Although the pay if paid clause is illegal in California, the pay when paid clause is still perfectly legal and is found in many subcontracts that contractors issue to their subcontractors. The pay when paid clause allows a contractor to delay paying its subcontractors until the dispute between the contractor and the property owner over payment has been resolved and the contractor is paid by the property owner. Although seemingly reasonable (since it merely delays payment until the contractor is paid by the owner, thereby providing a funding source to pay subcontractors), significant problems still arise.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
William L. Porter, Porter Law GroupMr. Porter may be contacted at
bporter@porterlaw.com
Traub Lieberman Wins Affirmation of Judgment on Pleadings Before the Seventh Circuit
August 16, 2026 —
Dana A. Rice & Adam P. Joffe - Traub LiebermanTraub Lieberman Partners Dana Rice and Adam Joffe obtained affirmation of judgment from the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals in favor of an Insurance Company. The Insurance Company filed suit seeking a declaration that it had no duty to defend or indemnify its Insured, a Roofing Contractor, in an underlying lawsuit. The Insurance Company issued a commercial general liability policy with a one-year policy term. The policy included an exclusion that barred coverage for any losses arising out of work the insured completed before the date the policy incepted.
Reprinted courtesy of
Dana A. Rice, Traub Lieberman and
Adam P. Joffe, Traub Lieberman
Mr. Rice may be contacted at drice@tlsslaw.com
Mr. Joffe may be contacted at ajoffe@tlsslaw.com
Read the full story...
Bona Fide Dispute Defeats Violation of Prompt Payment Act
June 15, 2026 —
David Adelstein - Florida Construction Legal UpdatesMost, if not all, jurisdictions, including the federal government, have what is known as a “Prompt Payment Act.” The objective is to ensure prompt payment. If prompt payment is not made, the Prompt Payment Act provides for interest penalties, as well as potentially other costs such as attorney’s fees.
But the thing is, it’s not as simple as untimely payment to support the recourse and interest penalties the applicable Prompt Payment Act affords. And the teeth associated with the applicable Prompt Payment Act are not as sharp as perhaps the party claiming untimely payment prefers.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
David Adelstein, Kirwin NorrisMr. Adelstein may be contacted at
dma@kirwinnorris.com
Limitations of Liability Provisions in Construction Contracts: A Means to Manage Risk and Limit Financial Exposure
June 23, 2026 —
Ellen Chapelle, Richard Reizen, Hannah Batsche - Construction ExecutiveTaking a cue from architects and engineers, construction contractors have started inserting limitation of
liability clauses in their construction contracts to manage risk and limit financial exposure. This article will address the specific risks that can be limited through an LOL, tips for negotiating the LOL terms with reluctant owners to cover those specific risks, how to limit unintended consequences of an LOL (such as relieving an insurer of its obligations to cover certain losses), and approaches to setting the amount of the liability cap in the LOL.
Addressing Particular Risks
An LOL can address a wide range of risks, including:
- Damages for delay
- Liability for non-conforming or defective work
- Liability for third-party bodily injury or property damage
- Liability excluded by a general liability policy (e.g., pollution and cyber liability)
- Liability related to intellectual property
Reprinted courtesy of
Ellen Chapelle, Richard Reizen, Hannah Batsche, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved.
Read the full story...
UPDATED: No Easy Fix for Potomac River Sewage Spill, Now Estimated at $20M
April 08, 2026 —
Jim Parsons & Debra K. Rubin - Engineering News-RecordOne month after a collapsed pipeline north of Washington, D.C., spilled about 240 million gallons of raw sewage into the Potomac River and possibly between 300 and 400 million—which could be the largest wastewater spill in U.S. history—efforts are progressing to clear the damaged section and begin repairs despite weather and other impacts.
Reprinted courtesy of
Jim Parsons, Engineering News-Record and
Debra K. Rubin, Engineering News-Record
Ms. Rubin may be contacted at rubind@enr.com
Read the full story...
At the Intersection of Indemnity and Prevailing Wages
March 17, 2026 —
Garret Murai - California Construction Law BlogIn a case that I’m frankly surprised I don’t see more of, the 2nd District Court of Appeal of California examined an indemnity claim by a subcontractor against a general contractor and public entity who mistakenly believed that a construction project did not require the payment of prevailing wages.
The Nabors Case
In
Nabors Corporate Services, Inc. v. City of Long Beach, 108 Cal.App 540 (2025), subcontractor Nabors Corporate Services, Inc. sued general contractor Tidelands Oil Production Company and the City of Long Beach after it was found liable in a class action lawsuit for failing to pay prevailing wages to its employees. Nabors’ contract with Tidelands did not require the payment of prevailing wages and neither Tidelands nor the City believed that the project, which involved “oil well plug and abandonment” work, required the payment of prevailing wages.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Garret Murai, Nomos LLPMr. Murai may be contacted at
gmurai@nomosllp.com
SDNY Ruling Highlights Privilege Risks in Client Use of Generative AI
March 03, 2026 —
Christopher J. Olsen, Freddy X. Muñoz & Gary M. Stein - Peckar & Abramson, P.C.Artificial intelligence is quickly becoming a go‑to tool for aggregating and summarizing large volumes of data, formulating and testing arguments, and even sketching litigation strategies. But a recent ruling from the Southern District of New York serves as a stark warning: when clients turn to generative AI for legal strategy, they may be unknowingly turning privileged information over to a third party and then creating documents that may later be discoverable in litigation. In a closely watched bench decision, Judge Rakoff ruled that AI‑generated documents created by the target of a criminal investigation using Anthropic’s Claude were not privileged despite being generated with information learned from his attorneys to support his potential legal defense and then shared with his counsel. The decision highlights the unresolved and increasingly consequential intersection of AI, privilege, and discovery.
Facts
Bradley Heppner received a grand jury subpoena and hired attorneys at Quinn Emanuel to represent him. After learning he was a target of the investigation, but before he was arrested, he created 31 documents with Claude using information from his attorneys to outline a potential defense strategy. He was later arrested on charges of securities and wire fraud, and federal agents seized his electronic devices, which contained the 31 documents that had been provided to his attorne
Design-Build Contracting: Is the Shine Off the Apple?Chambers USA Recognizes Hunton’s Insurance Coverage Practice in 2026 GuideRoadway Contractor Owed Duty of Care to Driver Injured Outside of Construction ZoneAppellate Court Endorses Discretionary Test for Vicarious Disqualification of Law Firms Due To New Attorney’s ConflictWATCH: 2023 Construction Economic Update and ForecastManhattan Condo Lists for Record $150 MillionNewmeyer Dillion Announces Jason Moberly Caruso As Its Newest PartnerDefend Now, Allocate Later? An Unresolved Tension in Colorado Construction LawAppraisal Award Upheld Despite Insurer’s Contention that Causation was ConsideredFrom Dark Data to Building IntelligenceInsurer Obligated to Cover Preventative Remediation of Construction DefectsLondon Penthouse Will Offer Chance to Look Down at RoyaltyEvacuations in Santa Barbara County as more Mudslides are PredictedEvery High-Tech Building Has Many Lifespans$5 Million Construction Defect Lawsuit over Oregon TownhomesPerez Broke Records … But Should He Have Settled Earlier?GRSM Secures Complete Judgment for Defense in Years-Long Dispute Spanning Multiple VenuesFour Kahana Feld Attorneys Selected to 2027 Southern California Super Lawyers® and Rising Stars ListsGrupo Mexico Spill Sparks Public Scrutiny of $150 Million Mop-UpConstruction Termination Issues for the Architect and Engineer: Part 1– Introduction to the SeriesChanges to Va. Code Section 43-13: Another Arrow in a Subcontractor’s QuiverNew Jersey Court Upholds Registration Requirement for Joint Ventures Bidding on Public Works ContractsNevada Legislature Burns Insurers' Rights to Offer Eroding LimitsFaulty Workmanship may be an Occurrence in Indiana CGL PoliciesWreckage Removal Underway at Site of Collapsed Key Bridge in Baltimore, But Weather Slows ProgressEndorsements Preclude Coverage for Alleged Faulty WorkmanshipReal Estate & Construction News Roundup (08/08/23) – Buy and Sell With AI, Urban Real Estate Demand and Increasing Energy CostsForcible Entry and Detainer Actions: Courts May Not Consider Tenant’s HardshipTimely Filed, Wrongly Rejected: Court of Appeal Reinforces Summary Judgment RightsTraub Lieberman Attorneys Lisa M. Rolle, Eric D. Suben, and Justyn Verzillo Secure Dismissal of All Claims in a Premises Liability Case2023 Construction Outlook: Construction Starts Expected to FlattenLost Rental Income not a Construction DefectMandatory Arbitration Isn’t All Bad, if. . .EPA Rejects Most of N.Y.’s $511 Million Tappan Zee LoanFlorida Law: Interplay of SIR and the Made-Whole DoctrineConsumer Confidence in U.S. Increases More Than Forecast4 Ways the PRO Act Would Impact the Construction Industry2016 California Construction Law UpateWho is a “Contractor” as Used in “Unlicensed Contractor”?New Jersey Supreme Court Upholds $400 Million Award for Superstorm Sandy DamagesCongratulations to Wilke Fleury’s 2024 Super Lawyers and Rising Stars!!Insurer’s Consent Not Needed for SettlementCalifornia Supreme Court Upholds Insurance Commissioner’s Authority to Regulate Replacement Cost EstimatesCalifornia’s Right to Repair Act not an Exclusive RemedyWood Smith Henning & Berman LLP Expands into GeorgiaWhen Does a Contractor Legally Abandon a Construction Project?Congratulations to Haight Attorneys Selected to the 2025 Southern California Super Lawyers and Rising Stars ListsCourt Retained Jurisdiction to Enforce Settlement Under Code of Civil Procedure Section 664.6 Despite Dismissal of ComplaintSnell & Wilmer’s Orange County Office Recognized as One of the “Best Places to Work” by the Orange County Business JournalGRSM Named Among 2025 “Best Law Firms” by Best Lawyers="name">UPDATED: Dominion Sues Feds Over Offshore Wind Project Halt, With Action Possible on Others Shut
More Musings on Why I MediateIn a Win for Design Professionals, California Court of Appeals Holds That Relation-Back Doctrine Does Not Apply to Certificate of Merit LawPine River’s Two Harbors Now Targets Non-Prime MortgagesTwo-Part Series on Condominium Construction Defect IssuesNew York Court of Appeals Addresses Choice of Law ChallengesLeaders in Dispute Resolution Need to Make Unbiased Decisions for Mediation to Succeed 
